Latest news on trade tariffs
Read the latest news stories as they are published.
New 10pc US tariff keeps aromatics arbs shut
New 10pc US tariff keeps aromatics arbs shut
Houston, 25 February (Argus) — The new 10pc tariff on US imports that replaced earlier traiffs ruled unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court keep aromatics arbitrage opportunities in the US closed on paper. The new 10pc tariffs will keep arbitrages closed for benzene, toluene and mixed xylenes (BTX) for chemical use. As of 24 February, US benzene (BZ) stood at a $145/t premium to South Korea BZ, according to Argus data, but with the 10pc tariff rate and freight costs at $72/t, the arbitrage remained closed on paper. Similarly, toluene closed at a $145/t premium and mixed xylenes closed at a $129/t premium to toluene and mixed xylenes in South Korea, but the 10pc tariff and freight costs kept those arbitrages shut. President Donald Trump has threatened to raise the 10pc tariffs — enacted under a different law that allows them to only be in place for 150 days before requiring Congressional approval — to 15pc . The new tariffs continue to provide an exemption for BTX imports for use in the energy sector, which market participants said means BTX used for gasoline blending. This exemption last year allowed for some toluene and mixed xylene imports to arrive in the US without an import tax. In 2025, the US imported 529,000 metric tonnes (t) of benzene, 488,193t of mixed xylenes and 183,379t of toluene, according to US Census Bureau data compiled by Global Trade Tracker. By Jake Caldwell Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
FedEx sues US for tariff refunds
FedEx sues US for tariff refunds
Houston, 24 February (Argus) — Global shipping giant FedEx has filed a lawsuit seeking tariff refunds from the US administration after the Supreme Court threw out most of the import duties imposed last year. FedEx, which transports goods into the US from many of the tariffed countries on behalf of its customers, said it has "suffered injury" caused by the now-cancelled tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). The company said in the lawsuit it is seeking a full refund with interest of tariffs it paid, but did not mention a specific monetary figure. Separately, FedEx posted a notice on its website saying it "has taken necessary action to protect the company's rights as an importer of record to seek duty refunds from US Customs and Border Protection" but that no refund process has been established by regulators or the courts at this time. FedEx is waiting for additional guidance from the US and the courts, the notice said. The US had collected $133bn in tariffs under IEEPA as of December, but that amount has since likely risen to $175bn, according to economists at the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School. Hundreds of companies, including refiners Valero and Marathon Petroleum have previously filed lawsuits seeking to recover tariffs they have paid to the US for imported goods. But recovering the duties will be challenging due to the billions of dollars involved and the sheer number of importers that could be eligible for refunds. The upcoming refund process is likely to be a "mess" as the US may be required to refund "billions of dollars" to importers, associate supreme court justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a dissent to the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision throwing out the tariffs. Trump said he is expecting a years-long court fight over whether his administration must refund the tariffs. A new 10pc tariff on all US imports using a different law, Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Expansion Act, went into effect today , while Trump on 21 February said he will increased that tariff to 15pc tariff . By Eunice Bridges Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
New US 10pc tariff goes into effect
New US 10pc tariff goes into effect
Washington, 24 February (Argus) — A new 10pc tariff on US imports from all countries went into effect on Tuesday, replacing the emergency tariffs imposed last year that the Supreme Court struck down on 20 February. The new tariff will exempt energy, critical minerals, fertilizers and certain agricultural imports. It will also exempt imports eligible for duty-free treatment under the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. The 10pc tariff will not be added on top of existing sectoral duties on steel, aluminum, copper, cars and auto parts. President Donald Trump on 20 February invoked Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Expansion Act to impose the 10pc tariff. A day later, Trump posted on his social media platform that he would raise the rate to 15pc, but the social media post does not have legal force. The US will assess the Section 122 duty at the 10pc level, the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency said late on Monday. The law cited by Trump allows him to maintain the 10pc tariff for a period of 150 days, unless the US Congress authorizes an extension. CBP also said it will stop collecting the invalidated emergency tariffs effective on Tuesday. The agency said it was ready to "implement current and any forthcoming executive actions as directed by the president" with regard to refunding an estimated $175bn in tariffs the US Supreme Court said were imposed unlawfully. Trump said he is expecting a years-long court fight over refunds. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Trump threatens 15pc tariff on all US imports
Trump threatens 15pc tariff on all US imports
Washington, 21 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump on Saturday said he will slap a 15pc tariff on all US imports, less than 24 hours after his administration unveiled a 10pc global import tax meant to replace the emergency tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court on Friday. Trump, in a social media post, said that he "will be, effective immediately, raising the 10pc Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been 'ripping' the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15pc level". Trump cited "a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued" on Friday as a justification for his decision. The White House has yet to release an official record of any decision to implement Trump's 15pc tariff threat. Trump on Friday had to rescind executive orders he signed in the past year that imposed tariffs by invoking the economic emergency authority that the Supreme Court found to be illegal. Trump, in a separate proclamation on Friday, invoked Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to impose a 10pc tax on all US imports from 24 February. Trump's decision on Friday exempted energy, critical minerals, fertilizers and certain agricultural imports from new import taxes. The 10pc tax, which was to be in effect for 150 days — until 24 July — exempted imports eligible for duty-free treatment under the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA). Why 10pc or 15pc? It is not clear why Trump announced on Saturday that he would raise the Section 122 tariff to the maximally allowed 15pc, or why his administration initially chose a lower rate, at 10pc. The Trump administration had signaled since mid-January that it would opt for a 10pc tariff under Section 122 authority if the Supreme Court struck down Trump's emergency tariff. The Trump administration said it was planning to use the 150-day duration of the Section 122 tariffs to rapidly put in place other tariffs targeting specific industries and countries under existing, previously used trade authorities. While Trump said that his Section 122 tariff authority is "legally tested", no other president has invoked this power, and US courts have not weighed on its merits before. But Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh, who dissented from the majority decision that struck down Trump's emergency tariffs, cited Section 122 five times in his separate opinion issued on Friday. Kavanaugh argued that since Congress delegated to the executive branch broad tariff authority to impose tariffs under Section 122 and multiple other laws, there was no reason to dispute Trump's authority to impose tariffs by invoking economic emergencies. Trump on Saturday called Kavanaugh "my new hero", together with two other justices who voted to uphold Trump's tariffs. Trump continued to lob insults at conservative justices who voted to strike down his tariffs, calling them "fools" and "lapdogs" of "radical left Democrats". More court action likely Despite criticism of the court's decision, Trump and his top officials have tried to put a positive spin on the ruling by arguing that he will instead impose "stronger" tariffs and raise even more revenue. But his Section 122 tariffs likely will face challenges in courts. The Supreme Court's majority opinion hinged on the finding that Congress did not explicitly authorize Trump to impose taxes, in the form of tariffs, under the legal authority he has cited. Chief justice John Roberts and two of the justices Trump appointed during his first term, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, also referenced the "major questions" doctrine to justify their decision, meaning that Congress, not the White House, should decide on matters of major economic significance. Trump has left little doubt that he plans to bypass Congress in rolling out new tariffs. "I have the right to do tariffs," he said on Friday. "We have a right to do pretty much what we want to do." The Republican-led US Congress has not challenged Trump's tariff authority to date, although lawmakers have increasingly voiced concerns about the effect of tariffs on prices. In the House of Representatives, where the Republican majority has shrunk to one, several Republican members have expressed support for the Supreme Court's decision. Trump on Saturday blasted one of those lawmakers, Jeff Hurd (R-Colorado), for "a lack of support, in particular for the unbelievably successful TARIFFS imposed on Foreign Countries and Companies". Trump endorsed Hurd's opponent in the upcoming Republican primary. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Trump threatens 15pc tariff on all US imports
Trump threatens 15pc tariff on all US imports
Washington, 21 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump on Saturday said he will slap a 15pc tariff on all US imports, less than 24 hours after his administration unveiled a 10pc global import tax meant to replace the emergency tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court on Friday. Trump, in a social media post, said that he "will be, effective immediately, raising the 10pc Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been 'ripping' the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15pc level". Trump cited "a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued" on Friday as a justification for his decision. The White House has yet to release an official record of any decision to implement Trump's 15pc tariff threat. Trump on Friday had to rescind executive orders he signed in the past year that imposed tariffs by invoking the economic emergency authority that the Supreme Court found to be illegal. Trump, in a separate proclamation on Friday, invoked Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to impose a 10pc tax on all US imports from 24 February. Trump's decision on Friday exempted energy, critical minerals, fertilizers and certain agricultural imports from new import taxes. The 10pc tax, which was to be in effect for 150 days — until 24 July — exempted imports eligible for duty-free treatment under the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA). Why 10pc or 15pc? It is not clear why Trump announced on Saturday that he would raise the Section 122 tariff to the maximally allowed 15pc, or why his administration initially chose a lower rate, at 10pc. The Trump administration had signaled since mid-January that it would opt for a 10pc tariff under Section 122 authority if the Supreme Court struck down Trump's emergency tariff. The Trump administration said it was planning to use the 150-day duration of the Section 122 tariffs to rapidly put in place other tariffs targeting specific industries and countries under existing, previously used trade authorities. While Trump said that his Section 122 tariff authority is "legally tested", no other president has invoked this power, and US courts have not weighed on its merits before. But Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh, who dissented from the majority decision that struck down Trump's emergency tariffs, cited Section 122 five times in his separate opinion issued on Friday. Kavanaugh argued that since Congress delegated to the executive branch broad tariff authority to impose tariffs under Section 122 and multiple other laws, there was no reason to dispute Trump's authority to impose tariffs by invoking economic emergencies. Trump on Saturday called Kavanaugh "my new hero", together with two other justices who voted to uphold Trump's tariffs. Trump continued to lob insults at conservative justices who voted to strike down his tariffs, calling them "fools" and "lapdogs" of "radical left Democrats". More court action likely Despite criticism of the court's decision, Trump and his top officials have tried to put a positive spin on the ruling by arguing that he will instead impose "stronger" tariffs and raise even more revenue. But his Section 122 tariffs likely will face challenges in courts. The Supreme Court's majority opinion hinged on the finding that Congress did not explicitly authorize Trump to impose taxes, in the form of tariffs, under the legal authority he has cited. Chief justice John Roberts and two of the justices Trump appointed during his first term, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, also referenced the "major questions" doctrine to justify their decision, meaning that Congress, not the White House, should decide on matters of major economic significance. Trump has left little doubt that he plans to bypass Congress in rolling out new tariffs. "I have the right to do tariffs," he said on Friday. "We have a right to do pretty much what we want to do." The Republican-led US Congress has not challenged Trump's tariff authority to date, although lawmakers have increasingly voiced concerns about the effect of tariffs on prices. In the House of Representatives, where the Republican majority has shrunk to one, several Republican members have expressed support for the Supreme Court's decision. Trump on Saturday blasted one of those lawmakers, Jeff Hurd (R-Colorado), for "a lack of support, in particular for the unbelievably successful TARIFFS imposed on Foreign Countries and Companies". Trump endorsed Hurd's opponent in the upcoming Republican primary. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
New Trump tariffs to exempt energy, metals, USMCA
New Trump tariffs to exempt energy, metals, USMCA
Washington, 20 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump will enact a 10pc tax on all US imports from 24 February to replace the emergency tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court on Friday, but the new tariffs will exempt energy, critical minerals, fertilizers and certain agricultural imports. The new 10pc tax, which will be in effect for 150 days — until 24 July — will also exempt imports eligible for duty-free treatment under the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA). Trump's proclamation of the new tariff invokes Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows imposing tariffs of up to 15pc to address a balance of payments issue. The Section 122 tariffs will also exempt "natural resources and fertilizers that cannot be grown, mined, or otherwise produced in the US", according to a White House fact sheet. Trump's proclamation also exempts beef, oranges and tomatoes from the 10pc tariff. The new tariff will not apply to steel, aluminum, cars, auto parts and any other products subject to sectoral tariffs Trump's administration has imposed in the past year or plans to tax in the future. Trump directed the US Trade Representative's office (USTR) to immediately launch "Section 301" investigations to justify future tariffs directed at specific, yet unnamed countries. A Section 301 investigation would target a specific country on the grounds that it is discriminating against US exports. China almost certainly would be subject to import taxes under this rubric. USTR launched a Section 301 investigation against China last October, citing its lack of compliance with the 2020 US-China deal. The Supreme Court earlier on Friday threw out most of the tariffs Trump has imposed on nearly all US trading partners, finding his ability to unilaterally impose tariffs under the pretext of economic emergencies exceeded his powers under a decades-old law. Uncertainty ahead The announcement of exemptions for USMCA, energy and other products addresses concerns raised by US importers in the wake of the Supreme Court rulings. The exemption regime is the same established under the emergency tariffs Trump applied since last year. But Trump's choice of the legal avenue for reverse-engineering the now invalid emergency tariffs points to more uncertainty ahead. The administration can impose those tariffs only for a period of 150 days, according to law. Any extensions would require explicit authorization from Congress. "Is the 150 day limit an actual limit? We'll see," Georgetown University law professor Kathleen Claussen said on Friday. No president has previously invoked Section 122 to impose tariffs, and "it's hard to see what would stop him from trying to" unilaterally extend it by a further 150 days, she said during a webinar hosted by WITA - The International Trade Membership Association. The Republican-led US Congress has not challenged Trump's tariff authority to date, although lawmakers have increasingly voiced concerns about the effect of tariffs on prices. The House of Representatives and the Senate have voted on separate resolutions challenging the tariffs Trump has imposed on imports from Canada and Brazil, but they have not passed any tariff legislation. "Congress and the administration will determine the best path forward in the coming weeks" with respect to tariffs, House of Representatives speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) said. But Trump likely would have trouble finding enough votes on Capitol Hill to support his tariffs. "The president must refrain from any further unilateral action on tariffs," House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) said. No clarity on refunds Trump on Friday also signed an executive order formally rescinding all his previous tariffs that were imposed by invoking the economic emergency authority that the Supreme Court found to be illegal, including those on Brazil and those threatened against countries doing business with Iran. The US will immediately stop collecting duties imposed under the emergency tariffs. But the order makes no mention of any mechanism to refund the previously collected emergency tariff revenues. Trump said earlier today he is expecting a years-long court fight over whether his administration must refund an estimated $175bn in emergency tariffs. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US high court strikes down Trump's tariffs: Update
US high court strikes down Trump's tariffs: Update
Updates with details throughout Washington, 20 February (Argus) — The US Supreme Court has thrown out most of the tariffs President Donald Trump has imposed on nearly all US trading partners, finding his ability to unilaterally impose tariffs exceeded his powers under a decades-old law. The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling released on Friday will block Trump's ability to use tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to extract concessions from trading partners and punish countries that reject his demands. The Constitution "did not vest any part of the taxing power in the executive branch," chief justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion, backed by two other conservative justices and all three liberal justices. Trump, speaking hours after the court announced its ruling, raged against the justices who overturned his tariffs. "I'm ashamed of certain members of the court for not having the courage to do what's right for our country," Trump said. "It's an embarrassment to the families" of justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, he said. Trump appointed both justices during his first term. The majority opinion noted that "the Framers gave 'Congress alone' the power to impose tariffs during peacetime." Trump "must 'point to clear congressional authorization' to justify his extraordinary assertion of that power," the majority opinion said, adding that "He cannot." Trump scoffed at the opinion. "The court said that I'm not allowed to charge even one dollar under IEEPA", he said and suggested that the six justices were "swayed by foreign interests". What is affected? The Supreme Court decision affects Trump's tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China, where he cited an economic emergency created by the three countries' alleged inaction to stop the flow of fentanyl drugs into the US. The Supreme Court ruling also strikes down Trump's most extensive action — imposing tariffs of at least 10pc on nearly every US trading partner to address the "economic emergency" of persistent US trade deficits. The Supreme Court's decision also will affect the tariffs Trump imposed on imports from Brazil, US government lawyers informed the Court of International Trade last month. Trump cited Brazil's alleged suppression of freedom of speech as a reason to impose tariffs. The decision will not affect tariffs on US imports of steel, aluminum, cars and auto parts, which Trump imposed by citing well-tested legal trade authorities. Next steps Trump said he will sign an executive order later on Friday to impose a 10pc broad tariff on all US trading partners, in place of the struck down IEEPA tariffs. Trump said that action will invoke Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows imposing tariffs of up to 15pc to address a balance of payments issue. But that legal avenue comes with limitations. The administration can impose those tariffs only for a period of 150 days. Any extensions would require explicit authorization from Congress. The Republican-led US Congress has not challenged Trump's tariff authority to date, although lawmakers have increasingly voiced concerns about the effect of tariffs on prices. The House of Representatives and the Senate have voted on separate resolutions challenging the tariffs Trump has imposed on imports from Canada and Brazil, but they have not passed any tariff legislation. "Congress and the administration will determine the best path forward in the coming weeks" with respect to tariffs, House of Representatives speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) said. But Trump likely would have trouble finding enough votes on Capitol Hill to support his tariffs. "The president must refrain from any further unilateral action on tariffs," House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) said. Trump said he does not plan to work with Congress on tariffs. "I have the right to do tariffs," he said. "We have a right to do pretty much what we want to do." The Trump administration will also quickly begin the legal process for replicating the IEEPA tariffs with "Section 202" and "Section 301" tariffs, US trade representative Jamieson Greer said, speaking alongside Trump. A "Section 232" authority allows the Commerce Department or US Trade Representative's office to determine whether imports of a product need to be curbed on national security grounds. A Section 301 investigation would target a specific country on the grounds that it is discriminating against US exports. In both cases, the process for imposing tariffs can take months. It also requires public consultation and allows carveouts for the affected US importers. The use of Section 232 and 301 authorities is "a little more complicated" than IEEPA, and "those will also be challenged", Trump's former trade representative Bob Lighthizer told participants at the Argus Americas Crude Summit in Houston on 4 February. Trump's administration will have its work cut out for it in deciding how, and whether, to refund an estimated $175bn in tariffs collected using IEEPA tariffs. Trump in his remarks suggested that the refund process could take years. Hundreds of companies, including refiners Valero and Marathon Petroleum, have already filed lawsuits seeking to recover the tariffs. The effective US tariff rate was around 13pc as of late 2025, up from 2.6pc a year earlier, according to research published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on 12 February. US companies and consumers paid about 90pc of the tariff burden, with only a fraction absorbed by foreign producers, the Fed researchers found. Foreign governments did not immediately react to the US court's tariff decision. "We take note of the ruling," the EU said. "We remain in close contact with the US administration as we seek clarity on the steps they intend to take in response to this ruling." By Haik Gugarats and Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
End of tariffs could boost US organic corn imports
End of tariffs could boost US organic corn imports
Minneapolis, 20 February (Argus) — The US Supreme Court's ruling to strike down most US import tariffs implemented last year could boost organic corn imports, but the US government could reimpose tariffs through other laws. The Supreme Court released its 6-3 decision Friday that blocked President Donald Trump's ability to use tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Trump threatened in a press conference to impose 10pc tariffs under other legal justifications, which leaves the future of tariffs unclear, but the market was already anticipating impacts. Organic corn imports fell by 27pc in the 2024-25 marketing year ended 31 August because of strong supplies earlier in the season, but the US organic corn market has been tight since then. US organic corn imports were also 17pc behind pace for the first five months of the 2025-26 marketing year. Organic corn imports to the US from the Black Sea in particular could see an increase following the court ruling since it's the only region with significant excess volumes. Exporters in the Black Sea kept corn export volumes low for the start of the 2025-26 marketing year because of the difficulty competing with US-grown supplies, but the end of the 15pc tariff enacted under IEEPA will make them more competitive. Cheaper organic corn imports will weigh on domestic organic corn prices because US farmers will have to compete with lower import prices. Argentina does not have significant volumes left to export, but the end of tariffs would allow buyers to boost bids into Argentina. This could encourage more organic corn planting during the South American country's next planting cycle. Argentinian exporters are offering organic corn for export in June after their early harvest, and the end of tariffs will boost revenues for organic growers in Argentina. Organic soybean impact subdued The end of US import tariffs is unlikely to boost organic soybean import volumes, but will lower the cost paid by importers, market contacts said. US organic soybean imports continued to grow despite the tariffs, Argus data show, up by 41pc in the 2024-25 marketing year ended 31 August and up by 54pc for the first five months of the 2025-26 marketing year. Strong demand, especially from the organic poultry sector, drove up import volumes even as tariffs pushed up costs. The volume imported in recent months weighed heavily on prices and put the spot market in a surplus, so exporters are unlikely to increase volume further. But the end of the tariffs will reduce costs, which will translate into lower import values. Cheaper imported meal will weigh on domestic meal prices, which will cut into domestic crush margins. But imported soybeans will no longer be subject to tariffs, which will add to returns for crushers who rely on imported soybeans. Canadian soybean exporters will be unaffected, since they already paid no tariffs, but Canadian meal exports to the US may fall if Canada is no longer the only country that can export organic soymeal to the US tariff-free. By Alexander Schultz Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Trump threatens 15pc tariff on all US imports
Trump threatens 15pc tariff on all US imports
Washington, 21 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump on Saturday said he will slap a 15pc tariff on all US imports, less than 24 hours after his administration unveiled a 10pc global import tax meant to replace the emergency tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court on Friday. Trump, in a social media post, said that he "will be, effective immediately, raising the 10pc Worldwide Tariff on Countries, many of which have been 'ripping' the U.S. off for decades, without retribution (until I came along!), to the fully allowed, and legally tested, 15pc level". Trump cited "a thorough, detailed, and complete review of the ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American decision on Tariffs issued" on Friday as a justification for his decision. The White House has yet to release an official record of any decision to implement Trump's 15pc tariff threat. Trump on Friday had to rescind executive orders he signed in the past year that imposed tariffs by invoking the economic emergency authority that the Supreme Court found to be illegal. Trump, in a separate proclamation on Friday, invoked Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to impose a 10pc tax on all US imports from 24 February. Trump's decision on Friday exempted energy, critical minerals, fertilizers and certain agricultural imports from new import taxes. The 10pc tax, which was to be in effect for 150 days — until 24 July — exempted imports eligible for duty-free treatment under the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA). Why 10pc or 15pc? It is not clear why Trump announced on Saturday that he would raise the Section 122 tariff to the maximally allowed 15pc, or why his administration initially chose a lower rate, at 10pc. The Trump administration had signaled since mid-January that it would opt for a 10pc tariff under Section 122 authority if the Supreme Court struck down Trump's emergency tariff. The Trump administration said it was planning to use the 150-day duration of the Section 122 tariffs to rapidly put in place other tariffs targeting specific industries and countries under existing, previously used trade authorities. While Trump said that his Section 122 tariff authority is "legally tested", no other president has invoked this power, and US courts have not weighed on its merits before. But Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh, who dissented from the majority decision that struck down Trump's emergency tariffs, cited Section 122 five times in his separate opinion issued on Friday. Kavanaugh argued that since Congress delegated to the executive branch broad tariff authority to impose tariffs under Section 122 and multiple other laws, there was no reason to dispute Trump's authority to impose tariffs by invoking economic emergencies. Trump on Saturday called Kavanaugh "my new hero", together with two other justices who voted to uphold Trump's tariffs. Trump continued to lob insults at conservative justices who voted to strike down his tariffs, calling them "fools" and "lapdogs" of "radical left Democrats". More court action likely Despite criticism of the court's decision, Trump and his top officials have tried to put a positive spin on the ruling by arguing that he will instead impose "stronger" tariffs and raise even more revenue. But his Section 122 tariffs likely will face challenges in courts. The Supreme Court's majority opinion hinged on the finding that Congress did not explicitly authorize Trump to impose taxes, in the form of tariffs, under the legal authority he has cited. Chief justice John Roberts and two of the justices Trump appointed during his first term, Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, also referenced the "major questions" doctrine to justify their decision, meaning that Congress, not the White House, should decide on matters of major economic significance. Trump has left little doubt that he plans to bypass Congress in rolling out new tariffs. "I have the right to do tariffs," he said on Friday. "We have a right to do pretty much what we want to do." The Republican-led US Congress has not challenged Trump's tariff authority to date, although lawmakers have increasingly voiced concerns about the effect of tariffs on prices. In the House of Representatives, where the Republican majority has shrunk to one, several Republican members have expressed support for the Supreme Court's decision. Trump on Saturday blasted one of those lawmakers, Jeff Hurd (R-Colorado), for "a lack of support, in particular for the unbelievably successful TARIFFS imposed on Foreign Countries and Companies". Trump endorsed Hurd's opponent in the upcoming Republican primary. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
New Trump tariffs to exempt energy, metals, USMCA
New Trump tariffs to exempt energy, metals, USMCA
Washington, 20 February (Argus) — President Donald Trump will enact a 10pc tax on all US imports from 24 February to replace the emergency tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court on Friday, but the new tariffs will exempt energy, critical minerals, fertilizers and certain agricultural imports. The new 10pc tax, which will be in effect for 150 days — until 24 July — will also exempt imports eligible for duty-free treatment under the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement (USMCA). Trump's proclamation of the new tariff invokes Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows imposing tariffs of up to 15pc to address a balance of payments issue. The Section 122 tariffs will also exempt "natural resources and fertilizers that cannot be grown, mined, or otherwise produced in the US", according to a White House fact sheet. Trump's proclamation also exempts beef, oranges and tomatoes from the 10pc tariff. The new tariff will not apply to steel, aluminum, cars, auto parts and any other products subject to sectoral tariffs Trump's administration has imposed in the past year or plans to tax in the future. Trump directed the US Trade Representative's office (USTR) to immediately launch "Section 301" investigations to justify future tariffs directed at specific, yet unnamed countries. A Section 301 investigation would target a specific country on the grounds that it is discriminating against US exports. China almost certainly would be subject to import taxes under this rubric. USTR launched a Section 301 investigation against China last October, citing its lack of compliance with the 2020 US-China deal. The Supreme Court earlier on Friday threw out most of the tariffs Trump has imposed on nearly all US trading partners, finding his ability to unilaterally impose tariffs under the pretext of economic emergencies exceeded his powers under a decades-old law. Uncertainty ahead The announcement of exemptions for USMCA, energy and other products addresses concerns raised by US importers in the wake of the Supreme Court rulings. The exemption regime is the same established under the emergency tariffs Trump applied since last year. But Trump's choice of the legal avenue for reverse-engineering the now invalid emergency tariffs points to more uncertainty ahead. The administration can impose those tariffs only for a period of 150 days, according to law. Any extensions would require explicit authorization from Congress. "Is the 150 day limit an actual limit? We'll see," Georgetown University law professor Kathleen Claussen said on Friday. No president has previously invoked Section 122 to impose tariffs, and "it's hard to see what would stop him from trying to" unilaterally extend it by a further 150 days, she said during a webinar hosted by WITA - The International Trade Membership Association. The Republican-led US Congress has not challenged Trump's tariff authority to date, although lawmakers have increasingly voiced concerns about the effect of tariffs on prices. The House of Representatives and the Senate have voted on separate resolutions challenging the tariffs Trump has imposed on imports from Canada and Brazil, but they have not passed any tariff legislation. "Congress and the administration will determine the best path forward in the coming weeks" with respect to tariffs, House of Representatives speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) said. But Trump likely would have trouble finding enough votes on Capitol Hill to support his tariffs. "The president must refrain from any further unilateral action on tariffs," House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) said. No clarity on refunds Trump on Friday also signed an executive order formally rescinding all his previous tariffs that were imposed by invoking the economic emergency authority that the Supreme Court found to be illegal, including those on Brazil and those threatened against countries doing business with Iran. The US will immediately stop collecting duties imposed under the emergency tariffs. But the order makes no mention of any mechanism to refund the previously collected emergency tariff revenues. Trump said earlier today he is expecting a years-long court fight over whether his administration must refund an estimated $175bn in emergency tariffs. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Trump threatens 'global' tariff on aluminum scrap
Trump threatens 'global' tariff on aluminum scrap
Houston, 20 February (Argus) — US imports of aluminum scrap may be subject to a 10pc tax after President Donald Trump sought to counteract the US Supreme Court ruling today that struck down the "reciprocal" tariffs that he imposed last year. Trump threatened to impose the trade measure on Friday, hours after the US Supreme Court ruled that he exceeded his power when implementing country-specific duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) on 4 April 2025. He said an executive order would come in the afternoon, but none had been posted by publication time. If he decides against levying a 10pc tariff, then aluminum scrap would return to being freely traded. In touting the new tariffs, Trump planned to invoke Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows for the US to impose duties of up to 15pc to address balance-of-payment issues. Those tariffs can only remain in place for 150 days, though, with Congress having sole authority to approve any extensions. He added that he was considering taking action under sections 232, 201, 301 or 330 of the act. Section 232 tariffs on imports of P1020 and other grades of primary aluminum remain in effect at a 50pc rate, aside from imports from the UK, which are subject to a 25pc rate. Previously, goods subject to section 232 tariffs have been exempted from stacking of additional tariffs for specific countries, except for imports from China. Still, Trump's latest tariff threat likely would benefit certain countries, while being a wash for others, as the baseline duty rate under IEEPA already was 10pc. Fewer than half of the top 15 suppliers of aluminum scrap to the US in 2025 were subject to a higher "reciprocal" tax. The US brought in 581,000 metric tonnes (t) of aluminum scrap at a declared value of $1.53bn from May-December 2025, the latest data from the US Commerce Department shows. Still, tariff costs on consumers were minimal during that period, given that material coming from Canada and Mexico — which accounted for 89pc of shipments to the US — is largely imported duty free under the US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) free-trade agreement. It remains to be seen whether importers will be able to recoup tariff costs or whether aluminum scrap shipments covered by USMCA would be affected by the Section 122 tariffs, given that it was not clear by publication time if the latest legal avenue proposed by Trump would supersede that deal. By Alex Nicoll and Jenna Baer Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US high court strikes down Trump's tariffs: Update
US high court strikes down Trump's tariffs: Update
Updates with details throughout Washington, 20 February (Argus) — The US Supreme Court has thrown out most of the tariffs President Donald Trump has imposed on nearly all US trading partners, finding his ability to unilaterally impose tariffs exceeded his powers under a decades-old law. The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling released on Friday will block Trump's ability to use tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to extract concessions from trading partners and punish countries that reject his demands. The Constitution "did not vest any part of the taxing power in the executive branch," chief justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion, backed by two other conservative justices and all three liberal justices. Trump, speaking hours after the court announced its ruling, raged against the justices who overturned his tariffs. "I'm ashamed of certain members of the court for not having the courage to do what's right for our country," Trump said. "It's an embarrassment to the families" of justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, he said. Trump appointed both justices during his first term. The majority opinion noted that "the Framers gave 'Congress alone' the power to impose tariffs during peacetime." Trump "must 'point to clear congressional authorization' to justify his extraordinary assertion of that power," the majority opinion said, adding that "He cannot." Trump scoffed at the opinion. "The court said that I'm not allowed to charge even one dollar under IEEPA", he said and suggested that the six justices were "swayed by foreign interests". What is affected? The Supreme Court decision affects Trump's tariffs on Mexico, Canada and China, where he cited an economic emergency created by the three countries' alleged inaction to stop the flow of fentanyl drugs into the US. The Supreme Court ruling also strikes down Trump's most extensive action — imposing tariffs of at least 10pc on nearly every US trading partner to address the "economic emergency" of persistent US trade deficits. The Supreme Court's decision also will affect the tariffs Trump imposed on imports from Brazil, US government lawyers informed the Court of International Trade last month. Trump cited Brazil's alleged suppression of freedom of speech as a reason to impose tariffs. The decision will not affect tariffs on US imports of steel, aluminum, cars and auto parts, which Trump imposed by citing well-tested legal trade authorities. Next steps Trump said he will sign an executive order later on Friday to impose a 10pc broad tariff on all US trading partners, in place of the struck down IEEPA tariffs. Trump said that action will invoke Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act, which allows imposing tariffs of up to 15pc to address a balance of payments issue. But that legal avenue comes with limitations. The administration can impose those tariffs only for a period of 150 days. Any extensions would require explicit authorization from Congress. The Republican-led US Congress has not challenged Trump's tariff authority to date, although lawmakers have increasingly voiced concerns about the effect of tariffs on prices. The House of Representatives and the Senate have voted on separate resolutions challenging the tariffs Trump has imposed on imports from Canada and Brazil, but they have not passed any tariff legislation. "Congress and the administration will determine the best path forward in the coming weeks" with respect to tariffs, House of Representatives speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) said. But Trump likely would have trouble finding enough votes on Capitol Hill to support his tariffs. "The president must refrain from any further unilateral action on tariffs," House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York) said. Trump said he does not plan to work with Congress on tariffs. "I have the right to do tariffs," he said. "We have a right to do pretty much what we want to do." The Trump administration will also quickly begin the legal process for replicating the IEEPA tariffs with "Section 202" and "Section 301" tariffs, US trade representative Jamieson Greer said, speaking alongside Trump. A "Section 232" authority allows the Commerce Department or US Trade Representative's office to determine whether imports of a product need to be curbed on national security grounds. A Section 301 investigation would target a specific country on the grounds that it is discriminating against US exports. In both cases, the process for imposing tariffs can take months. It also requires public consultation and allows carveouts for the affected US importers. The use of Section 232 and 301 authorities is "a little more complicated" than IEEPA, and "those will also be challenged", Trump's former trade representative Bob Lighthizer told participants at the Argus Americas Crude Summit in Houston on 4 February. Trump's administration will have its work cut out for it in deciding how, and whether, to refund an estimated $175bn in tariffs collected using IEEPA tariffs. Trump in his remarks suggested that the refund process could take years. Hundreds of companies, including refiners Valero and Marathon Petroleum, have already filed lawsuits seeking to recover the tariffs. The effective US tariff rate was around 13pc as of late 2025, up from 2.6pc a year earlier, according to research published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on 12 February. US companies and consumers paid about 90pc of the tariff burden, with only a fraction absorbed by foreign producers, the Fed researchers found. Foreign governments did not immediately react to the US court's tariff decision. "We take note of the ruling," the EU said. "We remain in close contact with the US administration as we seek clarity on the steps they intend to take in response to this ruling." By Haik Gugarats and Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
