Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest Market News

Von der Leyen faces new Green Deal challenges

  • Spanish Market: Biofuels, Electricity, Hydrogen, Natural gas
  • 19/07/24

The president promises a ‘clean industrial deal', but will need to make compromises over climate policy, writes Dafydd ab Iago

Ursula von der Leyen's re-election by the European Parliament as president of the European Commission on 18 July promises to see a doubling down on climate and energy policy, with her 2024-29 mandate stipulating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cuts of at least 90pc by 2040 compared with 1990.

"I have not forgotten how [Russian president Vladimir] Putin blackmailed us by cutting us off from Russian fossil fuels. We invested massively in homegrown cheap renewables and this enabled us to break free from dirty Russian fossil fuels," von der Leyen says, promising to end the "era of dependency on Russian fossil fuels". She has not given an end date for this, nor specified if this includes a commitment to ending Russian LNG imports.

Von der Leyen went on to detail political guidelines for 2024-29. She has pledged to propose a "clean industrial deal" in the first 100 days of her new mandate, albeit without giving concrete figures about how much investment this would channel to infrastructure and industry, particularly for energy-intensive sectors. The clean industrial deal will help bring down energy bills, she says.

Von der Leyen told parliament that the commission would propose legislation, under the European Climate Law, establishing a 90pc emissions-reduction target for 2040. Her political guidelines also call for scaling up and prioritising investment in clean technologies, including grid infrastructure, storage capacity, transport for captured CO2, energy efficiency, power digitalisation and a hydrogen network. She plans to extend aggregate demand mechanisms beyond gas to include hydrogen and critical raw materials, and notes the dangers of dependencies and fraying supply chains — from Putin's energy blackmail to China's monopoly on battery and chip raw materials.

Majority report

Passing the necessary legislation to implement her stated policies will now require approval from EU states and parliament. Unless amplified by Germany's election next year, election victories by far-right parties in France and elsewhere appear not to threaten EU state majorities for specific legislation.

Parliament's political centre-left S&D and liberal Renew groups, as well as von der Leyen's own centre-right European People's Party (EPP), have elaborated key policy requests. These broadly call for the continuation of the European Green Deal — a set of legislation and policy measures aimed at 55pc GHG emissions reductions by 2030 compared with 1990.

A symbolic issue for von der Leyen to decide on — or compromise on — is that of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. EPP wants to stick to technological neutrality and revise the current mandate for sales of new ICE cars to be phased out by 2035, if they cannot run exclusively on carbon-neutral fuels. The EPP wants an e-fuel, biofuel and low-carbon fuel strategy. Von der Leyen's guidelines reflect the need to gain support from centre-right, centre-left and greens. She says the 2035 climate neutrality target for new cars creates investor and manufacturer "predictability" but requires a "technology-neutral approach, in which e-fuels have a role to play". She has not mentioned carbon-neutral biofuels.

It will be impossible for von der Leyen to satisfy all demands in her second mandate. This includes policy requests put forward by the EPP, ranging from a "pragmatic" definition of low-carbon hydrogen and market rules for carbon capture and storage, to postponing the EU's deforestation regulation.

EU member states are expected to propose their candidates for commissioners in August, including for energy, climate and trade policy, with von der Leyen's new commission subject to a final vote in parliament in late October.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

13/06/25

EPA proposes record US biofuel mandates, foreign limits

EPA proposes record US biofuel mandates, foreign limits

New York, 13 June (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration today proposed requiring record biofuel blending into the US fuel supply over the next two years, including unexpectedly strong quotas for biomass-based diesel. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposal, which still must be finalized, projects that oil refiners will need to blend 5.61bn USG of biomass-based diesel to comply with requirements in 2026 and 5.86bn USG in 2027. That's a 67pc increase in 2026 and a 75pc increase in 2027 from this year's 3.35bn USG requirement, above what most industry groups had sought. The proposal alone is likely to boost biofuel production, which has been down to start the year as biorefineries have struggled to grapple with uncertainty about future blend mandates, the halting rollout of a new clean fuel tax credit, and higher import tariffs. The EPA proposal also would halve Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits generated for foreign biofuels and biofuels produced from foreign feedstocks, a major change that could increase US crop demand and hurt renewable diesel plants that source many of their inputs from abroad. US farm groups have lamented refiners' rising use of Chinese used cooking oil and Brazilian tallow to make renewable diesel, and EPA's proposal if finalized would sharply reduce the incentive to do so. The Renewable Fuel Standard program requires US oil refiners and importers to blend biofuels into the conventional fuel supply or buy credits from those who do. One USG of corn ethanol generates one RIN, but more energy-dense fuels like renewable diesel can earn more. In total, the rule would require 24.02bn RINs to be retired next year and 24.46bn RINs in 2027. That includes a specific 7.12bn RIN mandate for biomass-based diesel in 2026 and 7.5bn in 2027, and an implied mandate for corn ethanol of 15bn RINs, similar to prior years. EPA currently sets biomass-based diesel mandates in physical gallons but is proposing a change to align with how targets for other program categories work. US soybean oil futures surged following the release of the EPA proposal, and RIN credits rallied similarly. Current year D6 credits, typically generated from conventional ethanol production, traded at 92¢/RIN near the opening of the session before peaking at 110¢/RIN and then retreating slightly. Current year biomass-based diesel D4 RINs followed a similar trajectory, trading up to 116¢/RIN and widening the gap with conventional D6 RINs. Proposed targets are less aspirational for the cellulosic biofuel category, where biogas generates most credits. EPA proposes lowering the 2025 mandate to 1.19bn RINs, down from from 1.38bn RINs previously required, with 2026 and 2027 targets proposed at 1.30bn RINs and 1.36bn RINs, respectively. In a separate final rule today, EPA cut the 2024 cellulosic mandate to 1.01bn RINs from 1.09bn previously required, a smaller cut than initially proposed, and made available special "waiver" credits refiners can purchase at a fixed price to comply. Small refinery exemptions The proposal includes little clarity on EPA's future policy around program exemptions, which small refiners can request if they claim blend mandates will cause them disproportionate economic hardship. EPA predicted Friday that exemptions for the 2026 and 2027 compliance years could total anywhere from zero to 18bn USG of gasoline and diesel. EPA plans to continue a policy from past administrations of estimating future exempted volumes when calculating the percentage of biofuels individual refiners must blend, effectively requiring those with obligations to shoulder more of the burden to meet high-level volume targets. EPA in the proposal said it plans to "communicate our policy regarding [exemption] petitions going forward before finalization of this rule". Industry groups expect the agency will try to conclude the rule-making by November. Notably though, the proposal says little about how EPA is weighing a backlog of more than a hundred requests for exemptions stretching back to 2016. Many of these refiners had already submitted RINs to comply and could push for some type of compensation if granted retroactive waivers, making this part of the program especially hard to implement. An industry official briefed on Thursday ahead of the rule's release said Trump administration officials were "coy" about their plans for the backlog. The proposed mandates for 2026-2027 will have to go through the typical public comment process and could be changed as regulators weigh new data on biofuel production and food and fuel prices. Once the program updates are finalized, lawsuits are inevitable. A federal court is still weighing the legality of past mandates, and the Supreme Court is set to rule this month on the proper court venue for litigating small refinery exemption disputes. By Cole Martin and Matthew Cope Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Limited prompt impact on LNG from Israel-Iran conflict


13/06/25
13/06/25

Limited prompt impact on LNG from Israel-Iran conflict

London, 13 June (Argus) — Israel has halted production at two of its major gas fields and cut pipeline exports to Egypt, but resulting LNG demand may only come later this summer when Egypt builds out its LNG import capacity. Israel's Karish and Leviathan fields have stopped production following a government order issued in the wake of Israeli airstrikes on Iran . Israel's energy ministry today said it expects the minister to declare a state of emergency in the gas sector. Pipeline exports to Egypt and Jordan have since dropped sharply, market participants said, resulting in Egypt cutting gas supply to urea plants as it prioritises gas for power generation. But Egypt has access to only one LNG import terminal at present — the 170,000m³ Hoegh Galleon floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) at Ain Sukhna. Three carriers were holding offshore today waiting to deliver, and the terminal is importing at maximum capacity already, so Egypt cannot import more than it already is through the facility. And Jordan no longer has LNG import capacity, with the 160,000m³ Energos Eskimo having departed ahead of installation later this summer in Egypt. The FSRU at present is at a shipyard in Egypt's Ain Sukhna, unable to import LNG for either Jordan or Egypt. The gas supply cuts from Israel also come ahead of the region's peak cooling demand season. LNG demand could rise if Israeli gas supply is constrained for an extended period of time. Egypt plans to build out its LNG import terminal capacity to three FSRUs later this summer, as well as an additional temporary FSRU for summer leased from Turkey's Botas, and additional LNG import capacity would allow for stronger imports if Israeli supply remains constrained. Two of these FSRUs — the Energos Eskimo and 174,000m³ Energos Power — are at Egyptian shipyards and could be installed in the coming weeks or months. Egypt is understood to have bought at least 110 cargoes for delivery this year , which is equivalent to just under 8mn t. But the country plans to add about 18mn t/yr of LNG import capacity for its peak summer season, assuming 750mn ft³/d of regasification capacity at three FSRUs. Egypt imported 10.2bn m³, or almost 8mn t, of pipeline gas from Israel last year, according to data from the Joint Organisations Data Initiative (Jodi), meaning that with three FSRUs, Egypt has enough capacity to substitute lost Israeli volumes with LNG imports. But it remains unclear for how long Israeli gas exports will be curtailed. Iran also struck Israeli targets with missiles in early October last year , with Israel's Tamar and Leviathan fields having gone off line temporarily, although production returned after one day. Another potential impact of escalating tensions in the Middle East is disruption to shipping around the Strait of Hormuz, but LNG carriers have continued to transit the route as normal today. The tensions could compound insurance costs, adding to shipping costs from the Middle East. More than 80mn t/yr of LNG supply, mostly from Qatar, has to transit the Strait of Hormuz to reach international delivered markets. By Martin Senior Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

CBAM to push renewable power export price above lignite


13/06/25
13/06/25

CBAM to push renewable power export price above lignite

London, 13 June (Argus) — Exports from renewable power production from Energy Community constituent states to the EU could cost more per MWh than exports from lignite-fired generation under the current implementation of the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM), Energy Community CBAM lead Peter Pozsgai said at the Energy Trading Central and South Eastern Europe (ETCSEE) conference in Vienna on 12 June. CBAM will be applied to all cross-border electricity flows from Energy Community states, including power generated from renewables. Producers will be able to deduct any payments made into a regional carbon tax or emissions trading system (ETS) equivalent — a key pillar of market coupling as laid out in 2022's energy integration package. But renewable energy producers will not pay into a regional carbon tax or ETS equivalent, and thus will not be able to deduct this carbon tax from the CBAM applied to all electricity exports. In effect, exports from renewable sources will be priced higher than those from lignite-fired plants in the Western Balkans six — Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia. Pozsgai "hopes this can be amended" and emphasised that the Energy Community and the European Commission will hold a stakeholder meeting on 1 July with the aim of providing more clarity on CBAM's implementation. Electricity is treated separately from other physical commodities under the CBAM legislation. Carbon quantity will be based on average country-wide emissions rather than on individual plant efficiency. Each country's CO2 emissions factor will be calculated as the weighted-average emissions from all fossil fuel-fired generation in the country and is higher than the indirect emissions factor applied to other goods that are subject to CBAM when they enter the EU. This weighted-emissions factor will be applied to all cross-border power exports, regardless of generation source. CBAM loomed over discussions at ETCSEE, with the regulation being discussed on every panel over the two-day event. Market participants already have observed lower forward liquidity as uncertainty mounts on how CBAM will be implemented and expressed concern about taking financial positions while CBAM implementation evolves. But trading firms and regulators alike expressed a desire for market coupling, while acknowledging that CBAM's implementation instead may hinder regional market integration. "Regional integration is hugely important for security of supply and efficiency and should move forward regardless of CBAM, and if they meet requirements, there should be discussions of [CBAM] being lifted," according to the European Commission's deputy head of unit of the Directorate-General for Energy, Andras Hujber. "Price sensitivity will increase with the implementation of CBAM," Hungarian state-owned energy firm MVM chief commercial officer Laszlo Fritsch said. Provisions in the 2022 integration package provided a pathway to a four-year exemption for Energy Community states, provided they complete market coupling measures before CBAM's scheduled start on 1 January 2026. But no Energy Community countries have met these requirements yet. Serbia will be the first country to couple with EU neighbours Hungary and Romania in the fourth quarter of 2026, but it is unclear whether a CBAM exemption will be granted from that point forward or applied retroactively. European power transmission system operator association Entso-E earlier this week asked the EU to postpone the definitive period of CBAM to provide electricity markets with more time to adjust. By Annemarie Pettinato Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Iran suggests upcoming nuclear talks with US are off


13/06/25
13/06/25

Iran suggests upcoming nuclear talks with US are off

Dubai, 13 June (Argus) — Nuclear negotiations between Iran and the US scheduled for Sunday, 15 June, appear to be off following the Israeli air and missile strikes on Iran in the early hours of today. The talks were formally confirmed by mediators Oman on 12 June as taking place in the Omani capital, Muscat. With the mood around the negotiations having taken a turn for the worse this past week, the new round would provide an opportunity for the sides to re-establish their demands, and re-evaluate progress. The key outstanding issue is Iran's ability to enrich uranium, and thus, retain a theoretical path to nuclear weapons. Tehran insists it should be allowed to retain its civilian nuclear enrichment program to supply fuel to nuclear power plants, while US administration officials now appear bent on allowing zero enrichment. The Israeli attacks , which came against US President Donald Trump's advice, appear to have thrown a wrench into the US' efforts to engage Iran diplomatically. Speaking on state television today, Iranian parliament's national security and foreign policy committee member Alaeddin Boroujerdi said the attacks on Iran meant the talks with the US now cannot take place. "With respect to the talks, which we entered at America's request… we were on the verge of a sixth round," he said. "But with these latest developments, I can't see a sixth round taking place." Iran's foreign ministry, which has been leading the discussions for the Iranian side, has yet to explicitly comment on the status of the talks. Neither has Oman. On the attacks, Tehran's Guardian Council, a powerful supervisory body tasked with overseeing legislation, vowed to "give a crushing and tooth-breaking response to these criminals of history in such a way that it will serve as a less on to the enemies of Islam, and the arrogant powers of the world." Iran sent a barrage of drones towards Israel, which appeared to trigger a second round of Israeli strikes on several cities, including Shiraz in the south, Tabriz in the northwest, and Kermanshah in the west. Trump calls for deal The Trump administration has said it was not involved in the Israeli strikes, and warned Iran not to retaliate against its personnel in the Middle East. But it did appear to have at least advance warning of the imminent attack, after ordering non-essential US personnel in Iraq and Israel to evacuate. Trump today again called on Iranian leaders to "make a deal" or face even more "death and destruction" from the next waves of Israeli attacks. "I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal… but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done," Trump said on his Truth Social media platform. "There has already been great death and destruction, but there is still time to make this slaughter, with the next already planned attacked being even more brutal, come to an end. Iran must make a deal before there is nothing left." By Nader Itayim and Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Iran’s oil infrastructure untouched by Israeli strikes


13/06/25
13/06/25

Iran’s oil infrastructure untouched by Israeli strikes

Dubai, 13 June (Argus) — Iran's oil infrastructure emerged unscathed from Israeli air and missile strikes in the early hours of 13 June, according to Iran's state news agency Irna and Argus sources. But the attacks have raised the prospect of a broader escalation in the world's largest oil-producing region. Israel said the strikes targeted military facilities and infrastructure linked to Iran's nuclear programme. It described the operation as an act of self-defence, claiming Iran is "closer than ever" to acquiring a nuclear weapon. The US denied involvement and urged Tehran not to retaliate against US personnel in the region. Iran informed the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that its Bushehr nuclear power plant was not targeted and that no increase in radiation levels had been observed at its Natanz site, IAEA director general Rafael Grossi said today. Oil operations remain unaffected. Activities at Iranian facilities are continuing "without interruption and in a stable manner," Irna reported, citing state-owned refiner NIORDC. The operator of Iran's 700,000 b/d Abadan refinery said the plant is running at full capacity with no disruption, according to the state news agency Shana. The 110,000 b/d Tabriz refinery — located near one of the reported strike zones — was not hit and "operations resumed as normal," an official at the plant told Argus . No other Iranian oil or gas facilities have been targeted so far, Argus understands. Crude futures surged in early Asian trading on news of the strikes, rising by as much as 13pc before paring gains. As of 09:00 GMT, the front-month August Ice Brent contract was trading at $74.30/bl, down from an earlier high of $78.50/bl. The absence of physical supply disruption helped ease immediate concerns, but the risk of a wider conflict remains high. In response to the strikes, Iran launched around 100 drones toward Israeli territory. "Israel is working to intercept [the drones]," Israeli military spokesperson Effie Defrin said. Israeli media later reported that all drones were intercepted. The fallout from the strikes has affected regional gas operations. Greek independent Energean suspended production from its Karish gas field offshore Israel following a government order issued after the Israeli attacks. Security concerns in key shipping lanes were already rising ahead of the strikes. On 12 June, the Joint Maritime Information Centre (JMIC) warned that the "threat will be elevated until further notice for vessels operating in or transiting the Arabian Gulf, strait of Hormuz, and Northern Arabian Sea". Any disruption to the strait of Hormuz — a chokepoint for nearly a fifth of global oil flows — could have immediate and severe consequences for global crude supply and pricing. The Yemen-based Houthi movement, part of Iran's regional proxy network known as the ‘Axis of Resistance', condemned the Israeli strikes and affirmed "Iran's right to carry out a deterrent response." It declared support for Iran's "legitimate right to respond to the aggression." So far, however, neither the Houthis nor other Iran-aligned groups — including Lebanon's Hezbollah and Shia militias in Iraq — have taken retaliatory action. Israel has significantly weakened the Axis of Resistance since the October 2023 Hamas-led attack, eliminating most of Hamas' leadership and key Hezbollah figures. Israel and Iran also exchanged missile and drone strikes in 2024. By Bachar Halabi, Yong Li Tng and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more