Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Tax credit delay risks growth of low-CO2 fuels

  • Spanish Market: Agriculture, Biofuels, Emissions, Hydrogen, Oil products
  • 15/10/24

A new US tax credit for low-carbon fuels will likely begin next year without final guidance on how to qualify, leaving refiners, feedstock suppliers, and fuel buyers in a holding pattern.

The US Treasury Department this month pledged to finalize guidance around some Inflation Reduction Act tax credits before President Joe Biden leaves office but conspicuously omitted the climate law's "45Z" incentive for clean fuels from its list of priorities. Kicking off in January and lasting through 2027, the credit requires road and aviation fuels to meet an initial carbon intensity threshold and then ups the subsidy as the fuel's emissions fall.

The transition to 45Z was always expected to reshape biofuel markets, shifting benefits from blenders to producers and encouraging the use of lower-carbon waste feedstocks, like used cooking oil. And the biofuels industry is used to uncertainty, including lapsed tax credits and retroactive blend mandates.

But some in the market say this time is unique, in part because of how different the 45Z credit will be from prior federal incentives. While the credit currently in effect offers $1/USG across the board for biomass-based diesel, for example, it is unclear how much of a credit a gallon of fuel would earn next year since factors like greenhouse gas emissions for various farm practices, feedstocks, and production pathways are now part of the administration's calculations.

This delay in issuing guidance has ground to a halt talks around first quarter contracts, which are often hashed out months in advance. Renewable Biofuels chief executive Mike Reed told Argus that his company's Port Neches, Texas, facility — the largest biodiesel plant in the US with a capacity of 180mn USG/yr — has not signed any fuel offtake contracts past the end of the year or any feedstock contracts past November and will idle early next year absent supportive policy signals. Biodiesel traders elsewhere have reported similar challenges.

Across the supply chain, the lack of clarity has made it hard to invest. While Biden officials have stressed that domestic agriculture has a role to play in addressing climate change, farmers and oilseed processors have little sense of what "climate-smart" farm practices Treasury will reward. Feedstock deals could slow as early as December, market participants say, because of the risk of shipments arriving late.

Slowing alt fuel growth

Recent growth in US alternative fuel production could lose momentum because of the delayed guidance. The Energy Information Administration last forecast that the US would produce 230,000 b/d of renewable diesel in 2025, up from 2024 but still 22pc below the agency's initial outlook in January. The agency also sees US biodiesel production falling next year to 103,000 b/d, its lowest level since 2016.

The lack of guidance is "going to begin raising the price of fuel simply because it is resulting in fewer gallons of biofuel available," said David Fialkov, executive vice president of government affairs for the National Association of Truck Stop Operators.

And if policy uncertainty is already hurting established fuels like biodiesel and renewable diesel, impacts on more speculative but lower-carbon pathways — such as synthetic SAF produced from clean hydrogen — are potentially substantial. An Argus database of SAF refineries sees 810mn USG/yr of announced US SAF production by 2030 from more advanced pathways like gas-to-liquids and power-to-liquids, though the viability of those plants will hinge on policy.

The delay in getting guidance is "challenging because it's postponing investment decisions, and that ties up money and ultimately results in people perhaps looking elsewhere," said Jonathan Lewis, director of transportation decarbonization at the climate think-tank Clean Air Task Force.

Tough process, ample delays

Regulators have a difficult balancing act, needing to write rules that are simultaneously detailed, legally durable, and broadly acceptable to the diverse interests that back clean fuel incentives — an unsteady coalition of refiners, agribusinesses, fuel buyers like airlines, and some environmental groups. But Biden officials also have reason to act quickly, given the threat next year of Republicans repealing the Inflation Reduction Act or presidential nominee Donald Trump using the power of federal agencies to limit the law's reach.

US agriculture secretary Tom Vilsack expressed confidence last month that his agency will release a regulation quantifying the climate benefits of certain agricultural practices before Biden leaves office, which would then inform Treasury's efforts. Treasury officials also said this month they are still "actively" working on issuing guidance around 45Z.

If Treasury manages to issue guidance, even retroactively, that meets the many different goals, there could be more support for Congress to extend the credit. The fact that 45Z expires after 2027 is otherwise seen as a barrier to meeting US climate goals and scaling up clean fuel production.

But rushing forward with half-formed policy guidance can itself create more problems later.

"Moving quickly toward a policy that sends the wrong signals is going to ultimately be more damaging for the viability of this industry than getting something out the door that needs to be fixed," said the Clean Air Task Force's Lewis.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

17/06/25

Brazil's Amazon Fund approves over R1bn in 1H

Brazil's Amazon Fund approves over R1bn in 1H

Sao Paulo, 17 June (Argus) — Brazil's Amazon Fund has approved about R1.19bn ($215mn) to finance projects submitted in the first half of 2025, about 25pc more than it financed in all of last year and double the financing in 2023. The fund — which issues grants to projects that prevent, monitor and combat deforestation while promoting conservation and sustainable development in the Amazon forest — invested more in the first six months of the year than it has in any year since project funding started in 2009, according to Brazil's development bank Bndes and environment ministry (MMA). The fund approved over R947mn last year and R584mn in 2023. The government reactivated the fund in 2023 — initially launched in 2008 — after four inactive years, when the administration of former president Jair Bolsonaro stopped backing new projects. The fund has released R2.7bn since 2009. The fund so far this year has directed R825mn to the Fortfisc deforestation program and R360mn to diverse projects aiming to combat and prevent deforestation. The most recent funding follows new approval standards on structuring and strategic projects. The Amazon Fund has R5.6bn under management in 133 assets, such as the Restaura Amazonia, which has been backing ecological and productive restoration projects for 16 years. Payments have also picked up in the first half this year, as it released R158mn from current approved programs to combat deforestation and boost revenue generation in traditional communities. This amount represents 75pc of last year's payments of R209mn and triple the 2023 payment of R51mn. Norway is the fund's largest donor, having pledged R3.5bn, followed by German development bank KfW with around R388mn and the US with R291mn. Other donors include the UK, Switzerland, Japan, Ireland and Denmark . Brazil is working to eliminate deforestation — both legal and illegal — by 2030, to meet its emissions reductions targets under the Paris climate agreement. Deforestation is one of Brazil's flagship issues for the UN Cop 30 summit, which it will host in northern Para state in November. By João Curi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Countries adopt agenda at UN climate talks after delay


17/06/25
17/06/25

Countries adopt agenda at UN climate talks after delay

London, 17 June (Argus) — Countries have adopted the agenda of the UN Bonn climate talks after an extra day of negotiations, following disagreements over the inclusion of items on climate finance and climate-related trade measures, which caused delays. The adopted agenda was a compromise, in which the two agenda items were not included, but will be addressed in other ways. The topic of trade measures — in effect carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAM) — will be discussed under other relevant agenda items. For the climate finance topic, which refers to developed countries' obligations to provide climate finance to developing nations, Bonn chairs will hold consultations and report back at the UN Cop 30 climate summit, set for November. The Bonn technical negotiations — halfway-point talks before Cop conferences each year — were scheduled to begin on 16 June, but the plenary was suspended as parties failed to agree on the agenda. The outgoing Azeri Cop 29 presidency oversaw further negotiations on the agenda. In the talks' opening plenary, which re-started today, India's representative said that the country was "extremely disappointed" with developed countries' "reluctance" to discuss "legal obligations" for climate finance. India will return to the topic at Cop 30, the country's representative said — echoed by Tanzania. The EU's representative welcomed the agenda's adoption. "It is hard to remain silent when our positions and our motivations are mischaracterised by our partners. This is a multilateral process in which the views of all parties must be respected… we work here together to reach compromises to allow us to move forward", he added. Finance remains a central issue in climate negotiations. At Cop 29 last year, almost 200 countries agreed on a new goal to provide $300bn/yr in climate finance to developing nations by 2035. The Cop 29 finance outcome was significantly lower than the trillions of dollars sought by developing countries, which expressed frustration at the time. But the text also called on "all actors… to enable the scaling up of financing to developing country parties for climate action from all public and private sources to at least $1.3 trillion/yr by 2035". Consultations on a roadmap to achieve that level will take place in Bonn. The EU's CBAM was a point of contention during the Cop 28 and 29 talks, with countries such as China and Brazil raising concerns about its impact on developing countries. The European Commission expects the CBAM, when fully phased in, to capture more than half of the emissions covered by the bloc's ETS. The scheme's full implementation starts on 1 January 2026, but its impact is already starting to be felt . By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

UN Bonn climate talks delayed by agenda disagreements


17/06/25
17/06/25

UN Bonn climate talks delayed by agenda disagreements

Edinburgh, 17 June (Argus) — The start of UN climate talks in Bonn, Germany, has been delayed as a result of agenda disagreements over finance and trade measures. The Bonn technical negotiations — halfway-point talks before the UN Cop 30 conference in Brazil — were scheduled to begin on 16 June, but the plenary was suspended as parties failed to agree on an agenda. The opening meeting is due to restart later today. Bolivia — acting on behalf of the Like-Minded Group of Developing Countries (LMDC) negotiating group — proposed two additional items to the provisional agenda. The LMDC group also includes countries such as China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba and Vietnam. The group's first proposed agenda item seeks to add a line on the implementation of Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement relating to the provision of climate finance to developing countries from developed nations. The EU opposed the agenda item as proposed by the LMDC, and asked for references to Article 9.2 and 9.3, which relate to the provision of finance by "other parties" and sources of finance. The LMDC rejected this counterproposal. Finance remains a central issue in climate negotiations. At Cop 29 last year, almost 200 countries agreed on a new goal to provide $300bn/yr in climate finance to developing nations by 2035. The Cop 29 finance outcome was significantly lower than the trillions of dollars sought by developing countries, which expressed frustration at the time. But the Cop 29 text also called on "all actors… to enable the scaling up of financing to developing country parties for climate action from all public and private sources to at least $1.3 trillion/yr by 2035". Consultations on a roadmap to achieve that level will take place in Bonn. The second agenda item proposed by the LMDC relates to "promoting international co-operation and addressing the concerns with climate change related trade-restrictive unilateral measures" — namely the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM). The CBAM was a point of contention during the Cop 28 and 29 talks, with countries such as China and Brazil raising concerns about its impact on developing countries. The mechanism aims to create a level playing field by imposing an effective carbon price on imports to the EU in sectors covered by the bloc's emissions trading system (ETS). This is to prevent EU-based firms from moving carbon-intensive production to non-EU jurisdictions with lower carbon costs, and to avoid EU products being replaced by more carbon-intensive imports. The European Commission expects the CBAM, when fully phased in, to capture more than half of the emissions covered by the bloc's ETS. The scheme's full implementation starts on 1 January 2026, but its impact is already starting to be felt . Six emissions-intensive industries are included under CBAM's scope at present — cement, fertilizers, iron and steel, aluminium, electricity and hydrogen. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

India's HPCL plans another expansion at Vizag refinery


17/06/25
17/06/25

India's HPCL plans another expansion at Vizag refinery

Mumbai, 17 June (Argus) — Indian state-owned refiner HPCL plans another expansion at its Visakhapatnam (Vizag) refinery, and will raise its capacity to 401,000 b/d in the next five years from the current 301,000 b/d, the refinery's executive director Ramanathan Ramakrishnan said. The refinery underwent an expansion in 2023 when its capacity was raised to 270,000 b/d. Crude processing at the refinery was up by 21pc on the year at 307,000 b/d in the April 2024-March 2025 fiscal year, oil ministry data show. The refinery will be processing more than 321,000 b/d of crude in the 2025-26 fiscal year and 361,000 b/d over the next five years to meet the country's increasing energy demand, Ramakrishnan said on 16 June. Under the expansion plan, the refinery will add a 9mn t crude distillation unit, a 3mn t vacuum gas oil hydrocracker, a 3.55mn t residue upgradation facility, gas turbine generators, two trains of hydrogen, a sulphur recovery unit, an isomerization unit and associated tankages and facilities. HPCL expects to commission the residue upgradation unit at its refinery by July-September 2025. While the refinery does not have a petrochemical complex due to space constraints, HPCL intends to produce specialty chemicals and continue focusing on producing gasoline and diesel. The construction of HPCL's 180,000b/d refinery in Barmer is expected to be completed soon and the plant is expected to take in crude by October. The refinery is a joint venture between HPCL with a 74pc stake and the Rajasthan state government with 26pc. HPCL also has a 190,000 b/d refinery in Mumbai, and a 226,000 b/d refinery in Punjab in a joint venture with Mittal Energy. HPCL's sales of oil products in domestic markets rose by 6pc on the year to 47.29mn t in April 2024-March 2025. By Roshni Devi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australian safeguard credit transfers total 3mn in 1Q25


17/06/25
17/06/25

Australian safeguard credit transfers total 3mn in 1Q25

Sydney, 17 June (Argus) — Australia's safeguard mechanism credits (SMCs) changed hands 32 times for a combined 3mn units in the first quarter of 2025, following the first issuances early this year, the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) said. SMCs were first issued into the CER's new unit and certificate registry in January. The first transactions in the over-the-counter (OTC) market were reported by climate solutions and markets firm Core Markets in the end of February, when it claimed 190,000 SMCs sold at A$34/t CO2 equivalent ($22.24/t CO2e). Very few further transactions were reported by brokers over the rest of the quarter. The 32 transactions the CER recorded in the new unit registry may include both brokered reported trades as well as non-reported trades, it told Argus . They include any internal transfer of SMCs from one account to another, excluding surrender transactions. "This could include any transactions where a parcel of SMCs has been transacted more than once," the regulator said on 16 June in response to queries about the data. The relatively small volumes of SMC trades were in line with the CER's expectations that most entities will surrender or bank their own SMCs in the early periods of the reformed safeguard mechanism to manage future obligations, the regulator said in its quarterly carbon market report released in June. The SMCs are allowances that are issued to facilities that reduce emissions below their baselines, with each unit representing 1t of CO2e below the baseline. A total of 138 facilities out of 219 covered under the scheme surrendered 7.05mn Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) and 1.38mn SMCs for 2023-24 , up sharply from 1.22mn units of ACCUs a year earlier. Around 8.3mn SMCs were issued to 63 facilities in 2023-24. SMCs consistently traded at a discount to ACCUs in the first quarter, the CER noted. This likely reflects that the latter have alternative uses, including cancellation for voluntary purposes and corporate emissions reporting, while SMCs may only be surrendered for safeguard compliance purposes, the regulator added. Argus assessed SMC prices at A$34.95/t CO2e on 17 June, at a A$0.75/t CO2e discount to generic no avoided deforestation (No AD) ACCUs. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more