Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

IMO 2040 CO2 goals unmet under base case: ABS

  • Spanish Market: Biofuels, Fertilizers, Natural gas, Oil products, Petrochemicals
  • 27/08/24

The shipping industry will not meet the International Maritime Organization (IMO) goal for reducing CO2 emissions by 2040 without hastening the expected pace of vessel replacements, a study by vessel classification organization American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) concluded.

IMO calls for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by at least 20pc by 2030, by at least 70pc by 2040, and to net zero by 2050, compared with 2008 base levels. Under a base case scenario, a 20pc reduction in CO2-equivalent emissions by 2030 is achievable on a full lifecycle basis, but a 70pc percent reduction by 2040 is not, ABS said.

Under the best case scenario examined by ABS, achieving IMO's 70pc target would require a significantly faster renewal of the vessel fleet to replace oil-fueled vessels or a higher degree of vessel retrofitting.

The three biggest categories of bunker consuming vessels — tankers, dry bulk carriers and container ships — are expected to follow a similar trajectory for marine fuel demand under the base case scenario, with conventional marine fuel accounting for more than 60pc of demand through 2035, ABS said.

Conventional fuel demand would decline to 38-44pc of marine fuel demand in the first half of the 2040s in the base case, ABS predicted. Methanol in that period would grow to about 35pc of marine fuel demand for tankers and container ships and about 22pc for dry bulk carriers. Ammonia and hydrogen demand would grow to about 13pc of tankers' marine fuel demand, 18pc of dry bulk carriers' demand and about 14pc of container ships' demand. LNG across the three vessel categories is expected at 4-6pc of bunkering demand in the early 2040s, with biodiesel at 5-9pc of demand.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

10/11/25

Cop: IMO pushes forward with carbon pricing

Cop: IMO pushes forward with carbon pricing

Belem, 10 November (Argus) — External politics rather than any failure of the International Maritime Organization (IMO) led to the delay in adopting a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions pricing mechanism for global shipping, proposal supporters said on Monday. IMO members last month voted to delay the adoption of the Net-Zero Framework (NZF) by a year, despite some of those backing the delay previously supporting the carbon pricing system. The October gathering was "not a typical IMO" meeting, IMO secretary general Arsenio Dominguez said during a side event at the UN Cop 30 climate talks in Belem, Brazil. "We were affected by the global geopolitics that we all face right now. We're not immune to it," he said. Dominguez also sought to assure critics of the vote that the IMO is not backing down from the proposal, citing ongoing work to address some questions that member states raised during last month's meeting. "My message to you is very clear, don't judge IMO for what happened last October. Don't think that IMO stops there because we don't," he said. Dutch climate envoy Jaime de Bourbon Parme struck a similar tone, telling the audience that while the delay may give supporters a "sense of failure" very few countries last month argued the NZF should not be adopted. "I know the Netherlands and many other countries were ready to sign, however, the meeting went a very different direction," he said. While Dominguez and the Dutch prince did not single out any country for causing the delay, many NZF supporters have put the blame on the US. In the days leading up to the vote, the administration of US president Donald Trump threatened to retaliate against countries that back the proposal with measures such as visa restrictions, new port fees or sanctions on officials that sponsor "activist-driven" climate policies. The Trump administration "went outside the rules of engagement," said Andrew Forrest, non-executive chairman of Australian mining company Fortescue, calling US actions before the vote a form of "thuggery." By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

European gasoline cracks hit 18-month high


10/11/25
10/11/25

European gasoline cracks hit 18-month high

London, 10 November (Argus) — European gasoline margins to crude hit an 18-month high on Monday. Benchmark non-oxy gasoline barge premiums to Ice Brent crude futures were $22.11/bl at Monday's close, surpassing seasonal peaks during the 2025 and 2024 summer driving seasons and the highest since 7 May 2024. Non-oxy barge refining margins have averaged $18.59/bl to date in October, the highest for the period since 2022 when global demand began returning following the Covid-19 pandemic. Ambiguity about the future of Russian firm Lukoil's subsidiary Litasco and its European refining and product assets has supported European gasoline cracks. The US blocked trading firm Gunvor's bid for the assets, throwing the future of Litasco's downstream European operations in doubt. Prices were already underpinned by European refinery maintenance and tighter prompt supply availability, according to traders. Gasoline barge loading delays have been reported since late September-early October, limiting the amount of product making its way into storage. Cracks have also been supported recently by refiners pivoting to diesel production to capture strong distillate margins, a trader said, as the global diesel pool is shrunken by lower Russian export loadings. Europe appears to be rolling back the amount of gasoline made available for export. Cargo loadings from the EU, UK and Norway for overseas destinations in the first 10 days of November were the the lowest daily rate on record for the period at 736,000 b/d, according to Kpler. This was down from 844,000 b/d in 1-10 October. And Europe has imported 104,000 b/d of gasoline to date this month, the highest for the period since August 2024, to tackle elevated prompt supply tightness. This is reflected in $45/t backwardation in the Eurobob oxy swap structure, between the balance of the November swap and the front-month December swap on Monday. West African buying interest may be waning, however. Nigeria's 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery cut its asking prices for gasoline on Friday, probably closing the arbitrage window from Europe to its second-largest export market. This may weigh on non-oxy barge refining premiums. Paper indications are still pricing in a drop in Eurobob oxy cracks month-on-month until January. By George Maher-Bonnett Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

DAP softening could catch Pakistani importers off guard


10/11/25
10/11/25

DAP softening could catch Pakistani importers off guard

London, 10 November (Argus) — Pakistani domestic DAP prices have begun to slip since peaking in the first half of October. By realigning with declining international prices, lower domestic prices could force importers who bought DAP at higher levels to sell at a loss. The latest range for domestic DAP prices spans 13,500-14,350 rupees/50kg bag ex-Karachi, with private importers offering at Rs13,500-13,800/50kg bag ex-Karachi. Import costs have been widening their discount to domestic levels since turning cheaper in early October. The domestic equivalent breakeven cost of the latest DAP assessment at $725-730/t cfr is now more than Rs1,000/50kg bag ex-Karachi below domestic prices at a midpoint basis, Argus data show. This is the widest discount since the start of 2025. Imports on a $/t cfr basis are transferred into domestic prices by applying current exchange rates with the Pakistani rupee. Insurance, transportation and bagging costs add around 14pc. A goods and sales tax and a FED tax, each 5pc, also add to landed costs. This means that the peak of import prices at $815/t cfr in the second half of August at the midpoint was equivalent to breakeven landed costs at Rs14,341/50kg bag ex-Karachi. Domestic prices have matched import levels with a delay of about two months over March-October. Import prices had moved above domestic levels in March, with the premium remaining above Rs1,000/50kg bag over most of May-August, while prices rose steadily. Importers who bought DAP during this period were counting on the continuing increase in domestic prices to secure positive margins when selling domestically. But domestic prices never equalled the peak of import prices in the second half of August and have now started declining. Domestic prices peaked in mid-October at Rs14,000/50kg bag ex-Karachi at the midpoint, equivalent to about $793/t cfr when using the latest $/Rs exchange rate. Any DAP imported above this level would sell at a loss domestically. The fall of domestic prices could be faster than the initial softening in cfr prices going forward. Suppliers will want to resist dropping prices to avoid high-cost imports wiping out profits made earlier in the year, but farmers that return to the market for the peak offtake season in November are pointing to the bearish international trend. Despite improving crop prices, the cancellation of the expected subsidy for DAP has hurt farmers' finances. Suppliers are holding onto healthy inventories, and some are understood to be eager to sell their stocks to avoid getting caught out by declining prices. Up to 440,000t of DAP has been brought into Pakistan by private importers since May, line-up data show. Some buyers have reported targeting import prices at $700/t cfr, a level not seen since mid-April. This would be equivalent to breakeven landed costs at Rs12,361/50kg bag ex-Karachi. If domestic prices drop by 9.4pc from current levels, unsold cargoes that were imported after mid-April would be selling at a loss. The decline in domestic prices is less likely to cause losses for suppliers of branded and domestically produced DAP, which sell at a premium to private importers. But higher raw material costs is likely squeezing margins for Pakistan's domestic DAP production. By Adrien Seewald Pakistan domestic DAP price VS cfr domestic equivalent Rs/50kg bag ex-Karachi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EPA does not update court on biofuel timing: Correction


10/11/25
10/11/25

EPA does not update court on biofuel timing: Correction

Corrects government shutdown's impact on court deadlines, and updates with new information throughout. New York, 10 November (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration did not update a court on its timeline for finalizing new biofuel blend mandates, as a partial government shutdown slows down court cases and regulatory work. Biofuel groups Clean Fuels Alliance America and Growth Energy have repeatedly sued the administration over its delays, hoping that a court will require the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to set new biofuel quotas before year-end. Judge Timothy Kelly of the US District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the administration to provide an update on its timeline by 7 November. But in a filing that evening, the biofuel groups said they had not heard back from government lawyers. No timing update was provided. "It is the understanding of Clean Fuels and Growth Energy that counsel for defendants may currently be furloughed," they told the court. Kelly ordered the update before the ongoing partial government shutdown began. The DC district court later said in a general order that it would give the government more time to respond across all civil cases because of the funding lapse. Government lawyers had previously warned courts that the shutdown would sideline critical officials and make it hard to meet deadlines. But the government's lack of response to biofuel groups in the case is still raising fears of more prolonged delays updating a program that is important for producers of ethanol, renewable diesel and other biofuels and is popular among powerful farm-state Trump allies in Congress. EPA told Argus it was reviewing comments on its plan to make oil companies offset past program exemptions and "continues to work on final regulations" to establish new blend mandates. In past cases over biofuel program deadlines, biofuel groups and federal officials have negotiated new timelines or judges have ordered EPA to act by a set date. Clean Fuels said it would continue to ask the DC court to expedite the case and require the agency to publish a final regulation by year-end. Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, EPA requires oil refiners and importers to annually blend different types of biofuels or buy credits from those that do. The program is crucial for the production margins of ethanol, renewable diesel and other biofuels and is popular among powerful farm-state Trump allies in Congress. EPA — required by law to set new mandates 14 months in advance of a new year — is late setting new quotas for 2026 and 2027. Even before the shutdown, the Trump administration told the DC court that developing a complicated plan to offset the impact of small refinery exemptions meant it might not be able to finalize new blend mandates until next year . Biofuel advocates fear that further delays would mean less ambitious final quotas, another hurdle for biorefineries that have cut run rates this year and for farmers hurting from this year's tariff fights. EPA has indeed been more cautious in the past when finalizing retroactive mandates since oil companies have less notice on volumes they must bring to market. Lawyers and lobbyists who closely track the program have also told Argus that delays raise the chance that major program updates — like a plan to halve program credits for fuels made abroad or from foreign feedstocks — are at least pushed back. Oil refiners have argued the half-credit idea is illegal and questioned how EPA could roll out a new feedstock tracking system in a matter of weeks. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Rising German gasoil prices pressure demand


10/11/25
10/11/25

Rising German gasoil prices pressure demand

Hamburg, 10 November (Argus) — Inland heating oil and diesel prices in Germany rose last week, driven by a rally in Ice gasoil futures. The increases curbed buying interest from consumers. Ice front-month gasoil futures climbed above $800/t on 7 November — their highest since early July 2024. The rise equates to about €7.30/100 litres. National average prices for heating oil and diesel in Germany increased at a more moderate pace, up by around €4/100l, but still reached their highest since late June. Gasoline prices saw a smaller increase of about €1.40/100l. Traders said higher prices are deterring buyers. Subdued demand also explains the smaller rise in domestic prices compared with futures. High domestic refinery utilisation is helping cap inland price increases in Germany, with only the 187,000 b/d Godorf refinery currently in partial shutdown. Calculated German greenhouse gas (GHG) costs for diesel fell by nearly €1/100l last week, further weighing on prices. The drop reflects lower prices for hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) and GHG certificates. Arbitrage conditions for US gasoil exports to Europe worsened in October. But the arbitrage window reopened last week as Ice futures rose, potentially allowing US flows to Europe to resume in the coming weeks — assuming fundamentals remain stable. By Johannes Guhlke Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more