Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Combustível do Futuro deve avançar rápido, diz Abicom

  • Spanish Market: Biofuels, Natural gas
  • 27/02/24

A Câmara dos Deputados deve aprovar rapidamente o projeto de lei (PL) Combustível do Futuro, disse o presidente da Associação Brasileira de Importadores de Combustíveis (Abicom), Sérgio Araújo, à Argus.

Nesta segunda-feira, o deputado federal Arnaldo Jardim (Cidadania-SP), relator do projeto, apresentou um relatório com mudanças no texto original.

"A demora excessiva para soltar o relatório me faz acreditar que ele [Jardim] já tenha divulgado um relatório costurado e amarrado com os principais decisores – incluindo os ministérios de Minas e Energia e da Agricultura", contou Araújo, acrescentando que o deputado é muito influente no Congresso.

Recentemente, o Combustível do Futuro também foi apensado a um projeto semelhante de autoria do deputado Alceu Moreira, que corre em caráter emergencial e pode facilitar a tramitação do pacote verde.

"Acho que o relatório está pronto para ser votado, principalmente na Câmara, e ser aprovado rapidamente", disse o presidente da Abicom à Argus.

O texto precisa ser aprovado pelas duas casas do Congresso e sancionado pelo presidente Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva para ser transformado em lei. Mas é provável que o PL enfrente um debate maior no Senado, Araújo afirmou.

A aceitação do relatório não é unânime no setor de combustíveis fósseis, já que que os principais consumidores de diesel, como a Confederação Nacional do Transporte (CNT) e a Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores (Anfavea), não estão satisfeitos com a adição do aumento do mandato de mistura do biodiesel na revisão proposta por Jardim, apontou Araújo.

"Deve acontecer uma reação bem forte dos principais consumidores, como as distribuidoras", ele acrescentou.

A última versão do projeto inclui o biodiesel no escopo e estabelece um cronograma de elevação anual do percentual de adição obrigatória no período de 2025 a 2030, de modo a chegar em 20pc e subir para 25pc a partir de 2031. Atualmente, a mescla do biocombustível no diesel está em 12pc.

O texto revisado também propõe a instituição do Programa Nacional do Biometano e abre espaço para elevar o percentual obrigatório do etanol anidro na gasolina dos atuais 27,5pc para 35pc, após testes de viabilidade técnica.

O governo Lula apresentou o PL pela primeira vez em setembro, como parte de esforços de transição energética para expandir o uso de combustíveis renováveis e reduzir emissões.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

14/02/25

Lack of tariff details worry US energy markets

Lack of tariff details worry US energy markets

Washington, 14 February (Argus) — Uncertainty over potential tariffs on US imports from Canada and Mexico is already roiling North American energy trade, as trading desks struggle to understand how tariffs would be assessed and some buyers are unwilling to commit to taking March cargoes without more details. US president Donald Trump's planned 10pc tariff on energy commodity imports from Canada and a 25pc import tax on Mexican energy was originally set for 4 February but he postponed implementation until 4 March. The three governments are negotiating to avert a full-blown trade war, and many market participants are hoping that Trump would again delay their implementation after winning some concessions, as he did earlier this month. But even without tariffs in place, vast segments of the energy industry — oil and gas producers, refiners, pipeline operators, traders — are bracing for them. Energy trade across North America has been tariff-free for decades. Trump during his first term terminated the 1994 North America Free Trade Agreement, but replaced it with the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement in 2020 that kept the energy trade terms unchanged. The sudden imposition of tariffs after decades of free trade could create legal uncertainty in contractual obligations related to the payment of tariffs and reporting requirements, law firm Vinson & Elkins partner Jason Fleischer told Argus . "It's been a long time since oil and gas pipelines have really had to deal with anything quite like this." At least one large Canadian refiner attempted to pass along the tariff to gasoline cargo buyers in the US ahead of the original 4 February start date, leading a few buyers to threaten to pull out of their contracts, market sources told Argus . Complicating the matter is the approach taken by the Trump administration to impose import taxes differs greatly from current trade terms. The regular US customs duties on crude, for example, are currently set in volumetric terms, at 5.25¢/bl and 10.5¢/bl depending on crude quality. In practice, nearly every source of US crude imports is exempt from tariffs at present. But the import tax set out in Trump's executive orders is to be imposed on the value of the commodity — without specifying how that will be calculated and at what specific point during the transportation process. Likewise, guidance on the new tariffs from the US Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), given just before the original 4 February deadline, did not address the specific issues relating to the energy commodities. CBP and the Treasury Department will have to issue regulations spelling out specific details on how tariffs are to be assessed and collected, Vinson & Elkins partner Jeff Jakubiak said. "The advice we're giving to companies is to collect information and get ready to provide it to the government at some point in the future," Jakubiak said. If tariffs go into effect, "there is likely to be a combination of reporting obligations by the transporter as well as the owner of the commodity. And in both cases, my advice is, figure out how you can accurately count and assign volumes that are moving across the border and figure out how you would price those." Market effects also uncertain The uncertainty over the timing and details of implementation of tariffs have left the affected market participants having to guess who will carry the burden of new taxes. The discount for Western Canadian Select (WCS) crude at Hardisty, Alberta, to the CMA Nymex WTI contract widened on the eve of the initial 4 February deadline of tariffs, suggesting that market participants expected Canadian producers to bear the brunt of tariffs. But over time, that burden likely will shift depending on individual market power of buyers and sellers. This could hit refiners in the US midcontinent that currently rely on WCS and have few alternatives to taking Canadian crude. They could, in turn, pass on the additional costs to consumers at the pump. US independent refiner PBF Energy said this week that tariffs would likely cut US midcon refinery runs , even if those refiners could find alternatives to Canadian crudes. Most Mexico-sourced crude markets are seaborne, giving producers in that country an alternative to US markets. "For this scenario, we anticipate [US Gulf coast] refiners will reduce consumption to the lower limit of their contractual obligations but will continue to purchase Mexican crude and pay the tariff via reduced refining margins," investment bank Macquarie said in a recent note to clients. Canadian producers also expressed concern about the uncertain impact of tariffs on crude volumes trans-shipped through the US, either for exports to third country destinations from Gulf coast ports or transported on US pipelines to destinations in eastern Canada. Without guidance from the US customs authorities, it is not clear if such flows would be subject to new US tariffs. Integrated oil sands producer Suncor's refineries on the Canadian east coast rely on crude flows from Enbridge's 540,000 b/d Line 5 or 500,000 b/d Line 78 that cross into the US in Michigan before crossing back into Canada. "I would say that I don't know that anyone on the planet knows exactly what's going to happen on tariffs," chief executive Rich Kruger said. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Mexico’s Sierra Madre pipeline faces permit hurdles


14/02/25
14/02/25

Mexico’s Sierra Madre pipeline faces permit hurdles

Mexico City, 14 February (Argus) — Gas supply to Mexico's largest LNG terminal is in question as security concerns and community opposition threaten the Sierra Madre pipeline's progress. Mexico Pacific's 48-inch, 800km (497 mi) pipeline, when completed, will transport up to 2.8 Bcf/d of natural gas from Texas' Waha Basin to Mexico Pacific's Saguaro LNG terminal in Puerto Libertad, Sonora state. The terminal, under construction, is expected to reach 30mn tonnes (t)/yr capacity over two phases — nearly half the combined output of Mexico's six Pacific LNG projects. Mexico Pacific says the first three 5mn t/yr trains will be completed in 2025, with all federal, state and municipal permits secured. But the pipeline still lacks key state and municipal approvals. "The terminal has all its permits," said Miriam Grunstein, a former advisor to the energy regulatory commission CRE. "But some pipeline permits will be tough to secure." Both the terminal and pipeline have strong federal and state backing. In October, Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum publicly praised Mexico Pacific's planned $15bn investment. The company also signed agreements with Chihuahua and Sonora state governments and national power utility CFE to channel investments into social, security and infrastructure projects. "The pipeline is likely to get state permits," Grunstein said, "but political opposition is real." While Sheinbaum's Morena Party dominates congress, Chihuahua governor Maria Eugenia Campos belongs to the opposition party PAN, and the centrist PRI still holds sway in northern states. "The PAN and PRI could try to block the project to weaken Morena," Grunstein said. Security is another major hurdle. "Border projects need military protection," said Eduardo Prud'homme, former technical director at Mexico's state pipeline operator Cenagas, citing threats from criminal organizations trafficking drugs and migrants. The pipeline's route runs near the Altar desert, a federally protected area used by human traffickers. Clashes with drug gangs and armed human traffickers could escalate after Sheinbaum pledged to deploy thousands of National Guard troops to the border in talks with US president Donald Trump, Grunstein said. The last time Mexico waged direct war on cartels — during the 2006-2012 administration of former president Felipe Calderon — it resulted in over 120,000 homicides and 27,000 disappearances in six years, according to government data. Durazo's 'Plan Sonora' Sonora governor Alfonso Durazo has privately committed to securing the Sierra Madre project, Grunstein said, while Chihuahua's Campos "has been silent on the issue." "For Durazo, the stakes are high," she said. "It's part of ‘Plan Sonora,' his administration's flagship project, and he'll push to start construction this year." Launched in 2022, Plan Sonora aims to establish a cross-border lithium battery supply chain, with a state-owned company managing lithium extraction. A new 1GW CFE solar plant will support the industry, but natural gas from Sierra Madre remains key in the transition. Environmental opposition could further complicate matters. Over 30 civil groups have protested the LNG project's impact on the Gulf of California's biodiversity, organizing rallies and gathering 200,000 signatures. Their formal complaints date back to former president Andres Manuel López Obrador's administration, but Sheinbaum— an environmental scientist — has yet to address them. Indigenous resistance may pose the biggest challenge. Mexico Pacific is likely just beginning the legally required consultation process. "Mexico has struggled to secure indigenous approvals for pipelines," Grunstein said. "The Tula-Tuxpan pipeline was delayed over six years because of opposition. This could trigger even greater resistance." By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Central eastern Europe’s gas flows switch west to east


14/02/25
14/02/25

Central eastern Europe’s gas flows switch west to east

London, 14 February (Argus) — Strong import demand in Ukraine and Moldova has shifted regional pricing dynamics and driven a switch to west-to-east gas flows in central and eastern Europe. Outflows from Slovakia, Poland and Hungary to Ukraine surged to a combined high of 267GWh on 13 February, after Ukraine's Naftogaz started issuing tenders for additional gas on a day-ahead basis on top of previous balance-of-month bookings. Combined outflows at these points were only 30 GWh/d on 1-5 February, but they stepped up significantly afterwards as the weather turned much colder and continued attacks on Ukrainian gas production infrastructure significantly reduced domestic output ( see flows graph ). And capacity bookings suggest flows will remain strong. Firms have booked 78 GWh/d at Budince on the Slovak border and 54.1 GWh/d at Bereg on the Hungarian border for the rest of February and may continue to top this up with day-ahead or within-day reservations. After including receipts from Isaccea in Romania and some transit through Moldova, Ukrainian inflows reached as high as 274GWh on 13 February. But at least some of this gas exited Ukraine again to end up in Moldova, particularly when EU-funded imports to the Transnistrian region ended and Moldovagaz took over supply obligations on 11-13 February. Trading firm Met will supply gas to Moldova from today onwards, probably through Bereg on the Ukrainian border rather than the previously-used route through Isaccea. After taking into account all of these border flows, Ukrainian net imports reached 229GWh on 13 February, by far the highest this month. With Ukrainian gas storage withdrawals at nearly full capacity , any additional upward flexibility needed in the system will have to come from higher imports. Higher Ukrainian and Moldovan import demand has not just flipped flows at these countries' borders, but has also drawn in gas from further west. Physical gas flows at Baumgarten on the Slovak-Austrian border flipped towards Slovakia on 12-13 February for the first time since one day in December last year, and before that in December 2020. The end of Russian gas transit through Ukraine, which moved Russian gas across Slovakia to Austria, made the switch more feasible but was still a reversal of average net outflows to Austria of 12 GWh/d on 1-11 February. And flows from Austria to Hungary at Mosonmagyarovar have stepped up significantly since 7 February, averaging 56 GWh/d on 7-13 February against nearly zero earlier in the month. Mosonmagyarovar was little used since the start of last year, having previously carried Russian gas transited through Ukraine to Hungary, as well as spot purchases when economical. And while Oberkappel on the German border had already been flowing towards Austria since the start of this month, net inflows jumped to 109 GWh/d on 7-13 February from 52 GWh/d earlier this month. Significant changes to regional gas price differentials have incentivised this reorientation of flows in central and eastern Europe. The Hungarian and Slovak day-ahead markets each have held a consistent premium to Austria since 6 February, having been at a small discount earlier this month and at larger €1.92/MWh and €0.93/MWh discounts, respectively, in January. Naftogaz has bought the majority of its gas from Slovakia and Hungary, driving up prompt prices to a premium to other neighbouring markets. The Slovak day-ahead market's premium to Austria peaked at €1.40/MWh on 13 February, while Hungary's premium reached €2.64/MWh on 11 February ( see price graph ). By Brendan A'Hearn Ukrainian flows in February GWh HU, SK day-ahead prices vs AT €/MWh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Biomethanol-methanol diff widens, UK demand ticks up


14/02/25
14/02/25

Biomethanol-methanol diff widens, UK demand ticks up

London, 14 February (Argus) — The spread between biomethanol and conventional methanol is the highest in more than nine months, at $734/t. This is partly driven by falling European methanol prices, with the methanol fob Rotterdam barge quote hitting $348.97/t on 12 February, the lowest since 7 August. Increased imports from the US, and the restart of a 900,000 t/yr capacity European plant have put downward pressure on prices. Biomethanol values ticked higher in recent sessions, tracking gains in the wider biofuels complex after record low values for renewable fuel tickets — tradeable credits generated primarily by the sale of biofuel-blended fuels — in major European demand centres in 2024. European demand for biofuels in 2025 could be supported by a combination of higher mandates for the use of renewables in transport, and by changes to regulations on the carryover of renewable fuels tickets in Germany and in the Netherlands . UK biomethanol prices and demand rise In the UK, the Argus cif biomethanol price has averaged $1,110/t so far in February, a $22/t increase from January and a $60/t rise from the September 2024 average, when prices hit a record low. The price averaged around $1,094/t in February last year. Prices have been in part supported by stronger renewable fuel ticket prices (RTFCs) in the UK recently, according to market participants. UK 2025 non-crop RTFCs averaged 25.45p in the first quarter of 2025 so far, an increase of 1.88p when compared with the previous quarter. Demand picked up in the UK and the wider European market, including from voluntary sectors, at the beginning of the year, participants said. Biomethanol is used as a gasoline blending component in the UK. Consumption in the country in 2024 rose by 45pc on the year but was lower by 7.9pc than in 2022 at 58mn litres, according to the third provisional release of the 2024 Renewable Transport Fuel Obligation statistics. The Argus biomethanol fob Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) netback quote was $1,083/t on 12 February. FuelEU fuels demand The January rollout of the FuelEU Maritime regulations could increase demand for biomethanol in shipping. Ship operators traveling in to, out of and within EU territorial waters must reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity on a lifecycle basis by 2pc. The reduction rises to 6pc from 2030 and gradually reaches 80pc by 2050. Shipping companies can choose from a range of alternative marine fuels to reduce their emissions. Only dedicated ships can run on methanol alone, but many companies, including Maersk , have ordered dual-fuel vessels that can run on methanol and traditional bunker fuels, along with biofuel blends like B24 — a mix of very-low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO) and used cooking oil methyl ester (Ucome) biodiesel. International offtake agreements for renewable methanol are also on the rise. Maersk has signed several letters of intent for procurement of biomethanol and e-methanol from producers including Equinor , Proman and OCI Global , and has an agreement with Danish shipping and logistics company Goldwind for 500,000 t/yr from 2024. Biomethanol and e-methanol are likely to be the most competitive and scalable pathways to decarbonisation this decade, Maersk said . While relatively small, Maersk's 'green marine' fuel consumption, which includes biomethanol, increased by 38pc in 2024 to 3,034 GWh. Singaporean container shipping group X-Press Feeders said it will buy biomethanol from OCI's Texas plant starting from 2024. Biomethanol bunker sales in the port of Rotterdam dropped by more than half in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared with the third quarter, to 930t, but sales were 86pc higher than those in the fourth quarter of 2023, according to Port of Rotterdam data . UDB risk to biomethanol imports The European Commission's proposal to exclude automatic certification of biomethane and biomethane-based fuels from the Union Database for Biofuels, if relying on natural gas that has been transported through grids outside the EU, has been slowing some negotiations for 2025 biomethanol imports — particularly from the US — according to market participants. Industry bodies have expressed concerns about implementation of the database, particularly that it will impede the bloc's biomethane development. Burdensome fees, overly strict deadlines, risk of double counting, and a significantly increased number of participants required to enter data will slow market growth, said the European Compost Network and the European Waste Management Association. They recommend mandatory use of the UDB be postponed until 1 January 2026 "at the earliest". By Evelina Lungu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US reciprocal tariffs could hit Brazilian ethanol


13/02/25
13/02/25

US reciprocal tariffs could hit Brazilian ethanol

New York, 13 February (Argus) — Brazil's growing ethanol industry is a likely target for "reciprocal" US tariffs that President Donald Trump plans to impose on products from countries that he says discriminate against US imports. In announcing the plan Thursday to raise US import tariffs to the same level foreign countries charge on US exports, Trump did not specify which countries and products would face the new levies. But a White House fact sheet specifically mentions Brazil's treatment of US ethanol as an unfair practice worth addressing. "The US tariff on ethanol is a mere 2.5pc. Yet Brazil charges the US ethanol exports a tariff of 18pc," the White House said. The US produces more ethanol than any other country, almost all derived from corn. Brazil, the world's second largest ethanol producer, largely uses sugarcane as a feedstock but has a fast-growing corn ethanol industry, too. The disparity in tariff rates has long frustrated US producers, who have become reliant on export markets since ethanol's growth in the US is limited by rising vehicle fuel efficiency, electric vehicle adoption and regulatory constraints on higher blends. The US exported more than 1.9bn USG of ethanol last year according to the Renewable Fuels Association, an all-time high. Renewable Fuels Association general counsel Ed Hubbard told Argus last week that his organization raised the issue of Brazilian tariffs with Trump transition staffers, and the office of senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said he discussed the same at a recent meeting with Jamieson Greer, Trump's nominee to be US trade representative. Greer said at a recent Senate hearing that Brazil's tariff on US ethanol was among his top priorities. Federal agencies are planning to review trade disparities and report back by 1 April, potentially giving countries like Brazil some time to consider policy changes that might avoid tariffs. Hubbard said he sees the threat of tariffs as a tool to bring Brazil back to the negotiating table on reducing its own restrictions, potentially allowing more US ethanol to enter the country and meet increasingly ambitious national targets for biofuel adoption. At the same time, Brazil could negotiate for changes to US trade barriers, such as a tariff rate quota system for sugar imports and a new 25pc tariff on steel and aluminum imports. If the US does ultimately increase taxes on Brazilian ethanol, trade flows might not change much in the near term. Ethanol trade between the two countries has already dropped off significantly, and the US is oversupplied with renewable fuels used to meet federal blend mandates. While essentially all foreign ethanol in the US is from Brazil, the US imported less fuel ethanol in 2024 than in at least 30 years. But new tariffs would hurt LanzaJet, a US biofuel producer with a plant that imports Brazilian ethanol and refines it into sustainable aviation fuel (SAF). While the company says it can and does use other feedstocks, federal and state clean fuel programs treat Brazilian sugarcane ethanol as lower-carbon. LanzaJet thus earns larger subsidies for producing fuel from sugarcane ethanol than if it used more corn ethanol, which is generally too carbon-intensive to qualify for a new US biofuel tax credit. "Tariffs impacting nascent industries like SAF will undoubtedly hurt the United States' potential to continue to lead in this space — limiting our ability to import necessary resources and export our own for the global market, given aviation is a global industry," LanzaJet vice president for corporate affairs Meg Whitty said. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more