Germany to abolish gas storage levy from 2026

Spanish Market: Natural gas
24/06/25

The German government will abolish the gas storage levy from 2026 to support industry suffering from high energy prices, rather than this year as previously assumed, according to the country's finance ministry.

Finance minister Lars Klingbeil on Tuesday presented the draft budget for 2025, as well as the planning "cornerstones" for the 2026-29 budgets. Klingbeil named three projects that will help relieve consumers and industry from high energy prices that will enter force from 1 January 2026, chief of which is the financing of the gas storage levy from the federal budget, as well as electricity tax relief for industry and support for power grid fees.

The coalition had previously promised to abolish the gas storage levy — set at €2.99/MWh for the first half of this year and €2.89/MWh for the second — to help industry and households cope with high gas prices in its coalition agreement in April. In a draft paper circulating last week, the government had still stated that the gas storage levy account will "receive a subsidy from the KTF [climate and transformation fund] in 2025 to relieve the burden on gas consumers".

German gas market area manager THE's gas storage levy account was still in a €4.2bn ($4.8bn) deficit at the end of May, according to the latest preliminary published balances. The levy was introduced in 2022 to cover the losses that THE incurred that year when filling German storage sites. The levy is currently charged on all domestic exit points, excluding to storage sites. Any potential future intervention in the filling of storage sites would be charged to this account and could then be refinanced in a similar way, although the government has recently made it clear that it is not planning to intervene this summer, even if legal targets for individual sites are missed.

Political difficulties

Klingbeil confirmed on Tuesday that he plans to pay the outstanding balance from the KTF, which has received criticism from opposition parties and industry associations.

The head of the parliamentary Greens, Katharina Droege, said on Tuesday that chancellor Friedrich Merz and Klingbeil are "fiddling" with the budget by declaring fossil gas subsidies as climate action, which is in fact "the opposite". Changing the definition of the KTF to allow for gas subsidies is "absolutely irresponsible" and shows that he is looking for every excuse to not have to support climate action, Droege said.

The KTF was established in 2010 to allow for expenditure that "supports reaching the goal of the climate protection act" and supports measures "suitable for advancing Germany's transformation into a sustainable and climate-neutral economy", according to the current KTF act. The funds recently received a €100bn boost from new debt as the Green party only agreed to €500bn of special funds for infrastructure investment and aid to Ukraine if some of the infrastructure investment was bound to climate targets.

German energy and water association BDEW also criticised the move, saying it is "crucial" that the KTF "lives up to its name" and is used for investments in climate protection and transformation. Consumption-related expenses such as the gas storage levy "belong in the core budget", the association said. And climate group WWF said it could be against the constitution to use climate funds for fossil subsidies, warning that the constitutional court could again force the government to redo its budget planning.

Klingbeil said today that he stands behind his decision "one hundred percent", saying it is important to send a signal to industry and consumers that the government is supporting competitive energy prices. The decision to put gas into the climate bracket is "building on the policy of the previous government", which agreed that Germany must rely on gas in a transitional phase, to phase out coal more quickly. Lower energy prices overall are "supporting industry in this transformation", he said, pointing out that the fund is "a climate fund, but also a transformation fund".

Other associations have pointed out that indiscriminately lowering energy prices for power and gas removes any price signals for a switch away from gas, both in terms of industrial decarbonisation as well as the buildout of heat pumps.

By Till Stehr

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

05/12/25

US LNG margins tighten on higher Henry Hub prices

Houston, 5 December (Argus) — A narrowing spread between US and European LNG prices and high freight rates in the Atlantic basin have pushed the front-month indicative long-term LNG contract cost above the spot Gulf coast fob price for the first time in two years. But the premium over the spot price will likely be brief, and limited flexibility in annual delivery plans will likely leave export schedules unchanged, with the impact solely on profit margins rather than fundamentals. A steeper backwardation in the US' Henry Hub forward curve compared to the northwest European LNG forward curve beyond February, as well as a steep backwardation in charter rates, means US LNG offtakers likely will not need to alter export plans. Liquefaction fees are also considered a sunk cost, and the Henry Hub remains comfortably below European LNG prices to more than cover the shipping cost between the two markets. This means there is still a strong financial incentive to maximise US LNG export volumes. The indicative long-term LNG contract price — 115pc of Henry Hub plus a $3/mn Btu liquefaction fee — has exceeded the Argus Gulf coast (AGC) spot fob price since 28 November, climbing to a premium of 69¢/mn Btu on 4 December. That premium came with the front-month Henry Hub price at a nearly three-year high of $5.06/mn Btu on forecasts for cold weather and US LNG exports at a record high. At the same time, the front-month NW Europe LNG des price was at $8.83/mn Btu, the lowest since May 2024, with warmer-than-normal weather forecast in Europe and EU underground storage well-supplied. A surge in freight rates, primarily driven by higher Atlantic basin loading demand, including at the 27.2mn t/yr Plaquemines plant, widened the spread between the AGC fob price and delivered spot prices in northwest Europe. The spread grew to 96¢/mn btu on 24 November, near the peak of the freight rally, up from 28¢/mn Btu in mid-October (see spread chart) . The wider spread pushed the AGC fob price for January loading below the indicative long-term LNG contract price for the same month. Forward freight rates are in steep backwardation in the first quarter of 2026, which is reflected in a tighter AGC-NW Europe spread over that span, as are Henry Hub futures contracts. This puts AGC prices above the indicative long-term contract prices from March through June (see forwards chart) . Although exports are unaffected because of liquefaction costs being considered sunk, the dynamic highlights the tightening margins for US LNG as a supply wave brings more liquefaction capacity on line through the end of the decade. The AGC fob's premium over the long-term indicative contract averaged $4.11/mn Btu through 4 December this year, down from $4.63/mn Btu, $5.37/mn Btu and $20.13/mn Btu in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively (see margins chart) . By Tray Swanson AGC-NWE spread and freight rates Tighter margins for US LNG $/mn Btu Indicative long-term contract forwards vs LNG spot prices $/mn Btu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Golden Pass LNG approved to receive cool-down cargo

04/12/25

Golden Pass LNG approved to receive cool-down cargo

Houston, 4 December (Argus) — QatarEnergy and ExxonMobil's 18.1mn t/yr (2.4bn ft³/d) Golden Pass LNG export terminal in Texas received federal approval today to unload a cool-down cargo, a key step in commissioning the plant. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted the project's request to introduce hazardous fluids into various systems and receive the cool-down cargo. The 174,000m³ Imsaikah has been holding offshore Texas' Port Arthur since 29 November after departing QatarEnergy's 77mn t/yr Ras Laffan export terminal with a cargo on 27 October. The vessel's LNG will be used to cool down Golden Pass' equipment for its start-up process. The three-train project also has federal approval to introduce fuel gas to train 1 and train 1's gas turbine. Feedgas flows to Golden Pass have yet to materially rise. Pipeline nominations on 4 December were just over 8mn ft³, in line with daily flows since mid-October. Flows to LNG plants can be revised later in the day. The project's developers anticipate the facility will start production by the end of the year or in early 2026, with each of its three trains coming on line in six-month intervals. By Tray Swanson Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

LNG to fill the gap as Seoul pledges faster coal exit

03/12/25

LNG to fill the gap as Seoul pledges faster coal exit

South Korea is scrambling for alternatives to coal-fired power to maintain sufficient base-load capacity, writes Evelyn Lee London, 3 December (Argus) — South Korea's pledge to phase out coal-fired power generation by 2040 has thrown its energy strategy into sharp focus, exposing a looming 40GW capacity gap. With nuclear expansion stalling and renewables facing infrastructure hurdles, LNG has become the most likely bridge to fill the potential shortfall. South Korea has formally confirmed its plan to retire 40 out of its 61 existing coal-fired units by 2040, following its declaration during the UN Cop 30 climate summit in Brazil last month to join the Powering Past Coal Alliance (PPCA) — a coalition of countries committed to ending coal use for power generation. The phase out timeline for the country's remaining 21 units — some of which were built relatively recently — will be determined through public consultation taking into account economic and environmental feasibility, and a detailed phase-out strategy is expected to be finalised next year, the PPCA says. This aligns with Seoul's intention to establish its 2026-40 long-term power plan by the end of next year. The firm phase-out pledge leaves South Korea scrambling for alternatives to maintain sufficient base-load power capacity. Its current long-term power plan covering 2024-39 was established in February under the previous administration of then-president Yoon Suk-Yeol. It earmarked 28 aging coal-fired units with a combined 14.1GW of capacity for conversion to LNG, and 12 units with 6.8GW of capacity to transition to carbon-free generation, such as pumped storage, hydrogen or ammonia co-firing, all by 2038. The current administration under President Lee Jae-Myung has indicated it does not intend to allow plants to switch to ammonia co-firing , signalling a decisive break from earlier strategies that sought to keep coal in the mix under a low-carbon guise. In line with this, Lee's administration in October cancelled the second round of a clean hydrogen power generation bidding market, which would have subsidised hydrogen and ammonia co-firing under 15-year contracts. Seoul searching An accelerated coal phase-out alongside a ban on approving new nuclear reactors has led to growing expectations that South Korea will lean more heavily on gas-fired plants to maintain its power system at least until renewables capacity catches up. The current electricity plan stipulates building two new 1.4GW reactors and continued use of expiring reactors, resulting in nuclear capacity rising to 35.2GW in 2038 from 26.1GW in 2025. But the Lee administration has ruled out building new reactors, although construction of reactors already under development can proceed as planned. The government has approved the restart of the 650MW Kori reactor 2, in line with the president's stance that expiring reactors may continue operating if safety standards are met. But even with these measures, Seoul must identify more than 40GW of replacement capacity by 2040, based on information currently available. This is roughly equivalent to the country's entire coal-fired fleet, which has accounted for around 28pc of total power output this year. The government aims to expand South Korea's renewable energy capacity to 100GW by 2030 from a previous target of 80.9GW and current capacity of 37.9GW, but its renewables rollout continues to be constrained by insufficient transmission capacity upgrades, mainly driven by local opposition. A law to accelerate grid projects came into force on 26 September, but progress is now being held up by local governments, which are reluctant to approve project permits in a bid to maintain positive public opinion ahead of municipal elections in June next year. Persistent grid bottlenecks have increased the country's reliance on gas-fired generation in recent years, as these plants are located close to the main demand centre around Seoul. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

UK gas output continues to defy forecast decline

03/12/25

UK gas output continues to defy forecast decline

London, 3 December (Argus) — Production from the UK continental shelf (UKCS) inched up on the year in September, in contrast to the North Sea Transition authority's (NSTA) projected fall in output this year from last production. Gas output on the UKCS was 71.24mn m³/d in September, NSTA data show, up marginally from 71.17mn m³/d a year earlier. Output was varied across the country's largest production hubs, with higher production at Britannia and Arran balancing the decline at other fields. Production rose significantly on the year at Arran to 2.1mn m³/d in September, up from 0.1mn m³/d a year earlier. Similarly, there was sharp increase at Britannia to 2.1mn m³/d from 0.2mn m³/d a year earlier, because of heavy works in September 2024 at the two fields. Harbour Energy, the operator of the Britannia, experienced an "unusually high number of planned shutdowns" in 2024 . Meanwhile, production declined at the UK's largest fields — Culzean, Elgin, Franklin, Cygnus, Bruce and Tolmount — with the biggest production decrease at Bruce. Bruce production fell to 2.8mn m³/d from 4.4mn m³/d a year earlier. Marginally higher production coupled with lower domestic consumption on the year meant that UKCS output met a larger share of demand than in September 2024. UK demand fell to 107.4mn m³/d in September, from 116.4mn m³/d a year earlier. UK output in September met 66pc of demand, including exports to Ireland at Moffat, up from 61pc a year earlier. Production in 2025 revised up The NSTA increased its projection for production for 2025 and 2026 in its biannual forecast released in November. The NSTA forecast that net gas production will continue its decline, but remain higher than previously forecast in 2025 and 2026. The regulator expects net production of 24.6bn m³ — or 67.4mn m³/d — this year. This is up from its estimation of 24.5bn m³ in March, equivalent to 67.1mn m³/d. The NSTA also revised its net gas production figure for 2026 to 21.3bn m³, up from 21.2bn m³ in the previous forecast (see forecast table) . The NSTA revised its expected decline on the year in 2025 to 9.6pc from the previously projected 10pc. But the decline rate remains unchanged at 12pc for 2026-50. And the NSTA's projections for production in 2025-30 fall by an average of 2.3bn m³/yr. The regulator projects that the average unit cost of gas and crude oil together will increase to £19.80 barrels of oil equivalent (boe) this year, from £19.50/boe in 2025. And it expects this cost to increase in the following years, moving up to £20.80/boe by 2030. In its Autumn Budget, the UK government retained the energy profits levy on oil and gas profits until its scheduled end date of 31 March 2030 . Alongside the budget, the government published its North Sea Future Plan, which outlined that the government will not issue new oil and gas exploration licences in the North Sea, but it will encourage firms to produce gas from areas adjacent to operating fields . Production may surpass 2025 forecast Implied production data suggest that UK production may decline even lower than the revised NSTA forecast states. UKCS production totalled 21bn m³ in January-September. And based on the NSTA's projection of a total production of 24.6bn m³, this leaves 3.6bn m³ to be produced in October-December, or 39.1mn m³/d, based on NSTA data. But implied production — based on gas delivered to the national transmission system — was 79.8mn m³/d in October-November, or 4.87bn m³, already surpassing the projected annual figure for 2025. And if the 9.6pc production decline rate is applied to actual average output of 85.43mn m³/d in October-December 2024, this would equate to an output of 77.23mn m³/d during this period, which also suggests higher total annual production of 28.1bn m³. Operators expect strong production at certain hubs in December, further suggesting potential for production to surpass the NSTA projections. UK North Sea producer Ithaca Energy expects strong production in December on the back of new wells coming on line. An infill campaign at its Cygnus field is continuing, Ithaca said in its third-quarter results earlier this month, with the first of four wells expected to achieve production early this month . Similarly, the operator of the Bruce hub, Serica Energy, said in its third-quarter results last month that it expects strong output from Bruce in the last two months of the year . By Aleksandra Godlewska UK production forecast bn m³ November forecast March forecast October 2024 2024 27.4 27.2 26.3 2025 24.6 24.5 23.6 2026 21.3 21.2 20.3 2027 18.4 18.4 17.5 2028 16.2 15.9 15.6 2029 13.9 13.8 13.7 2030 12.2 11.9 12.1 2031 10.7 10.4 10.8 2032 9.4 9.2 9.7 2033 8.2 8.1 8.7 2034 7.1 6.9 7.5 2035 6.0 5.9 6.5 — NSTA Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Saudi Arabia brings giant Jafurah gas project onstream

03/12/25

Saudi Arabia brings giant Jafurah gas project onstream

Dubai, 3 December (Argus) — Saudi state-controlled Aramco has begun production from the first phase of the giant Jafurah natural gas project, the finance ministry said late on Tuesday. In its 2026 budget statement, the finance ministry listed the phase one start-up as one of Saudi Arabia's achievements in 2025. It didn't specify a date, but it is likely to have been in the past few days. It said production began at 450mn ft³/d, which is two and a half times the rate at which Aramco had long projected. With in-place reserves of 229 trillion ft³ (6.87 trillion m³) of raw gas and 75bn bl of condensate, Jafurah is the largest unconventional gas field in the Mideast Gulf and represents a major pillar of Aramco's ambitious gas expansion plans. Aramco has yet to announce the start up. It previously said it expects to lift sales gas output ꟷ or net production ꟷ to 650mn ft³/d by the end of 2026 in phase one. It is unclear if this stronger-than-anticipated start-up rate could translate into a higher end-2026 target. A second phase is scheduled to come on stream in 2027, to lift production to 2bn ft³/d by the end of the decade, Aramco has said. Aramco has an ambitious programme to expand gas production by more than 80pc by the end of the decade, relative to a 2021 baseline of 9.2bn ft³/d. This implies output of at least 14.7bn ft³/d by 2030, with Jafurah delivering more than one-third of the increase. Jafurah will also produce about 420mn ft³/d of ethane and 630,000 b/d of NGLs and condensate as by-products by 2030. The ethane and NGLs will be sent to the Riyas fractionation plant, which is being built as part of the phase two development. The condensate will be sent to the Juaymah terminal, where Aramco is expanding its storage and export facilities. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more

Germany to abolish gas storage levy from 2026

Political difficulties

Related news posts

US LNG margins tighten on higher Henry Hub prices

US LNG margins tighten on higher Henry Hub prices

Golden Pass LNG approved to receive cool-down cargo

Golden Pass LNG approved to receive cool-down cargo

LNG to fill the gap as Seoul pledges faster coal exit

LNG to fill the gap as Seoul pledges faster coal exit

UK gas output continues to defy forecast decline

UK gas output continues to defy forecast decline

Saudi Arabia brings giant Jafurah gas project onstream

Saudi Arabia brings giant Jafurah gas project onstream

Argus North American Long-Term Electricity Forward Curves

Argus North American Long-Term Electricity Forward Curves

Argus North American Long-Term Electricity Forward Curves

Argus North American Long-Term Electricity Forward Curves

Argus Carbon

Informe Argus Low Carbon Hydrogen Strategy

Argus Hydrogen and Future Fuels

Business intelligence reports