CFTC relaxes proposed position limits on energy

  • Spanish Market: Crude oil, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 05/12/16

The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) today proposed establishing position limits for key contracts for crude, diesel, gasoline and natural gas that are significantly looser than previously contemplated.

But the agency is considering taking a more mixed approach to metals, relaxing restrictions for gold and silver contracts, while adopting tougher limits for platinum, palladium and copper.

Unveiling its surprise, 910-page proposal, the CFTC announced it is considering allowing a company to hold far more contracts in energy commodities before hitting the position limits than in an earlier proposal released in 2013. The revised limits take into account new data on the "deliverable supply" of crude, gasoline, diesel and gasoline in the market that could fulfill the specifications of core NYMEX energy contracts.

The revised position limit for RBOB gasoline, for example, would increase nearly seven-fold to 6,800 contracts for a given spot month while the position limit for light sweet crude would more than triple to 10,400 contracts. The proposal would set a 2,000 contract limit for natural gas that was twice as high as before, while nearly tripling the position limits for ultra-low sulfur diesel to 2,900 contracts.

The proposed limits on energy commodities, set at 25pc of what exchanges say is the deliverable supply in the market, are designed to help prevent manipulative practices such as "corners and squeezes" in energy markets, while also promoting market liquidity. The proposed rule maintains an exemption from the position limits for commercial businesses using energy contracts to hedge against price risks.

The decision to re-propose the position limit rule comes as the agency is poised to flip to Republican control when president-elect Donald Trump takes office.

CFTC chairman Timothy Massad today said he does not want to adopt the regulations, only to then have the agency under new leadership choose not to implement or defend them.

"Our markets and the many end-users and consumers who rely on them are served best by having reasonable and predictable regulation," Massad said. "Uncertainty and inconsistency from one year to the next are not helpful."

The CFTC for the past six years has tried to adopt the position limits to fulfill a mandate in the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law, which ordered the agency to set position limits to guard against "excessive" speculation in energy commodities within 180 days. But a court threw out its first attempt at the rule in 2012, and the agency has been struggling since that time to craft a replacement.

The CFTC today re-proposed its definition of what qualifies as a "bona fide" hedging position that would be exempt from the position limits, such as positions established in good faith prior to the effective date of the eventual regulations. The agency also offered more details on a process for exchanges to recognize exemptions to the position limits rule.

Republican CFTC member Christopher Giancarlo, who could become the next chairman of the agency, has criticized past versions of the position limits rule and pushed the agency to propose them again. Doing so would provide the public a chance to comment on the revised deliverable supply data and other changes, he said. But he offered tentative support for the new rule.

"I feel comfortable that the proposal before us provides the basis for the implementation of a final position limits rule that I could support," Giancarlo said.

Massad today acknowledged the revised position limits might still draw criticism and requests to expand position limits exemptions so they encompass "practically any activity with a business purpose." But Massad said he felt the proposal was balanced and achieved the objectives in Dodd-Frank.

For metals, the proposal would allow traders to hold up to 6,000 contracts in the spot month for gold and 3,000 for silver, twice as many as the earlier proposal. The spot month position limit for platinum would drop to 100 contracts, from 500. The limits for palladium and copper would drop slightly to 500 and 1,000 contracts, respectively.

The CFTC plans to take comment on the new proposal for 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register, meaning the regulation could not be finalized until well into 2017.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

18/04/24

Uganda aims for net zero energy sector by 2062

Uganda aims for net zero energy sector by 2062

Kampala, 18 April (Argus) — Uganda has brought forward its target for net zero carbon emissions from its energy sector by three years, to 2062, energy ministry permanent secretary Irene Batebe told an oil and gas conference in Kampala. This new deadline is still lagging some way behind a 2050 "net zero operations" target pledged by 40 oil and gas firms , including African state-owned ones such as Libya's NOC and Sudan's Nilepet, at the UN Cop 28 climate summit. Signatories to the Cop 28 charter also pledged "near-zero upstream methane emissions" by 2030. Uganda's CO2 emissions from fuel combustion were 5.7mn t in 2021, according to most recent IEA data, but this will probably increase with the development of a 230,000 b/d crude project in its western Lake Albert region. The crude project had been scheduled to begin production in late 2025 — although the head of TotalEnergies' Ugandan operations recently said the company may miss this long-standing target. Batebe said the Ugandan government has plans to increase hydroelectricity capacity to around 52GW by 2050, to increase use of solar wind and nuclear power, and has a budget of $8bn by 2030 to finance these. The IEA estimates hydroelectricity accounts for around 90pc of Uganda's generating capacity. But this installed capacity is only around 1.5GW currently. The country's nuclear ambitions remain at the planning stage, and biomass — wood and charcoal — dominates energy consumption. "We want to phase out use of coal, but… countries that produced oil and gas should get out first and we shall follow," she said. "We cannot afford to remain poor. We shall produce our oil and gas responsibly, use LPG from the [planned] refinery and then connect more than the current 57pc of our population to electricity with affordability to use it for cooking and other uses other than lighting then meet our emissions targets." Batebe said the world's longest heated crude export pipeline, which will connect its oil fields with to the port of Tanga on Tanzania's Indian Ocean coast, will be insulated to "three layers" to limit emissions. TotalEnergies' Ugandan general manager Philippe Groueix said the two Lake Albert projects, Tilenga and Kingfisher, are designed to produce crude at 13kg of CO2/bl, far below the world average of 33 kg/bl. TotalEnergies is developing the 190,000 b/d Tilenga field and and Chinese state-controlled CNOOC the 40,000 b/d Kingfisher. By Mercy Matsiko Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

NSTA fines Neo Energy for North Sea methane venting


18/04/24
18/04/24

NSTA fines Neo Energy for North Sea methane venting

London, 18 April (Argus) — UK offshore regulator the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) has fined UK upstream firm Neo Energy £100,000 for breaching its methane venting permit at North Sea fields. The company emitted 1,200t of methane in excess of its permit from the Donan, Lochranza and Balloch fields in the first nine months of 2022. Neo had permission to vent 378t of methane from installations at these fields in that year, but incorrectly assigned volumes vented through unlit flares to its flaring consent, the NSTA found. Neo showed a "lack of oversight" by failing to detect the licence breach for seven months, NSTA said. The company reached its annual limit by 21 March 2022, but continued venting without authorisation until October 2022. The company said it did not update its flare and vent allocation process to reflect NSTA guidance updated in 2021, and as such was still assigning its flaring and venting according to previous guidance. Neo becomes the fourth company to be fined by the NSTA over breaches relating to flaring and venting consents. The regulator in 2022 sanctioned Equinor and EnQuest and last year fined Spanish utility Repsol for consent breaches. The four companies have been fined a total of £475,000 for the breaches. And the regulator in February had four more investigations under way for breaches of vent consents. Neo Energy's fine is equivalent to £2.98/t of CO2e emitted, assuming a global warming potential of methane that is 28 times that of CO2 on a 100-year time scale, compared with a UK emissions trading system price of £34.40/t of CO2e on 17 April. The UK offshore industry targets a 50pc reduction in production emissions of greenhouse gases by 2030, from a 2018 baseline. And it intends to end all routine venting and flaring by that year. The regulator last year warned that "further, sustained action" would be needed to reach the 2030 emissions reduction goal. Methane emissions from offshore gas fell in recent years, to 1mn t in 2022 from 1.6mn t in 2018, according to NSTA data. Roughly half of methane emissions in the sector in recent years has been produced by venting, while flaring makes up about a quarter of the emissions. The UK government is a member of the Global Methane Pledge group of countries that aims to reduce methane emissions by 30pc by 2030 from a 2020 baseline. By Rhys Talbot Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

UAE air traffic recovery begins after storm disruptions


18/04/24
18/04/24

UAE air traffic recovery begins after storm disruptions

Singapore, 18 April (Argus) — Air traffic at Dubai International (DXB) has begun to recover after an unprecedented storm hit the country on 16 April, although flight delays are expected to continue. "DXB resumed inbound flights of international airlines operating out of terminal 1", a spokesperson for DXB operator Dubai Airports said on 18 April. But it urged travellers not to come to the terminal for outbound flights before confirming their flight status, as it said the access to the terminal is "strictly limited" to guests with confirmed departures. Prolonged flight disruptions at DXB, which was ranked the second-busiest airport in the world in 2023, according to the Airports Council International's preliminary ranking, could affect regional jet fuel demand. Dubai low-cost carrier flydubai said it has now resumed partial operations from DXB, having previously cancelled all of its flights scheduled to depart from Dubai on 16 April evening until 10am on 17 April. Select outbound flights were to operate from DXB's terminal 2 with scheduled operations resuming after 8pm on 17 April, it said, while flights from terminal 3 were due to resume after midnight. But Dubai-owned Emirates Airlines has extended the suspension on check-in for passengers departing DXB until 9am on 18 April, after having initially suspending it between 8am and midnight on 17 April. The airline said the extension was because of "continued operational challenges caused by bad weather and road conditions". Neighbouring Abu Dhabi's Zayed international airport said it is "operating smoothly", despite issuing a warning on 17 April that some flights might be delayed. By Ieva Paldaviciute Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US reimposes Venezuela oil sanctions


17/04/24
17/04/24

US reimposes Venezuela oil sanctions

Washington, 17 April (Argus) — The US administration today reimposed sanctions targeting Venezuela's oil exports and energy sector investments and set a deadline of 31 May for most foreign companies to wind down business with state-owned PdV. The US decision rescinds a sanctions waiver issued last October, which allowed Venezuela to sell oil freely to any buyer and to invite foreign investment in the country's energy sector. The waiver, which was due to expire on 18 April, was tied to Caracas' agreement to hold a competitive presidential election and to allow opposition politicians to contest it. Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro's government reneged on that deal by refusing to register leading opposition candidate Maria Corina Machado or an alternative candidate designated by her, a senior US official said. The US considered the potential effects on global energy markets and other factors in its decision, but "fundamentally, the decision was based on the actions and non-actions of the Venezuelan authorities," the official said. The separate waivers granted to Chevron and to oil field service companies Halliburton, SLB, Baker Hughes and Weatherford will remain in place. Chevron will be allowed to continue lifting oil from its joint venture with PdV, solely for imports into the US. US-bound Venezuelan crude volumes averaged 133,000 b/d last year. Chevron said its Venezuela output was 150,000 b/d at the end of 2023. Argus estimated Venezuela's crude output at 850,000 b/d in March, up by 150,000 b/d on the year. PdV said it will seek to change terms of its nine active joint ventures , starting with Spain's Repsol, in an effort to boost production. The reimposition of sanctions will primarily affect Venezuelan exports to India and China. India has emerged as a major new destination for Venezuelan crude since the US lifted sanctions in October, importing 152,000 b/d in March. There are two more Venezuelan cargoes heading to India and are expected to arrive before the 31 May deadline. The VLCC Caspar left the Jose terminal on 14 March and was expected to arrive at a yet-unknown west coast Indian port on 26 April. The Suezmax Tinos left Venezuela on 18 March and was due at Sikka on 30 April. By contrast, Chinese imports of Venezuelan Merey, often labeled as Malaysian diluted bitumen, have been lower since October. Independent refiners in Shandong, which benefited from wide discounts on the sanctioned Venezuelan crude, cut back imports to just a fraction of pre-relief levels. By contrast, state-controlled PetroChina was able to resume imports. The Merey discount to Brent already widened in anticipation of a possible reimposition of US sanctions. Reprieve expected for European companies Separate US authorizations previously issued to Repsol and to Italy's Eni to allow oil-for-debt deals with PdV and to enable a Shell project to import natural gas from Venezuela's Dragon field to Trinidad and Tobago are expected to remain in place. The US sanctions enforcers as a rule do not disclose the terms of private sanctions licenses, and the European companies were not immediately available to comment. The US would still consider future requests for sanctions waivers for specific energy projects, another senior official said. Repsol imported 23,000 b/d of Venezuelan crude into Spain last year and 29,000 b/d so far this year, according to Vortexa data. The last cargo to arrive was on 15 April. Hope springs eternal The US administration says it will consider lifting the sanctions again if Maduro's government allows opposition candidates to participate in the July presidential election. The US action today "should not be viewed as a final decision that we no longer believe Venezuela can hold competitive and inclusive elections," a third senior official said. "We will continue to engage with all stakeholders, including Maduro representatives, the democratic opposition, civil society and the international community to support the Venezuelan people's efforts to ensure a better future for Venezuela." By Haik Gugarats and Kuganiga Kuganeswaran Chinese imports of Venezuelan crude Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US House advances Ukraine, Israel aid bills


17/04/24
17/04/24

US House advances Ukraine, Israel aid bills

Washington, 17 April (Argus) — The Republican-controlled US House of Representatives is preparing to advance a bill to extend military and economic aid to Ukraine, as Kyiv has complained about critical shortages of ammunition on the battlefield and has resorted to aerial attacks against refineries in Russia. The House is also advancing a separate bill to extend military aid to Israel and to pay for the rising cost of US operations in the Middle East, including the cost of providing maritime protection from the Houthi attacks on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. Yet another bill would extend military aid to Taiwan and other US partners and allies in the Indo-Pacific region. The US Senate in February approved a bill providing around $60bn in military aid for Ukraine, $14bn for Israel, and $9bn in humanitarian aid to Gaza and other global crisis spots. House speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) has, in effect, deconstructed the Senate bill into individual components in an effort to facilitate their passage in a chamber where his party has a two seat majority and the Republican lawmakers allied with former president Donald Trump oppose aid to Ukraine. In an effort to secure the Republican caucus' assent to the three foreign aid bills, Johnson is also planning to advance a separate bill including a hodgepodge of his party's policy priorities, such as a ban on social media network TikTok and sanctions against Iran. Yet another bill would advance draconian restrictions on immigration and strengthen the security of the US-Mexico border. None of the bills released today would require President Joe Biden to reconsider his pause on the issuance of new LNG export licenses. Johnson's legislative proposal has immediately drawn opposition from some members of his party, two of which said they would move to oust him as speaker. Johnson assumed his position after his predecessor Kevin McCarthy was ousted in October following a compromise government funding deal with House Democrats. "Every true conservative America First patriot in the House should vote against the rule for this borrowed foreign aid bill with no border security!" congressman Bob Good (R-Virginia) said via X social network. The foreign aid bills will have to have the backing of the Democratic caucus and a sufficient number of Republicans in order to pass. Biden said he supports the three foreign aid bills proposed by Johnson. "The House must pass the package this week and the Senate should quickly follow," Biden said. The majority-Democratic Senate leaders likewise have signaled willingness to consider separate aid bills so long as those do not significantly differ from the version passed by the Senate. The only major differences in the House version of the Ukraine aid bill is a requirement that the US provide no more than 50pc of the total economic assistance extended to Ukraine by western countries, as well as a requirement for Ukraine to repay the $9.5bn in direct economic support under the bill. Congress since February 2022 has allocated $114bn in aid to Ukraine, including $66bn for military supplies. The EU in the same period has allocated $150bn to Ukraine, mostly in economic support. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more