Chile eyes green tax reform

Spanish Market: Electricity, Emissions, Hydrogen
29/11/23

Chile plans to amend its green taxation framework with a bill that incentivizes investments in climate-friendly projects, including in the energy sector, rather than collect revenue, finance minister Mario Marcel said today.

"In this group of measures, everything that is collected would be used in subsidies or incentives for investments or activities that have a green character," he said.

The proposed initiative would have a long transition period to allow polluting companies to adjust processes to reduce carbon emissions and "pay less or ideally nothing".

The legislation would address Chile's $5/t carbon tax on fixed sites, which the government wants to increase, as well as tax exemptions for diesel that benefit the transport sector, but Marcel did not specify how those taxes or exemptions would change under the new plan.

The government plans to present the bill in mid-2024 after it presents an income tax reform, scheduled in March. The income tax bill, known as the "fiscal pact," will propose tax credits for investments with a multiplier effect and positive environmental impact.

In October the environment ministry launched a domestic green investment certification scheme to allow polluting companies to acquire certificates to offset carbon taxes. Certified emission capture or reduction projects must be verified by the ministry.

Green financing strategies are a key part of Chile's approach to addressing climate change. Marcel will be promoting different instruments — such as sustainable bonds — at the UN's Cop 28 climate summit.

By Emily Russell

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

23/12/25

Viewpoint: Stable 2026 start for US steam coal

Cheyenne, 23 December (Argus) — US thermal coal markets are ending 2025 on a stronger footing than when they started the year, with producers expressing cautious optimism about 2026. Prices for most US thermal coal were at their highest levels since April-May 2023 in September and October. While steam coal prices have slipped in more recent weeks, they remain well-above year-earlier levels. US coal markets began to recover near the end of 2024, in response to a blast of colder-than-expected weather and higher natural gas prices. Coal-fired generation in at least some of the US continued to be above expectations through the third quarter of this year. This unanticipated boost offset lackluster seaborne coal pricing, leading US coal producers to focus their sales on US markets. Some producers expect to continue to favor domestic shipments over international markets in the coming year, given that US customers continue to be willing to pay more than international buyers. "We're still in negotiations for additional business next year," Core Natural Resources chief financial officer Mitesh Thakkar said on 6 November. "We certainly could increase some more volumes and get them exported. But I would say domestic is going to be year-on-year improved." The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) is expecting coal-fired generation to decrease next year largely because of continued power plant retirements. But generation may still be higher than in 2024. Some market fundamentals suggest generators could run remaining coal units at relatively elevated rates during peak demand seasons. Profit margins for running coal units in December, January and the first quarter of 2026 have been running higher than year earlier levels. In some cases, coal-fired generation also has been more profitable than power dispatch from some natural gas plants. For example, in the first 12 days of December, Argus assessed the peak day-ahead spark spread for 10,000 Btu/kWh coal units at the Indiana power hub — a reference point for central portions of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator — at an average of $27.44/MWh, while the margins for 8,000 Btu/kWh natural gas units were $26.14/MWh. Natural gas units also had less of a profit advantage over coal units in peak month-ahead and peak season Indiana power markets than they had in the first half of December 2024. Similar economic dynamics are present in the PJM Interconnection and Electric Reliability Council of Texas. President Donald Trump's full-throated endorsement of the coal sector, his moves to claw back environmental regulations and his administration's efforts to delay coal-plant retirements are boosting producers' confidence about US coal consumption in 2026. US energy secretary Chris Wright has invoked emergency powers to extend operations at Consumers Energy's JH Campbell plant until at least 17 February 2026. Consumers chief executive officer Garrick Rochow said on 30 October company officials expect the emergency orders for the Campbell plant to continue "for the long term". Independent of federal action, some utilities also have delayed a handful of power plant retirements and conversions previously scheduled for this year. All told, about 6,000-6,500MW of US coal capacity is being permanently taken off line or converted to another fuel this year, a sharp reduction from the 9,300MW projected at the very beginning of 2025, information collected by Argus and EIA show. The plant units that have delayed retirement dates consumed 6.7mn short tons (st) (6.1mn metric tonnes) of coal last year and 4.7mn st in the first eight months of 2025, EIA power plant operating data show. More retirements are scheduled for 2026, but some market participants have expressed uncertainty about their plans for next year, wondering if the Department of Energy (DOE) also will order their facilities to stay open. So far, DOE has directed Consumers' Energy's JH Campbell plant, which was scheduled to retire in May, three 90-day extension orders. And on 17 December, DOE also ordered Canadian utility TransAlta to delay retirement of its coal unit 2 in Centralia, Washington, for at least 90 days. Wright has indicated he could issue further orders. Some utilities — including CenterPoint, Dominion Energy, Southern Company subsidiary Georgia Power and Santee Cooper — have indicated they may delay coal plant retirements and conversions scheduled for 2026 and later. Most of the delays are short term and tied to revised timelines for bringing other facilities on line or incremental electricity growth, including potential data center additions. CenterPoint in October cited both economic reasons and greater load growth forecasts for reconsidering converting unit 3 of its FB Culley plant in Indiana to natural gas by the end of next year. The outlook for US exports is certain. Competition to place coal in European and Asia-Pacific markets remains steady. Those conditions could sustain downward pressure on some US thermal coal export prices and demand. But producers have expressed some optimism about 2026 US coal markets, with many having filled all of their projected sales book for next year and layered in contracts that have deliveries going out into 2027 and slightly later. And many market participants are thinking that stabilization might well continue into 2026. By Courtney Schlisserman Prompt season coal to gas differentials $/MWh Coal versus gas prompt month differentials $/MWh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

UK refiners seek unused CO2 allowances after closures

23/12/25

UK refiners seek unused CO2 allowances after closures

London, 23 December (Argus) — UK downstream association Fuels Industry UK has urged the government to reallocate unused free CO2 allowances from two recently closed refineries to help remaining plants cope with rising emissions compliance costs. The group wants allowances granted under the UK Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) for the 150,000 b/d Grangemouth and 105,700 b/d Lindsey refineries to be redistributed. Each allowance permits the holder to emit one tonne of CO2 equivalent. Grangemouth and Lindsey were allocated 441,925 and 541,475 allowances for 2025, respectively. It is unclear how many remain after their closures in April and August. The association warned the sector "may not survive that long" without temporary support, citing carbon costs that exceed those faced by overseas competitors until the UK's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) takes effect. ExxonMobil's 270,000 b/d Fawley refinery — the UK's largest — will spend $70mn-80mn on carbon costs this year, rising to $150mn within five years, the company's UK chair Paul Greenwood told MPs during an Energy Security and Net Zero Committee hearing in October. Fuels Industry UK chief executive Elizabeth de Jong also addressed the committee, highlighting broader cost pressures. It remains unclear whether refined fuels will be covered by the UK CBAM, which starts in January 2027. Fuels Industry UK is seeking confirmation that they be included from January 2028, and it wants additional free UK ETS allowances distributed to sectors not covered by CBAM during a "volatile" period linked to expected UK-EU carbon market linkage. Such linkage would exempt UK and EU from each other's CBAMs, but talks have yet to start. UK refiners have also missed out on government energy price support schemes during the gas price surge triggered by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, de Jong told MPs. Refiners paid market rates to power operations at their UK sites, missing out on discounts afforded to UK companies under the Energy Bill Relief Scheme, which ran between October 2022-March 2023, and then under the Energy Bills Discount Scheme between April 2023-March 2024. By contrast, US refiners access natural gas at roughly one-third of UK prices, Greenwood said. By George Maher-Bonnett Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Ausblick Biomethan: Chancen und Hindernisse im EU-Markt

23/12/25

Ausblick Biomethan: Chancen und Hindernisse im EU-Markt

Hamburg, 23 December (Argus) — Der europäische Biomethanmarkt wird in 2026 ein regional ungleichmäßiges Wachstum verzeichnen. Verzögerte Umsetzungen der RED III und ungelöste politische Fragen bremsen den Markthochlauf. Gleichzeitig bleibt die Schifffahrt ein zentraler Nachfragetreiber — vor allem für zertifiziertes, subventioniertes Biomethan. Die überarbeitete EU-Richtlinie für erneuerbare Energien (RED III) gibt den Mitgliedstaaten bis 2030 zwei Optionen, um die Klimaschutzziele der EU zu erreichen: Entweder können die Staaten ihre Treibhausgasemissionen bis 2030 um 14,5 % zu senken, oder sie können einen Anteil von 29 % ihres Energiebedarfs aus erneuerbaren Quellen decken. RED II verlangte lediglich einen Anteil von 14 % erneuerbarer Energien. Einige Länder wie Deutschland haben ihre nationalen Umsetzungspläne der Vorgaben von RED III bereits vorgestellt und planen, diese im kommenden Jahr umzusetzen. Mehrere Länder wie die Niederlande oder Frankreich setzen zukünftig auch auf ein THG-System, wie es in Deutschland nun schon seit Jahren existiert. Biomethan mit niedriger oder negativer Kohlenstoffintensität wird damit zum bevorzugten Kraftstoff, um die Verpflichtungen zu erfüllen — vor allem in den Niederlanden, wo es bisher hinter vergleichsweise günstigeren Biokraftstoffen zurückblieb. Eine weitere EU-Verordnung, die den Einsatz von Biomethan begünstigt, ist FuelEU Maritime. Diese trat im Januar 2025 in Kraft und verpflichtet Reedereien, die Emissionen ihrer Flotten in den Jahren 2025 und 2026 um jeweils 2 % pro Jahr zu senken. Übererfüllung kann über Pooling-Systeme vermarktet werden. Dies hat sich für das Bunkering von Bio-LNG in 2025 als besonders profitabel erweisen. Die Regelung hat die Preise für Herkunftsnachweise (HKNs, oder englisch: RGGOs) stark beeinflusst und dürfte 2026 weiter für Dynamik sorgen. Neue Systeme, entweder unter RED III oder nationalen Verpflichtungen, die 2026 in Kraft treten, werden Nachfrage erzeugen, die mit dem Bedarf aus der Schifffahrt um das Angebot konkurrieren muss. Der größte Teil des niederländischen und dänischen Biomethanangebots für 2026 ist bereits für den maritimen Sektor vorgesehen. Wachstum in den Niederlanden Neben der Umstellung auf die THG-basierte Verpflichtung im Rahmen des sogenannten ERE-Zertifikatssystem unter RED III haben die Niederlande im November mit der Arbeit an einer "Green Gas Blending Obligation" begonnen. Eine Umsetzung vor Ende 2027 erscheint zwar unwahrscheinlich, doch die Pläne stützen vorerst die Preise für HKNs. Die Liquidität von niederländischem Biomethan könnte steigen, wenn die Regierung die Massenbilanzierung von Biomethan genehmigt. Ein entsprechender Antrag wurde im November im Parlament eingebracht, doch eine jüngste Regierungsantwort deutet darauf hin, dass dieser nicht von Erfolg gekrönt sein wird. Bio-LNG muss, wie auch in Deutschland, unsubventioniert sein, zertifiziert sein und physisch geliefert werden, um sich für ERE-Zertifikate zu qualifizieren, andernfalls wird es bei der Berechnung des Gesamtmandats eines Kraftstoffanbieters mit einer fossilen CI von 94 g CO2e/MJ behandelt. Stabiles Deutschland, Frankreich Deutschland wird 2026 die Doppelanrechnung für fortschrittliche Biokraftstoffe wie Biomethan auf die THG-Quote abschaffen. Bislang war dies stets ein großer Anreiz für den Einsatz von Biomethan als Kraftstoff. Trotzdem bleibt Biomethan in Deutschland der günstigste Weg, um die THG-Quote zu erfüllen, denn insbesondere güllebasiertes Biomethan hat ein konkurrenzloses Einsparungspotenzial. Auch die steigende THG-Quote könnte die Nachfrage stützen, jedoch bleibt der Absatzmarkt in Deutschland durch die limitierte Anzahl an LNG- und CNG-Fahrzeugen begrenzt. Frankreichs Beimischungspflicht für Biogas-Produktionszertifikate (CPB) tritt im Januar in Kraft und dürfte auch dort die Inlandsnachfrage deutlich ankurbeln. Die Umsetzung der RED III-Richtlinie, die ein neues, auf Treibhausgasen basiertes IRICC-Ticketsystem vorsieht, wurde jedoch auf 2027 verschoben. Das derzeitige energiebasierte TIRUERT-Ticketsystem für den Transport bleibt bis dahin bestehen, und bremst die Nutzung von Biomethan im Verkehrssektor. Ob IRICCs ab 2027 aus Biomethan generiert werden können, ist noch unklar. Die Verpflichtung, 3 % erneuerbares Gas im Verkehrssektor zu verwenden, tritt 2028 in Kraft und wird danach weiter ansteigen. Der grenzüberschreitende Handel und die Bunkerung von Bio-LNG dürften weiterhin eingeschränkt bleiben. Französisches Biomethan kann nur im Rahmen einer Ex-Domain-Annullierung exportiert werden, also durch die Löschung von HKNs in einem Land zur Verwendung in einem anderen. Dies birgt Risiken für Käufer, da die Eigentumsrechte an den Nachweisen nicht zwangsläufig übertragen werden. Subventioniertes Biomethan darf an französischen LNG-Terminals nicht für die Nutzung außerhalb des Landes verflüssigt werden. Französisches Bio-LNG muss über Massenbilanzierung an andere Terminals in der EU exportiert werden, um unter FuelEU Maritime genutzt zu werden. Großbritannien: Zugang zur EU unklar Der Zugang des Vereinigten Königreichs zu EU-Märkten hängt vom Zugang zur Unionsdatenbank für gasförmige Biokraftstoffe (UDB) ab, deren Start nun für Ende Sommer 2026 vorgesehen ist. Unklarheiten bei der Drittstaatenregelung könnten den EU-Handel einschränken — ein kritisches Thema, da das Vereinigte Königreich in den ersten drei Quartalen 2025 mehr als die Hälfte seiner HKNs exportierte, hauptsächlich nach Deutschland, Norwegen und in die Schweiz. Das Vereinigte Königreich prüft derzeit den Ersatz volumenbasierter RTFC-Tickets durch ein THG-basiertes System, doch Änderungen würden erst 2027 in Kraft treten. Fazit Insgesamt bleibt Biomethan in Europa in THG-basierten Systemen gut positioniert, doch Verzögerungen bei der Umsetzung von Vorschriften dürften das Gesamtwachstum des Marktes verlangsamen. Die Niederlande, Dänemark und Deutschland sollten weiterhin Anker für die europäische Preisbildung bleiben, und Spanien dürfte seine Rolle als maritimer Hub festigen. Doch mehrere Länder riskieren, zurückzufallen, wenn sie keine HKN-Register, Export-Hub-Zugänge, politische Anreize und Subventionsreformen einführen. Von Madeleine Jenkins & Svea Winter Senden Sie Kommentare und fordern Sie weitere Informationen an feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Policy is key for Cop 30 sustainable fuels pledge

23/12/25

Policy is key for Cop 30 sustainable fuels pledge

London, 23 December (Argus) — A UN Cop 30 climate summit pledge, known as "Belem 4x", to quadruple "sustainable fuels" use over 2024-35 has so far drawn 27 signatories, including major biofuels producers and consumers. But such a substantial increase could face constraints, including feedstock and land availability, and will depend on supportive legislation. The signatories pledged at Cop 30 to "expand sustainable fuels use globally by at least four times by 2035 from 2024 levels", including by "adopting ambitious national policies". Sustainable fuels, in the context of the pledge, refers to liquid biofuels, biogases, "low-emissions hydrogen and hydrogen-based fuels", according to energy watchdog the IEA. The pledge follows an IEA report in October developed for the Cop 30 presidency, which found that a fourfold increase "is ambitious yet achievable". Under the IEA scenario, liquid and gaseous biofuels would meet around two-thirds of sustainable fuel demand in 2030, while hydrogen and hydrogen-derived fuels would "expand rapidly" after 2030. Cop 30 host Brazil proposed the pledge in September , based on the IEA's preliminary findings, and the commitment was launched with India, Italy and Japan at the pre-Cop event in Brasilia, Brazil in October. The pledge now has 27 signatories from Latin and North America, Asia, Africa and Europe, encompassing sustainable fuels producers and consumers. Canada, Indonesia, Mexico and the Netherlands are among the signatories. The pledge "sends an important political signal: scaling up sustainable fuels is not only necessary for climate goals, but feasible", the European Waste-based and Advanced Biofuels Association (Ewaba) told Argus . "Europe's biodiesel sector shows how sustainable biofuels can strengthen energy security, reduce import dependence and deliver immediate climate benefits using existing vehicles and fuel infrastructure," Ewaba added. Rising demand Sustainable fuels are typically used in transport sectors, which are among the highest-emitting, particularly in advanced economies. Although transport electrification is expanding, it is typically not moving fast enough to hit climate targets in line with the Paris Agreement, while shipping and aviation will require multiple decarbonisation solutions. Hydrogen and related fuels are also likely to see uptake from industry and power generation. Global demand for sustainable fuels doubled over 2010-24, and is already expected to grow this decade, boosted by policies designed to drive emissions reductions and support energy security. Conversely, the removal of tax credits for electric vehicles in the US, and recent weakening of the EU target for zero-emission cars are also likely to support increased biofuels consumption. The full implementation of existing and announced policies and targets, "plus the removal of market barriers, could lead to a near-doubling of sustainable fuel use in just six years", the IEA said. This could attract investment for new production capacity, it added. It also recommended prioritising infrastructure and supply chain development, as well as innovation funds for new technologies. The IEA found that sustainable fuels could cover 10pc of road transport demand, 15pc of aviation demand and 35pc of shipping fuel demand by 2035 — although it would "vary widely" by region. In an accelerated case, the IEA found that liquid biofuels could provide 8.07EJ in energy in 2030, up by 62pc from 2024 levels. The picture shifts by 2035 in the scenario, with biogas supply more than doubling and low-emissions hydrogen more than quadrupling, both from 2030. Land-use concerns But a near-term focus on increased biofuels production sparked concerns from several organisations about feedstock availability and the land conversion implications. "Such a massive uptake in biofuels could have calamitous consequences for the environment and climate, depending on how this pledge is interpreted," European non-governmental organisation (NGO) Transport & Environment (T&E) said. It flagged land cleared for crops such as palm oil, soy, sugarcane and corn. T&E projections show that "under current growth trends and policies, 90pc of biofuels will still be reliant on food and feed crops by 2030." The IEA noted "limited" expansion opportunities for biofuels from waste oils and fats, while it recommended improving crop yields for other feedstocks. But climate change is likely to hamper crop output. The UN Environment Programme warned recently that under a ‘business as usual' pathway, land degradation "is expected to continue at current rates, with the world losing fertile and productive land the size of Ethiopia or Colombia annually". Cop pledges often aim to drive an existing trend faster, and this is typically evident in the signatories — a coalition of the willing. Brazil has vast ethanol production capacity and strong domestic consumption mandates, like India, while another signatory, Chile, is forging ahead with renewable hydrogen production. The pledges, like all climate action, rely on strong policy, but commitment from key countries is more likely to achieve results. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Viewpoint: WCI changes still in the works

23/12/25

Viewpoint: WCI changes still in the works

Houston, 23 December (Argus) — The Western Climate Initiative (WCI) — the joint California-Quebec carbon market — has spent over two years waiting for clarity on potential program changes with growing concerns that it may not appear until 2026. Bullish sentiment initially pervaded the WCI market in December as California Air Resources Board (CARB) originally planned on publishing its long-awaited draft of cap-and-invest amendments by the end of the year. But this sentiment has been tempered by the possibility that CARB may instead release guidance on its plans because of the limited time left in the year, with a draft published in early 2026, sources said. The WCI partners are considering more-stringent program rules for 2027 and beyond, including increased incentives for participants to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. But market participants may feel like they are experiencing deja vu — at this same time last year, they were expecting to see draft plans for updates to each program. CARB delayed publishing a draft of these program amendments multiple times over the last two years, which in turn has resulted in Quebec delaying the release of its own proposed changes. The agency earlier this year deferred to state legislators and their work to extend the state's 'cap-and-invest' program to 2045 from its previous 2030 sunset date. Lawmakers passed this program extension package, AB 1207 and SB 840, in September , putting the ball back in CARB's court. Staff at an October workshop said CARB planned to publish its amendment proposal, which includes changes required by the legislation, by the end of this year and bring it before its board for review by April. At the meeting, staff floated the idea of removing at least 118mn metric tonnes (t) from the 2027-2030 program allowance budgets to keep the program on target for a 40pc reduction in GHG emissions, compared with 1990 levels, by 2030. The agency previously considered setting a stricter 48pc or 55pc by 2030 target, which would have required the removal of a larger number of allowances through 2030. The change in the program's ambition was a central point of the agency's rulemaking discussions since they started in 2023 . The 40pc target is a more "viable" option at this time, but this decision is not final, CARB staff said in October. The change in the US economy and federal policy away from Inflation Reduction Act incentives and greenhouse gas regulation this year may have contributed to CARB's 2030 target shift, said Nick Roy, a national and state energy policy research associate with environmental policy think tank Resources for the Future. "It is probably true that there is not the governor's office pushing for the same level of ambition that they were originally because of federal policy changes," Roy said. WCI partner Quebec is considering removing 17.5mn allowances, equal to historical carbon offset use in the program, and limiting future offset use for compliance, the province's environment ministry said in an October 2024 market notice. The province has also weighed transitioning to a government purchase and retirement system to replace carbon offsets as part of these changes, but it has not provided further details. The province plans to publish its draft regulations in winter 2026, with adoption in spring-summer 2026. A formal proposal would shed light on CARB's plans going forward as well as how the agency plans to implement program changes required by AB 1207 and SB 840. CARB has one year to adopt the new regulations after it publishes the draft. Legal scrutiny Whether the administration of President Donald Trump plans to act on its threat of legal action against California's "cap-and-invest" program is still unclear. An 8 April executive order directed US attorney general Pam Bondi to evaluate legal action against state and local laws hindering the development or use of domestic energy resources. The order specifically cited California's carbon market. California Carbon Allowances for December delivery fell by more than $2.50/t to $26.74/t the day after the order, but have since climbed above $30/t. Market participants believe the Trump administration could target a proposed link between the WCI and the Washington state carbon markets. Such a link could happen in mid- to late-2027, according to California and Washington regulators. This could create a narrow window for any federal action before Trump leaves office in January 2029. The threat of federal legal action still pervades the market, but participants expect that a lawsuit becomes increasingly unlikely as time passes. By Denise Cathey Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Argus Carbon

Benchmarks de precios del carbono, noticias sobre políticas y proyectos, y análisis exhaustivos, a diario.

Informe Argus Low Carbon Hydrogen Strategy

Tercera parte: América del Norte Un análisis en profundidad de los sectores, países y políticas claves que permiten el crecimiento del hidrógeno.

Argus Hydrogen and Future Fuels

El punto de vista global sobre el hidrógeno y los mercados de productos derivados.

Argus LNG Daily

Acceda a las últimas evaluaciones del precio al contado de GNL, noticias del mercado y análisis independientes.

Argus North American Natural Gas Forward Curves

Herramienta de valoración de mercado independiente para respaldar las decisiones de inversión y negociación en los mercados de gas natural de Norteamérica.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more