Q&A: Oman Shell to balance upstream with renewables

  • : Crude oil, Hydrogen, Natural gas
  • 24/05/24

Shell has been in Oman for decades now and had a front row seat to its energy evolution from primarily an oil producing nation to now a very gas-rich and gas-leaning hydrocarbons producer. Argus spoke to Oman Shell's country chairman Walid Hadi about the company's energy strategy in the sultanate. Edited highlights follow:

How would you characterize Oman's energy sector today, and where do new energies fit into that?

Oman is one of the countries where there is quite a bit of overlap between how we see the energy transition and how the country sees it.

Oman is clear that hydrocarbons will continue to play a role in its energy system for a long period of time. But it is also looking to decrease the carbon intensity to the most extent which is viable. We need to work on creating new energy systems or new components of energy system like hydrogen and EV charging to facilitate that. It is what we would like to call a 'just transition' because you think about it from macroeconomic perspective of the country and its economic health.

Shell is involved across the energy spectrum in Oman – from upstream gas to alternative, clean energies. What is Shell's overall strategy for the country?

In Oman, our strategic foundation has three main pillars. The first is around oil and liquids and our ambition is to sustain oil and liquids production.

At the same time, we aim to significantly reduce carbon intensity from the oil production coming from PDO. The second strategic pillar is gas, and our ambition here is to grow the amount of gas we are producing in Oman and also to help Oman grow its LNG export capabilities.

The more committed we are in unlocking the gas reserves in the country, the more we can support Oman's growth, diversification, and the resilience of its economy through investments and LNG revenue. Gas also offers a very logical and nice link into blue and green hydrogen, whether in sequence or as a stepping stone to scale the hydrogen economy in the country.

The last strategic pillar is to establish low-carbon value chains, predominantly centered around hydrogen, more likely blue hydrogen in the short term and very likely material green in the long term, which is subject to regulations and markets developing.

How would you view Oman's potential to be a major exporter of green hydrogen?

When examining the foundational aspects of green hydrogen manufacturing, such as the quality of solar and wind resources and their onshore complementarity, Oman emerges as a highly competitive country in terms of its capabilities.

But where we are in technology and where we are in global markets and on policy frameworks — the demand centers for green hydrogen are maturing but not yet matured. I think there will be a period of discovery for green hydrogen globally, not just for Oman, in the way LNG started 20-30 years ago. When it does, Oman will be well-positioned to play global role in the global hydrogen economy.

But the question is, how much time it is going to take us and what kind of multi-collaboration needs to be in place to enable that? The realisation of this potential hinges on several factors: the policies of the Omani government, its bilateral ties with Japan, Korea, and the EU, and the technological advancements within the industry.

Shell has also been looking at developing CCUS opportunities in the country. How big a role can CCUS play in the region's energy transition?

CCUS is going to be an important tool in decarbonising the global energy system. We have several projects globally that we are pursuing for own scope 1, scope 2 emissions reductions, as well as to enable scope 3 emissions with the customers and partners

In Oman, we are pursuing a blue hydrogen project where CCUS is a clear component. This initiative serves as a demonstrative case, helping us gauge the country's potential for CCUS implementation. We are using that as a proof point to understand the potential for CCUS in the country.

At this stage, it's too early to gauge the scale of CCUS adoption in Oman or our specific role within it. However, we are among the pioneers in establishing the initial proof point through our Blue Hydrogen initiative.

You were able to kick off production in block 10 in just over a year after signing the agreement. How are things progressing there?

We have started producing at the plateau levels that we agreed with the government, which is just above 500mn ft³/d.

Block 10 gas is sold to the government, through the government-owned Integrated Gas Company (IGC), which so far has been the entity that purchases gas from various operators in Oman like us, Shell. IGC then allocates that gas on a certain policy and value criteria across different sectors.

We will require new gas if we are going to expand LNG in Oman. There is active gas exploration happening there in Block 10. We know there is more potential in the block. We still don't know at what scale it can be produce gas or the reservoir's characteristics. But blocks 10 and 11 are a combination of undiscovered and discovered resources.

We are aiming to significantly increase gas production through a substantial boost. However, the exact scale and timing of this expansion will only be discernible upon the conclusion of our two-year exploration campaign in the block. We expect to understand the full growth potential by around mid to late 2025.

Do you have any updates on block 11? Has exploration work there begun?

We did have a material gas discovery which is being appraised this year, but it is a bit too early to draw conclusions at this stage.

So, after the appraisal campaign is completed, we will be able to talk more confidently about the production potential. Exploration is a very uncertain business. You must go after a lot of things and only a few will end up working. We have a very aggressive exploration campaign at the moment. We also expect by the end of 2025, we would be in a much better position to determine the next wave of growth and where it is going to come from.

Shell is set to become the largest off taker from Oman LNG, how do you view the LNG markets this year and next?

As a company, we are convinced, that the demand for LNG will grow and it needs to grow if the world is going to achieve the energy transition

Gas must play a role, it has to play a bigger role globally over the time, mainly to replace coal in power generation and given its higher efficiency and lower carbon intensity fuel in the energy mix.

While Oman may not be the largest LNG exporter globally or hold the most significant gas reserves, it is a niche player in the gas sector with a sophisticated and high-quality gas infrastructure. Oman's resource base remains robust, driving ongoing exploration and investment efforts.

This growth trajectory includes catering to domestic needs and servicing industrial hubs like Duqm and Sohar, alongside allocating resources for export purpose. We have the ambition to grow gas for domestic purpose and for gas for eventual exports

Have you identified any international markets to export LNG?

We have been historically and predominantly focused on east and we continue to see east as core LNG market with focus on Japan, Korea, and China.

Europe has also emerged on the back of the Ukraine-Russia crisis as growing demand center for LNG. Over time we might focus on different markets to a certain extent. It will be driven on maximising value for the country.

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.


MVP start-up shows permitting troubles in US

MVP start-up shows permitting troubles in US

Washington, 24 June (Argus) — The start-up of the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) after a delay of over five years highlights the difficulty the US gas industry faces in building greenfield pipelines under current permitting rules — which are unlikely to change any time soon. The 500km natural gas pipeline began commercial operations on 14 June, at a $7.85bn price tag that was more than double the cost expected when the project was first proposed in 2015. The 2bn ft³/d (20bn m³/yr) pipeline will move shale gas from a mountainous region in West Virginia to demand centres in Virginia, with the possibility for future expansions. MVP is expected to run at just 35-40pc of its nameplate capacity until downstream bottlenecks are removed, according to analyst groups RBN Energy and East Daley Analytics. The pipeline offers the promise of eventually easing price pressure in markets in southeastern US and increasing Appalachian gas output that would otherwise remain constrained. The pipeline — soon to change ownership once US independent EQT closes its $5.5bn all-stock acquisition of operator Equitrans Midstream — is the sole survivor of a round of eastern US pipeline cancellations in 2020-21 caused by permitting issues. MVP was also delayed by permitting lawsuits that forced construction crews to repeatedly halt work, adding billions of dollars to project costs as inflation increased the price of both labour and materials. Construction on the project resumed last year only after extraordinary intervention from the US Congress, which approved all remaining pipeline permits as part of an unrelated law that raised the limit on federal debt. The permitting obstacles for pipelines in the eastern US show no signs of fading, despite smaller changes to speed permitting negotiated through legislation last year. Retiring US senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, is circulating a comprehensive permitting package he says would fast-track the approval process for pipelines and renewable energy projects. Gas groups say any meaningful permitting bill will have to revise the judicial process and limit the ability of states such as New York to continue using water permits to veto new pipelines. In exchange, renewable energy projects could follow a faster permitting schedule for electricity transmission. But that is a deal many progressive Democrats are reluctant to take, particularly as they face the prospect that former president Donald Trump will win in US presidential elections in November. Far-right Republicans are hesitant to give President Joe Biden a permitting win when they believe they can get a better deal if Trump is elected. But without legislative changes industry officials expect permitting delays to continue whoever is in the White House. "This is not a left or right thing," EQT chief executive Toby Rice says. Sticky red tape Trump's campaign says if he is elected he will speed up approval of gas pipelines serving the Appalachian basin by removing "all red tape". But his regulatory changes when in office failed to make a material difference in permitting timelines, and he repeatedly failed to broker a legislative deal to hasten permitting. Gas industry officials say they want to expedite permitting regardless of the election results, and believe momentum could occur when voters start feeling the effects of delays. "The motivation for pipeline reform I think will increase when the American consumers believe that their energy needs are impacted by the lack of infrastructure," Iowa-based Berkshire Hathaway Energy's gas transmission president, Paul Ruppert, says. The difficulty and time required to permit large greenfield pipelines in the eastern US has led developers to focus on adding capacity to existing pipelines or pursuing shorter expansions instead. By Chris Knight Mountain Valley and its peers Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Western Australia’s Strike plans gas-fired power plant


Western Australia’s Strike plans gas-fired power plant

Sydney, 24 June (Argus) — Australian independent Strike Energy plans to build and operate an 85MW peaking gas-fired power plant that could come on line by October 2026 near its South Erregulla operations in Western Australia (WA). Strike applied to the Australia Energy Market Operator (Aemo) for capacity credits and network access to develop the power plant. It is targeting a final investment decision in November this year subject to Aemo's decision. Gas supplies of around 1.3 PJ/yr (34.7mn m³/yr) would come from Strike's South Erregulla reserves . The power plant would be on land owned by Strike 280km north of Perth and around 15km of existing power transmission lines within the South West Interconnected System, the electricity network that covers Perth and the southwest region of WA. The WA system will need around 3.9GW of new flexible gas-fired power capacity by 2042 to firm increasing renewable generation as the state exits coal-fired power generation, the state government said last year. It plans to close the two remaining state-owned coal-fired power plants by 2030 , while the private-sector Bluewaters coal-fired power plant is expected to retire by 2030-31, according to Aemo. Aemo has identified a supply shortfall of 391MW emerging in 2027-28 because of a progressive coal-fired power phase-out and increasing electricity demand. The shortfall could reach as high as 2.88GW by 2033-34, highlighting the need for continued capacity investment particularly from 2027 onwards, Aemo said in its latest electricity statement of opportunities for WA's Wholesale Electricity Market, which is not connected to east Australia's National Electricity Market. Strike estimates total annual revenues of A$40mn-50mn ($26.6mn-33.2mn) for the gas-fired peaking plant over the first five years of operation, of which almost 40pc would come from payments under WA's capacity credit scheme. The plant would operate for over 25 years, with investment costs currently estimated between A$120mn-160mn. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Western Australia’s Wheatstone LNG fully back on line


Western Australia’s Wheatstone LNG fully back on line

Singapore, 24 June (Argus) — Operator Chevron fully resumed output at the 8.9mn t/yr Wheatstone LNG in Western Australia (WA) over the weekend, after restarting its two production trains and domestic gas plant. This is days ahead of an initially targeted supply restart by 27 June . Operations at an offshore platform were interrupted from 10 June, disrupting supplies to Wheatstone's LNG production and domestic gas facilities located near WA's Onslow in the Pilbara region. The WA Gas Bulletin Board's medium-term capacity outlook operated by the Australian Energy Market Operator earlier showed Wheatstone's domestic plant off line until 26 June, meaning supplies could return the following day. But restarts may have been attempted from as early as 14 June, said offtakers contacted by Chevron. While the shutdown of Wheatstone initially raised concerns about potential supply disruptions, the resulting spike in spot prices were short-lived. The front half-month of the ANEA, the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia, was last assessed at $12.44/mn Btu on 21 June, 73¢/mn Btu lower than when prices peaked on 14 June. But this still 66¢/mn Btu higher than on 10 June before the disruption and subsequent repairs. It is unclear how many LNG cargoes have been lost as a result of the incident, with the disruption only resulting in a July term cargo being deferred by a few weeks, a Wheatstone offtaker said. No known term cargo cancellations have emerged. By Rou Urn Lee Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Nigeria adds more oil blocks to 2024 licensing round


Nigeria adds more oil blocks to 2024 licensing round

Lagos, 21 June (Argus) — Nigeria's upstream regulator NUPRC has added 17 oil blocks to its 2024 licensing round and removed five, leaving the total on offer at 24, double the original number. The 17 additions are all deepwater blocks and have been added as a result of new data acquired. "We had indicated that the total number of blocks we are putting on offer is 12. Actually, our intention was to do more but we were constrained by availability of data," NUPRC chief executive Gbenga Komolafe said. Newly acquired data became available between 7 May and 11 June, leading to the round's offer being expanded, Komolafe said. Five blocks on the original list of 12 — PPL 3008, 3009, 267, 268 and PML 51 — have been withdrawn because of "ongoing litigation", according to NUPRC. The regulator did not elaborate on the litigation. It previously said that PPL 3008 and 3009 were formerly OPL 321 and 323, respectively, with the name change reflecting compliance with the provisions of petroleum industry legislation that came into effect in 2021. The blocks are located in the western Niger delta, close to the 44,000 b/d Abo field floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) facility operated by Italy's Eni. Nigerian upstream operator Oando, which is in the process of acquiring one of Eni's three Nigerian subsidiaries for an undisclosed amount, has a 30pc working interest in OPLs 321 and 323 through its subsidiary Equator Energy. According to Oando, South Korea's KNOC is operator of a joint exploration work programme for the two blocks, which were awarded in Nigeria's 2005 licensing round before becoming the subject of litigation involving the Nigerian government, the operator and Oando's subsidiary. Meanwhile, PML 51, PPL 267 and PPL 268 are new blocks carved out from the former OML 122, NUPRC said. The shallow water OML 122 block, east of the Shell-operated Bonga field, has long been the subject of litigation and is listed on the website of local upstream firm Peak Petroleum as its sole asset. An industry source told Argus that the withdrawn oil blocks were included in the 2024 licensing round after the regulator enforced forfeiture rules against the companies previously linked to them. But legal challenges are not surprising, the source added. At the launch of its 2024–26 regulatory action plan in January, NUPRC said enforcement of "drill or drop provisions" in the 2021 legislation is one of its main commitments. Nigeria plans to conclude the 2024 licensing round with ministerial consent and contracting in January 2025. NUPRC has pushed back the deadline for submissions of pre-qualification documents from 25 June this year to 5 July and the start of data access and evaluation from 4 July to 8 July. By Adebiyi Olusolape Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

PetroVietnam, South Korea’s Mubo partner on gas


PetroVietnam, South Korea’s Mubo partner on gas

Singapore, 21 June (Argus) — Vietnam's state-owned PetroVietnam (PVN) today agreed an initial financing deal with the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation, also known as Mubo, to strengthen and streamline South Korean companies' participation in natural gas projects with PVN and its subsidiaries. The $1bn package has both mid- to long-term financial tranches available if South Korean companies secure PVN's natural gas projects. PVN has plans to expand its gas field development, pipeline construction and gas-fired power plants in projects valued at around $12bn. This is aligned with the government's plan to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 through increased reliance on gas-fired power generation. PVN manages at least four gas-fired power plants, two coal-fired power plants and two hydropower plants, with 5404MW of total capacity, according to the firm. State-owned PetroVietnam Gas (PV Gas) is at the forefront of the gas power sector projects. It operates the 1mn t/yr Thi Vai LNG terminal, commissioned in July 2023 and has started supplying gas-fired power generation to industrial customers since 15 March. Vietnam is expecting to import more LNG, in anticipation of the start-up of the 1.6GW Nhon Trach LNG thermal power plant in November this year. The plant is comprised of two units that could require as much as 775,000 t/yr of LNG each, assuming a generating efficiency of 60pc. It is also building the 3.6mn t/yr Son My LNG import terminal in Binh Thuan province in southcentral Vietnam. The first phase of commercial operations is scheduled for 2027. A second and third phase at Son My will lift's Vietnam's overall LNG import capacity to 10mn t/yr. PV Gas is to supply 70,000t of LNG to state-owned utility EVN for use at its 715MW Phu My 3 thermal power plant in April and May, marking the first LNG supplies to the county's power sector. Russia has also expressed interest to partner with Vietnam for oil and gas supplies, including LNG, following a state visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin to Hanoi on 20 June. By Naomi Ong Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more