ガスとエネルギー
概要
ガスと電力は、すべての経済活動を支える2つの不可欠なエネルギー源です。信頼できる市場情報、データ、価格へのアクセスはガスと電力セクターへのエクスポージャーに関して、より多くの情報に基づいた意思決定が可能になります。
当社の市場専門家チームは、独立した信頼できる価格査定、インデックス、市場データ、詳細な分析を提供しています。当社の価格とマーケット・インテリジェンスは、エネルギー会社、政府、銀行、規制当局、取引所、その他多くの組織で利用されています。より良い意思決定のために、これらの市場に関する当社の深い知識をご活用ください。
Gas and power market coverage
Argus is a leading independent provider of market intelligence to the global energy and commodity markets. Our price assessments and market intelligence are available for all major gas and power markets across the globe. Explore our coverage most relevant to your business.
Latest gas and power news
Browse the latest market-moving news on the global gas and power industry.
Viewpoint: US, European LNG spread may narrow in 2026
Viewpoint: US, European LNG spread may narrow in 2026
Houston, 22 December (Argus) — The spread between US and European LNG prices will likely narrow further in 2026, but forward prices indicate US LNG supply under long-term contracts will remain comfortably profitable in international spot markets until at least summer 2027 as a wave of new supply comes on line. A recent rally in the US natural gas market highlighted US LNG's tightening margins. The indicative long-term LNG contract price — 115pc of US benchmark Henry Hub plus a $3/mn Btu liquefaction fee — surpassed the Argus Gulf coast (AGC) spot fob price in early December for the first time in more than two years amid cold weather in the US, mild weather in Europe and high Atlantic basin freight rates. But the premium over the spot price was brief and caused no change to export schedules. The front-month Henry Hub contract quickly shed its gains on warmer weather, falling to $3.89/mn Btu on 16 December from a nearly three-year high of $5.29/mn Btu on 5 December. Prices hovered around $4/mn Btu through 19 December. The impact was solely on profit margins rather than fundamentals. Customers of US LNG facilities did not need to cancel cargoes under take-or-pay provisions because a profit incentive to maximize exports remained. Liquefaction costs are considered sunk, and the spread between Henry Hub and European LNG prices remained wide enough to more than cover shipping costs. Though rising exports may add to domestic pricing volatility during cold winter weather through the end of the decade, US and European gas futures today indicate long-term offtake from US LNG terminals will remain profitable until the summer of 2027, assuming freight rates of $80,000/d and a 50¢/mn Btu discount to the European benchmark TTF for northwest European deliveries. At that time, contracts with $3/mn Btu liquefaction fees could surpass delivered LNG prices in northwest Europe, though the arbitrage for US gas would remain open for contracts with lower fees (see chart) . Fees now range between $2.50-2.80/mn Btu for US supply coming on line toward the end of the decade. Contracts with fees on either end of that range remain below European LNG prices until summer 2029 and summer 2028, respectively, assuming freight rates of $80,000/d. But cargo cancellations are not always necessary when long-term US LNG contract prices surpass international prices. Terminal operators and their customers finalize annual delivery plans as well as upward and downward delivery tolerances before the start of each year, leaving less flexibility later in the year. If a customer wishes to cancel a cargo, they typically must notify the terminal up to two months in advance, which would likely only happen in an environment where the cost of 115pc of Henry Hub plus freight stabilizes above European LNG prices. The spread between Henry Hub and delivered European prices is wide enough to absorb freight costs through winter 2030-31. If an offtaker opts for a lower quantity in its delivery tolerance or cancels a cargo, the volume returns to the terminal operator, which could still market and sell the cargo on the spot market. This effectively shifts the seller of a cargo from the LNG customer to the LNG terminal operator. The likelihood of cancellations beyond 2027 may be higher in the spring and autumn shoulder seasons, when demand in Europe is typically lower. Depending on the previous winter, this may be more likely to occur in autumn, given the annual rebuild of Europe's underground gas inventories that begins in the spring. Additional liquefaction capacity has already helped tighten margins for US LNG since Europe's conflict-driven volatility in 2022 . The AGC fob's premium over the long-term indicative contract averaged $3.95/mn Btu through 19 December this year, down from $4.63/mn Btu, $5.37/mn Btu and $20.13/mn Btu in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. But the anticipated convergence of US and European LNG is not guaranteed. Geopolitical conflict could disrupt existing trade patterns. And lower prices in Europe will be contingent on new LNG projects, led by the US and Qatar, maintaining their timelines, which are prone to delays from supply chain issues and workforce constraints. This would add upside risk to international prices and downside risk for Henry Hub if the delays are in the US. By Tray Swanson European LNG spot prices vs long-term US LNG $/mn Btu Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US shale firms see subdued spending next year
US shale firms see subdued spending next year
New York, 22 December (Argus) — US president Donald Trump took to prime-time TV this week to reassure voters that 2026 will see a stronger economy, but US shale executives see little prospect of an imminent upturn in their business. US oil and gas firms plan to keep capital spending flat to slightly lower next year, according to a closely watched survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, as the industry grapples with lower oil prices. Although activity edged lower in the fourth quarter, uncertainty grew and companies remained increasingly wary about future prospects in the poll of 131 executives from Texas, southern New Mexico and northern Louisiana that was carried out earlier this month. "Decreasing oil prices are making many of our firm's wells uneconomic," one exploration and production (E&P) executive said. "Capital efficiencies and returns drive our investment decisions," another respondent said. "If economic conditions worsen, drilling and completion activities will cease in 2026." The muted outlook for spending next year comes as producers have adopted a wait-and-see approach in recent months, given an increasingly uncertain macro backdrop, with crude prices trading near four-year lows this week on fears of global oversupply. A number of shale operators have posted higher-than-expected production this year. At the same time, spending has come in below expectations as drilling operations become more efficient, a trend UK bank Barclays says could be repeated in 2026. The executives who took part in the Dallas Fed survey gave varied responses when asked about their spending plans for next year depending on their size. Large producers — or those with output of 10,000 b/d or more — were more likely to say they expect capital expenditure to remain close to this year's levels. The most selected response among smaller firms — with production under 10,000 b/d — was for a slight increase. Although there are more small firms in the US, the larger companies account for more than 80pc of total US output. When asked about the oil price they were using for capital planning in 2026, the average response among executives was $59/bl for WTI. That was down from the $68/bl average price for the US benchmark that firms planned to use this year. The Dallas Fed said it was not necessarily a surprise that companies were not planning to trim spending further given weaker oil prices. Capital-intensive care "Oil and gas is a capital-intensive business," the bank's senior business economist, Kunal Patel, said. "It takes a lot of money to sustain the wells, even to keep production flat, and so that's why I don't think you're seeing as many people looking to significantly cut." Also, the prices that companies are using to plan next year's budgets are not too far from current breakeven levels. And producers may yet respond with deeper cuts to spending if prices tumble again. Oil and natural gas production was relatively unchanged in the fourth quarter, the survey showed, while costs rose at a slower pace than in the previous three months. "While oil prices have not been low enough this quarter to force a substantial cutback in activity, they were not high enough to support any growth either," Dallas Fed assistant vice-president Michael Plante said. In its annual E&P spending survey, Barclays expects upstream capital expenditure in North America to fall by 5pc in 2026, on lower US activity, reduced reinvestment ratios, and the impact of drilling and well completion efficiencies. That would mark its third consecutive annual decline. Barclays also revised down this year's upstream spending forecast to a decline of 5pc, from an initial estimate of a 3pc drop. The change was driven by further US rig count losses after Opec+ started to ramp up supplies, as well as the hit from Trump's tariff wars. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Australia releases key IFLM carbon method draft
Australia releases key IFLM carbon method draft
Sydney, 22 December (Argus) — The Australian government today released the exposure draft for the long-awaited Integrated Farm and Land Management (IFLM) carbon credit method ahead of a public consultation starting in late January. The draft method includes the regeneration of native forest on suppressed land as a proposed eligible activity, meeting a key demand from carbon project developers, but it excludes a previously planned soil carbon module . The method's "framework" design will enable the addition of future activities, including improvements to soil, as well as updates to measurement approaches and carbon pools over time, the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) said on 22 December. The DCCEEW will allow two abatement-calculation approaches to estimate carbon stock change under the method, using Australia's Full Carbon Accounting Model (FullCam) — a model-only approach and a hybrid approach where modelled estimates are refined by measurements in the project. The hybrid approach will need to be legislatively drafted to be included in the final draft methodology determination. "The modular design enables more activities, technologies and carbon pools to be added over time, giving greater flexibility to land managers," the DCCEEW said. Three main activities The planned Australian Carbon Credit Unit (ACCU) method could be the first in the country to combine multiple activities that store carbon in the land on a single property. This aims to streamline participation and reduce the administrative burden compared with running multiple projects on the same land, the DCCEEW said. The module for regeneration of native forest on suppressed lands builds on the key human-induced regeneration (HIR) ACCU method, which expired in September 2023. But like the FullCam hybrid approach, it will require legislative drafting in 2026, as both components "are more complex than approaches already incorporated into the exposure draft". The method would also enable crediting of carbon from two modules which are already legislatively drafted — reforestation by environmental plantings, an activity with an existing method that was updated late last year , and regeneration of native forest on cleared lands, which is based on the expired native forest from managed regrowth (NFMR) method. Soil carbon is not in the draft because the Emissions Reduction Assurance Committee (Erac) — the statutory body responsible for ensuring the integrity of Australia's carbon crediting framework — is reviewing the Soil Organic Carbon 2021 method. This is because of the complexity of the review process , Erac chair Karen Hussey said last month. The outcomes of that review will inform the inclusion of a revised soil carbon module in the IFLM method in the future, the DCCEEW said. Contentious areas Uncertainties remained until recent weeks on whether a draft method would be submitted to Erac before the end of 2025. A summary paper of a stakeholder group meeting in September noted that some members had recommended postponing the IFLM method, as "a robust approach which clearly demonstrated integrity was more important than timelines". The inclusion of regeneration of native forest on suppressed land has proved to be a contentious issue. "There has been considerable research into the impacts of grazing management on the diverse ecosystems in Australia, including the different approaches to quantify the changes in vegetation, and in existing HIR projects," the DCCEEW said today. "Uncertainties remain and this issue is still an active area of research." But the IFLM draft settings provide confidence that the method is robust and that credited abatement is additional, as it will establish new eligibility criteria, require on-ground measurements and apply conservative abatement estimates in early project years, the DCCEEW noted. Projects will need to use the FullCam hybrid approach to estimate abatement for this activity module. This will reduce the potential for over-crediting or under-crediting abatement, particularly for lower-rainfall environments where there can be less certainty in attributing the regeneration to project activities. Projects will also need to have a low initial carbon stock at the start of their 25-year crediting period, and will need to achieve forest cover during that period. They will also have a baseline period of 20 years compared with 10 years for HIR projects. This is the time over which the project land area must not have had forest cover because of suppression mechanisms such as grazing pressure, chemical or mechanical destruction of regrowth, or the presence of non-native plants. Finally, the department is proposing to apply discounts when attributing carbon stock change to projects under that module, including a temporary 5-25pc attribution discount to address climate-related uncertainties. Existing HIR, NFMR or environmental plantings projects will be able to transfer their projects to become IFLM projects if they meet eligibility requirements in the final IFLM method. They will also be able to add additional land to the project area to undertake additional abatement activities. Consultation to start on 27 Jan The release of the draft method and other documents allows an early review of the material before a formal, 28-day consultation period starts on 27 January, the DCCEEW said today. Feedback will help Erac decide whether the method complies with Australia's offsets integrity standards and it will recommend it to assistant minister for climate change and energy Josh Wilson. The DCCEEW intends to provide a final IFLM methodology determination for Erac's consideration "in 2026", it said, without disclosing a specific timeline. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Viewpoint: Biogas growth uneven, shipping drives 2026
Viewpoint: Biogas growth uneven, shipping drives 2026
London, 22 December (Argus) — Europe's biomethane market faces uneven growth in 2026, with numerous unsolved policy hurdles and as adoption of the EU's revised renewable energy directive (RED III) reshapes national compliance frameworks. Shipping demand will remain a key driver, particularly for certified subsidised product. RED III's overall 2030 target gives EU member states the option to reduce greenhouse gases (GHGs) by 14.5pc, or reach a 29pc renewable energy share. RED II only required countries to reach a 14pc renewable energy share. Some states have already transposed RED III, including the Netherlands and Germany , and pivoted incentive schemes to reward fuels on a GHG reduction basis. This is setting up biomethane with low or negative carbon intensity (CI) as a fuel of choice for suppliers obligated to comply with the regulation in the Netherlands, where previously it lagged behind cheaper, energy-intense biofuels. Another EU regulation that favours biomethane use is FuelEU Maritime, which came into effect in January 2025 requiring shipowners to reduce fleet emissions by 2 pc/yr in 2025 and 2026. Over-compliance can be sold under pooling schemes — which have proven profitable for bio-LNG bunkering. The mandate became a major market price driver for renewable gas guarantees of origin (RGGOs) — certificates issued to companies producing gas made from non-fossil fuel sources — and this should continue into 2026. New schemes, either under RED III or domestic obligations, that will come into effect in 2026 will compete with maritime demand for supply. Most 2026 Dutch and Danish supply has already been sold to the maritime sector. Growing Netherlands As well as a pivot to GHG-based compliance with a new ERE ticket system under RED III, the Netherlands began work on a Green Gas Blending Obligation in November. While implementation before late 2027 seems unlikely, progress should boost RGGO forward pricing. Dutch biomethane liquidity could be bolstered if the government approves mass-balancing , a method to track and verify biomethane when it is injected into the gas grid system and becomes indistinguishable from conventional gas. A motion was proposed in parliament in November, but a recent government response indicates this is unlikely. Bio-LNG must be unsubsidised, certified and physically delivered to qualify for ERE tickets, otherwise it will be treated with a fossil gas CI of 94g CO2e/MJ when calculating a fuel supplier's overall mandate level. Steady Germany, France Germany will remove double-counting for waste-based biofuels under its GHG reduction quota (THG) in 2026, but biomethane should remain the cheapest compliance route for fuel suppliers, as rising mandates will support demand. Most German imports come from the UK or Denmark. The former may benefit from Danish prices inflated by maritime demand, despite questions about UK eligibility with German schemes. France's biogas production certificate (CPB) blending mandate starts in January, which should significantly boost domestic demand. But the country has delayed its RED III transposition , which includes a new GHG-based IRICC ticket system, to 2027. The current energy-based TIRUERT transport ticket system will remain in place for a year, limiting transport-sector uptake. It is unclear if IRICCs can be generated from biomethane in 2027, but 3pc renewable gas obligations for transport will start in 2028, increasing thereafter. Cross-border trade and bio-LNG bunkering should remain limited. French biomethane can only be exported as an ex-domain cancellation , the cancellation of RGGOs in one country's registry for use in a different country. This carries risk to buyers, as ownership is not necessarily transferred. Subsidised biomethane cannot be liquefied at French LNG terminals for use outside the country. French bio-LNG must be exported via mass-balancing to other terminals in the EU, for use under FuelEU Maritime. Uncertain UK The UK's access to EU markets hinges on access to the Union Database for gaseous Biofuels (UDB), now targeted for launch by end-summer 2026. Uncertainty about third-country treatment could restrict EU trade — a critical issue given the UK exported more than half its RGGOs in the first three quarters of 2025, mostly to Germany, Norway and Switzerland. The UK is consulting on replacing volume-based RTFC tickets with a GHG-based system, but any changes would not be enacted until 2027. Overall in Europe, biomethane remains well positioned in GHG-based systems, but policy implementation delays will probably slow overall market growth. The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany should remain anchors for European pricing, and Spain should consolidate its role as a maritime hub. But several countries risk lagging behind without RGGO registries, export hub access, policy incentives and subsidy reform. By Madeleine Jenkins Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Spotlight content
Browse the latest thought leadership produced by our global team of experts.
Explore our gas and power products
Both the natural gas and power services have a long track record of providing well researched pricing, high quality analysis and market intelligence to our clients.
Key price assessments
Argus prices are recognised by the market as trusted and reliable indicators of the real market value. Explore some of our most widely used and relevant price assessments.