Pandemic may further weaken US coal market

  • Spanish Market: Coal
  • 27/03/20

More US coal mines may close and more producers may have to file for bankruptcy if the coronavirus pandemic leads to a meaningful drop in power demand, analysts and market participants said.

Electricity use has already declined by about 10pc in March in much of the northeastern US as businesses were forced to close to try to slow the spread of the virus, Moody's Investors Service said in a report on the coal industry. Significant business closures are expected to continue into April, resulting in a further decline in power demand and less coal purchases, said Moody's lead coal analyst, Ben Nelson.

Some utilities and grid operators, if not all of them, are having difficulty forecasting electricity use since this is an unprecedented event. The Midcontinent Independent System Operator, which reported an 18pc decline in peak power demand this month from a year earlier, said it will only gain more clarity on projections once usage patterns emerge.

Coal market participants said a sustained drop in electricity use will lower coal demand even further than it has already declined. Producers have already been struggling for months to find buyers because of cheap natural gas, the mild fall and winter, continued coal plant retirements and low export prices. These conditions have led coal prices to fall to multi-year lows and driven producers to scale back production.

From 1 January-21 March, US coal production totaled 134.5mn short tons (122mn metric tonnes), an 18pc decrease from the same period a year earlier, according to the US Energy Information Administration.

Nelson said it is not a matter of whether more mines will close, but when.

"I am very confident in saying it is going to get worse," he said.

Moody's projected in January that US coal production would fall by 15-20pc in 2020 to about 550mn-600mn st. But Nelson said production could now potentially decline by as much as a third from last year.

A US coal producer said this week he also expects more mines to close.

"It was bad enough before all this started," he said, referencing an "absence" of winter weather.

Only two US coal producers have thus far closed their mines because of the coronavirus outbreak. Rhino Resource Partners and Blackhawk said on 20 March that it was closing for at least two weeks out of concern for employees' health. While other producers are continuing their operations, they are nonetheless nervous about coal miners becoming infected with the virus. They are also concerned about greater financial difficulties.

The National Mining Association last week asked Congress and the White House to suspend some taxes as the country tries to contain the pandemic.But the industry will receive no direct aid from the $2 trillion stimulus package that Congress passed this week.

Moody's said the coronavirus' affect on producers will be mixed.

Thermal coal producers that have lower output costs and enough cash on hand to offset pressure from low prices, such as Alliance Resource Partners, may gain market share and be better able to service debt obligations, the ratings agency said. But others, like Consol Energy, which "has reduced debt aggressively" in recent years, owe more to lenders and have less anticipated cash flow to further reduce debt.

At least one major US coal producer, Contura Energy, has boosted its cash cushion. The company said on 23 March that it tapped $57.5mn under its revolving credit facility as a "proactive, precautionary measure" in light of the coronavirus pandemic and "its potential effects upon national and world economies."

Contura has about $120mn in outstanding letters of credit under the facility. It said it will use the cash to preserve liquidity "amid the growing uncertainty surrounding the [coronavirus]."

Smaller and mid-sized thermal coal producers may struggle to keep afloat as well.

"I see this as being a really rough year on marginal players," a coal producer said.

Moody's also had a "darkened" outlook for US coal-fired power plants. It said its view was dimmer particularly for plants in the mid-Atlantic and industrial midwest, which have been "economically challenged" for a number of years.

"The developments in the past few months have conspired to push them into an even more perilous position," the ratings agency said.

Even before the coronavirus spread to the US, coal-fired generation was falling because of mild winter weather and competition from cheap natural gas. Coal power across the US was 36pc lower in January than it had been a year earlier, according to EIA data. It was the lowest level of coal output for the month of January in at least 48 years.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel


24/04/24
24/04/24

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel

Cheyenne, 24 April (Argus) — The Port of Baltimore is preparing to open another, deeper temporary shipping channel this week so at least some of the vessels that have been stranded at the port can depart. The new 35-ft deep Fort McHenry Limited Access Channel is scheduled to be open to commercially essential vessels from 25 April until 6am ET on 29 April or 30 April "if weather adversely impacts vessel transits," according to a US Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin. The channel will then be closed again until 10 May. The channel also will have a 300-ft horizontal clearance and 214-ft vertical clearance. This will be the fourth and largest channel opened since the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The Unified Command has said that the new limited access channel should allow passage of about 75pc of the types of vessels that typically move through the waterway. Vessels that have greater than 60,000 long tons (60,963 metric tonnes) of displacement will likely not be able to move through the channel and those between 50,000-60,000 long tons of displacement "will be closely evaluated" for transit. There were seven vessels blocked from exiting the port as of 27 March, including three dry bulk carriers, one vehicle carrier and one tanker, according to the US Department of Transportation. Two of the bulk carriers at berth in Baltimore are Kamsarmax-sized coal vessels, data from analytics firm Kpler show. The US Army Corps of Engineers still expects to reopen the Port of Baltimore's permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel by the end of May. The Key Bridge collapsed into the water late last month when the 116,851dwt container ship Dali lost power and crashed into a bridge support column. Salvage teams have been working to remove debris from the water and containers from the ship in order to clear the main channel. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules


24/04/24
24/04/24

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules

Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement


24/04/24
24/04/24

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement

Manila, 24 April (Argus) — Early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants in the Philippines has advanced with utility Ayala Energy's 246MW South Luzon Thermal Energy eligible for the US-based Rockefeller Foundation's coal to clean credit initiative (CCCI). The Rockefeller Foundation is a non-profit philanthropic group that creates and implements programmes in partnership with the private sector across different industries aimed at reversing climate change. Ayala has been working with the foundation to further shorten South Luzon's operating life from an original decommissioning date of 2040 to 2030. Doing so could result in the reduction of up to 19mn t of carbon emissions, Ayala said. An assessment by the Rocky Mountain Institute, the technical partner of the foundation for its energy-related projects, found that an early retirement date of 2030 instead of the original retirement date of 2040 could yield positive financial, social and climate outcomes. But decommissioning by this date will require carbon finance. Carbon financing will need to cover costs associated with the early retirement of the power plant's power supply contract, costs associated with 100pc clean replacement of the plant's power generation, plant decommissioning and transition support for workers affected by the plant's early closure, Ayala said. Ayala's listed arm ACEN welcomed the plant's eligibility for the CCCI programme, as its retirement is part of the company's goal to have its power generation portfolio composed solely of 100pc renewable sources by 2025. The Philippines' Department of Energy (DOE) said if successful, the pilot programme could serve as a basis for the development of other early retirement efforts as part of the country's plan to reduce carbon emissions. The DOE is seeking the early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants older than 20 years with a combined total capacity of 3.8GW by 2050, as part of the Philippines' transition to clean energy. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US-led carbon initiative misses launch date


23/04/24
23/04/24

US-led carbon initiative misses launch date

Houston, 23 April (Argus) — The Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA), a global initiative to use voluntary carbon market revenue to speed the decarbonization of developing countries' power sectors, has missed its planned Earth Day launch but continues to prepare for doing business. At the Cop 28 climate conference in Dubai last year, the initiative's leaders said they hoped to formally launch the program on 22 April 2024 . That didn't happen, but the program's leaders last week announced that the US climate think tank Center for Climate and Energy Solutions will serve as the ETA's new secretariat and that former US special presidential envoy for climate John Kerry will serve as the honorary chair of an eight-member senior consultative group that will advise the ETA's design and operations. The ETA plans to spend 2024 "building" on a framework for crediting projects they released last year. ETA leaders said the initiative could ultimately generate tens of billions of dollars in finances through 2035. The ETA also said the Dominican Republic had formed a government working group to "guide its engagement" as a potential pilot country for investments and that the Philippines would formally participate as an "observer country" rather than as a direct participant immediately. The ETA is still engaging Chile and Nigeria as potential pilot countries too, the initiative told Argus . The ETA is being developed by the US State Department, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Bezos Earth Fund and would be funded with money from the voluntary carbon market. The initiative's ultimate goal is to allow corporate and government offset buyers to help developing countries decarbonize their power sectors through large projects that accelerate the retirement of coal-fired power plants and build new renewable generation. As of now, the ETA's timeline for future changes and negotiations with countries and companies is unclear. The program's goals are ambitious, especially at a time when scrutiny of some voluntary carbon market projects from environmentalists has weighed on corporate offset demand. By Mia Westley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more