Latest market news

FERC blocks Trump support for coal, nuclear plants

  • : Coal, Electricity, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 18/01/08

The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) today rejected a proposal backed by President Donald Trump that would have provided potentially billions of dollars to coal and nuclear power plants in support "grid resiliency."

US energy secretary Rick Perry released the plan in September out of concern that pending retirements of coal and nuclear plants posed an "urgent" threat to the resiliency of the grid. Those plants have been struggling to compete against low-priced natural gas and renewable energy, and Perry's plan would have helped them through subsidies.

But FERC said the proposal failed to show that existing power market rules in the US were unreasonable, a step the agency says is needed before it can force changes.

FERC specifically rejected the idea that only power plants with 90 days of on-site fuel should qualify for additional payments. FERC said the proposal did not show how providing payments would benefit the grid, or how excluding other resources would not be discriminatory. Other resources that do not have 90 days worth of fuel supply can also improve the reliability of the grid, FERC said.

Coal and nuclear groups had supported the proposal, which they said was needed to stave off a wave of retirements of baseload power plants that run constantly. But a coalition of natural gas groups, power plant owners and renewable energy companies rallied against the plan over concerns it would cause chaos across power markets.

The grid resiliency proposal would have cost between $800mn/yr and $3.8bn/yr, the consulting firm ICF said last year. The research firm Energy Innovation estimated the costs of the proposal could reach $11.8bn/yr, of which 30pc would go toward coal plants and 70pc would go toward nuclear plants.

FERC said it appreciated that Perry identified grid resilience as an "important issue that warrants further attention" and had decided to open a new proceeding into the issue. The order today asks the major electric grid operators dozens of questions about the largest issues they face with grid resiliency and the steps underway to address those issues.

Perry today reiterated his earlier arguments that an on-site fuel supply plays an important role in resilient and affordable electricity.

"As intended, my proposal initiated a national debate on the resiliency of our electric system," Perry said.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/09/19

LNG-burning vessels well positioned ahead of 2025

LNG-burning vessels well positioned ahead of 2025

New York, 19 September (Argus) — Vessels outfitted with dual-fuel LNG-burning engines are poised to have the lowest marine fuel expense heading into 2025 when the EU will tighten its marine EU emissions trading system (ETS) regulations and add a new regulation, " FuelEU", from 1 January 2025. Considering both regulations, at current price levels, fossil LNG (also known as grey LNG) will be priced the cheapest compared with conventional marine fuels and other commonly considered alternative fuels such as biodiesel and methanol. The EU's FuelEU maritime regulation will require ship operators traveling in, out and within EU territorial waters to gradually reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity on a lifecycle basis, starting with a 2pc reduction in 2025, 6pc in 2030 and so on until getting to an 80pc drop, compared with 2020 base year levels. The FuelEU GHG intensity maximum is set at 85.69 grams of CO2-equivalent per MJ (gCO2e/MJ) from 2030 to 2034, dropping to 77.94 gCO2e/MJ in 2035. Vessel pools exceeding the FuelEU's limits will be fined €2,400/t ($2,675/t) of very low-sulphur fuel oil (VLFSO) energy equivalent. GHG emissions from grey LNG vary depending on the type of marine engine used to burn the LNG, but ranges from about 76.3-92.3 gCO2e/MJ, according to non-governmental environmental lobby group Transport & Environment. This makes a number of LNG-burning, ocean-going vessels compliant with FuelEU regulation through 2034. The EU's ETS for marine shipping commenced this year and requires that ship operators pay for 40pc of their GHG generated on voyages within, in and out of the EU. Next year, the EU ETS emissions limit will increase to 70pc. Even with the added 70pc CO2 emissions cost, US Gulf coast grey LNG was assessed at $639/t VLSFOe, compared with the second cheapest VLSFO at $689/t, B30 biodiesel at $922/t and grey methanol at $931/t VLSFOe average from 1-18 September (see chart). "In 2025, we expect [US natural gas] prices to rise as [US] LNG exports increase while domestic consumption and production remain relatively flat for much of the year," says the US Energy Information Administration. "We forecast the Henry Hub price to average around $2.20/million British thermal units (mmBtu) in 2024 and $3.10/mmBtu in 2025." Provided that prices of biodiesel and methanol remain relatively flat, the projected EIA US 2025 LNG price gains would not affect LNG's price ranking, keeping it the cheapest alternative marine fuel option for ship owners traveling between the US Gulf coast and Europe. LNG for bunkering global consumption from vessels 5,000 gross tonnes and over reached 12.9mn t in 2023, according to the International Maritime Organization (IMO), up from 11mn t in 2022 and 12.6mn t in 2021. The maritime port authority of Singapore reported 111,000t of LNG bunker sales and the port authorities of Rotterdam and Antwerp reported 319,000t in 2023 from all size vessels. Among vessels 5,000 gross tonnes and over, LNG carriers accounted for 89pc of LNG bunker demand globally, followed by container ships at 3.6pc, according to the IMO. The large gap between LNG global and LNG Singapore, Rotterdam, and Antwerp bunker demand, is likely the result of most of the demand taking place at the biggest LNG export locations where LNG carriers call, such as the US Gulf coast, Qatar, Australia, Russia and Malaysia. By Stefka Wechsler USGC bunkers and bunker alternatives $/t VLSFOe Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Industry decarbonization talks mark progress: EDF


24/09/19
24/09/19

Industry decarbonization talks mark progress: EDF

Houston, 19 September (Argus) — Growing decarbonization discussions in the oil and gas industry is a sign that momentum is building toward reducing emissions, according to Mark Brownstein, senior vice president of energy transition for the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Brownstein, speaking on the sidelines of the Gastech conference in Houston, Texas, noted a "robust conversation" was happening to address CO2 and methane emissions from natural gas use, which was "something you would not have seen five years ago." "Now, what would really make me happy, is to come back here next year, and see that it's not just talk," he said. "That there's real investment, that there's real action and that we're actually beginning to see emissions of methane and other pollutants going down." Brownstein noted that more than 70 companies in the oil and gas industry have committed to the COP 28 decarbonization charter to get to near-zero methane emissions by 2030. "That is a commitment that needs to be expanded to all players," he said. "A commitment that needs to be expanded by investment and real action. I believe the industry can do it. But of course you need to see it." Earlier this year the EDF helped launch MethaneSAT, a satellite that will allow for real-time monitoring of global methane emissions, aimed at bringing transparency to global emissions data. By David Haydon Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Fed rate cuts 'no bearing' for CCUS: NET Power


24/09/19
24/09/19

Fed rate cuts 'no bearing' for CCUS: NET Power

Houston, 19 September (Argus) — Interest rate cut by the US Federal Reserve this week have "no bearing" on carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS) projects, according to the chief executive of power technology company NET Power, since most are still in the development phase. The majority of CCUS projects are in the "pre-revenue" stage with companies that are still "more focused on the engineering" aspects, chief executive Danny Rice said on the sidelines of the Gastech conference in Houston, Texas, today. The Fed on Thursday cut its target interest rate by 50 basis points, the first cut since 2020 and following an aggressive rate increase regimen to fight inflation. Lower interests rates lower borrowing costs for companies. Rice said earlier in the day during a CCUS panel discussion there was still a need to "get capital costs down". "Historically it would be challenging to deploy a new technology and scale into a flat or declining market, but ... we're talking about decarbonization for power generation," Rice said. "Power generation is growing globally." CCUS projects and other carbon capture technologies have been repeatedly criticized by non-governmental organisations as an excuse for continued fossil fuel use, although the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has backed the technology. Rice stressed the importance of an "objective, physics-driven view" for policy regarding decarbonization, describing CCUS projects for gas-fired powerplants as the most cost-effective method to decarbonize power. "People are going away from this exercise of 'what's clean or not'," Rice said. "What matters is the outputs. The affordability, the reliability, the carbon intensity." By David Haydon Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Kosovo confident in winter 24-25 supply: TSO


24/09/19
24/09/19

Kosovo confident in winter 24-25 supply: TSO

London, 19 September (Argus) — Kosovar transmission system operator (TSO) Kostt is confident it can meet demand over the winter season through domestic generation and imports, Kostt told Argus in an interview ahead of the Energy Week Western Balkans conference. Domestic generation capacity is not enough to meet demand during periods of high consumption, such as during the winter season, and imports will be necessary during peak tariff periods to meet demand, the TSO said. Maximum demand over the upcoming winter season is expected to reach 1.45GW, and transmission capacity can reach 1.85GW under normal operating conditions, Kostt said. Kosovar distribution company Keds and energy supplier Kesko had to import up to 35pc of power during peak periods in December last year, when peak demand reached 1.1GW. Annual maintenance at the 680MW Kosova B lignite-fired plant was completed on 18 August, and the plant is scheduled to be fully available over the winter season. Constraints on the electric system should be reduced in the upcoming winter season, as Keds has started metering the four Serbian-majority municipalities located in the country's north in January . Kostt was responsible for supply in the region last year, but received payment through subsidies from the Kosovar government, rather than tariffs. But subsidies were sometimes delayed, which created challenges in balancing real-time deviations within Kostt's control area, the TSO said. An agreement was reached last year with Serbian state-owned utility EPS subsidiary Elektrosever to normalise power supply for the Serbian majority municipalities, which were not paying for the unauthorised withdrawal of electricity. Elektrosever is now responsible for supply in the region and submits daily nominations and adheres to balancing requirements, although Kostt still meets its financial requirement to cover losses in the transmission system. There have been no violations of the operational terms since the agreement went into effect on 1 January, Kostt said. "System operations have become more stable, and deviations are now within the Entso-e acceptable limits," Kostt said. And Elektrosever has agreed to Kostt's request to submit an electricity supply plan for the region for 2025. By Annemarie Pettinato Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Western Australia to allow some onshore gas exports


24/09/19
24/09/19

Western Australia to allow some onshore gas exports

Darwin, 19 September (Argus) — Western Australia's (WA) state government will allow onshore developers of gas fields to export about 20pc of their output as LNG during a five-year window, in response to a growing failure to bring on new supplies for the domestic market. WA previously banned onshore gas exports, except in the case of Australian independent Beach Energy's 250 TJ/d (6.7mn m³/d) Waitsia stage 2 project . Beach may be required to share its infrastructure with fellow Perth basin firms, the WA government said, to expedite market access for new projects. Australian mining firm Mineral Resources, which has argued for permission to export 85pc of the gas from its Lockyer project as LNG and fellow WA-based firm Strike Energy may benefit from the changes, as both hold significant reserves in the Perth basin. The changes apply to new onshore developments or existing projects seeking to expand production. Developers are required to reserve 80pc of gas produced for WA, with this rising to 100pc from 2031 onwards. The policy shift follows dire outlooks for WA's gas supplies as the state attempts to wean itself off coal-fired power generation. It currently contributes about a third of the electricity into the state's largest power grid. A parliamentary report last month warned WA cannot rely on sporadic appeals for more gas to meet demand. "These policy changes are sensible responses that balance the need for Western Australia to secure its energy future while encouraging onshore producers to bring on more gas supply as and when it is needed," mines and petroleum Minister David Michael said on 19 September. The 15pc reservation for offshore LNG projects will continue, while WA has promised more transparency on the policy with the publication of a yearly WA Domestic Gas Statement to reveal how producers are meeting obligations, with a review to take place after two years. An interim parliamentary report tabled earlier this year showed about 8pc of the state's offshore gas output has reached WA consumers since 2006, representing just over half the required volumes. Following public criticism of LNG producers' contributions, Australian independent Woodside Energy has since pledged an extra 32PJ (854mn m³) of domestic supplies by the end of 2025 . WA will also seek to strengthen laws designed to prevent companies banking prospective onshore oil and gas tenements, with a review into the "use it or lose it" policy to be led by the state's energy department. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more