Companies race to build US crude export capacity

  • : Crude oil, Oil products
  • 19/09/16

The race to build new offshore docks to handle the rising flow of US crude exports is on and speed is of the essence. Only the first few projects to be permitted and sanctioned are likely to get built.

The prize for Enterprise Products Partners, Phillips 66 and about eight others looking to build these offshore ports along the US Gulf coast will be the ability to fully load Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCC). That's because VLCCs offer the economies of scale needed to deliver US crude to farflung destinations like China and India.

The lead times for the projects are many years — meaning they will not have any impact on the ability of US crude to reach overseas in the short-term, as markets reel from the weekend attacks on Saudi Arabian crude production and processing. But they will play a role continuing to build on the US' role as a major supplier to global oil markets.

Five projects have submitted applications to the US Maritime Administration (MARAD) and the Coast Guard for the offshore projects, and at least four other projects could follow. In addition, a project on an island off the Texas coast also includes plans to fully load the supertankers, which can each carry up to 2mn bl of crude.

Some analysts predict that two or three of the VLCC offshore ports will come to fruition, including at least one off the coast of Corpus Christi and another in the Freeport area near Houston. The terminals will be key to the growth of US crude exports, which hit a record high of 3.16mn b/d in June and are already changing global markets. US exports fell to 2.69mn b/d in July, but are expected to continue in the 3mn b/d range this year.

Currently, only one US port is able to fully load a VLCC — the Louisiana Offshore Oil Port (Loop) about 20 miles (32km) off the coast from Grand Isle, Louisiana.

Midstream companies, refiners, a private equity group, a port authority and a trading firm are all vying to be the second.

Enterprise, already a key player in US crude exports, has reached a final investment decision on its offshore VLCC project near Freeport after signing long-term contracts for crude transportation, storage and marine terminalling services with Chevron, a top Permian producer.

Enterprise submitted a 10,000-page application to MARAD in January for the project, dubbed the Sea Port Oil Terminal (Spot). It would include two crude pipelines, built from a shoreline crossing to a deepwater port. The offshore port would connect to two single-point mooring (SPM) buoys and would be capable of loading and exporting oil at about 85,000 bl/hour.

Stop the clock

The Spot application hit a snag in May when federal regulators temporarily suspended the timeline of the review, also known as a "stop clock" order. The procedure, which has also been applied to two other pending offshore VLCC port applications, occurs when regulators need more information or analysis.

Enterprise said the "stop clock" was expected during the year-long MARAD process and that it will not affect the project's schedule. The company expects regulatory approval in the first half of 2020 and construction will take about two years. Enterprise is bullish on US crude exports, predicting they will rise to 8mn b/d in the next few years.

Phillips 66 more recently joined the VLCC race with its own Bluewater project off the coast of Corpus Christi. The facility is expected to service 16 VLCCs per month. Phillips 66 submitted a MARAD application for the project in May.

The Port of Corpus Christi Authority is supporting the Phillips 66 project, even as it has joined forces with private equity firm the Carlyle Group on another VLCC port at Harbor Island near Aransas Pass.

The Harbor Island project is not technically an offshore project but will be able to fully load VLCCs, as it includes a privately-paid-for dredging plan to reach a channel depth of 75ft. This is a separate project from a planned Corps of Engineers dredging project that will increase the channel depth to 54ft starting at the jetties at the entrance of the ship channel to Harbor Island.

The Harbor Island VLCC project does not need a permit from MARAD and has already filed for several permits with the US Army Corps of Engineers, said Jerry Ashcorft, chief executive of Lone Star Ports, the company set up to develop the project.

Ashcroft expects that about 4mn b/d of US crude will be exported out of the Corpus Christi area within three years.

Looking more broadly at the US Gulf coast, two new VLCC projects are likely to be developed -- one in Corpus Christi and one in the Houston area -- and possibly a third depending on the status of trading with China, Ashcorft said.

Another project competing in the Corpus Christi area is Trafigura's proposed Texas Gulf Terminal, which would be off the coast of Padre Island in Texas. The trading and logistics company earlier this year submitted its application to MARAD for the project which would use a single-point mooring buoy, similar to the one used at Loop.

MARAD put a "stop clock" on that project in February, asking for more information.

Texas Gulf Terminals said last month that federal agencies routinely "stop the clock" or pause the mandated schedule in the permitting process, to ensure officials have adequate time to review materials or to allow the applicant to provide additional information.

Canadian pipeline company Enbridge and storage and terminal operator Oiltanking are proposing to build a VLCC export terminal off the coast of Freeport, in direct competition with the Enterprise proposal. The Texas Crude Offshore Loading Terminal or Colt will include an offshore platform and two offshore loading single-point mooring buoys capable of fully loading VLCCs in about 24 hours. MARAD also issued a "stop clock" on that project in part related to a plan to add a marine vapor control system to the original design and amend its application.

Enbridge said last month that Texas Colt expects to file an amended application in the fourth quarter of this year and does not anticipate a delay to the project's schedule.

One other VLCC offshore project has submitted an application to MARAD – Sentinel Midstream's Texas Gulf Link project off the coast of Brazoria County, near Freeport. The project would have export loading rates of up to 85,000 bl/hour and is expected to handle 15 VLCCs per month.

Two other VLCC offshore projects are not in the Corpus Christi or Houston areas – logistics company Jupiter's VLCC plan off the coast of Brownsville, Texas, and Tallgrass Energy's plan related to its terminal in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana.

Tallgrass said last month that it is in advanced discussions on the Plaquemines project with several counterparties that would lead to a final investment decision if consummated. The company envisions two phases of the project. The first will allow full loading of post-Panamax-sized vessels and the second would include building a separate offshore pipeline extension that would allow VLCC loading at a deep-water single point mooring.

Jupiter announced its Brownsville project last year but has not submitted an application to MARAD. The company has delayed the projected start date of its related 1mn b/d Permian crude pipeline by about six months to the first quarter of 2021.

Jupiter said in August that it has started the process to submit its MARAD permit and is also waiting for approvals from the Port of Brownsville.

Two other companies are weighing VLCC projects but have provided few specifics.

Energy Transfer said earlier this month it is negotiating with potential shippers on a VLCC project connected to its terminal in Nederland, Texas. The company said it was optimistic about the project and that it would take 2.5-3 years, including the regulatory process and construction.

Meanwhile, Flint Hills Resources last year teased a VLCC project related to an expansion of its terminal in Ingleside, near Corpus Christi. But Flint Hills, a subsidiary of Koch Industries, is now considering a sale of the terminal, leaving the related VLCC project uncertain.

Flint Hills said in August that it continues to advance the expansion project announced last year.

US Gulf Coast VLCC loading projects

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/02

US regulator slams executive over Opec 'collusion'

US regulator slams executive over Opec 'collusion'

Washington, 2 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulators for the first time took action against a leading US oil executive over his alleged "collusion" with Opec, but the producers' alliance itself was not a target of investigation. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) today issued a proposed consent order barring former Pioneer Natural Resources chief executive Scott Sheffield from joining the board of ExxonMobil following its $59.5bn takeover of Pioneer. FTC accused Sheffield of organizing "anti-competitive coordinated output reductions between and among US crude oil producers" and members of Opec and the broader Opec+ alliance. "Opec and Opec+ are cartels that exist to control global crude oil production and reserves," FTC said. The specific charges against Sheffield relate to the outspoken executive's frequent public appearances where he opined on US companies' desired production levels, his meetings and frequent communications with Opec officials since 2017 and his advocacy of drastic production cuts by US companies as global demand fell sharply at the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. Opec under then secretary general Mohammed Barkindo began active outreach to independent US producers, starting in March 2017 with private dinner discussions held on the sidelines of IHS CERAWeek conferences in Houston, Texas. Barkindo hosted similar discussions at CERAWeek in 2018 and 2019, in addition to hosting some of the US companies' chief executives at Opec seminars in Vienna. FTC references Sheffield's public comments following those meetings and alleges that Sheffield kept in frequent touch with Opec officials via messaging service WhatsApp and other means to discuss production levels and prices. Barkindo at the time said that production cuts and prices were never on the agenda of his meetings with the US shale producers and that his organization wanted to better understand the US companies' technological innovation and to compare market outlooks and forecast models. Barkindo in the same time frame held similar discussions with major US hedge funds and money managers. US oil executives polled by Argus in 2017-20 also said that their discussions with Barkindo and other Opec officials revolved around market fundamentals. The US oil industry broadly felt that it was benefiting from a policy of production cuts Opec was implementing as it supported prices at a time when the US domestic production and crude exports grew uninterrupted. Former president Donald Trump took credit for engineering a breakthrough agreement in April 2020 to remove more than 10mn b/d of global crude supply by brokering an agreement between Saudi Arabia, Russia and other Opec+ producers. Even without prodding from Trump, US producers cut back production cuts in 2020 as transportation fuel demand and prices fell sharply in the first months of the pandemic. FTC singled out Sheffield for allegedly coordinating his company's production levels with Opec. Sheffield "held repeated, private conversations with high-ranking Opec representatives assuring them that Pioneer and its Permian basin rivals were working hard to keep oil output artificially low," according to the FTC order. Sheffield, who helped found Pioneer and was its longtime chairman, served as chief executive from 1997 to 2016 and from 2019 through 2023. He remains on the company's board, serving as special adviser to the chief executive since 1 January. The son of an oil executive, Sheffield attended high school in Tehran, Iran. Pioneer shrugged off what it termed a "fundamental misunderstanding" of global oil markets and said that FTC misread "the nature and intent" of Sheffield's actions. Opec declined to comment on FTC's action against Sheffield. FTC is so far the only US regulator to set sights on Opec, even if indirectly. President Joe Biden in 2021 separately tasked FTC with leading an investigation into whether there is price manipulation in gasoline markets. Biden, like many of his predecessors at a time of high gasoline prices, in 2022 accused Opec of uncompetitive behavior in oil markets and expressed support for US legislation allowing antitrust action against the organization by the US Department of Justice. But that acrimony has largely dissipated after global oil and US gasoline prices fell in 2023 from unusually high levels in the previous year. US Congress has not taken significant steps to advance the anti-Opec legislation since 2022. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction


24/05/02
24/05/02

Canadian rail workers vote to launch strike: Correction

Corrects movement of grain loadings from a year earlier in final paragraph. Washington, 2 May (Argus) — Workers at the two major Canadian railroads could go on strike as soon as 22 May now that members of the Teamsters Canada Rail Conference (TCRC) have authorized a strike, potentially causing widespread disruption to shipments of commodities such as crude, coal and grain. A strike could disrupt rail traffic not only in Canada but also in the US and Mexico because trains would not be able to leave, nor could shipments enter into Canada. This labor action could be far more impactful than recent strikes because it would affect Canadian National (CN) and Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) at the same time. Union members at Canadian railroads have gone on strike individually in the past, which has left one of the two carriers to continue operating and handle some of their competitor's freight. But TCRC members completed a vote yesterday about whether to initiate a strike action at each carrier. The union represents about 9,300 workers employed at the two railroads. Roughly 98pc of union members that participated voted in favor of a strike beginning as early as 22 May, the union said. The union said talks are at an impasse. "After six months of negotiations with both companies, we are no closer to reaching a settlement than when we first began, TCRC president Paul Boucher said. Boucher warned that "a simultaneous work stoppage at both CN and CPKC would disrupt supply chains on a scale Canada has likely never experienced." He added that the union does not want to provoke a rail crisis and wants to avoid a work stoppage. The union has argued that the railroads' proposals would harm safety practices. It has also sought an improved work-life balance. But CN and CPKC said the union continues to reject their proposals. CPKC "is committed to negotiating in good faith and responding to our employees' desire for higher pay and improved work-life balance, while respecting the best interests of all our railroaders, their families, our customers, and the North American economy." CN said it wants a contract that addresses the work life balance and productivity, benefiting the company and employees. But even when CN "proposed a solution that would not touch duty-rest rules, the union has rejected it," the railroad said. Canadian commodity volume has fallen this year with only rail shipments of chemicals, petroleum and petroleum products, and non-metallic minerals rising, Association of American Railroads (AAR) data show. Volume data includes cars loaded in the US by Canadian carriers. Coal traffic dropped by 11pc during the 17 weeks ended on 27 April compared with a year earlier, AAR data show. Loadings of motor vehicles and parts have fallen by 5.2pc. CN and CPKC grain loadings fell by 4.3pc from a year earlier, while shipment of farm products and food fell by 9.3pc. By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

FTC clears Exxon-Pioneer deal but bars Sheffield


24/05/02
24/05/02

FTC clears Exxon-Pioneer deal but bars Sheffield

New York, 2 May (Argus) — US antitrust regulators signaled they will clear ExxonMobil's proposed $59.5bn takeover of Pioneer Natural Resources but banned the shale giant's former chief executive officer from gaining a seat on the board. A proposed consent order from the Federal Trade Commission seeks to stop Scott Sheffield, Pioneer's former chief executive, from taking part in "collusive activity" that would potentially raise crude prices and cause US consumers to pay more at the pump. The order paves the way for ExxonMobil to close its blockbuster deal for Pioneer, which will make it the leading producer in the prolific Permian shale basin of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico. It is also the top US oil producer's biggest transaction since Exxon's 1999 merger with Mobil. ExxonMobil's Permian output will more than double to 1.3mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) when the acquisition closes, before increasing to about 2mn boe/d in 2027. The FTC, which has taken a tougher line on mergers under the administration of President Joe Biden, has paid close attention to oil deals announced during the latest phase of shale consolidation. Only this week, Diamondback Energy said it had received a second request for information from the regulator over its $26bn proposed takeover of Endeavor Energy Resources. And Chevron's planned $53bn acquisition of US independent Hess has also been held up. The FTC alleged in a complaint that Sheffield exchanged hundreds of text messages with Opec officials discussing crude pricing and output, and that he sought to align production across the Permian with the cartel. His past conduct "makes it crystal clear that he should be nowhere near Exxon's boardroom," said Kyle Mach, deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Competition. ExxonMobil said it learnt about the allegations against Sheffield from the FTC. "They are entirely inconsistent with how we do business," the company said. While Pioneer said it disagreed with the FTC's complaint, which reflects a "fundamental misunderstanding" of US and global oil markets and "misreads the nature and intent" of Sheffield's actions, the company said it would not be taking any steps to stop the merger from closing. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Abu Dhabi’s Adnoc puts crude capacity at 4.85mn b/d


24/05/02
24/05/02

Abu Dhabi’s Adnoc puts crude capacity at 4.85mn b/d

Dubai, 2 May (Argus) — Abu Dhabi's state-owned Adnoc has nudged up its self-reported crude production capacity to 4.85mn b/d, from 4.65mn b/d previously. The UAE state energy giant did not formally announce the increase but updated the figure on its website. It did something similar when its capacity reached 4.65mn b/d in late 2023, up from 4.5mn b/d in the middle of last year. This latest hike takes the company a step closer to its long-term 5mn b/d crude capacity target, which it aims to reach by 2027. Adnoc set the 5mn b/d target back in 2018 when its capacity was 3.5mn b/d. At that time, the company said it was aiming to deliver the increase by 2030, but in November 2022 it brought the timeframe forward by three years, citing the "UAE's robust hydrocarbon reserves". The change in timeline had been expected, with sources telling Argus earlier that year that discussions had been taking place in the upper echelons of Adnoc about significantly accelerating its capacity growth plans . Given the speed at which the company has been delivering capacity gains over the past few years, and how close it is to meeting its target already, it is not inconceivable that Adnoc will reach 5mn b/d ahead of schedule. Put your best foot forward The UAE's rising capacity comes as Opec+ producers engage with independent agencies to update their respective crude output capacities for use in production policy decisions from 2025. At their meeting in June last year, all Opec+ members committed to undergo an external assessment of their sustainable capacities in the first half of 2024 by three independent consultancies, IHS, Wood Mackenzie and Rystad. The updated capacity assessment will help address a key criticism of the Opec+ production restraint agreements in their current format, namely that many of the countries involved have been cutting output from a baseline level of production that they can no longer actually deliver, in most cases due to natural decline. The UAE has been one of a handful of countries in the group that has been raising its capacity over the past few years. This means it should, in theory, benefit from the latest assessment, as a higher accepted capacity will afford it a higher production baseline under any Opec+ agreements struck from 2025 onwards. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining


24/05/02
24/05/02

Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining

London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell delivered a better-than-expected profit for the first quarter of 2024, helped by a strong performance from its LNG and oil product businesses. The company reported profit of $7.4bn for January-March, up sharply from an impairment-hit $474mn in the previous three months but down from $8.7bn in the first quarter of 2023. Adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items, Shell's profit came in at $7.7bn, 6pc ahead of the preceding three months and above analysts' estimates of $6.3bn-$6.5bn, although it was 20pc lower than the first quarter of 2023 when gas prices were higher. Shell's oil and gas production increased by 3pc on the quarter in January-March and was broadly flat compared with a year earlier at 2.91mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d). For the current quarter, Shell expects production in a range of 2.55mn-2.81mn boe/d, reflecting the effect of scheduled maintenance across its portfolio. The company's Integrated Gas segment delivered a profit of $2.76bn in the first quarter, up from $1.73bn in the previous three months and $2.41bn a year earlier. The segment benefited from increased LNG volumes — 7.58mn t compared to 7.06mn t in the previous quarter and 7.19mn t a year earlier — as well as favourable deferred tax movements and lower operating expenses. For the current quarter, Shell expects to produce 6.8mn-7.4mn t of LNG. In the downstream, the company's Chemicals and Products segment swung to a profit of $1.16bn during the quarter from an impairment-driven loss of $1.83bn in the previous three months, supported by a strong contribution from oil trading operations and higher refining margins driven by greater utilisation of its refineries and global supply disruptions. Shell's refinery throughput increased to 1.43mn b/d in the first quarter from 1.32mn b/d in fourth quarter of last year and 1.41mn b/d in January-March 2023. Shell has maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.344/share. It also said it has completed the $3.5bn programme of share repurchases that it announced at its previous set of results and plans to buy back another $3.5bn of its shares before the company's next quarterly results announcement. The company said it expects its capital spending for the year to be within a $22bn-$25bn range. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more