Jera considers joining ExxonMobil’s H2 project in US
Japan's largest power producer by capacity Jera is considering joining an ExxonMobil-led hydrogen and ammonia production project in the US, aiming to boost its ammonia import portfolio in its efforts to reduce coal use.
Jera has signed a framework agreement with ExxonMobil to jointly explore the development of blue hydrogen and its derivative of ammonia at ExxonMobil's Baytown complex east of Houston, Texas, the Japanese firm said on 25 March.
Jera will explore the possibility of importing around 500,000 t/yr of ammonia and securing a stake in the project through the deal.
ExxonMobil is developing a hydrogen production plant and a carbon capture and storage (CCS) facility at its Baytown complex, aiming to begin operations in 2028.
The plant would produce around 900,000 t/yr of hydrogen, part of which will be used to produce around 1mn t/yr of ammonia, Jera said.
Jera is separately working with Norway-based fertilizer producer Yara and US ammonia producer CF Industries to develop blue ammonia production on the US Gulf coast, targeting production of more than 1mn t/yr under each partnership. Jera has not decided yet whether it wants to invest in the upstream projects.
Jera said it can proceed with projects to invest in low-carbon ammonia production and marketing only with financial and other support from the government. The private sector cannot make upstream or downstream decisions on fuel ammonia "based on just pure business judgment," Jera chief executive Yukio Kani said at CERAWeek by S&P Global in Houston on 20 March. Beyond funding, the government will have to help set safety and other standards for the new type of fuel, Kani said.
Jera aims to import around 2mn t/yr of fuel ammonia in 2030, which is nearly 70pc of Japan's current 2030 ammonia demand target of 3mn t/yr. The company is planning to start testing the use of ammonia at its 1GW Hekinan No.4 coal-fired unit by the end of this month.
Tokyo and Washington have also geared up efforts to strengthen their ties in clean energy technology development, alongside private-sector partnerships. Japan's trade and industry ministry and the US Department of Energy held a second US-Japan clean energy and energy security initiative plenary meeting on 19 March, ahead of a US-Japan leaders' summit in April. This is aimed at accelerating cooperation in developing and deploying clean energy technology such as nuclear energy, floating offshore wind, perovskite solar cell, geothermal, hydrogen and its derivatives, including ammonia and synthetic fuels, as well as carbon management.
Related news posts
Pakistan's ECC approves urea imports of 200,000t
Pakistan's ECC approves urea imports of 200,000t
Amsterdam, 8 May (Argus) — Pakistan's Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) met on 7 May and has approved the import of 200,000t of urea for the Kharif summer season. The ECC did not disclose an exact timeline, but a tender will have to be issued shortly if the imports are to meet demand in Kharif, which runs from April to September with demand peaking in June-July. Pakistan occasionally enters the import market to plug supply gaps in key consumption periods. State-owned importer TCP previously agreed a deal with Azerbaijan's state-owned Socar in early December last year to source 200,000t of urea for arrival by 20 January. Domestic supplier Engro began maintenance at its 1.3mn t/yr granular urea Enven plant towards the end of April and is expected to return to production in mid-June. Pakistan's urea inventories started April at around 170,000t, but are set to be under significant pressure in June-July, data from the country's national fertilizer development centre (NFDC) show. Demand is set to hit over 800,000t in June and around 650,000t in July, outstripping typical domestic output of 520,000-555,000 t/month in the peak summer months. This has prompted the need for imports, given current stock levels. By Harry Minihan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
EPA sets new oil and gas methane reporting rules
EPA sets new oil and gas methane reporting rules
Washington, 7 May (Argus) — Federal regulators have updated emissions reporting requirements for oil and gas facilities as they prepare to implement a methane "waste" fee for the industry. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Monday finalized new rules it says will improve the accuracy of data from the oil and gas sector under the federal greenhouse gas emissions reporting program. Oil and gas facility owners and operators will be required to estimate emissions from additional types of equipment under the rule, and they can draw on newer technologies, like remote sensing, to help estimate emissions. "EPA is applying the latest tools, cutting edge technology, and expertise to track and measure methane emissions from the oil and gas industry," agency administrator Michael Regan said. "Together, a combination of strong standards, good monitoring and reporting, and historic investments to cut methane pollution will ensure the US leads in the global transition to a clean energy economy." Data to support new fee The revisions to the "Subpart W" reporting requirements will be used to determine the amount of methane that will be subject to a "waste emissions charge" created by the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the law, the charge will be calculated based on the annual data that about 8,000 oil and gas sources are now required to report. The charge will begin at $900/t for 2024 methane emissions above a minimum threshold using current measurement data. It will then rise to $1,200/t in 2025 and $1,500/t in subsequent years. Industry officials had raised "serious concerns" about several aspects of the original proposal , warning it could lead to inflated emissions data. "We are reviewing the final rule and will work with Congress and the administration as we continue to reduce GHG emissions while producing the energy the world needs," American Petroleum Institute vice president of corporate policy Aaron Padilla said. The industry group previously said it will ask Congress to repeal the fee, which is only likely to occur if Republicans win control of the White House. Data collected since 2010 Oil and gas facilities have reported emissions under Subpart W since 2010. To simplify reporting, operators often count the equipment they have deployed, and use industry-wide averages to estimate emissions, in addition to other direct and indirect measurements. The industry has argued the Subpart W data is not accurate enough to collect the methane charge, which is expected to cost operators more than $6bn over the next decade. Environmental groups have had their own criticisms of the data, which they say omits vast amounts of emissions such as those from "super-emitter" events and poorly maintained flares. The final rule seeks to respond to some of those concerns by relying on updated emission factors, incorporating additional empirical data on emission rates, collecting data at a more granular level and relying on remote sensing technologies to detect large emission events. EPA also revised Subpart W to include more types of sources, including produced water tanks, nitrogen removal units and crankcase venting. The final rule also sets a threshold of 100 kg/hr of methane for requiring the reporting of emissions from "other large release events." The new data rules will take effect on 1 January 2025 and will first apply to reports submitted in early 2026 for next year's emissions. EPA is allowing the use of the new methodologies for calculating 2024 emissions, but operators can still use the existing rules. By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Superbac busca reestruturação de dívidas
Superbac busca reestruturação de dívidas
Sao Paulo, 7 May (Argus) — A empresa brasileira de fertilizantes Superbac entrou com pedido no Tribunal de Justiça do estado de São Paulo (TJ-SP) para renegociar dívidas com credores e bloquear temporariamente os pagamentos por 60 dias, de acordo com solicitação arquivada em 3 de maio. O pedido, feito para a 1ª Vara de Falências e Recuperação Judicial de São Paulo, não é uma solicitação formal de recuperação judicial, mas sinaliza que a Superbac poderá solicitar o processo no futuro. De acordo com a petição inicial, a razão para a interrupção é uma "dificuldade financeira momentânea, porém reversível". A empresa afirma no pedido que a suspensão dos pagamentos é essencial para preservar os ativos da Superbac. Os pagamentos apenas beneficiariam um pequeno grupo de credores e colocariam a empresa em risco, informou a empresa. A dívida total da Superbac é de cerca de R$650 milhões. Em meio aos credores mencionados no arquivo, estão empresas de fertilizantes como a BPC; bancos como BTG, Santander, Daycoval e XP; fundos de investimentos; e empresas de logística como Multitrans e Coocatrans. A XP adquiriu uma participação na Superbac em julho de 2023, totalizando R$300 milhões. Localizada em Cotia, em São Paulo, a Superbac é uma empresa de biotecnologia, fundada em 1995, com operações em diferentes setores, como agricultura, fertilizantes e biofertilizantes, petróleo, gás e saneamento básico. A Superbac corresponde por 50pc dos fertilizantes organominerais e 6pc dos fertilizantes especiais no Brasil, de acordo com a petição. A empresa informou que a queda global no preço das commodities está prejudicando seu crescimento, uma vez que o setor de agricultura representa 99pc de sua receita. A Superbac tem uma fábrica de fertilizantes organominerais no Paraná, assim como centros de pesquisa nos Estados Unidos, Colômbia, Israel e Singapura. Por João Petrini Envie comentários e solicite mais informações em feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . Todos os direitos reservados.
Chile’s 1Q24 sulacid imports drop 19pc on port closures
Chile’s 1Q24 sulacid imports drop 19pc on port closures
London, 7 May (Argus) — Chile's sulphuric acid imports in the first quarter fell by 19pc on the previous quarter owing to heavy swells at Mejillones port. A total of 875,000t of sulphuric acid was imported in January-March, down by 19pc from 1.08mn t in October-December last year, GTT data show. They were also down by 15pc on the year. The drop was mainly down to heavy disruption at Mejillones, Chile's main import hub for sulphuric acid. The port, which hosts three sulphuric acid discharge terminals, was shut for a record 40 days in January-March owing to heavy swells. The port closures led to lengthy waiting times to discharge, with some ships experiencing nearly 3-4 weeks from arrival at the port, which resulted in high demurrage costs and a lack of spot demand. China regained its position as the key supplier to Chile, with imports rising by 19pc to 342,200t in the quarter, as Asian-origin cargoes looked economically viable owing to sliding fob values, while freight rates remained firm. Imports from South Korea rose by 34pc on the quarter to 145,300t, while Japanese shipments rose by 14pc to 114,300t. Chinese fob values averaged $16/t on a midpoint basis during the quarter, down from $32/t fob on a midpoint basis in the fourth quarter of last year. South Korea/Japanese fob values averaged $8/t on a midpoint basis during the first quarter, down from $31/t the previous quarter. Imports from neighbouring Peru dropped by 34pc on the quarter on a combination of logistical issues stemming from the congestion at Mejillones and some unplanned output issues faced earlier in the year by a supplier in Peru. Imports from European countries continued to slow in the first quarter, falling by nearly 60pc on the prior quarter, as heavy buying by key Moroccan buyer OCP and transport restrictions through the Panama Canal affected trade flows. Belgium was the largest European supplier to Chile, shipping 33,000t, compared with 86,000t the previous quarter. By Lili Minton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more