Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Queensland to review CCS after rejecting Glencore plan

  • Spanish Market: Coal, Emissions
  • 28/05/24

Australia's Queensland state government will review the long-term suitability of carbon capture and storage (CCS) following the rejection of a demonstration project planned by commodities producer and trading firm Glencore.

Queensland's Department of Environment, Science and Innovation late last week rejected the environmental impact statement for Glencore's CTSCo Surat Basin CCS project, which aimed to demonstrate carbon capture from a coal-fired power station and the permanent storage of carbon dioxide. The project was unsuitable to proceed because of the potential impact on groundwater resources in the Great Artesian Basin, the department said.

"The department's final decision on the EIS acknowledges the importance of the Great Artesian Basin to multiple stakeholders and makes it clear that other carbon capture and storage projects will not be viable in the Great Artesian Basin," it added.

The aquifer is used for agriculture, irrigation and stock watering, with Glencore's proposal sparking strong criticism from farmers and local groups. The decision to reject the project was a step in the right direction but not enough, said Queensland Farmers' Federation chief executive Jo Sheppard.

"We know that there are currently two companies with exploration permits for CCS in the Great Artesian Basin and we know that other companies globally are looking at the basin as a cheap way to conduct CCS at an industrial scale to manage their emissions," Sheppard said. "In the absence of federal policy, the Queensland government can and must now take a leadership role and put regulations in place to protect the Queensland component of the Great Artesian Basin from further CCS bids."

The rejection meant the state government has now "effectively banned" CCS projects in Queensland, Glencore said.

"It's a missed opportunity for Queensland and sends mixed messages on emissions reduction to industry who are looking to invest in low-emission technologies, including CCS," the company noted. "It's now up to the Queensland government to explain how it's going to meet its ambitious emissions reduction targets in the absence of CCS technology for heavy industry."

The state government will assess the suitability of CCS in the state following the "logical conclusion" on the CTSCo project, Queensland premier Steven Miles said on 27 May. "Cabinet will now have a conversation about what we think the longer term and wider application of those concerns should be. That is whether CCS should be allowed and under what circumstances."

Queensland last month approved two separate laws setting renewable energy and emissions reduction targets over the next decade. It set net greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets of 30pc below 2005 levels by 2030, 75pc by 2035 and zero by 2050. The government will receive advice from an expert panel on the measures needed to reduce emissions. It will need to develop and publish sector plans by the end of 2025 with annual progress reports to Queensland's parliament.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

19/05/25

EU, UK to ‘work towards’ linking carbon markets

EU, UK to ‘work towards’ linking carbon markets

London, 19 May (Argus) — The EU and UK agreed to work towards linking their respective emissions trading systems (ETS), as part of their common understanding agreement concluded at a summit in London today. "The European Commission and the United Kingdom share the view that a functioning link between carbon markets would address many of the issues raised in respect of trade and a level playing field," the agreement states. A linking agreement should exempt both jurisdictions from their respective carbon border adjustment mechanisms, according to the common understanding, and the linked systems should cover power and industrial heat generation, and domestic and international maritime and aviation emissions. The statement specifically states that any link "should not constrain the European Union and the United Kingdom from pursuing higher environmental ambition". It also underlines that the UK ETS's supply cap and its emissions reduction pathway are "guided by" the country's Climate Change Act and nationally determined contributions to the Paris climate agreement, and that these should be "at least as ambitious" as the EU's. The UK has legally binding targets to cut its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 68pc by 2030 and 81pc by 2035, both compared with 1990 levels. The EU aims to cut its net GHG emissions by 55pc by 2030, and is yet to set a 2035 target. Both jurisdictions are targeting net zero emissions by 2050, while they share the "same interests" in addressing climate change, commission president Ursula von der Leyen said today. Linking the systems would "save British businesses £800mn in EU carbon taxes", UK prime minister Keir Starmer said today, without specifying a timeframe for the savings. A study commissioned by a range of utilities and published last week found that linking the two systems would save up to €1.2bn on lower hedging costs resulting from improved market liquidity and lower bid-offer spreads. Today's agreement provides no timeline for linking the systems. The process to negotiate and link the Swiss ETS to the EU's scheme took almost 10 years. Alongside plans to work towards linking the EU and UK ETS, the jurisdictions also alluded in the agreement to continuing "technical regulatory exchanges" on energy technologies including hydrogen, carbon capture and storage and biomethane. And they will "explore in detail the necessary parameters" for the UK's potential participation in the EU's internal power market. By Victoria Hatherick and Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australian carbon lobby urges government program reform


19/05/25
19/05/25

Australian carbon lobby urges government program reform

Sydney, 19 May (Argus) — Australia's lobby group Carbon Market Institute (CMI) urged the federal government to reform its Climate Active voluntary program, after utility Energy Australia admitted to flaws in its carbon offsetting strategy in a key legal case. The CMI said the Australian government must push reforms to the Climate Active program, and that carbon credits should not substitute decarbonisation efforts. Most of the voluntary demand for Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) comes from the federal government-backed Climate Active , which awards certification to businesses that measure, reduce and offset their carbon emissions to achieve carbon neutrality. "Offsets do not prevent or undo the harms caused by burning fossil fuels for a customer's energy use," Energy Australia said on 19 May. The utility admitted that carbon offsetting is not the best way to help customers reduce their emissions, as a legal action launched by advocacy organisation Parents for Climate in the Federal Court of Australia in 2023 reached its conclusion. The two parties have settled, with the utility saying it has now shifted its focus to direct emissions reductions. Energy Australia in 2016 launched the ‘Go Neutral' carbon offset product, which is certified by Climate Active and provided residential customers with a way to offset emissions generated by their electricity or gas consumption. But the utility admitted their electricity or gas use was still sourced predominantly from fossil fuels. It withdrew the ‘Go Neutral' product from the market in July last year and is phasing it out for existing customers during 2025. The government has been delaying key decisions on the future of the Climate Active voluntary program , including whether to change the existing list of eligible international units or setting a minimum percentage use of ACCUs. There are currently 528 active certified brands under the Climate Active program, down from almost 590 in the end of 2024. The number of brands that stopped using the certification increased to 240, from around 180 over that same period. By susannah Cornford Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US House panel votes down Republican megabill


16/05/25
16/05/25

US House panel votes down Republican megabill

Washington, 16 May (Argus) — A key committee in the US House of Representatives voted today to reject a massive budget bill backed by President Donald Trump, as far-right conservatives demanded deeper cuts to clean energy tax credits and social spending programs. The House Budget Committee failed to pass the budget reconciliation bill in a 16-21 vote, with four House Freedom Caucus members — Ralph Norman (R-South Carolina), Chip Roy (R-Texas), Josh Brecheen (R-Oklahoma) and Andrew Clyde (R-Georgia) — voting no alongside Democrats. A fifth Republican voted no for procedural reasons. The failed vote will force Republicans to consider major changes to the bill before it comes up for a vote on the House floor as early as next week. Republican holdouts say the bill would fall short of their party's promises to cut the deficit, particularly because it would front-load increased spending and back-load cuts. The bill is set to add $3.3 trillion to the deficit, or $5.2 trillion if temporary provisions were permanent, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Some critics of the bill said the proposed cut of $560bn in clean energy tax credits is not enough, because the bill would retain some tax credits for new wind and solar projects. "A lot of these credits have been in existence for 30 or 40 years, and you talk about giveaways, we want to help those who really need help," Norman said ahead of his no vote. "That's the heart of this. Sadly, I'm a no until we get this ironed out." Negotiations will fall to House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana), who can only lose three votes when the bill comes up for a vote by the full House. But stripping away more of the energy tax credits enacted in the Inflation Reduction Act could end up costing Johnson votes among moderates. More than a dozen Republicans on 14 May asked to pare back newly proposed restrictions on the remaining clean energy tax credits. Ahead of the failed vote, Trump had pushed Republicans to support what he calls the "Big Beautiful Bill". In a social media post, he said "Republicans MUST UNITE" in support of the bill and said the party did not need "GRANDSTANDERS". The failed vote has parallels to the struggles that Democrats had in 2021 before the implosion of their push to pass their sprawling "Build Back Better" bill, which was later revived as the Inflation Reduction Act. Republicans say they will work over the weekend on a compromise. The House Budget Committee has scheduled another hearing at 10pm on 18 May to attempt to vote again on the budget package, but any changes to the measure would occur later, through an amendment released before the bill comes up for a vote on the House floor. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Verkehrssektor verfehlt Klimaziele


15/05/25
15/05/25

Verkehrssektor verfehlt Klimaziele

Hamburg, 15 May (Argus) — Der Verkehrssenktor hat sein Emissionsreduktionsziel in 2024 verfehlt. Dies geht aus dem Prüfbericht des Expertenrats für Klimafragen hervor. Branchenverbände des Kraftstoffmarktes nutzen den Bericht als Appell an die Bundesregierung. Laut des Berichtes vom 15. April hat der Verkehrssektor in Deutschland im Jahr 2024 rund 143 Mio. t CO2-Äquivalent emittiert. Dies stellt einen Rückgang um etwa 1,4 % gegenüber dem Vorjahr dar und entspricht etwa dem Rückgang der Emissionen von 2022 zu 2023. Ursprünglich sollte der Verkehrssektor eine Reduzierung auf 125,2 Mio. t CO2e erzielen. Entsprechend wurde diese Zielmarke um knapp 18 Mio. t CO2e überschritten. Insgesamt ist der Verkehrssektor für 9 % der bundesweiten Emissionen verantwortlich, so der Expertenrat. Dabei sei ein Großteil des Rückgangs auf den Bereich schwerer Fahrzeuge wie LKW und Busse zurückzuführen. Die Emissionen des privaten Personenverkehrs sind konstant geblieben. Der geringe Emissionsrückgang ist laut Expertenrat auf die mangelnde strukturelle Entwicklung im Verkehrssektor sowie der anhaltenden Dominanz fossiler Antriebsarten zurückzuführen. Außerdem soll die Verkehrsleistung von PKW zugenommen haben. Die daraus resultierenden Mehremissionen seien jedoch aufgrund des im Vergleich zum Vorjahr höheren Bestand an batterieelektrischen Fahrzeugen ein Stück weit ausgeglichen worden. Auch das geringe Wirtschaftswachstum hat zum Emissionsrückgang beigetragen. Die neue Bundesregierung hat im Koalitionsvertrag bestätigt, am Anstieg der THG-Quote festzuhalten. Dies soll Inverkehrbringer von Kraftstoffen dazu anregen, mehr emissionsärmere Kraftstoffe anstelle von fossilen in Verkehr zu bringen. Der Branchenverband Uniti begrüßt dieses Vorhaben zwar, mahnt jedoch an, dass diese Maßnahmen nicht ausreichen würden, um den Markthochlauf der erneuerbaren und alternativen Kraftstoffen voranzutreiben. Der Verband fordert die Regierung auf, sich auf europäischer Ebene für eine Anpassung der CO2-Flottenregulierung einsetzen. Diese berücksichtigt bei der Ermittlung der Emissionen nicht etwaige Einsparungen bei der Produktion des Kraftstoffes, sondern nur die tatsächlichen Emissionen im Betrieb. Von Max Steinhau Senden Sie Kommentare und fordern Sie weitere Informationen an feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

India’s coal imports drop in Apr 2024-Feb 2025


14/05/25
14/05/25

India’s coal imports drop in Apr 2024-Feb 2025

Singapore, 14 May (Argus) — India's imports of all types of coal declined on the year from April 2024 to February 2025 because domestic supplies rose, the federal coal ministry said. The country's imports of all types of coal — including thermal and coking coal — fell by 9.2pc from a year earlier to 220.3mn t during the 11-month period, the ministry said. India's production rose by 5.5pc from a year earlier to 929.15mn t over the same period. The drop in imports resulted in foreign exchange savings of about $6.93bn, it said. Imports declined as the country continued to boost output, in line with federal efforts to expand commercial coal mining and coking coal output as well as reduce imports, the ministry said. Increases in domestic supplies could weigh on demand for imports, although key coal-consuming industries could continue to source seaborne material for their operations, especially as domestic coal is comparatively inferior in quality. Utilities' imports for blending with domestic coal fell by 39pc during the period, the ministry said, without elaborating on the volume. The drop comes as Delhi did not renew its order on imported-domestic coal blending after the directives expired in October last year. But it has extended its directive requiring imported coal-fired utilities to boost generation until 30 June , a move that could support demand for seaborne coal during the peak summer period. Imports Imports would continue to be part of the mix to power India's economic growth, especially as it serves as a primary energy source for critical industries including power, steel, and cement, the ministry added. Imports have been vital to meet the needs of key sectors because India faces challenges in meeting the growing domestic demand, especially for coking coal and high-grade thermal coal, the ministry said. India imported 38.29mn t of thermal coal in January-March, down from 41.87mn t a year earlier, according to data from shipbroker Interocean. Imports may have remained under pressure in April, with India's seaborne thermal coal receipts estimated at 15.77mn t for the month, down from 15.84mn t a year earlier, according to trade analytics platform Kpler. By Saurabh Chaturvedi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more