Democrats ready vote on climate bill: Correction

  • : Biofuels, Coal, Crude oil, Electricity, Emissions, Metals, Natural gas, Oil products
  • 22/07/28

Corrects hydrogen production credit price in 12th paragraph.

Democrats in the US Senate plan to vote as soon as next week on a massive budget deal that would spend nearly $370bn on energy security and climate change over the next decade, alongside new mandates to hold regular oil and gas lease sales on federal land and waters.

The budget agreement, if enacted, would be by far the largest climate bill to pass in the US. Senate Democrats say their plan to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on clean energy — through tax credits and grants for wind, solar, biofuels, carbon capture, hydrogen, electric vehicles and sustainable aviation fuel — will put the US on track to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 40pc by 2030, relative to 2005 levels. That would still be short of President Joe Biden's goal for a 50pc reduction by the same year.

But the bill also aligns with demands from the US senator Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) for the budget to include a "truly all of the above" energy package that would retain a role for fossil fuels over the next decade. The bill would revive a $192mn oil and gas lease sale in the US Gulf of Mexico that a federal judge scrapped early this year and require at least three other offshore oil and gas lease sales by late 2023. Another provision includes a first-time fee on excess methane emissions from thousands of large oil and gas facilities starting in 2024.

Democrats have set an aggressive schedule for advancing the budget bill, which also includes a new 15pc minimum tax on large corporations, more tax enforcement to pay for the climate spending and $300bn in deficit reduction. Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) wants to hold a floor vote next week, which would require unanimous support from all 50 members who caucus with Democrats.

The final budget deal, negotiated in secret by Schumer and Manchin over the last two weeks, gives Democrats a chance to rescue large parts of their agenda before the midterm elections in November. The last-minute talks hinged in part on a commitment by Democrats to separately vote on energy infrastructure permitting changes by the end of the year.

"It was kept very quiet because I wasn't sure it was ever going to come to fruition," Manchin said. "I wanted to make sure we had a robust energy reform in our permitting process."

Biden on 27 July backed the "historic" legislation as a way to fight climate change, paid for by requiring corporations to pay their "fair share" of taxes. Biden plans to offer remarks on the bill, named the Inflation Reduction Act, today from the White House.

Republicans plan to fiercely oppose the bill, which just days ago was widely expected to be scaled back to focus on prescription drugs and healthcare. Republicans are citing last month's 9.1pc annual inflation rate and two consecutive quarters of declining US GDP to push against major legislation backed by Democrats.

"After Democrats bungled the economy and failed to meet expectations in five of the last six quarters of economic growth, imposing the Schumer-Manchin tax hikes on our economy will only make things worse," US House Ways and Means ranking member Kevin Brady (R-Texas) said.

Energy, climate spending

The core climate spending in the bill consists of tens of billions of dollars of tax credits, grants and loans for renewables, energy efficiency, biofuels, nuclear, carbon capture, clean hydrogen and sustainable aviation fuel.

The bill would extend by two years a $1/USG tax credit for biodiesel and renewable diesel by two years, until 31 December 2024. It would create a $1.25/USG tax credit for sustainable aviation fuel that has at least a 50pc reduction in carbon emissions compared to conventional fuels. Newly built hydrogen facilities placed into service prior to 2033 would qualify for a 10-year production credit of up to $3/kg for low-carbon hydrogen.

The bill would include a three-year extension of production tax credits for wind plants that begin construction before 2025. It would create a first-ever production credit of up to 15¢/kWh for some existing nuclear power plants.

It includes a seven-year extension of the 45Q tax credit for carbon sequestration, to cover facilities that start construction before 2033, and increase the rate to up to $85/metric tonne (t) from $50/t for geologic storage.

The agreement would bolster tax credits for electric vehicles (EV) by lifting a manufacturer limit on the number of new EV that can qualify for a $7,500 tax credit. It would also create a new $4,000 per vehicle tax credit for used EVs.

Other climate spending in the bill includes $30bn in grants and loans for states and electric utilities to transition to clean energy, $10bn in tax credits to build clean energy manufacturing plants, $6bn in grants and tax credits to cut emissions from industrial plants, and $3bn for the US Postal Service to buy zero-emission vehicles.

The bill would offer $60bn for environmental justice, such as grants to reduce emissions at ports and from heavy-duty vehicles.

Oil, gas support

Manchin sought to use his position negotiating the bill to ensure that fossil fuels are not "arbitrarily eliminated" over the next decade, based on concerns that continued production is needed to keep energy prices affordable and supply oversea allies with energy.

In a win for the oil sector, the bill would reinstate Lease Sale 257, a $192mn offshore oil and gas lease sale that a federal judge threw out earlier this year. It would also require the Biden administration to hold two other oil and gas lease sales in the US Gulf of Mexico and another sale in the Alaska's Cook Inlet that never occurred. The two Gulf of Mexico lease sales would need to be held by the end of 2022 and by 30 September 2023.

The bill is "grounded in reality" and appears to offer a path forward for offshore energy of all types, offshore industry group the National Ocean Industries Association president Erik Milito said.

The US Interior Department would face pressure to retain oil and gas leasing going forward under a separate provision. To approve onshore wind and solar projects on federal land, the bill would require there to be an onshore oil and gas lease sale in the preceding 120 days, along with at least 2mn acres of land leased in the prior year. A similar provision would apply to offshore wind by tying it to holding an offshore oil and gas lease sale during the prior year for at least 60mn acres.

But the budget deal also includes provisions meant to reduce the emissions intensity of oil and gas production across the US, while reducing the amount of speculative oil and gas leasing that critics say ties up large amounts of federal land that is unlikely to ever be developed.

The bill would place a first-time fee on methane emissions for about 2,400 large oil and gas facilities that already report emissions under "Subpart W" greenhouse gas reporting requirements. The fee would start at $900 per metric tonne (t) in 2024 and reach $1,500/t by 2026, for methane emissions above a 0.2pc leakage rate for oil and gas production facilities, 0.11pc for pipelines and 0.05pc for gas processing and LNG plants. The bill would give the US Environmental Protection Agency more than $1.5bn to deliver in grants and loans to help the oil and gas sector monitor and cut down down on methane leaks.

For oil and gas leasing on federal land, the bill would raise royalty rates to a minimum of 16.7pc, up from 12.5pc, and set a first time maximum royalty rate of 18.75pc. During lease sales, it would increase minimum bids on onshore land to $10/acre from $2/acre, raise annual rental payments, and eliminate a program that offered discounted bids for non-competitive lease sales.

And for the first time, the bill would require operators that obtain any new oil and gas leases to pay federal royalties on all natural gas lost to flaring and venting.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/03

Indonesia’s Tangguh LNG facility offers Jun-Jul cargoes

Indonesia’s Tangguh LNG facility offers Jun-Jul cargoes

Singapore, 3 May (Argus) — Indonesia's 7.6mn t/yr BP-operated Tangguh LNG facility is offering four LNG cargoes for June-July loading, through a tender that closes on 6 May. The Tangguh LNG project in Indonesia's west Papua province is offering four cargoes on a fob basis for loading on 17, 22, 27 June, and on 2 July, or two cargoes on a des basis. But the delivery windows are unclear. The firm was last in the market in March , when it offered four cargoes on a fob basis for loading during 28-29 April, 1-2 May, 3-4 May and 17-19 May, or three cargoes on a des basis for delivery over 6-8 May, 8-10 May and 12-14 May. But it is unclear if these cargoes were sold eventually. This offer adds to a growing pool of availability for June and July cargoes, as summer restocking demand among traditional major importing region northeast Asia is poised to be lower this year. This is mainly owing to higher inventories after the winter season and more than sufficient contracted term deliveries, buyers in the region said. This is despite Japan and South Korea forecasting higher summer temperatures this year as compared to the previous year, according to the Japan Meteorological Agency and Korea Meteorological Administration on 23 April. Spot prices have remained relatively rangebound at around high-$9s to low-$10s/mn Btu since the end of March despite weak demand. Spot prices have been tracking some strength in Dutch TTF contract prices, which has reduced importers' incentive to step up spot purchases since imported spot has no obvious price advantage. The front half-month of the ANEA — the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia — was last assessed on 3 May at $9.955/mn Btu, lower by about 11¢/mn Btu from a week earlier, but about 71¢/mn Btu higher from a month earlier. Spot demand has been mostly confined to south and southeast Asian importers. Most of southeast Asia is currently experiencing a heatwave, which is likely to continue driving spot LNG demand from firms like Thailand's state-controlled PTT. The firm has issued another tender seeking three deliveries over 1-2, 7-8 and 10-11 July that closed on 3 May. It may have awarded the tender, but further details are unclear, traders said. By Rou Urn Lee Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia's WesCEF to pursue Li plans despite hurdles


24/05/03
24/05/03

Australia's WesCEF to pursue Li plans despite hurdles

Singapore, 3 May (Argus) — Australian conglomerate Wesfarmers will still pursue the strategy for its chemicals, energy and fertilisers arm (WesCEF) to be an integrated lithium producer, despite the recent lithium market downturn. Wesfarmers earlier this year warned of unprofitable lithium sales from its Mount Holland project , owing to high production costs as it goes through a ramp-up. But WesCEF plans to weather through the downturn and plow ahead with its lithium downstream developments, given strong long-term fundamentals and despite the market's immaturity and cyclical demand, according to the group's executives on 2 May. Spodumene prices in China — which dominates global consumption of lithium raw materials — were assessed at $1,080-1,180/t on 30 April, down sharply from $5,750-5,900/t at the start of 2023. "It's also worth remembering that when we invested in Covalent and took the final investment decision , lithium hydroxide prices were lower than they are today," said WesCEF's managing director Ian Hansen. Wesfarmers and Chilean lithium firm SQM jointly own Australian firm Covalent Lithium, which looks after the Mount Holland project that includes a mine, concentrator and its 50,000 t/yr Kwinana lithium hydroxide refinery. Completing the refinery's construction and commissioning remains WesCEF's priority, with the mine and concentrator going through a ramp-up, according to WesCEF. The firm is also progressing its potential expansion project for the mine and concentrator, which it submitted an application for environmental approvals. The first lithium hydroxide output out of the Kwinana refinery is still expected in the first half of 2025, with a delay in timeline. Covalent completed its first spodumene concentrate shipment earlier in March, said WesCEF. Wesfarmers expected its share of spodumene concentrate output from Mount Holland to be 50,000t in the current July 2023-June 2024 fiscal year. The share will rise to 150,000-190,000t in the upcoming July 2024-June 2025 fiscal year. Lithium downturn The lithium downturn has led to multiple firms, including major particpants across the lithium and battery supply chain, reporting poor January-March results. Australian lithium and nickel producer IGO, affected by slumps in the lithium and nickel markets, reported its first quarterly loss in years while posting lower output . Major US lithium producer Albemarle's executives have also called the market "unsustainable" in the long run, as it posts a whopping $1.1bn year-on-year fall in sales from its energy storage division. Major Chinese lithium producer Tianqi Lithium also suffered heavy losses, while global lithium firm Arcadium Lithium earlier this year cut its planned sales numbers this year and warned that current market prices will weigh on future supply. South Korea's top battery manufacturer LG Energy Solution (LGES) reported W157bn of operating profit in January-March , but would have reported an operating loss of W32bn if it did not receive almost W189bn in US Inflation Reduction Act tax credits. By Joseph Ho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Nippon Steel delays timeline to acquire US Steel


24/05/03
24/05/03

Nippon Steel delays timeline to acquire US Steel

Tokyo, 3 May (Argus) — Japan's Nippon Steel has extended the scheduled timing of its US Steel acquisition completion until the end of the year, following a request by US authorities to submit more documentation, postponing an original plan of closing the deal by September at the latest. Nippon Steel will take more time to complete its $15bn deal to buy US Steel , as the Japanese firm received from the US Department of Justice a "second request" on submitting further documents necessary for the approval procedure. The deal was initially scheduled to close during April-September but is postponed to sometime during July-December, the Japanese firm announced on 3 May. Nippon Steel received the additional request in April, according to a company representative who spoke to Argus, without disclosing the specific date. The company anticipated the possibility of additional requirements, he added. The acquisition procedure may not finish before the US presidential election in November. Both the Democratic and the Republican party candidates repeatedly and vocally have opposed the deal , with incumbent US President Joe Biden pledging that a fellow American steel producer will be "American owned, American operated by American union steel workers". Nippon Steel is confident that its acquisition plan will eventually clear regulatory hurdles with "fair and objective judgement" from the US authorities, the representative added. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Oregon renewable diesel pours into CFP bank


24/05/02
24/05/02

Oregon renewable diesel pours into CFP bank

Houston, 2 May (Argus) — Rising renewable diesel deliveries helped grow the volume of Oregon Clean Fuels Program (CFP) credits available for future compliance by a record 30pc in the fourth quarter of 2023, according to state data released today. The roughly 253,000 metric tonne (t) increase in available credits from the previous quarter — bringing the total to 1.1mn t — illustrates the spreading influence of US renewable diesel capacity on markets offering the most incentives for their output. California and Oregon low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) credit prices have tumbled as renewable diesel deliveries generate a surge of credits in excess of immediate deficit needs. LCFS credits do not expire. LCFS programs require yearly reductions to transportation fuel carbon intensity. Higher-carbon fuels that exceed the annual limits incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from the distribution to the market of approved, lower-carbon alternatives. Renewable diesel volumes in Oregon increased by 12pc from the previous quarter to about 37,000 b/d — more than double the volume reported in the fourth quarter of 2022. The fuel represented 24pc of the Oregon liquid diesel pool for the period, while petroleum diesel fell to 75pc. Renewable diesel generated 46pc of all new credits for the quarter, compared to the 14pc from the next-highest contributor, biodiesel. Deficit generation meanwhile shrank from the previous quarter. Gasoline deficits fell by 6.6pc from the third quarter as consumption fell by roughly the same amount. Gasoline use trailed the fourth quarter of 2022 by 7.1pc. Diesel deficits also shrank as renewable alternatives push it out of the Oregon market. Petroleum diesel deficits fell by 19pc from the previous quarter and consumption was 27pc lower than the fourth quarter of 2022. Spot Oregon credits have fallen by half since late September, when state data offered the first indications that renewable diesel that was already inundating the California market had found its way to the smaller Oregon pool. The quarter marks the first time Oregon credits available for future compliance have exceeded 1mn t. Oregon in 2022 approved program targets extending into next decade that target a 20pc reduction by 2030 and a 37pc reduction by 2035. An ongoing rulemaking process this year will consider changes to how the state calculates the carbon intensity of fuels and verifies the activity of participants, but will not touch annual targets. By Elliott Blackburn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US regulator slams executive over Opec 'collusion'


24/05/02
24/05/02

US regulator slams executive over Opec 'collusion'

Washington, 2 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulators for the first time took action against a leading US oil executive over his alleged "collusion" with Opec, but the producers' alliance itself was not a target of investigation. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) today issued a proposed consent order barring former Pioneer Natural Resources chief executive Scott Sheffield from joining the board of ExxonMobil following its $59.5bn takeover of Pioneer. FTC accused Sheffield of organizing "anti-competitive coordinated output reductions between and among US crude oil producers" and members of Opec and the broader Opec+ alliance. "Opec and Opec+ are cartels that exist to control global crude oil production and reserves," FTC said. The specific charges against Sheffield relate to the outspoken executive's frequent public appearances where he opined on US companies' desired production levels, his meetings and frequent communications with Opec officials since 2017 and his advocacy of drastic production cuts by US companies as global demand fell sharply at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Opec under then secretary general Mohammed Barkindo began active outreach to independent US producers, starting in March 2017 with private dinner discussions held on the sidelines of IHS CERAWeek conferences in Houston, Texas. Barkindo hosted similar discussions at CERAWeek in 2018 and 2019, in addition to hosting some of the US companies' chief executives at Opec seminars in Vienna. FTC references Sheffield's public comments following those meetings and alleges that Sheffield kept in frequent touch with Opec officials via messaging service WhatsApp and other means to discuss production levels and prices. Barkindo at the time said that production cuts and prices were never on the agenda of his meetings with the US shale producers and that his organization wanted to better understand the US companies' technological innovation and to compare market outlooks and forecast models. Barkindo in the same time frame held similar discussions with major US hedge funds and money managers. US oil executives polled by Argus in 2017-20 also said that their discussions with Barkindo and other Opec officials revolved around market fundamentals. The US oil industry broadly felt that it was benefiting from a policy of production cuts Opec was implementing as it supported prices at a time when the US domestic production and crude exports grew uninterrupted. Former president Donald Trump took credit for engineering a breakthrough agreement in April 2020 to remove more than 10mn b/d of global crude supply by brokering an agreement between Saudi Arabia, Russia and other Opec+ producers. Even without prodding from Trump, US producers cut back production cuts in 2020 as transportation fuel demand and prices fell sharply in the first months of the pandemic. FTC singled out Sheffield for allegedly coordinating his company's production levels with Opec. Sheffield "held repeated, private conversations with high-ranking Opec representatives assuring them that Pioneer and its Permian basin rivals were working hard to keep oil output artificially low," according to the FTC order. Sheffield, who helped found Pioneer and was its longtime chairman, served as chief executive from 1997 to 2016 and from 2019 through 2023. He remains on the company's board, serving as special adviser to the chief executive since 1 January. The son of an oil executive, Sheffield attended high school in Tehran, Iran. Pioneer shrugged off what it termed a "fundamental misunderstanding" of global oil markets and said that FTC misread "the nature and intent" of Sheffield's actions. Opec declined to comment on FTC's action against Sheffield. FTC is so far the only US regulator to set sights on Opec, even if indirectly. President Joe Biden in 2021 separately tasked FTC with leading an investigation into whether there is price manipulation in gasoline markets. Biden, like many of his predecessors at a time of high gasoline prices, in 2022 accused Opec of uncompetitive behavior in oil markets and expressed support for US legislation allowing antitrust action against the organization by the US Department of Justice. But that acrimony has largely dissipated after global oil and US gasoline prices fell in 2023 from unusually high levels in the previous year. US Congress has not taken significant steps to advance the anti-Opec legislation since 2022. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more