Russian gas flows stay slow in May

  • : Natural gas
  • 20/05/19

Aggregate Russian gas deliveries to Europe, excluding the Baltic states and Turkey, have remained much slower in May than in previous years amid muted European demand, even as they have risen slightly from April.

Combined deliveries to Europe at the Nord Stream link's German exit point in Greifswald, the Polish entry points of Kondratki and Wysokoje, all Ukrainian exit points and the Strandzha-2 point between Bulgaria and Turkey were 4.37 TWh/d on 1-17 May. This was up from 4.23 TWh/d in all of April. That said, some minor deliveries from Ukraine to Europe may have been exports from Ukraine or made under the country's short-haul programme rather than having been sent from Russia.

In any event, aggregate flows at these points had been further above the April average earlier this month, before deliveries along the Yamal-Europe route fell sharply on the past weekend and remained slower at the start of this week (see Kondratki graph). Deliveries to Poland along the route dropped to 685.2 GWh/d on the past two days from 924.8 GWh/d on 1-16 May, after Russian state-controlled Gazprom's long-term transit booking expired.

While flows so far in May were still on track to be the quickest for any month so far this year, they were still much slower than in most previous years (see total flows graph). Physical deliveries from Russia are often quicker in summer than in winter. The firm makes deliveries for injections into its own storage capacity in summer while it uses withdrawals to supplement physical flows from Russia in winter months.

High stocks, Covid-19 curb European demand

Europe's demand for Russian supply could remain much weaker than in previous summers, partly because of higher storage inventories.

Storage space left to fill in 10 European countries that made up 70pc of Gazprom's sales to Europe, excluding the Baltic states and Turkey, last summer — France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Austria, the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, Hungary and Romania — was 262.3TWh on 1 April. This was well down from 410.2TWh a year earlier, and also lower than in previous years (see space-to-fill graph). The deficit to a year earlier has since contracted but only 205.5TWh of space was left to fill on 16 May. The figures exclude the Dutch Norg site, which in previous years was filled directly from the Groningen field only, although it can take injections of supply that has been converted to low-calorie from high-calorie this summer for the first time.

Gazprom itself had higher stocks in Europe prior to the core 2019-20 heating season than in most previous years, and may have carried some of the surplus over to the summer. This could curb the firm's need to replenish its own stocks.

Lower European gas demand driven by Covid-19 restrictions and the related economic downturn may have also curbed the region's ability to take strong Russian supply.

Demand in the same 10 countries — including an estimate of apparent consumption for Austria and Slovakia based on net imports, stock movements and production — was 6.48 TWh/d on 16 March-15 May, following the imposition of strict social distancing measures across much of the region. This was down from 7.07 TWh/d a year earlier.

While weather-adjusted gas use in some markets has recently rebounded somewhat from previous weeks, economic activity could stay weak. Annualised first-quarter GDP declines were 21pc in France and 18pc in Italy — both major markets for Gazprom — the IMF said earlier this month. And these economies are likely to record even steeper second-quarter declines, it said. This could keep gas demand, particularly in the industrial sector, muted and may limit Gazprom's scope for sales.

Weaker sales expected

Gazprom recently revised down its sales forecast for this year to Europe, excluding the Baltic states, and Turkey.

The firm preliminarily forecast sales of 166.6bn m³ to these destinations. It had previously said that sales could be similar to a year earlier — when it had sold 199.3bn m³ — on a weather-adjusted basis.

Gazprom sold 39.7bn m³ to Europe, excluding the Baltic states, and Turkey, in January-March, down from 48.9bn m³ a year earlier. Deliveries earlier in the year were lifted considerably by sales through Gazprom's online platform, which made up a higher percentage of the firm's aggregate monthly sales than during the same months last year (see Gazprom sales graph).

There may have regularly been little incentive for strong take under long-term contracts indexed to hub prices so far this year. Prompt prices across much of Europe have held firmly below TTF front-month index's settlements for prolonged periods in recent months (see TTF v prompt graphs).

Gazprom flows lower than in most recent years GWh/d

Less space to fill in many Gazprom markets TWh

Kondratki flows drop GWh/d

Little incentive in NW Europe for Russian take €/MWh

Little incentive for CEE Russian take €/MWh

Online sales boost aggregate sales bn m³

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/15

Chinese importers seek five LNG cargoes for Jun-Sep

Chinese importers seek five LNG cargoes for Jun-Sep

Shanghai, 15 May (Argus) — Five Chinese importers, mostly second-tier buyers, are each seeking one LNG cargo for June-September delivery, according to an official notice published by China's national pipeline operator PipeChina on 15 May. The five importers are PipeChina, Chinese independent ENN, Hong Kong-listed city gas firm China Resources Gas, Hong Kong-based Towngas and state-owned China Gas. PipeChina and ENN have indicated a target price of at most $9.50/mn Btu for their intended cargoes, both for delivery to PipeChina's 6mn t/yr Tianjin terminal. China Gas has indicated a target price of at most $9.30/mn Btu for delivery to PipeChina's 6mn t/yr Beihai termial. China Resources Gas and Towngas have both indicated a target price of at most $9/mn Btu for delivery to PipeChina's 2mn t/yr Yuedong and Tianjin terminals, respectively. This consolidated requirement came about because of a need for PipeChina to better leverage on its infrastructure advantages and, at the same time, meet the varying needs of gas importers and consumers in the country. But this requirement comes at a time when spot LNG prices are still somewhat higher than the importers' targeted prices. But the importers can choose not to buy if offers are not within their expectations. The front-half month of the ANEA, the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia, was last assessed at $10.485/mn Btu on 15 May. Chinese importers mostly perceive spot prices below $9-9.50/mn Btu for June-September deliveries to be unattainable for now because there is strong buying interest from south and southeast Asia in particular. Indian state-controlled refiner IOC most recently bought LNG for delivery between 22 May and 15 June at around $10.60/mn Btu, through a tender that closed on 14 May. Thailand's state-controlled PTT most recently bought three deliveries for 9-10 July, 16-17 July and 22-23 July through a tender that closed on 13 May , at just slightly above $10.50/mn Btu. The most recent spot transaction was Japanese utility Tohoku Electric's purchase of a 10-30 June delivery at around $10.55/mn Btu through a tender that closed on 14 May . This is at least $1/mn Btu higher than Chinese importers' indications. Summer requirements have so far been muted but concerns among buyers about potential supply disruptions remain. Malaysia's 30mn t/yr Bintulu LNG export terminal suffered a power loss on 10 May, but this issue may have been resolved as of early on 15 May, according to offtakers. Some unspecified upstream issues may still be affecting production at the Bintulu facility, resulting in Malaysia's state-owned Petronas having to ask some of its buyers for cargo deferments, according to offtakers. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Q&A: Brazil adds Asian indexation for flexible gas


24/05/13
24/05/13

Q&A: Brazil adds Asian indexation for flexible gas

Sao Paulo, 13 May (Argus) — Three years after the natural gas market liberalization in Brazil, the number of consumers migrating from regulated supply has slowly increased and more flexible pricing mechanisms adopted. Argus spoke to Alessandro di Domenico , president of gas and power trader Delta Geração, about the current state of the market. Excerpts follow. Explain Delta's supply contract with Bolivia through 2026 despite Bolivia's gas production decline. The decline in production will happen because there is less investment [in Bolivia] than a few years back. But there are still some volumes that can supply the Brazilian market, especially in flexible contracts in the liberalized market. There is some gas that was being directed to Argentina and is now available. Even with the decline in Bolivia production, we will continue to have natural gas in the short-term. Besides that, the Rota 3 pipeline project [in Brazil's southeast] is close to being completed, which will bring more gas from pre-salt fields, leaving the market with more supply. This boosts the growth of the liberalized market. Delta is positioning itself to meet those demands and will sign other supply contracts soon. What types of contracts has Delta and others signed in the liberalized market? These are interruptible contracts. Their innovation relies on flexibility. Volume and duration are flexible. This allows us to meet clients almost back-to-back. How are these flexible contracts priced? They are competitive with the regulated market and are connected to international parity prices. Contracts are using Brent, Henry Hub and [Japan-Korea marker LNG spot prices]. How has the market progressed since 2021? This market was born rigid and is now gaining flexibility, in baby steps. In the beginning, there were only three consumers: Acelen, Brazilian steelmaker Gerdau and petrochemical group Unigel. Now we have companies in the cellulose business, metallurgy and automotive industry, which are all gas-intensive. So, in the future, there will be a big movement depending on state regulations, because that is an important axis of articulation for the mobility the liberalized market requires. State regulations play a very important role in allowing smaller entities to enter the market. By Rebecca Gompertz Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Sao Paulo state seeks biomethane boost


24/05/13
24/05/13

Sao Paulo state seeks biomethane boost

Sao Paulo, 13 May (Argus) — Brazil's Sao Paulo state is seeking to capitalize on growing demand for renewable energy, announcing a series of measures to increase biogas and biomethane production across various sectors, including sugarcane, waste management firms and waste agriculture. As Brazil's largest sugar and ethanol producing state, Sao Paulo has substantial potential to leverage existing infrastructure and resources — especially vinasse, a byproduct of ethanol production — to increase biomethane output. To boost output, the state government will streamline environmental licensing for new projects through new rules that should attract investment, according to the state's environment undersecretary for energy and mining, Marisa Barros. The focus will initially be on the sugar and ethanol industry, which can produce 30mn m³/d of biogas. Biogas contains 50pc methane, which can be processed into biomethane, a drop-in substitute for natural gas. The state is also seeking to attract investment in biogas production from animal waste, which can produce up to 5mn m³/d. The government estimates that roughly 190,000 farms in the state can install biodigestors to produce biogas, which would contribute to lower emissions in the state. The state agriculture secretary also approved the use of the Sao Paulo agribusiness expansion fund (Feap) for investments in biodigestors as well as new solar power installations. And earlier this year state regulatory agency Arsesp stipulated a discount on distribution fees for biomethane sold on the wholesale market. Brazil's energy research company EPE sees significant potential for the sugarcane industry to expand biomethane production, in part because it has the advantage of having many mills adjacent to existing gas distribution infrastructure. In addition to selling the renewable gas on the wholesale market, many mills are using biomethane in their own operations and to substitute diesel in their trucks and machinery, contributing to lower fuel costs and emissions. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Banks’ 2023 fossil fuel funding rises to $705bn: Study


24/05/13
24/05/13

Banks’ 2023 fossil fuel funding rises to $705bn: Study

London, 13 May (Argus) — Fossil fuel financing by the world's 60 largest banks rose to $705bn in 2023, up by 4.8pc from $673bn in 2022, with the increase largely driven by financing for the LNG sector. This brings the total funding for fossil fuels since the Paris agreement was signed in 2015 to $6.9 trillion. The 15th annual Banking on Climate Chaos (BOCC) report was released on 13 May by a group of non-governmental and civil society organisations including the Rainforest Action Network and Oil Change International, and it analyses the world's 60 largest commercial and investment banks, according to ratings agency Standard and Poor's (S&P). Funding had previously dropped in 2022 to $673bn from $742bn in 2021, but this was because higher profits for oil and gas companies had led to reduced borrowing. JPMorgan Chase was the largest financier of fossil fuels in 2023 at $40.9bn, up from $38.7bn a year earlier, according to the report. It also topped the list for banks providing financing to companies with fossil fuel expansion plans, with its commitments rising to $19.3bn from $17.1bn in 2022. Japanese bank Mizuho was the second-largest financier, increasing funding commitments to $37bn for all fossil fuels, from $35.4bn in 2022. The Bank of America came in third with $33.7bn, although this was a drop from $37.3bn a year earlier. Out of the 60 banks, 27 increased financing for companies with fossil fuel exposure, with the rise driven by funding for the LNG sector — including fracking, import, export, transport and gas-fired power. Developers have rallied support for LNG projects as part of efforts to boost energy security after the Russia-Ukraine war began in 2022, and banks are actively backing this sector, stated the report. "The rise in rankings by Mizuho and the prominence of the other two Japanese megabanks — MUFG [Mitsubishi UFG Financial Group] and SMBC [Sumitomo Mitsui Banking] — is a notable fossil fuel trend for 2023," the report said. Mizuho and MUFG dominated LNG import and export financing, providing $10.9bn and $8.4bn respectively, to companies expanding this sector. Total funding for the LNG methane gas sector in 2023 was $121bn, up from $116bn in 2022. Financing for thermal coal mining increased slightly to $42.2bn, from $39.7bn in 2022. Out of this, 81pc came from Chinese banks, according to the report, while several North American banks have provided funds to this sector, including Bank of America. Some North American banks have also rolled back on climate commitments, according to the report. Bank of America, for example, had previously committed to not directly financing projects involving new or expanded coal-fired power plants or coal mines, but changed its policy in late 2023 to state that such projects would undergo "enhanced due diligence" and senior-level reviews. The report also notes that most banks' coal exclusions only apply to thermal coal and not metallurgical coal. Total borrowing by oil majors such as Eni, ConocoPhillips, Chevron and Shell fell by 5.24pc in 2023, with several such as TotalEnergies, ExxonMobil and Hess indicating zero financing for the year. The BOCC report's finance data was sourced from either Bloomberg or the London Stock Exchange between December 2023 and February 2024. UK-based bank Barclays, which ranks ninth on the list with $24.2bn in fossil fuel funding, said that the report does not recognise the classification of some of the data. Its "financed emissions for the energy and power sectors have reduced by 44pc and 26pc respectively, between 2020-23," it said. In response to its increase in financing for gas power, "investment is needed to support existing oil and gas assets, while clean energy is scaled," the bank said. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

APA defers FID for Australian gas pipeline's stage 3


24/05/13
24/05/13

APA defers FID for Australian gas pipeline's stage 3

Sydney, 13 May (Argus) — Australian pipeline operator APA has deferred a final investment decision (FID) for stage 3 of its planned east coast grid expansion, given potential rule changes for the South West Queensland pipeline (SWQP). APA is pushing back the FID by about 6-12 months to the first-half of 2025, and was likely initially planning to make the FID this year. The operator postponed the FID because of recent action by the Australian Energy Regulator (AER), which said it might recommend rule changes for the SWQP. A review was announced in February and is not expected to be completed until November at the earliest, APA said. The firm opposes any further regulation of the SWQP , maintaining that it does not return excessive profits. APA said the lack of a single arbitration case involving the facility since such a regime was instituted in 2017 is evidence that its customers accept present arrangements. "We've probably got around six to 12 months at the very most for us to work through and hopefully there's no change to regulation, but basically the time frame is we need to get started pretty much early next year on building stage 3," APA's chief executive Adam Watson said on 9 May. If the AER decides to make the lightly regulated SWQP subject to reference price regulation, an access arrangement would need to be determined which will take 2-3 years to complete, APA said. This means any changes would be instituted in the fiscal year to 30 June 2028. The SWQP can carry 440 TJ/d (11.75mn m³/d) in a westerly direction from Wallumbilla to the Moomba hub, from where gas can enter the APA-operated Moomba-Sydney and Epic Energy-owned Moomba-Adelaide pipelines for transport to southeastern facilities. Expanding the capacity of pipelines allowing the north-south transit of gas is considered critical to avoiding shortfalls owing to the depletion of Gippsland basin fields this decade. Stage 1 of APA's east coast grid expansion was completed in 2023, with stage 2 also now operational in line with guidance. These two stages increased capacity by 25pc, allowing about 50 TJ/d more gas to flow on the SWQP to southern markets, with similar increased volumes expected from stages 3 and 4. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more