Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Japan’s FEPC calls for clearer nuclear policy stance

  • : Coal, Electricity, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 24/05/20

Japan's Federation of Electric Power Companies (FEPC) has called for a clarification of the country's nuclear power policy, to ensure stable electricity supply and alignment with its net zero emissions goal.

The call comes as the government reviews its basic energy policy, which was formulated in 2021 and calls for the reduction of dependence on nuclear reactors as much as possible. But Japan's guidelines for green transformation, which was agreed in February 2023, states that Japan should make the most of existing nuclear reactors.

Tokyo should clearly state in its new energy policy that it is necessary to not only restart existing nuclear reactors, but also build new reactors, said FEPC chairman Kingo Hayashi on 17 May. Hayashi is also the president of utility Chubu Electric Power. Hayashi emphasised that to utilise reactors, it would be necessary to have discussions regarding financial support, policy measures that would help ensure cost recovery, address back-end issues in the nuclear fuel cycle and conduct a review of nuclear damage compensation law.

Japan's current basic energy policy is targeted for the April 2030-March 2031 fiscal year, when the country's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is forecast to fall by 46pc from 2013-14 levels. To achieve this, the power mix in the policy set the nuclear ratio at 20-22pc, as well as 36-38pc from renewables, 41pc from thermal fuels and 1pc from hydrogen and ammonia. Japan typically reviews the country's basic energy policy every three years.

Nuclear, as well as renewables, would be necessary to reduce Japan's GHG emissions, although thermal power units would still play a key role in addressing power shortages. But Japan has faced challenges in restarting the country's reactors following safety concerns after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, with only 12 reactors currently operational. Japan's nuclear generation in 2023 totalled 77TWh, which accounted for just 9pc of total power output.

Tokyo has made efforts to promote the use of reactors, after the current basic energy policy was introduced in 2021. The trade and industry ministry (Meti) has updated its nuclear policy, by allowing nuclear power operators to continue using reactors beyond their maximum lifespan of 60 years by excluding a safety scrutiny period in the wake of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster. This could advance the discussion on Japan's nuclear stance, especially if the new basic energy policy includes more supportive regulations.

The trade and industry ministry started discussions to review the energy policy on 15 May, aiming to revise it by the end of this fiscal year. It is still unclear what year it is targeting and what ratio will be set for each power source in the new policy. But the deliberation would form a key part of efforts to update the GHG emissions reduction goal, ahead of the submission of the country's new nationally determined contribution in 2025, with a timeframe for implementation until 2035.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/01/30

Trump to impose 25pc tariffs on Canada, Mexico

Trump to impose 25pc tariffs on Canada, Mexico

Washington, 30 January (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today he will proceed with plans to impose tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico on 1 February and explicitly referenced their potential application to crude imports. "I'll be putting the tariff of 25pc on Canada, and separately, 25pc on Mexico," Trump told reporters at the White House. "We will really have to do that, because we have very big deficits with those countries. Those tariffs may or may not rise with time." Pressed to explain if his tariffs may exempt crude imports, Trump said he was not inclined to exclude them but has yet to make a decision. "We may or may not" exclude oil, Trump said. "It depends on what the price is, if the oil is properly priced, if they treat us properly." Trump added: "We're going to make that determination, probably tonight, on oil." The looming face-off on tariffs has unnerved US oil producers and refiners, which are warning of severe impacts to the integrated North American energy markets if taxes are imposed on flows from Canada and Mexico to the US. Industry trade group the American Petroleum Institute has lobbied the administration to exclude crude from tariffs. US refiner Valero said today that a 25pc tariff on Canadian imports would force it to find alternative sources of crude, potentially resulting in a 10pc cut to throughputs. Valero's refining footprint in the US Gulf coast allows it to source feedstocks from around the world, but there is a point where a limit on heavy feedstocks like those from Canada could affect production of refined products, said chief operating officer Gary Simmons. Nearly all of Mexico's roughly 500,000 b/d of crude shipments to the US in January-November 2024 were waterborne cargoes sent to US Gulf coast refiners. Those shipments in the future could be diverted to Asia or Europe. Canadian producers have much less flexibility, as more than 4mn b/d of Canada's exports are wholly dependent on pipeline routes to and through the US. Canadian crude that flows through the US for export from Gulf coast ports would be exempt from tariffs under current trade rules, providing another potential outlet for Alberta producers — unless Trump's potential executive action on Canada tariffs eliminates that loophole. Trump frequently makes the case that foreign suppliers are solely responsible for paying tariffs. In reality, US importers pay the tariffs, and such costs are typically passed on to consumers. In the case of Canadian and Mexican crude, the US refiners that buy from those countries would pay a tax on the value of crude imports. Whether the price of Canadian crude falls by a sufficient amount to offset the 25pc tariff would depend on the market power of individual US refiners and Canadian producers, as well as actions by the Alberta government, according to a recent report by the Congressional Research Service. US refineries with access to alternative suppliers could source crude from non-Canadian producers, potentially keeping their additional costs below 25pc. Conversely, import reductions could pressure prices for Western Canadian Select (WCS) crude. In turn, Alberta could reimpose a production curtailment policy in a bid to narrow WCS discounts, the report said. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Study calls for e-fuels bunker subsidies, GHG tax


25/01/30
25/01/30

Study calls for e-fuels bunker subsidies, GHG tax

New York, 30 January (Argus) — E-fuel subsidies and a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions tax is needed for e-fuels to compete as a bunkering fuel before 2044, said a study by maritime consultancy University Maritime Advisory Services (Umas) and the UCL Energy Institute. The study found that adding a multiplier of the GHG intensity credit given to e-fuels could help to make e-fuel use financially competitive, but it would have to be set at high levels at the start. Using a multiplier of two, where one ship running on zero emissions e-fuel could generate credits to offset three other similar ships operating on conventional fossil fuels, was not able to make e-fuels more competitive before 2041. The multiplier would have to be set initially at 15 in 2030, falling to 10 by 2035, to enable the competitiveness of e-fuels, concludes the study. Additionally, levying a GHG tax or fee of $150-$300/t of CO2-equivalent would also make e-fuels more competitive. A tax of $30-$120/t CO2e is close to the aggregate level of subsidies, and would not create a sustained promotion of e-fuels. Under the current marine fuel standards, a combination of fossil fuels, including LNG, biofuels and carbon capture and storage systems would be most competitive up until 2036. After, blue ammonia dual fuel ships would be the lowest-cost solution until 2044. Ships that were more competitive from 2027-2035 would have at least 25pc higher operating cost from 2040 onwards. Thus, if ship owners order newbuild vessels to maximize short-term competitiveness, the sector is at a "major risk of technology lock-in" and will not be as cost-effective for reaching net zero by 2050. The study models a 2027-build, 14,000 twenty-foot equivalent unit container ship. The vessel sails between Asia and Latin America using different marine fuels such as bio-methanol, e-methanol, LNG, bio-LNG, e-LNG, bio-marine gasoil (MGO), e-MGO and very low-sulphur fuel oil. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EIB's transition, climate finance hit €50.7bn in 2024


25/01/30
25/01/30

EIB's transition, climate finance hit €50.7bn in 2024

London, 30 January (Argus) — The European Investment Bank (EIB) lifted its finance for the energy transition, climate action and environmental sustainability to a record €50.7bn ($52.8bn) in 2024 — 57pc of the bank's total financing last year. The EIB lifted its "green" financing by 14pc on the year . The bank signed €88.8bn in new financing in 2024, with the majority — €68.2bn — going to EU members. The projects financed in 2024 are expected to result in 21GWh of renewable power generation, as well as 107,370km of installed or upgraded power lines, the EIB said. The bank has an existing target for more than 50pc of its total annual financing to go to climate action and environmental sustainability by 2025. It surpassed this goal in 2021, 2022 and 2023, with 51pc, 58pc and 60pc, respectively, going towards climate action in those years. The EIB also aims to support €1 trillion of climate and sustainability investment by 2030 and remains "well on track" to reach this goal, it said. The EIB is the EU's lending arm, owned by EU member states. It is classed as a multilateral development bank (MDB). Countries often call on MDBs to do more to address climate change, as the institutions have significant leveraging power. The bank expects to lift its signed financing to €95bn this year, with plans to support renewable energy, grids and interconnectors, green hydrogen and storage and reduced emissions in heavy industry. "Far-reaching technological changes, the increasing costs of climate change and demand for more investment in defence, housing and global needs are the expected focus for 2025 to 2027," the EIB said today. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US growth slowed to 2.3pc in 4Q


25/01/30
25/01/30

US growth slowed to 2.3pc in 4Q

Houston, 30 January (Argus) — US economic growth slowed in the fourth quarter as falling private investment and exports offset gains in consumer spending. Growth in gross domestic product (GDP) slowed to a 2.3pc annual pace in the fourth quarter, down from 3.1pc in the third quarter, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reported Thursday. Consumer spending in the fourth quarter rose to a 4.2pc annual pace, up from 3.7pc in the prior quarter and the highest rate since the first quarter of 2023. Spending on goods rose by 6.6pc from a year earlier and spending on services rose by 3.1pc. Private investment fell by 5.6pc following an annual gain of 0.8pc in the third quarter. Residential investment rose at a 5.3pc annual pace after a 4.3pc drop in the prior quarter. Spending on equipment fell by 7.8pc after gaining 11pc in the prior quarter. Government spending and investment slowed to a 2.5pc annual gain from 5.1pc in the prior quarter. Defense spending rose by 3.3pc after climbing at a 13pc pace in the third quarter. Net exports in the fourth quarter fell by 0.8pc from a year earlier after a gain of 9.6pc in the prior quarter. Net imports fell on the year by 0.8pc. US economic growth for full-year 2024 slowed to 2.8pc from 2.9pc in 2023. GDP in 2022 rose by 2.5pc. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US’ Calcasieu Pass LNG repair work to end by Feb: Ferc


25/01/30
25/01/30

US’ Calcasieu Pass LNG repair work to end by Feb: Ferc

London, 30 January (Argus) — The remaining construction work at US LNG developer Venture Global's 12.4mn t/yr Calcasieu Pass export terminal is set to end by February, according to US energy regulator Ferc, which could allow the facility to start commercial operations. Calcasieu Pass loaded its first LNG cargo in March 2022. But the terminal has not yet been fully commissioned because of "performance deficiencies" with the facility's heat recovery steam generators, Venture Global told Ferc in February 2024 . Calcasieu Pass has five heat recovery steam generators, four of which have been repaired, Ferc said following an inspection of the terminal on 22 January. Repair work on the fifth generator is scheduled to be completed by February, Ferc added. Venture Global said in late December that it expects to start commercial operations at Calcasieu Pass by the end of March 2025, at which point the terminal's long-term offtake agreements will begin to apply. Calcasieu Pass has exported 418 cargoes since March 2022, according to data from ship-tracking firm Vortexa. The sale of these commissioning cargoes had generated Venture Global a revenue of $19.6bn by the end of September, the company said in December, ahead of its initial public offering. Venture Global has signed offtake agreements for all of Calcasieu Pass' 10mn t/yr of base capacity, as well as for 50pc of the volumes produced in excess of its nameplate capacity ( see table ). Seven long-term offtakers have launched arbitration proceedings against Venture Global over an alleged breach of contract for deliveries from the terminal. By Cerys Edwards Calcasieu Pass offtake agreements mn t/yr Offtaker Volume Duration ( yrs ) Nameplate capacity Shell 2.0 20 BP 2.0 20 Orlen 1.5 20 Edison 1.0 20 Galp 1.0 20 Repsol 1.0 20 Unipec 1.0 3 CNOOC Gas and Power Singapore Trading 0.5 5 Excess capacity BP 1.2 20 — Venture Global Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more