Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Japan mulls impact of potential Russian LNG sanctions

  • : Natural gas
  • 22/02/23

Japan's LNG buyers are awaiting updates on whether exports of the fuel from Russia will be included in newly imposed sanctions on the country, suggesting that there could be long-term repercussions on Japan's LNG supply-demand situation even if any short-term impact resulting from such curbs will likely be minimal.

A recent rise in LNG inventories and expectations of milder weather in Japan in the coming weeks could limit the short-term impact of any potential halt in LNG supplies from Russia, industry participants said. But sustained curbs could create additional spot requirements from Japan in the following months and hurt future bilateral collaboration between the two countries, especially with several of Japan's term contracts having expired or due to expire, they added.

Japan's prime minister Fumio Kishida said on 23 February that the country will join the US and EU in imposing sanctions on Russia over the situation in Ukraine, including banning trades with the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic (DNR) and Luhansk People's Republic (LNR) in eastern Ukraine, and suspending the issuance of new sovereign debt by the Russian government in Japan.

He did not mention if sanctions are being imposed on the energy sector, including LNG, but said that the "situation" will not have a huge impact on the country's energy supply. He also said that Japan will "promptly take further measures" if the situation worsens, without mentioning if LNG will be implicated.

"LNG is also in stock for a few weeks at electric power companies and gas companies," Kishida said in his only mention of LNG, as he spoke of the country's 240 days of crude oil reserves. "For this reason, we recognise that this situation will not immediately cause a major hindrance to the stable supply of energy," he continued.

Expectations on whether Japan's sanctions on Russia will be extended to LNG are mixed. "I don't think they will touch the energy sector… it will be a lose-lose situation for both countries," a Japanese buyer said.

But some expect the curbs to cover all sectors, including LNG. "Once they impose a sanction, it means they immediately want to stop trading with that country," a trading analyst said.

Japan imported a total of 6.57mn t of LNG from Russia in 2021, up from 6.14mn t a year earlier. Its Russian imports in 2021 accounted for around 8.8pc of its total LNG imports of 74.3mn t in the year.

It received 645,596t of LNG from Russia in December 2021, accounting for 9.2pc of its total LNG imports in the month. Russia was the country's fourth-largest LNG exporter in December, after Australia, Malaysia and Qatar.

"I am hoping LNG will remain outside of [the sanctions] if they don't want the population to pay," a trader said.

"End users [and the] general population will bear the brunt of energy inflation," he said, adding that high LNG prices have already trickled down to and impacted downstream customers.

Asian spot LNG prices have traded at high levels since September last year, largely fuelled by gains in European gas hub prices. The ANEA price, the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia including Japan, for the front half-month averaged $30.504/mn Btu from 1 September last year to 22 February this year and hit a record high of $44.980/mn Btu on 22 December 2021. It was last assessed at $24.535/mn Btu on 22 February, nearly four times the $6.780/mn Btu assessed exactly a year earlier.

Japan's LNG inventories rise

Japan's LNG inventory levels have picked up slightly in recent weeks, after a fall in coal- and oil-fired generation capacity in end-January increased the call on gas for power generation and led to a dip in stock levels.

Japan's main power utilities held 1.82mn t of LNG as of 20 February, up by 2.2pc from 1.78mn t a week earlier and higher than 1.67mn t on 30 January, according to a weekly survey by the trade and industry ministry. But they were lower than 2.3mn t at the end of February last year.

LNG market participants generally echoed Kishida's views of ample inventories, but cautioned that any cold snap that occurs in the coming weeks would draw down inventories rapidly.

"I think Japanese buyers will be able to cope in the next 2-3 weeks [in the event of LNG sanctions] because inventories are okay," a Japanese trader said. But an unexpected cold snap could draw down inventories significantly. This is also "bearing in mind that Japan's storage capacity is not as huge as in China [or] Europe," a trader at a European firm said.

The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) is so far predicting generally warmer-than-usual weather in the country in the coming weeks. It forecast on 17 February a 50pc or high probability of above-normal temperatures throughout Japan from 26 February-4 March, and a 30-50pc likelihood of that from 5-18 March.

But Japanese LNG buyers may have to procure replacement cargoes from the spot market for deliveries further out if their long-term supplies from Russia are disrupted.

"Maybe there won't be so much impact on the prompt market since buyers already bought some spot cargoes, but it may affect their supply-demand balance for summer if they don't get term cargoes from Russia," a Japanese buyer said. The northern hemisphere summer season typically lasts from June-September.

Several Japanese buyers — including power utilities Kansai Electric, Chugoku Electric and Kyushu Electric — have bought March and April cargoes from the spot market in recent weeks, with the supplies sourced from various liquefaction plants, including those in Oman and Australia.

At least eight Japanese buyers have term offtakes from the 9.6mn t/yr Sakhalin LNG project in far east Russia. Major state-owned importer Jera has a contract to receive 1.5mn t/yr of LNG from the facility across 2009-29 on a fob basis, and a separate agreement to receive 500,000 t/yr from 2011-26 on a des basis.

Other Japanese firms including Hiroshima Gas, Osaka Gas, Saibu Gas, Toho Gas, Tokyo Gas, Kyushu Electric and Tohoku Electric have separate contracts to receive a total of at least 3mn t/yr of LNG from the project.

Future LNG collaboration may be in jeopardy

Sustained sanctions on LNG, if they are imposed, could hurt chances of further collaboration between the two countries, particularly at a time when several of Japan's contracts with other LNG suppliers have expired or are expiring and Russian liquefaction capacity is expanding, industry participants said.

The first 6.6mn t/yr train at the planned 19.8mn t/yr Novatek-led Arctic LNG 2 facility is expected to begin operations in 2023, with the second and third equally-sized trains expected to commence in 2024 and 2025, respectively. Novatek has so far signed long-term agreements with Chinese firms that include ENN, Zhejiang Energy Gas and Shenergy to supply LNG from Arctic 2, in addition to trading firms Vitol and Glencore, as well as Spain's Repsol, and may potentially be looking to ink more term deals, industry participants said.

State-owned importer Jera said last November that it would not renew its long-term LNG contracts totalling 5.5mn t/yr from Qatar that were due to expire the following month. Another Japanese buyer has an existing contract with Malaysian state-owned Petronas to buy LNG from the 30mn t/yr Bintulu LNG plant that will expire in March this year.

By Joey Chua


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/06/23

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes

Dubai, 23 June (Argus) — A senior Iranian lawmaker says parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed" in response to US airstrikes on three nuclear sites early Sunday — a move that would severely disrupt global oil flows. Esmaeil Kowsari — a member of the national security and foreign policy commission, and a former high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — told state-owned Press TV that lawmakers had reached a consensus that closure would be the appropriate response. Argus understands that while members of parliament were all in agreement, the issue was not formally put to a vote. Kowsari said the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security body. His comments have drawn global attention as markets await Iran's response to the strikes, which US president Donald Trump ordered against nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The Fordow site is heavily fortified and located underground. The Natanz facility had already been targeted by Israeli strikes, prompting a series of retaliatory missile and drone exchanges between Iran and Israel. Iranian officials, including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had repeatedly warned Washington that any direct military action would trigger a response causing "irreparable" harm to the US. . Variety of options The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through. It has, however, previously targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Closure of the strait is one of several retaliatory options regularly floated by Iranian political and military leaders. Others include military strikes on US bases across the Mideast Gulf. The US maintains installations in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Asked whether closing the strait was under consideration, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi declined to confirm, saying only that "there are a variety of options available to us". Araqchi travelled to Moscow late on Sunday and is expected to meet Russian president Vladimir Putin on Monday. Moscow has condemned the US strikes. Ali Akbar Velayati, a long-time adviser to Khamenei, also issued a veiled threat to Washington, saying: "West Asia is not Greenland, and the strait of Hormuz is fundamentally different from the Panama Canal." The comment referenced earlier threats by Trump to assert US control over Greenland and the Panama Canal during the early days of his second term. US secretary of state Marco Rubio warned that any attempt by Iran to close the strait would be "a terrible mistake." "It's economic suicide for them if they do it, and we retain options to deal with that," he said. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US bombs nuclear sites in Iran: Update


25/06/22
25/06/22

US bombs nuclear sites in Iran: Update

Updates with remarks from President Donald Trump Washington, 21 June (Argus) — The US conducted air strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran, President Donald Trump said Saturday evening. US bombers targeted the heavily fortified, underground facility at Fordow and sites at Natanz and Isfahan, Trump said on his social media platform. "The strikes were a spectacular military success," Trump said in a televised address Saturday night. "Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier." Trump waited until after the US planes had left Iranian airspace before making the announcement. Israel's air and missile strikes, underway since 13 June, had already targeted those three facilities, in addition to some domestic energy infrastructure and urban areas across Iran. UN nuclear watchdog the IAEA on Friday warned of potential nuclear safety hazards from the ongoing Israeli attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities and cautioned Israel against targeting Iran's Busherh nuclear power plant and a nuclear research laboratory in Tehran. Washington-based military experts assessed that only the US Air Force had the right type of munitions to destroy Fordow. Involving the US in the Israel-Iran war is a watershed moment for Trump's presidency. Trump in the past decade has often lambasted his predecessors for involving the US in costly and fruitless military adventures in the Middle East. But he has changed his tune since the beginning of Israel's offensive on Iran, claiming that eliminating Iran's nuclear program was worth the US involvement. Trump, in his televised address, referenced the US' killing of senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in January 2020 — the last time US and Iranian forces directly exchanged fire. Tehran's response at that time involved missile attacks on US bases in Iraq that wounded more than 100 US military personnel, but drew no heavy US retaliation. The markets will closely watch Tehran's reaction to the US air strikes. Even before the US bombing raids, Trump's public musings about a possible US role in Israel's campaign against Iran in the past week spurred the oil industry and shipping sectors to increase the risk premiums embedded in their calculations. Most immediately at stake are Iran's 2.5mn b/d of crude, condensate and products exports, which mostly head to China. Oil markets are also concerned about the risk of contagion if Israel and the US draw retaliatory attacks elsewhere in the Mideast Gulf or jeopardize shipping through the strait of Hormuz — the global oil market's single most vulnerable chokepoint, through which pass about 17mn b/d of crude and products, or about a quarter of seaborne oil trade. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US bombs nuclear sites in Iran


25/06/22
25/06/22

US bombs nuclear sites in Iran

Washington, 21 June (Argus) — The US conducted air strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran, President Donald Trump said Saturday evening. The US bombers targeted the heavily fortified, underground facility at Fordow and sites at Natanz and Isfahan, Trump said on his social media platform. He said he would make a televised address at 10pm ET Saturday "regarding our very successful military operation in Iran". "A full payload of BOMBS was dropped on the primary site, Fordow," Trump said. Trump waited until after the US planes had left Iranian airspace before making the announcement. Israel's air and missile strikes, underway since 13 June, already targeted those three facilities, in addition to some domestic energy infrastructure and urban areas across Iran. UN nuclear watchdog the IAEA on Friday warned of potential nuclear safety hazards from the ongoing Israeli attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities and cautioned Israel against targeting Iran's Busherh nuclear power plant and a nuclear research laboratory in Tehran. Washington-based military experts assessed that only the US Air Force had the right type of munitions to destroy Fordow. Involving the US in the Israel-Iran war is a watershed moment for Trump's presidency. Trump in the past decade often lambasted his predecessors for involving the US in costly and fruitless military adventures in the Middle East. But he has changed his tune since the beginning of Israel's offensive on Iran, claiming that eliminating Iran's nuclear program was worth the US involvement. Trump's public musings about a possible US role in Israel's campaign against Iran in the past week spurred the oil industry and shipping sectors to increase the risk premiums embedded in their calculations. Trump since 13 June alternatively held out the prospect of diplomacy and discussed killing senior Iranian leaders. Even today, after the US air strikes, Trump posted that "NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!". The markets will closely watch Tehran's reaction to the US air strikes. Most immediately at stake are Iran's 2.5mn b/d of crude, condensate and products exports, which mostly head to China. Oil markets are also concerned about the risk of contagion if Israel and the US draw retaliatory attacks elsewhere in the Mideast Gulf or jeopardize shipping through the strait of Hormuz — the global oil market's single most vulnerable chokepoint, through which pass about 17mn b/d of crude and products, or about a quarter of seaborne oil trade. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop 28 outcome must be implemented in full: Cop 30 head


25/06/20
25/06/20

Cop 28 outcome must be implemented in full: Cop 30 head

London, 20 June (Argus) — The incoming UN Cop 30 summit president Andre Correa do Lago has set out his objectives for the conference in November, placing as a key priority the Cop 28 outcome of trebling renewables capacity and transitioning away from fossil fuels. Correa do Lago today said his plan is to drive "collective action" to tackle climate change, placing a strong emphasis on the global stocktake, the first of which was concluded at Cop 28 in 2023 . That outcome saw almost 200 countries commit to "transition away" from fossil fuels, as well as treble renewables capacity by 2030. The global stocktake, a five-yearly process, sets out progress made towards Paris climate agreement goals. Today's "Action Agenda must drive momentum towards the full implementation of the GST [global stocktake]", Correa do Lago said. The incoming Cop president is focusing on implementing agreements made at previous Cops, and ensuring that countries and all other stakeholders — such as sub-nationals and the private sector — work together to put the decisions into action. Correa do Lago's letter today repeated language from the Cop 28 outcome, and noted his other main themes for Cop 30, which will take place in Belem, in Brazil's Para state, on 10-21 November. As well as shifting energy, industry and transport from fossil fuel-powered to lower- or zero-carbon alternatives, he listed forests, oceans and biodiversity and agriculture and food as key topics. Further topics involved building resilience for cities, infrastructure and water and human and social development. A final priority was enablers and accelerators across the board, including for finance and technology. Correa do Lago said in May that Cop 30 should be a "pivot point" to action on climate change, and "a new era of putting into practice" what has been agreed at previous Cop summits. He has noted a difficult geopolitical situation , which could make talks more challenging. Brazil's Cop 30 presidency is also focused on climate finance at UN climate talks, currently underway in Bonn, Germany. These 'halfway point' discussions serve to cover substantial technical groundwork ahead of political talks at Cop summits each November. Brazil yesterday at Bonn presented a draft of a roadmap to scale up climate finance — from all sources — to $1.3 trillion/year by 2035. The roadmap will not be officially negotiated, although it was a key outcome from Cop 29 in 2024 and is likely to be finalised just ahead of Cop 30 this year. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

SEE gas operators propose changes to Route 1 product


25/06/19
25/06/19

SEE gas operators propose changes to Route 1 product

London, 19 June (Argus) — Gas transmission system operators (TSOs) in southeast Europe have proposed several changes to the "Route 1" integrated capacity product from Greece to Ukraine, including allowing nominations from the Greek virtual trading point (VTP) to count toward exports, subject to approval by the regulator. Route 1, a product offered only between June and October in order to help Ukraine reach its goal of importing roughly 5bn m³ of gas in preparation for the next heating season, bundles together capacity at the Kulata/Sidirokastro, Negru Voda/Kardam, Isaccea/Orlovka, Kaushany and Grebenyky interconnection points. The first monthly auction for Route 1 was held on 29 May , but no capacity sold at the auction as traders pointed toward serious questions over the product's compliance with EU law, a restrictive rule set and insufficient economic incentive to book. During a meeting with regional shippers today, the route's TSOs proposed several changes to the product. The most prominent change would allow nominations from the Greek VTP to count towards exports under the Route 1 product, which would increase the pool of eligible users if approved by the Greek regulatory authority. Under previous rules, Route 1 users would have had to cumulatively nominate at the Greek entry points of Agia Triada, Nea Mesimvria, Amfitriti and Kipi at least as much as they notify Greek TSO Desfa they intend to deliver to Ukraine, but this list explicitly did not include the Greek VTP or Kulata/Sidirokastro. These rules effectively heavily favoured users with LNG capacity at Revithoussa. The operators also clarified that Route 1 users will not be required to obtain a licence from Moldovan regulator Anre and conclude a balancing contract, as the gas will only be transmitted from one Moldovan interconnection to another. It is also not required to sign a balancing contract with Romanian TSO Transgaz, although it is necessary with Bulgartransgaz. The operators also clarified that interested parties do not need to have licences to trade in all five countries along the route, simply to be registered system users with access to transmission services for each of the TSOs. Although several market participants told Argus that even this process can take a month or longer. Other details of the product, such as the 25pc discount at all points except Isaccea entry, Kaushany exit and Grebenyky entry, where a 46pc discount is already applied by the Ukrainian TSO, remain in place. The operators do not appear to have addressed concerns raised by Energy Traders Europe that the offering of discounts on point-to-point capacity on a monthly basis is not in line with the EU's network code on capacity allocation (NC CAM). Traders today still expressed reservations about booking the Route 1 product, noting that the Greek discount to other competing routes into Ukraine is probably not large enough to justify booking given the cost of the tariffs. Argus assessed the Greek day-ahead price at a €6.70/MWh discount to the Slovak day-ahead market, the other most prominent underutilised route to Ukraine, at the most recent close. But at a cost of around €7/MWh for the Route 1 tariffs and volume fees, compared with a monthly Slovak exit tariff of €1.47/MWh and a volume fee of around €0.35/MWh, Route 1 would only marginally be in the money. Further, the 131 GWh/d booking from the Czech Republic to Slovakia for July , as well as a nearly correspondingly-large Ukrainian entry booking from Slovakia , suggests that traders intend to supply a large volume of gas to Ukraine along the main route competing with Route 1. Additionally, worries about the potential regulatory problems associated with Route 1 have not been addressed, leaving some firms uneasy, although all agreed that the potential inclusion of Greek VTP nominations would have a positive effect on potential interest. The next Route 1 auction will be held on the Regional Booking Platform (RBP) on Monday, with around 30 GWh/d on offer. By Brendan A'Hearn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more