Viewpoint: European pellet demand to outpace supply
The biomass market faces unprecedented demand levels in 2020, with upcoming base-load power generation capacity due to add around another 4.4mn t/yr of European wood pellet demand by the end of the year.
Pellet production projects are not growing at the same rate, pointing to an inevitable shortfall in supply.
Significant new base-load demand in 2020 will come from the Netherlands, where four substantial biomass co-firing projects began firing in the past year. The plants — RWE's 630MW Amer 9, its two 777MW Eemshaven units A and B, Uniper's 1.1GW Maasvlakte 3 and Onyx Power's 731MW Rotterdam plant — are all ramping up wood pellet co-firing percentages. Their demand alone will total around 3.4mn t/yr at full capacity.
Demand for the first half of 2020 looks particularly strong, despite a delay at MGT's pellet-fired 299MW Teesside plant in the UK. MGT is now due to start up at the end of July 2020, pushed back from March.
In the UK, the renewables obligation (RO) year ends on 31 March, encouraging UK generator Drax to run its 645MW biomass-fired units — three of which are under RO subsidy — at or near full capacity until then. Its shutdown plans for 2020 underline strong first-half demand. Drax's planned shutdowns total 156 days across its four biomass units in the third quarter, with just 28 days scheduled in January-June.
Denmark is likely to further boost first-half demand. Its biomass consumption is geared towards the heating season, with a weather-dependent "swing volume" of up to 500,000t in a season.
Its imported wood pellet demand peaked at 3.14mn t net in 2018, but a two-month delay at Hofor's 150MW Amager 4 wood chip-fired plant, now expected on line on 1 March 2020, leaves wood pellet-fired units to pick up the winter slack in January and February.
New pellet supply in 2020 is light, with just 890,000 t/yr (including Pinnacle) of production due to come on line.
The only new North American plant to start operating in 2020 will be Pinnacle's 200,000 t/yr facility in High Level, Alberta, in partnership with Canadian lumber firm Tolko. But this is due to commission in the fourth quarter, and is unlikely to offer extensive volumes in 2020.
US producer Enviva will add 490,000 t/yr of capacity in the year to three existing plants — Southampton, Virginia, Northampton, North Carolina and Sampson, North Carolina, fulfilling some of Europe's growing appetite.
But while European utilities are largely supplied by North American contracts, spot supply often comes from Europe, particularly the Baltics, which are well placed to send prompt coaster cargoes of SBP-certified material. The strength of the US dollar has already given Baltic producers an advantage over US counterparts in contract discussions for 2020 and 2021 volumes. And it is forecast to maintain its strength against the euro throughout 2020, benefiting Baltic wood pellet exporters as buyers look towards more competitive euro-denominated volumes.
But European production capacity is expected to grow by just 200,000 t/yr in 2020, potentially limiting the amount of spot demand that European producers will be able to fulfil. The majority of new production will come from Spain, where Spanish pellet producer Biowood Niebla plans to start two 75,000 t/yr pellet mills — but not until the second half of the year. In Latvia, Stora Enso is expected to start production at its 50,000 t/yr Launkalne plant in the second quarter.
Asian demand is increasing, heightening competition for the North American supply that Europe has until now almost exclusively accessed. Japan will get five new pellet co-firing plants in 2020, and South Korea is due for around 2mn t/yr of new pellet demand across 2020. It imported 2.5mn t in January-October. Although the bulk of North America's supply contracts to Asia will start in 2022 and Vietnamese pellets can feed some requirements, with the benefit of a comparatively low spot price and agile coaster deliveries, some North American supply will inevitably feed increased Asian demand.
The overall picture is one of increased global wood pellet demand and competition between regions and an inevitably tight and sensitive European spot market balance throughout 2020.
By Georgia Gratton and Jamie Aldridge
| European wood pellet plants 2020 | ||||
| Company | Plant | MW | Co-firing (%) | Estimated consumption t/yr |
| RWE | Amer 9 | 630 | 50 (2017-20) and 80 (2020-) | 1,760,000 (2020-) |
| RWE | Eemshaven A and B | 777 x 2 | 15 | 820,000 |
| Uniper | MPP3 (Maasvlakte) | 1,100 | 15 | 550,000 |
| Onyx | Rotterdam 1 | 731 | 10 | 235,500 |
| MGT | Teesside | 299 | na | 1,000,000 |
Related news posts
UK's Drax closes carbon removals deal with C-Zero
UK's Drax closes carbon removals deal with C-Zero
London, 18 April (Argus) — UK utility Drax has signed a deal for carbon removal (CDR) credits with environmental consultancy C-Zero, following an initial agreement between the two parties in May 2023 . C-Zero will purchase CDR credits from Drax representing 2,000t of permanently stored carbon under the terms of the deal, Drax said on 18 April. The deal is indicative of the "maturing carbon market's growing appetite for high-quality carbon removals" and another "concrete step" towards Drax's delivering of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (Beccs) in the US, the firm said. The deal with C-Zero comes a few weeks after Drax signed a five-year agreement with Karbon-X for CDR credits representing 25,000t of permanently stored carbon. Drax intends to remove at least 6mn t/y of CO2 from the atmosphere through its US Beccs projects . Drax aims to remove and store 8mn t/yr of CO2 from its UK Beccs projects, which are currently awaiting a consultation by the UK government to be finalised. By Marta Imarisio Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Railway equipment group warns of boxcar shortage
Railway equipment group warns of boxcar shortage
Washington, 8 April (Argus) — The Railway Supply Institute (RSI) is urging federal regulators to help avoid a so-called "boxcar cliff," fearing lower compensation rates are contributing to a shortage of boxcars in the US. Boxcars are essentially rented to railroads, which compensate the owners by paying car hire rates. US rail regulator the US Surface Transportation Board (STB), with a regulation known as the Arbitration Rule, has established a default rate for railcars, primarily boxcars, that do not have a negotiated rate. Those cars are assigned a rate that is equal to the lowest negotiated rate in effect for that equipment type at the end of the previous quarter. Other cars, such as tank cars and gondolas, usually have rates set in negotiated agreements to move various commodities. The problem is that the default rates can often be as low as 17¢/hour for a boxcar, which often costs more than $150,000 to build, according to RSI. It is difficult to negotiate a higher car hire rate with railroads because are very aware of that 17¢/hour default rate, said Paul Titterton, president of North American operations at railcar leasing company GATX. Those car owners also have to compete with TTX, a railcar pooling company owned by the largest railroads, that are exempt from these rules. TTX did not respond to calls for comment. Because they control TTX, railroads can invest and set boxcar rates they consider to be remunerative, Titterton said. There are about 100,000 boxcars in North America, and the low compensation rate is disincentivizing shippers from building and buying new boxcars, said Patty Long, president of RSI, which represents rail car makers and parts manufacturers. The existing "car hire system discourages investment in this integral component of our rail transportation fleet, with boxcars providing efficient shipping for crucial American commodities," she said. Boxcars are used to haul a wide array of goods including pulp, paper, beverages and canned goods. The default rate does not respond to changing market conditions, such as the shrinking equipment fleet, Long said. That low compensation rate contributed to a 38pc decline in the number of boxcars in the US since 2008, RSI said. And the aging boxcar fleet is expected to decline another 22pc by 2030. RSI has petitioned the STB to revisit its Arbitration Rule and reevaluate the way compensation is determined. Industry trade group the Association of American Railroads said it is reviewing the petition and deciding on its next steps. STB's Railroad-Shipper Transportation Advisory Council last year urged the agency to look into ways to head off the "boxcar cliff." The group noted that most railcars have a 50-year lifespan, and the retirement of boxcars built in the 1970s and 1980s is accelerating. "As a result, the North American railroad system and shippers across the US face a devastating boxcar shortfall without sufficient new production to replace thousands of mandated and other planned boxcar retirements," the group said in a March 2023 white paper. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Enviva to reject Sumitomo wood pellet contract
Enviva to reject Sumitomo wood pellet contract
Singapore, 8 April (Argus) — US wood pellet producer Enviva has filed a US court motion seeking to reject a term wood pellet offtake agreement with Japanese trading house Sumitomo. The 2 April motion, filed with the US Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, seeks to enable Enviva to submit an order to reject the 2018 cfr Iwakuni biomass fuel supply agreement with Sumitomo. This 2018 agreement, also known as the Sumitomo Kaita contract, is one of the term pellet offtake agreements within Enviva's Japanese trading portfolio. Sumitomo acts as an intermediary broker, buying wood pellets for Kaita Biomass Power, court documents stated. Sumitomo has acted in similar brokering capacities for several other consumers. The Sumitomo Kaita contract is the first term deal rejected, after Enviva last month filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and released a restructuring plan . Rejection of an agreement under US bankruptcy proceedings does not imply the termination of that agreement but "is treated as a breach of contract, and any damage claim arising from that breach is treated as if it arose immediately before the bankruptcy was filed", according to US legal firm Troutman Pepper . Enviva has set up a group comprising a subset of its management and advisors, known as the RTB team, to review and renegotiate existing term contracts. The review was possibly among a series of measures laid out and considered by Enviva late last year, when concerns regarding its liquidity first emerged . Lead-up The RTB team carried out due diligence measures on the Sumitomo Kaita contract and "determined that the existing contractual pricing will yield negative operating margins over the life of the contract with a negative net present value on the operating margin", based on statements made in court filings by Alvarez and Marsal North America (A&M), Enviva's financial adviser in the Chapter 11 proceedings. Attempts by the RTB team at contacting Kaita since late November last year — to renegotiate contractual terms such as pricing, volume and pellet origin — have been unsuccessful, according to A&M. The Japanese consumer appears to be neither keen on amending the Sumitomo Kaita contract nor engaging directly with Enviva and its RTB team, court filings by A&M revealed. A&M said the rejection of the Sumitomo Kaita contract will be appropriate in the commercial interest of Enviva and its stakeholders. Kaita's boiler plants could possibly be operating on soft wood, commonly found in US sources, as opposed to Asian hard wood pellets, according to a market participant. Kaita could possibly trial Asian hard wood as an alternative biomass feedstock, if similar soft wood is unable to be secured. Enviva is required under the restructuring support agreement to submit a draft on its long-term business plan by 10 June and a finalised version by 5 July. Some considerations in this business plan includes rejecting certain contracts that do not help in the company's reorganisation efforts and documenting contracts that are renegotiated. By Jun Bin Phua Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Indonesia’s Paiton power plant to boost biomass use
Indonesia’s Paiton power plant to boost biomass use
Manila, 8 April (Argus) — Indonesia's 4.71GW Paiton coal-fired power plant, the country's largest power generation facility, is to increase biomass use as part of the country's emissions reduction efforts. PLN EPI, which is the fuel procurement subsidiary of state-owned utility PLN, has increased biomass delivery targets for the power plant in east Java to 259,581t in 2024, an increase of nearly 60pc compared with last year, the company said. The 800MW No.1 and No.2 units are expected to consume a combined 154,519t this year, a 10pc increase compared with 2023. Biomass consumption at the 600MW No.9 unit is expected to increase more than fourfold to 105,062t from 22,741t in 2023. The increase at No.9 is because of the full implementation of biomass co-firing following initial test runs in 2023, PLN EPI said. The rest of the generation units at Paiton have yet to start biomass co-firing as they are owned by private-sector companies. Only No.1, No.2 and No.9 are owned by PLN, which is required to implement co-firing at its coal power plants. These three units currently use 5pc biomass but PLN aims to increase this to at least 10pc over the next few years, it said. Paiton mainly uses wood sawdust as its biomass source. PLN EPI said it has already agreed supply contracts for most of this year's supplies. It is looking at sources located close to the power plant to minimise transportation costs and help develop a biomass economy for surrounding areas. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more