CO2 cost could raise bunker price 25pc

  • Spanish Market: Emissions, Oil products
  • 18/01/19

The implementation of a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gas emissions from marine shipping could boost shipowners' bunker bills by 25pc at current price levels.

Shipping emissions of CO2 are not currently regulated, although the European Union (EU) has proposed plans to cover the sector.

Under the EU's Emission Trading System (ETS), companies receive or buy emission allowances, which they can trade with one another. In December, Argus-assessed ETS CO2-equivalent emission at $25.709/t, published in Argus' European Emissions Markets report. Since there are about 3.0-3.3t of CO2 in each tonne of marine fuel burned, CO2 emissions fees will raise the price of marine fuel by $77.13-84.84/t if the same ETS formula was adopted for marine shipping. Argus assessed high-sulphur 380cst bunkers at $342.68/t delivered in Rotterdam in December. In this instance, if ETS is applied, the bunker price would increase by about 24pc to about $426/t.

The latest emissions data from Maersk showed the Danish shipowner emitting 35.92mn t of CO2 equivalent in 2017. Assuming an ETS is implemented and Maersk's CO2 allowance is capped at half of its emissions, or 17.96mn t, then for the other half of its emissions at $25.709/t for CO2 equivalent, Maersk would be paying $461.74mn in CO2-equivalent fees.

There have been a number of options floated to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping, some of which shipowners have already implemented because they are economically feasible, including using fuel efficient vessels and traveling at lower speed. Some ports have given financial incentives to shipowners who choose to plug in their vessels into the ports' electrical grids to power their auxiliary engines instead of burning fuel while docked. Some shipowners have employed LNG, methanol or biofuels for bunkering.

But some economists believe that charging shipowners for CO2 emissions could be the biggest incentive for curbing those emisisons. In a working paper published in September 2018, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) examined carbon taxation on marine fuels. One of the scenarios explored included implementing a tax of $7.50/t of CO2 in 2021 and increasing the tax annually by $7.50/t, thus raising it to $75/t of CO2 by 2030 and to $150/t of CO2 by 2040.

The reduction of maritime shipping greenhouse emissions was omitted from the Paris Agreement in 2015, leaving it in the hands of the International Maritime Organisation's (IMO) Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC), which oversees global marine fuel regulations. Environmental groups have criticized the IMO for acting slowly on GHG reduction measures.

At its meeting in October 2018, MEPC did not agree on specific greenhouse gas action. At its next meeting in May 2019, IMO is considering an initial strategy to cut global shipping sector emissions by at least half by 2050 compared with 2008 levels. If the IMO does not deliver an international shipping deal by 2021, the EU has said it could include shipping emissions in its ETS from 2023. European shipowners largely oppose the EU's ETS plan, because they will be subjected to higher bunker costs compared with their international competition.

Since most ports, countries and shipowners do not collect or report bunker data, comprehensive information on global marine fuel sales has been limited. The first step to reducing emissions would be to collect data on bunker consumption and analyze it. Starting on 1 January 2018, the EU required vessels 5,000 gross tonnes (gt) and above calling ports in EU countries as well as Norway and Iceland to collect and report their bunker consumption to the EU. The data is compiled by the European Maritime Safety Agency and will be published every year starting in June 2019.

The IMO also began requiring vessels to collect bunker consumption data one year after the EU on 1 January 2019. The data collection applies to vessels 5,000gt and above, on all international voyages. The data is reported to the vessel's flag country, which in turn reports it to the IMO. The IMO will summarize the data in annual reports.

EU emission trading scheme CO2-equivalent $/t

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

New ISO 8217 eyes wider scope for alternative fuels


24/04/24
24/04/24

New ISO 8217 eyes wider scope for alternative fuels

London, 24 April (Argus) — The 7th edition of ISO 8217, to be published in the second quarter of this year, will outline a broader integration of marine biodiesel blending, delegates heard at the International Bunker Conference (IBC) 2024 in Norway. Tim Wilson, principal specialist fuels of Lloyds Register's fuel oil bunkering analysis and advisory service (FOBAS), presented on the upcoming iteration of the ISO 8217 marine fuel specification standard, which will be released at IBC 2024. The new edition will incorporate specification standards for a wide range of fatty acid methyl ester (Fame)-based marine biodiesel blends up to B100, 100pc hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), as well as synthetic and renewable marine fuels. This will also include additional clauses to cover a wider scope, and briefly touch on biodiesel specifications that do not entirely align with road biodiesel EN-14214 specifications. This follows the emergence of widening price spreads for marine biodiesel blends because of specification differences and the lack of a marine-specific standard for the blends. The new edition of ISO 8217 is also expected to remove the limit of 7pc Fame when blended with distillate marine fuels such as marine gasoil (MGO) which was in place in the previous ISO 8217:2017. Other changes to distillate marine biodiesel blends include changes to the minimum Cetane Index, oxidation stability alignment to be connected to either ISO 15751 for blends comprising 2pc or more of Fame biodiesel and ISO 12205 for blends comprising a Fame component of under 2pc. Cold-filter plugging point (CFPP) properties will be determined by the vessel's fuel storage tanks' heating capabilities and requirements will be set in place to report the CFPP for distillate marine biodiesel grades, according to the new edition of the marine fuel specification standard. Wilson said that a minimum kinematic viscosity at 50°C will be in place for various forms of residual bunker fuel oil along with a viscosity control alerting suppliers to inform buyers of the exact viscosity in the supplied fuel. He said they have seen delivered fuel viscosity come in at much lower levels than ordered by the buyers, which was the reasoning behind the viscosity control monitoring requirement. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Peninsula eyes B100 marine fuel supply in Barcelona


24/04/24
24/04/24

Peninsula eyes B100 marine fuel supply in Barcelona

London, 24 April (Argus) — Marine fuel supplier and trader Peninsula has added a chemical tanker to its fleet in Barcelona, with a view to supply the port with B100 marine biodiesel. Aalborg meets chemical tanker regulations under the International Maritime Organisation (IMO)'s International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Annex II. This means the tanker can supply marine biodiesel blends containing up to 100pc fatty acid methyl ester (Fame), which conventional oil tankers are unable to do . Oil tankers and barges are limited to up to 25pc Fame. Peninsula added that the Aalborg is also used to supply conventional fossil bunker fuels such as very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and marine gasoil (MGO). It is yet to complete a B100 delivery in Barcelona. Market participants pointed to limited demand for B100 in the Mediterranean, but regulatory changes such as the introduction of FuelEU maritime next year may help to support demand for marine biodiesel blends. By Hussein Al-Khalisy Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US-led carbon initiative misses launch date


23/04/24
23/04/24

US-led carbon initiative misses launch date

Houston, 23 April (Argus) — The Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA), a global initiative to use voluntary carbon market revenue to speed the decarbonization of developing countries' power sectors, has missed its planned Earth Day launch but continues to prepare for doing business. At the Cop 28 climate conference in Dubai last year, the initiative's leaders said they hoped to formally launch the program on 22 April 2024 . That didn't happen, but the program's leaders last week announced that the US climate think tank Center for Climate and Energy Solutions will serve as the ETA's new secretariat and that former US special presidential envoy for climate John Kerry will serve as the honorary chair of an eight-member senior consultative group that will advise the ETA's design and operations. The ETA plans to spend 2024 "building" on a framework for crediting projects they released last year. ETA leaders said the initiative could ultimately generate tens of billions of dollars in finances through 2035. The ETA also said the Dominican Republic had formed a government working group to "guide its engagement" as a potential pilot country for investments and that the Philippines would formally participate as an "observer country" rather than as a direct participant immediately. The ETA is still engaging Chile and Nigeria as potential pilot countries too, the initiative told Argus . The ETA is being developed by the US State Department, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Bezos Earth Fund and would be funded with money from the voluntary carbon market. The initiative's ultimate goal is to allow corporate and government offset buyers to help developing countries decarbonize their power sectors through large projects that accelerate the retirement of coal-fired power plants and build new renewable generation. As of now, the ETA's timeline for future changes and negotiations with countries and companies is unclear. The program's goals are ambitious, especially at a time when scrutiny of some voluntary carbon market projects from environmentalists has weighed on corporate offset demand. By Mia Westley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

USGC LNG-VLSFO discount to steady itself


23/04/24
23/04/24

USGC LNG-VLSFO discount to steady itself

New York, 23 April (Argus) — The premium for US Gulf coast (USGC) very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) to LNG is expected to linger but not widen this spring, maintaining interest in LNG as a bunkering fuel. US Gulf coast LNG prices slipped from a premium to a discount to VLSFO in March 2023 and have remained there since. The discount surpassed 200/t VLSFO-equivalent in January (see chart). Both LNG and VLSFO prices are expected to remain under downward pressure due to high inventories, which could keep the current LNG discount steady. The US winter natural gas withdrawal season ended with 39pc more natural gas in storage compared with the five-year average, according to the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Henry Hub natural gas monthly average prices dropped below $2/mmBtu in February, for the first time since September 2020, Argus data showed. The EIA expects the US will produce less natural gas on average in the second and third quarter of 2024 compared with the first quarter of 2024. Despite lower production, the US will have the most natural gas in storage on record when the winter withdrawal season begins in November, says the EIA. As a result, the agency forecasts the Henry Hub spot price to average less than $2/mmBtu in the second quarter before "increasing slightly" in the third quarter. EIA's forecast for all of 2024 averages about $2.20/mmBtu. US Gulf coast VLSFO is facing downward price pressure as demand falls and increased refinery activity signals a potential supply build . Rising Gulf coast refinery activity was likely behind some of the drop in prices. Gulf coast refinery utilization last week rose to 91.4pc, the highest in 12 weeks and up by 0.9 percentage points from the prior week. US Gulf coast suppliers are also eyeing strong fuel oil price competition from eastern hemisphere ports such as Singapore and Zhoushan, China, importing cheap Russian residual fuel oil. In general, LNG's substantial discount to VLSFO has kept interest in LNG for bunkering from ship owners with LNG-burning vessels high. The EIA discontinued publishing US bunker sales statistics with the last data available for 2020. But data from the Singapore Maritime & Port Authority, where the LNG–VLSFO discount widened to over $200/t VLSFOe in February, showed Singapore LNG for bunkering demand increase 11.4 times to 75,900t in the first quarter compared with 6,700t in the first quarter of 2023 and 110,900t for full year 2022. By Stefka Wechsler US Gulf coast LNG vs VLSFO $/t VLSFOe Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more