Viewpoint: European refiners' support is fading

  • : Crude oil, Oil products
  • 15/08/04

Refiners in Europe have enjoyed an unexpected 'mini golden age' on the back of lower crude prices and firm refined product demand, particularly for gasoline, but this may not last. Although demand has risen, bolstered by lower retail prices, other one-off supportive factors are fading. The strong global demand for gasoline, which has helped to lift refinery throughputs in Europe, is exacerbating a middle distillates surplus that is in turn weighing on diesel and jet fuel crack spreads and starting to undermine refiners' margins.

Oil product demand rebounded at the start of this year, lifted by seasonal winter demand for middle distillates and as lower prices started to filter through to consumers. This was most keenly felt in the US gasoline market, where a lower retail tax regime compared with Europe meant consumers felt the effect of lower wholesale prices more quickly. Chinese demand also soared — US and Chinese gasoline markets together accounted for 35pc of global oil demand growth in the first half of the year.

Gasoline margin strength has continued since, with a shortage of high octane blend stock supporting the market. Total's model European refining margin indicator (ERMI) increased to $54.10/t in the second quarter, from $10.90/t a year earlier, and averaged above $50/t in July with product demand receiving an unexpected boost from lower prices for all products.

Middle distillates demand was further boosted by the switch in marine fuel sulphur emission limits in January. Around 100,000 b/d of demand moved from fuel oil to marine gasoil as the sulphur emission limit in European Emission Control Areas (ECAs) in the Baltic and North Seas was lowered to 0.1pc from 1pc. But production and imports are now outpacing middle distillate demand in Europe.

Second quarter refining results were strong across Europe. Total — Europe's largest refiner by capacity — made an operating profit of $2bn in its downstream business in the second quarter, up from $675mn a year earlier. Its refinery runs were 18pc higher year-on-year at 1.909mn b/d, amid significantly stronger refining and petrochemical margins, lower maintenance activity in Europe and the start-up of the Satorp 400,000 b/d joint venture refinery with Saudi Aramco in Jubail. Italy's Eni reported a second-quarter profit of €79mn in its refinery and chemicals business, compared with a loss of €204mn a year earlier.

But these good times look set to come to an end later this year. Peak US summer driving demand will fade by the end of September, and the switch to lower value, winter grade gasoline around the same time will further undermine margins. Even if gasoline strength persists, the growing middle distillates surplus could drag margins lower.

Diesel margins have already weakened from over $20/bl at the start of the year to below $13/bl, the lowest in over a year. Seasonal autumn maintenance should provide some short-term margin support for refineries still operating, but the market looks set to weaken markedly by the end of the year.

Refinery investment programmes in Europe in recent years have been focused on increasing diesel production. Europe is structurally short on diesel and long on gasoline, importing to meet the shortfall and sending surplus gasoline production to the US. But refiners in other regions have been cashing in on the European diesel deficit.

Modern, advanced large-scale refineries coming on stream in the Middle East are sending increasing volumes of middle distillates to Europe, taking advantage of economies of scale and lower costs of production. Upgrades in the FSU mean refiners there are producing and exporting greater volumes of European-grade 10ppm sulphur diesel. And complex refineries on the US Gulf coast with access to cheap energy and cheap shale oil feedstock have a competitive advantage over their European counterparts, and are able to run at high rates and export surplus product to Europe or to compete with European refiners for export markets.

Last year's crude price collapse has helped level the playing field to some extent, but the fundamental picture remains unchanged. Europe has a structural refining over-capacity, with product demand in long-term decline as vehicle efficiency increases and population sizes stabilise.

There are some outliers who disagree. "There is no over-capacity, just wrong capacity," Saras executive vice president Dario Scaffardi said on 23 July. The closure of a string of European refineries since 2009 was as a result of substandard, smaller, and less-complex refineries being unable to compete in the wider market place, said Scaffardi, not simply because of an excess in supply. Saras expects gasoline margins to remain strong in 2015 and into 2016.

Product demand, especially for gasoline, has surprised to the upside this year.

"We underestimated the positive impact that lower prices would have on demand," said Total chief finance officer Patrick de la Chevardiere in late July. It remains to be seen whether this demand boost will be sustained, but refiners continue to benefit from depressed crude prices. A large overhang persists in the Atlantic basin, with the global crude surplus forecast at 1.4mn b/d in the fourth quarter and at an average 2.2mn b/d for the year.

But refinery closures in Europe remain on the cards, because of the substantial overhang of capacity in the region. Opec in November said it estimated a further 2.4mn b/d of European refining capacity would close by 2019. The strong margins this year have enabled some refiners to delay decisions on closure or sales, but others have fallen victim to the regional over-capacity.

Total will close its 160,000 b/d La Mede refinery in France by the end of 2016, and will halve capacity at its 222,000 b/d Lindsey refinery in the UK. Maintenance and strike action has kept La Mede shut for much of the summer. Murphy Oil shut the 130,000 Milford Haven refinery in the UK last year.

Kuwait's KPC is in talks to sell its 80,000 b/d Rotterdam refinery, and Tamoil suspended operations at the 72,000 b/d Collombey refinery in Switzerland earlier this year. Eni has cut its capacity by 30pc since 2012, and wants to increase this total 50pc. It shut its 80,000 b/d refinery in Venice in 2013 for conversion into a biofuels facility and has similar plans for its 105,000 b/d Gela plant in Sicily, which it has already closed. Its 84,000 b/d Livorno and 84,000 b/d Taranto refineries look to be at risk, but the company has kept its counsel over further closures.

In general it remains the smaller, less complex refineries that are most at risk of closure, especially coastal plants that are more exposed to competition from imports. Larger, more complex refineries and inland plants with good access to niche markets remain better placed.

Some refiners are investing to give themselves a competitive advantage. Turkish refiner Tupras started up a new 80,000 b/d coker, an 80,000 b/d hydrocracker and other upgrading units at its 227,000 b/d Izmit refinery fuel conversion project in June. Total will invest €400mn ($416mn) in Donges, France, to "capture profitable new markets with low-sulphur fuels that meet the evolutions of EU specifications". The company is upgrading its 308,000 b/d Antwerp refinery in Belgium, due to be completed in 2016, and is investing in its 210,000 b/d Leuna refinery in Germany. And ExxonMobil is investing $1bn in its 310,000 b/d Antwerp refinery, and will expand its Rotterdam hydrocracker by 30pc to 58,000 b/d.

jb/bw



Send comments to feedback@argusmedia.com

Request more information about Argus' energy and commodity news, data and analysis services.

Copyright © 2015 Argus Media Ltd - www.argusmedia.com - All rights reserved.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/02

US regulator slams executive over Opec 'collusion'

US regulator slams executive over Opec 'collusion'

Washington, 2 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulators for the first time took action against a leading US oil executive over his alleged "collusion" with Opec, but the producers' alliance itself was not a target of investigation. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) today issued a proposed consent order barring former Pioneer Natural Resources chief executive Scott Sheffield from joining the board of ExxonMobil following its $59.5bn takeover of Pioneer. FTC accused Sheffield of organizing "anti-competitive coordinated output reductions between and among US crude oil producers" and members of Opec and the broader Opec+ alliance. "Opec and Opec+ are cartels that exist to control global crude oil production and reserves," FTC said. The specific charges against Sheffield relate to the outspoken executive's frequent public appearances where he opined on US companies' desired production levels, his meetings and frequent communications with Opec officials since 2017 and his advocacy of drastic production cuts by US companies as global demand fell sharply at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Opec under then secretary general Mohammed Barkindo began active outreach to independent US producers, starting in March 2017 with private dinner discussions held on the sidelines of IHS CERAWeek conferences in Houston, Texas. Barkindo hosted similar discussions at CERAWeek in 2018 and 2019, in addition to hosting some of the US companies' chief executives at Opec seminars in Vienna. FTC references Sheffield's public comments following those meetings and alleges that Sheffield kept in frequent touch with Opec officials via messaging service WhatsApp and other means to discuss production levels and prices. Barkindo at the time said that production cuts and prices were never on the agenda of his meetings with the US shale producers and that his organization wanted to better understand the US companies' technological innovation and to compare market outlooks and forecast models. Barkindo in the same time frame held similar discussions with major US hedge funds and money managers. US oil executives polled by Argus in 2017-20 also said that their discussions with Barkindo and other Opec officials revolved around market fundamentals. The US oil industry broadly felt that it was benefiting from a policy of production cuts Opec was implementing as it supported prices at a time when the US domestic production and crude exports grew uninterrupted. Former president Donald Trump took credit for engineering a breakthrough agreement in April 2020 to remove more than 10mn b/d of global crude supply by brokering an agreement between Saudi Arabia, Russia and other Opec+ producers. Even without prodding from Trump, US producers cut back production cuts in 2020 as transportation fuel demand and prices fell sharply in the first months of the pandemic. FTC singled out Sheffield for allegedly coordinating his company's production levels with Opec. Sheffield "held repeated, private conversations with high-ranking Opec representatives assuring them that Pioneer and its Permian basin rivals were working hard to keep oil output artificially low," according to the FTC order. Sheffield, who helped found Pioneer and was its longtime chairman, served as chief executive from 1997 to 2016 and from 2019 through 2023. He remains on the company's board, serving as special adviser to the chief executive since 1 January. The son of an oil executive, Sheffield attended high school in Tehran, Iran. Pioneer shrugged off what it termed a "fundamental misunderstanding" of global oil markets and said that FTC misread "the nature and intent" of Sheffield's actions. Opec declined to comment on FTC's action against Sheffield. FTC is so far the only US regulator to set sights on Opec, even if indirectly. President Joe Biden in 2021 separately tasked FTC with leading an investigation into whether there is price manipulation in gasoline markets. Biden, like many of his predecessors at a time of high gasoline prices, in 2022 accused Opec of uncompetitive behavior in oil markets and expressed support for US legislation allowing antitrust action against the organization by the US Department of Justice. But that acrimony has largely dissipated after global oil and US gasoline prices fell in 2023 from unusually high levels in the previous year. US Congress has not taken significant steps to advance the anti-Opec legislation since 2022. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction


24/05/02
24/05/02

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction

Corrects movement of grain loadings from a year earlier in final paragraph. Washington, 2 May (Argus) — Workers at the two major Canadian railroads could go on strike as soon as 22 May now that members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) have authorized a strike, potentially causing widespread disruption to shipments of commodities such as crude, coal and grain. A strike could disrupt rail traffic not only in Canada but also in the US and Mexico because trains would not be able to leave, nor could shipments enter into Canada. This labor action could be far more impactful than recent strikes because it would affect Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) at the same time. Union members at Canadian railroads have gone on strike individually in the past, which has left one of the two carriers to continue operating and handle some of their competitor's freight. But TCRC members completed a vote yesterday about whether to initiate a strike action at each carrier. The union represents about 9,300 workers employed at the two railroads. Roughly 98pc of union members that participated voted in favor of a strike beginning as early as 22 May, the union said. The union said talks are at an impasse. "After six months of negotiations with both companies, we are no closer to reaching a settlement than when we first began, TCRC president Paul Boucher said. Boucher warned that "a simultaneous work stoppage at both CN and CPKC would disrupt supply chains on a scale Canada has likely never experienced." He added that the union does not want to provoke a rail crisis and wants to avoid a work stoppage. The union has argued that the railroads' proposals would harm safety practices. It has also sought an improved work-life balance. But CN and CPKC said the union continues to reject their proposals. CPKC "is committed to negotiating in good faith and responding to our employees' desire for higher pay and improved work-life balance, while respecting the best interests of all our railroaders, their families, our customers, and the North American economy." CN said it wants a contract that addresses the work life balance and productivity, benefiting the company and employees. But even when CN "proposed a solution that would not touch duty-rest rules, the union has rejected it," the railroad said. Canadian commodity volume has fallen this year with only rail shipments of chemicals, petroleum and petroleum products, and non-metallic minerals rising, Association of American Railroads (AAR) data show. Volume data includes cars loaded in the US by Canadian carriers. Coal traffic dropped by 11pc during the 17 weeks ended on 27 April compared with a year earlier, AAR data show. Loadings of motor vehicles and parts have fallen by 5.2pc. CN and CPKC grain loadings fell by 4.3pc from a year earlier, while shipment of farm products and food fell by 9.3pc. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

FTC clears Exxon-Pioneer deal but bars Sheffield


24/05/02
24/05/02

FTC clears Exxon-Pioneer deal but bars Sheffield

New York, 2 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulators signaled they will clear ExxonMobil's proposed $59.5bn takeover of Pioneer Natural Resources but banned the shale giant's former chief executive officer from gaining a seat on the board. A proposed consent order from the Federal Trade Commission seeks to stop Scott Sheffield, Pioneer's former chief executive, from taking part in "collusive activity" that would potentially raise crude prices and cause US consumers to pay more at the pump. The order paves the way for ExxonMobil to close its blockbuster deal for Pioneer, which will make it the leading producer in the prolific Permian shale basin of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. It is also the top US oil producer's biggest transaction since Exxon's 1999 merger with Mobil. ExxonMobil's Permian output will more than double to 1.3mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) when the acquisition closes, before increasing to about 2mn boe/d in 2027. The FTC, which has taken a tougher line on mergers under the administration of President Joe Biden, has paid close attention to oil deals announced during the latest phase of shale consolidation. Only this week, Diamondback Energy said it had received a second request for information from the regulator over its $26bn proposed takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources. And Chevron's planned $53bn acquisition of US independent Hess has also been held up. The FTC alleged in a complaint that Sheffield exchanged hundreds of text messages with Opec officials discussing crude pricing and output, and that he sought to align production across the Permian with the cartel. His past conduct "makes it crystal clear that he should be nowhere near Exxon's boardroom," said Kyle Mach, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. ExxonMobil said it learnt about the allegations against Sheffield from the FTC. "They are entirely inconsistent with how we do business," the company said. While Pioneer said it disagreed with the FTC's complaint, which reflects a "fundamental misunderstanding" of US and global oil markets and "misreads the nature and intent" of Sheffield's actions, the company said it would not be taking any steps to stop the merger from closing. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Abu Dhabi’s Adnoc puts crude capacity at 4.85mn b/d


24/05/02
24/05/02

Abu Dhabi’s Adnoc puts crude capacity at 4.85mn b/d

Dubai, 2 May (Argus) — Abu Dhabi's state-owned Adnoc has nudged up its self-reported crude production capacity to 4.85mn b/d, from 4.65mn b/d previously. The UAE state energy giant did not formally announce the increase but updated the figure on its website. It did something similar when its capacity reached 4.65mn b/d in late 2023, up from 4.5mn b/d in the middle of last year. This latest hike takes the company a step closer to its long-term 5mn b/d crude capacity target, which it aims to reach by 2027. Adnoc set the 5mn b/d target back in 2018 when its capacity was 3.5mn b/d. At that time, the company said it was aiming to deliver the increase by 2030, but in November 2022 it brought the timeframe forward by three years, citing the "UAE's robust hydrocarbon reserves". The change in timeline had been expected, with sources telling Argus earlier that year that discussions had been taking place in the upper echelons of Adnoc about significantly accelerating its capacity growth plans . Given the speed at which the company has been delivering capacity gains over the past few years, and how close it is to meeting its target already, it is not inconceivable that Adnoc will reach 5mn b/d ahead of schedule. Put your best foot forward The UAE's rising capacity comes as Opec+ producers engage with independent agencies to update their respective crude output capacities for use in production policy decisions from 2025. At their meeting in June last year, all Opec+ members committed to undergo an external assessment of their sustainable capacities in the first half of 2024 by three independent consultancies, IHS, Wood Mackenzie and Rystad. The updated capacity assessment will help address a key criticism of the Opec+ production restraint agreements in their current format, namely that many of the countries involved have been cutting output from a baseline level of production that they can no longer actually deliver, in most cases due to natural decline. The UAE has been one of a handful of countries in the group that has been raising its capacity over the past few years. This means it should, in theory, benefit from the latest assessment, as a higher accepted capacity will afford it a higher production baseline under any Opec+ agreements struck from 2025 onwards. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining


24/05/02
24/05/02

Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell delivered a better-than-expected profit for the first quarter of 2024, helped by a strong performance from its LNG and oil product businesses. The company reported profit of $7.4bn for January-March, up sharply from an impairment-hit $474mn in the previous three months but down from $8.7bn in the first quarter of 2023. Adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items, Shell's profit came in at $7.7bn, 6pc ahead of the preceding three months and above analysts' estimates of $6.3bn-$6.5bn, although it was 20pc lower than the first quarter of 2023 when gas prices were higher. Shell's oil and gas production increased by 3pc on the quarter in January-March and was broadly flat compared with a year earlier at 2.91mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d). For the current quarter, Shell expects production in a range of 2.55mn-2.81mn boe/d, reflecting the effect of scheduled maintenance across its portfolio. The company's Integrated Gas segment delivered a profit of $2.76bn in the first quarter, up from $1.73bn in the previous three months and $2.41bn a year earlier. The segment benefited from increased LNG volumes — 7.58mn t compared to 7.06mn t in the previous quarter and 7.19mn t a year earlier — as well as favourable deferred tax movements and lower operating expenses. For the current quarter, Shell expects to produce 6.8mn-7.4mn t of LNG. In the downstream, the company's Chemicals and Products segment swung to a profit of $1.16bn during the quarter from an impairment-driven loss of $1.83bn in the previous three months, supported by a strong contribution from oil trading operations and higher refining margins driven by greater utilisation of its refineries and global supply disruptions. Shell's refinery throughput increased to 1.43mn b/d in the first quarter from 1.32mn b/d in fourth quarter of last year and 1.41mn b/d in January-March 2023. Shell has maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.344/share. It also said it has completed the $3.5bn programme of share repurchases that it announced at its previous set of results and plans to buy back another $3.5bn of its shares before the company's next quarterly results announcement. The company said it expects its capital spending for the year to be within a $22bn-$25bn range. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more