Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Texas gas export ban remains unresolved: Wright

  • : Electricity, Natural gas
  • 21/11/09

Questions remain in Texas regarding executive authority to regulate natural gas exports only weeks ahead of the winter season, according to comments by a member of state oil and gas regulator the Texas Railroad Commission (RRC).

RRC commissioner Jim Wright, who was sworn into office a month before a major winter storm in February froze Texas gas infrastructure and knocked out power, discussed the regulatory reaction following the incident during a talk today at the LDC US-Mexico Natural Gas Forum in San Antonio, Texas.

The RRC received instructions from Texas governor Greg Abbott's office following the power outages. Abbott signed an executive order on 17 February mandating that all sources of gas in Texas be temporarily prioritized for domestic use, such as heating for residential homes, over exports.

"We had to put a directive out telling pipelines to make sure the gas was directed in that area," Wright said. "I wasn't real sure that we could tell pipelines they couldn't honor those contracts they had. And I still today don't think we have the authority to do that."

The order — which lasted five days — raised several ongoing legal questions and threatened to completely shut in pipelines exporting to Mexico. The result would have crippled the country's power generation and industrial activity.

During the storm, Mexico lost about 20pc of its then-average of 5 Bcf/d (142mn m³/d) in gas supplies from Texas. The reduction in flows led to power outages in 29 Mexican states. The country's president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, entered discussions with Texas a day after the order in an attempt to have it overturned.

"It was critical for us to continue our exports of gas into Mexico," Wright said.

One major help to ensure gas exports to Mexico remain stable in the upcoming winter season, Wright suggested, would be to ensure adequate electricity supplies for Texas' gas production and transportation infrastructure.

The Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC) proposed several weatherization requirements for the state's power infrastructure in August, though concerns remain as to whether enough will be done by December.

The LDC US-Mexico Natural Gas Forum continues through tomorrow.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/02/14

Lack of tariff details worry US energy markets

Lack of tariff details worry US energy markets

Washington, 14 February (Argus) — Uncertainty over potential tariffs on US imports from Canada and Mexico is already roiling North American energy trade, as trading desks struggle to understand how tariffs would be assessed and some buyers are unwilling to commit to taking March cargoes without more details. US president Donald Trump's planned 10pc tariff on energy commodity imports from Canada and a 25pc import tax on Mexican energy was originally set for 4 February but he postponed implementation until 4 March. The three governments are negotiating to avert a full-blown trade war, and many market participants are hoping that Trump would again delay their implementation after winning some concessions, as he did earlier this month. But even without tariffs in place, vast segments of the energy industry — oil and gas producers, refiners, pipeline operators, traders — are bracing for them. Energy trade across North America has been tariff-free for decades. Trump during his first term terminated the 1994 North America Free Trade Agreement, but replaced it with the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement in 2020 that kept the energy trade terms unchanged. The sudden imposition of tariffs after decades of free trade could create legal uncertainty in contractual obligations related to the payment of tariffs and reporting requirements, law firm Vinson & Elkins partner Jason Fleischer told Argus . "It's been a long time since oil and gas pipelines have really had to deal with anything quite like this." At least one large Canadian refiner attempted to pass along the tariff to gasoline cargo buyers in the US ahead of the original 4 February start date, leading a few buyers to threaten to pull out of their contracts, market sources told Argus . Complicating the matter is the approach taken by the Trump administration to impose import taxes differs greatly from current trade terms. The regular US customs duties on crude, for example, are currently set in volumetric terms, at 5.25¢/bl and 10.5¢/bl depending on crude quality. In practice, nearly every source of US crude imports is exempt from tariffs at present. But the import tax set out in Trump's executive orders is to be imposed on the value of the commodity — without specifying how that will be calculated and at what specific point during the transportation process. Likewise, guidance on the new tariffs from the US Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), given just before the original 4 February deadline, did not address the specific issues relating to the energy commodities. CBP and the Treasury Department will have to issue regulations spelling out specific details on how tariffs are to be assessed and collected, Vinson & Elkins partner Jeff Jakubiak said. "The advice we're giving to companies is to collect information and get ready to provide it to the government at some point in the future," Jakubiak said. If tariffs go into effect, "there is likely to be a combination of reporting obligations by the transporter as well as the owner of the commodity. And in both cases, my advice is, figure out how you can accurately count and assign volumes that are moving across the border and figure out how you would price those." Market effects also uncertain The uncertainty over the timing and details of implementation of tariffs have left the affected market participants having to guess who will carry the burden of new taxes. The discount for Western Canadian Select (WCS) crude at Hardisty, Alberta, to the CMA Nymex WTI contract widened on the eve of the initial 4 February deadline of tariffs, suggesting that market participants expected Canadian producers to bear the brunt of tariffs. But over time, that burden likely will shift depending on individual market power of buyers and sellers. This could hit refiners in the US midcontinent that currently rely on WCS and have few alternatives to taking Canadian crude. They could, in turn, pass on the additional costs to consumers at the pump. US independent refiner PBF Energy said this week that tariffs would likely cut US midcon refinery runs , even if those refiners could find alternatives to Canadian crudes. Most Mexico-sourced crude markets are seaborne, giving producers in that country an alternative to US markets. "For this scenario, we anticipate [US Gulf coast] refiners will reduce consumption to the lower limit of their contractual obligations but will continue to purchase Mexican crude and pay the tariff via reduced refining margins," investment bank Macquarie said in a recent note to clients. Canadian producers also expressed concern about the uncertain impact of tariffs on crude volumes trans-shipped through the US, either for exports to third country destinations from Gulf coast ports or transported on US pipelines to destinations in eastern Canada. Without guidance from the US customs authorities, it is not clear if such flows would be subject to new US tariffs. Integrated oil sands producer Suncor's refineries on the Canadian east coast rely on crude flows from Enbridge's 540,000 b/d Line 5 or 500,000 b/d Line 78 that cross into the US in Michigan before crossing back into Canada. "I would say that I don't know that anyone on the planet knows exactly what's going to happen on tariffs," chief executive Rich Kruger said. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Mexico’s Sierra Madre pipeline faces permit hurdles


25/02/14
25/02/14

Mexico’s Sierra Madre pipeline faces permit hurdles

Mexico City, 14 February (Argus) — Gas supply to Mexico's largest LNG terminal is in question as security concerns and community opposition threaten the Sierra Madre pipeline's progress. Mexico Pacific's 48-inch, 800km (497 mi) pipeline, when completed, will transport up to 2.8 Bcf/d of natural gas from Texas' Waha Basin to Mexico Pacific's Saguaro LNG terminal in Puerto Libertad, Sonora state. The terminal, under construction, is expected to reach 30mn tonnes (t)/yr capacity over two phases — nearly half the combined output of Mexico's six Pacific LNG projects. Mexico Pacific says the first three 5mn t/yr trains will be completed in 2025, with all federal, state and municipal permits secured. But the pipeline still lacks key state and municipal approvals. "The terminal has all its permits," said Miriam Grunstein, a former advisor to the energy regulatory commission CRE. "But some pipeline permits will be tough to secure." Both the terminal and pipeline have strong federal and state backing. In October, Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum publicly praised Mexico Pacific's planned $15bn investment. The company also signed agreements with Chihuahua and Sonora state governments and national power utility CFE to channel investments into social, security and infrastructure projects. "The pipeline is likely to get state permits," Grunstein said, "but political opposition is real." While Sheinbaum's Morena Party dominates congress, Chihuahua governor Maria Eugenia Campos belongs to the opposition party PAN, and the centrist PRI still holds sway in northern states. "The PAN and PRI could try to block the project to weaken Morena," Grunstein said. Security is another major hurdle. "Border projects need military protection," said Eduardo Prud'homme, former technical director at Mexico's state pipeline operator Cenagas, citing threats from criminal organizations trafficking drugs and migrants. The pipeline's route runs near the Altar desert, a federally protected area used by human traffickers. Clashes with drug gangs and armed human traffickers could escalate after Sheinbaum pledged to deploy thousands of National Guard troops to the border in talks with US president Donald Trump, Grunstein said. The last time Mexico waged direct war on cartels — during the 2006-2012 administration of former president Felipe Calderon — it resulted in over 120,000 homicides and 27,000 disappearances in six years, according to government data. Durazo's 'Plan Sonora' Sonora governor Alfonso Durazo has privately committed to securing the Sierra Madre project, Grunstein said, while Chihuahua's Campos "has been silent on the issue." "For Durazo, the stakes are high," she said. "It's part of ‘Plan Sonora,' his administration's flagship project, and he'll push to start construction this year." Launched in 2022, Plan Sonora aims to establish a cross-border lithium battery supply chain, with a state-owned company managing lithium extraction. A new 1GW CFE solar plant will support the industry, but natural gas from Sierra Madre remains key in the transition. Environmental opposition could further complicate matters. Over 30 civil groups have protested the LNG project's impact on the Gulf of California's biodiversity, organizing rallies and gathering 200,000 signatures. Their formal complaints date back to former president Andres Manuel López Obrador's administration, but Sheinbaum— an environmental scientist — has yet to address them. Indigenous resistance may pose the biggest challenge. Mexico Pacific is likely just beginning the legally required consultation process. "Mexico has struggled to secure indigenous approvals for pipelines," Grunstein said. "The Tula-Tuxpan pipeline was delayed over six years because of opposition. This could trigger even greater resistance." By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Brazil’s offshore wind gains momentum


25/02/14
25/02/14

Brazil’s offshore wind gains momentum

New York, 14 February (Argus) — Brazil is preparing for its first offshore wind projects following the approval of legislation that establishes a regulatory framework for investments in the sector. Industry leaders anticipate that this legal foundation will accelerate development, with the first auction for offshore wind areas expected soon. The move comes as Brazil seeks to leverage its vast wind resources and address slowing growth in its onshore wind sector. "The offshore wind law was approved at the right moment," said Elbia Gannoum, president of Brazilian wind association Abeeolica. "Brazil has one of the largest wind generation potentials, and without this law, the country risked missing investment opportunities." The new legislation comes as onshore wind expansion slows. After nearly 5GW of new wind capacity was added in 2023, investment declined, with capacity expanding by just 3.3GW last year, according to Abeeolica. A lack of demand from power distributors in energy auctions and an oversupply of power generation capacity have contributed to the slowdown. With limited demand for new projects, equipment suppliers have scaled back operations, and in some cases, suspended activities in Brazil. With the offshore wind law in place, the sector is optimistic that the government will hold its first auction for offshore wind areas this year or in early 2026. Awarding these areas would pave the way for Brazil's first offshore wind projects to begin operations by 2031 or 2032. Before the auction, the government must finalize regulations for the sector, which Gannoum expects will be complete this year. Companies have already begun preparing for the auction, conducting assessments of wind speeds, power transmission infrastructure and supply chains, according to Ricardo de Luca, Brazil country director for UK offshore wind developer Corio Generation. Once the areas are awarded, project development could take up to four years, followed by an auction for power purchase agreements in 2028, de Luca estimates. Corio plans to develop five offshore wind projects in Brazil, totaling 5GW of installed capacity. Wind developers warn that Brazil must also prepare its power transmission infrastructure for future offshore wind projects. "Even though areas haven't been awarded, the mines and energy ministry must start planning transmission infrastructure in regions with significant offshore wind potential," said Fernando Elias, regulatory director at Casa dos Ventos. "Without long-term planning, infrastructure bottlenecks could prevent projects from moving forward." While transmission constraints could pose challenges, Brazil has an advantage in developing offshore wind thanks to its established offshore oil and gas industry, said Renato Machado dos Santos, regional director of renewable energy at RES. "There is significant overlap in the supply chains for offshore wind and oil, which will not only accelerate investment but also make Brazil a more attractive destination for investors." Opportunities ahead? Despite potential hurdles, offshore wind developers remain cautiously optimistic. US president Donald Trump's 20 January executive order suspending offshore wind leasing and permitting could shift more investor interest toward Brazil. "Trump's policies have redirected attention to Brazil," de Luca said, adding that the Brazilian government has demonstrated a long-term commitment to renewable energy development. Beyond the offshore wind law, other recent legislation is expected to bolster demand for power from future offshore wind projects. This includes the approval of the low-carbon hydrogen law, which will drive demand for green fertilizer production. Additionally, the expansion of data centers for artificial intelligence and growing electricity demand from electric vehicle adoption will contribute to future power consumption in Brazil, a share of which will come from offshore wind projects, Gannoum said. Brazil’s onshore wind capacity GW Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Central eastern Europe’s gas flows switch west to east


25/02/14
25/02/14

Central eastern Europe’s gas flows switch west to east

London, 14 February (Argus) — Strong import demand in Ukraine and Moldova has shifted regional pricing dynamics and driven a switch to west-to-east gas flows in central and eastern Europe. Outflows from Slovakia, Poland and Hungary to Ukraine surged to a combined high of 267GWh on 13 February, after Ukraine's Naftogaz started issuing tenders for additional gas on a day-ahead basis on top of previous balance-of-month bookings. Combined outflows at these points were only 30 GWh/d on 1-5 February, but they stepped up significantly afterwards as the weather turned much colder and continued attacks on Ukrainian gas production infrastructure significantly reduced domestic output ( see flows graph ). And capacity bookings suggest flows will remain strong. Firms have booked 78 GWh/d at Budince on the Slovak border and 54.1 GWh/d at Bereg on the Hungarian border for the rest of February and may continue to top this up with day-ahead or within-day reservations. After including receipts from Isaccea in Romania and some transit through Moldova, Ukrainian inflows reached as high as 274GWh on 13 February. But at least some of this gas exited Ukraine again to end up in Moldova, particularly when EU-funded imports to the Transnistrian region ended and Moldovagaz took over supply obligations on 11-13 February. Trading firm Met will supply gas to Moldova from today onwards, probably through Bereg on the Ukrainian border rather than the previously-used route through Isaccea. After taking into account all of these border flows, Ukrainian net imports reached 229GWh on 13 February, by far the highest this month. With Ukrainian gas storage withdrawals at nearly full capacity , any additional upward flexibility needed in the system will have to come from higher imports. Higher Ukrainian and Moldovan import demand has not just flipped flows at these countries' borders, but has also drawn in gas from further west. Physical gas flows at Baumgarten on the Slovak-Austrian border flipped towards Slovakia on 12-13 February for the first time since one day in December last year, and before that in December 2020. The end of Russian gas transit through Ukraine, which moved Russian gas across Slovakia to Austria, made the switch more feasible but was still a reversal of average net outflows to Austria of 12 GWh/d on 1-11 February. And flows from Austria to Hungary at Mosonmagyarovar have stepped up significantly since 7 February, averaging 56 GWh/d on 7-13 February against nearly zero earlier in the month. Mosonmagyarovar was little used since the start of last year, having previously carried Russian gas transited through Ukraine to Hungary, as well as spot purchases when economical. And while Oberkappel on the German border had already been flowing towards Austria since the start of this month, net inflows jumped to 109 GWh/d on 7-13 February from 52 GWh/d earlier this month. Significant changes to regional gas price differentials have incentivised this reorientation of flows in central and eastern Europe. The Hungarian and Slovak day-ahead markets each have held a consistent premium to Austria since 6 February, having been at a small discount earlier this month and at larger €1.92/MWh and €0.93/MWh discounts, respectively, in January. Naftogaz has bought the majority of its gas from Slovakia and Hungary, driving up prompt prices to a premium to other neighbouring markets. The Slovak day-ahead market's premium to Austria peaked at €1.40/MWh on 13 February, while Hungary's premium reached €2.64/MWh on 11 February ( see price graph ). By Brendan A'Hearn Ukrainian flows in February GWh HU, SK day-ahead prices vs AT €/MWh Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Serbia aims to couple its electricity market in 4Q26


25/02/14
25/02/14

Serbia aims to couple its electricity market in 4Q26

London, 14 February (Argus) — Serbia aims to couple its day-ahead power market with the European market through its borders with Hungary and Bulgaria by the fourth quarter of 2026, but whether it will receive an exemption from the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) remains unclear, market operations specialist at Serbian electricity exchange Seepex Milos Mosurovic has told Argus . The fourth quarter of 2026 is the first available time slot for EU-led regulatory body Energy Community constituent states to join the EU's single day-ahead coupling scheme and was assigned by the market coupling steering committee, Mosurovic said. But market coupling is a prerequisite for exemption from the CBAM, which is planned to go into effect on 1 January 2026. Energy Community members previously agreed to the 2022 Electricity Integration Package, which would provide an exemption from the CBAM until 2030 if they coupled with the European market and met other requirements by 2026. But Energy Community Secretariat director Artur Lorkowski recently said in an interview with Argus that Energy Community constituent states probably will not receive a CBAM exemption , as they have not achieved market coupling, which is a precondition for exemption. But Lorkowski did acknowledge that "greater clarity is needed" on specific criteria to determine when a third country may be considered to have ''an electricity market that is integrated with the union". This lack of clarity, along with the procedural meetings, have created market uncertainty surrounding whether and how the CBAM could be applied to Energy Community constituent states. "All relevant participants in the energy sector are aware that [Energy Community] countries will not couple until [after] 1 January 2026," Mosurovic said. "This is why we do not know what to expect regarding the CBAM." If the CBAM was applied to electricity flows, an EU emissions trading system (ETS) equivalent would be applied to Serbian electricity flows beginning on 1 January 2026. The implementation of an EU ETS equivalent was deemed to be the most expensive of four models that could be introduced into the Energy Community region, as it would lead to an increase of 13-29pc more than the baseline scenario calculated on the electricity market as of July last year, an Energy Community ministerial council report published in December shows. The four proposed models are a regional ETS, a fixed-price ETS, a carbon tax and integration into the existing EU ETS. The final option was ranked the lowest for feasibility from a legal and technical standpoint. And the method of the application of the CBAM to electricity flows has not been revealed. According to an Energy Community report from October , it is not possible to separate electricity exports from transit flows based on currently available data, and therefore it is possible that both export and transit volumes will be subject to the CBAM, as transactions for electricity entering the EU from contracting parties were declared solely as imports regardless of origin. Thermal power plants among community contracting parties have benefited from access to the EU's integrated electricity market, but have not been subject to the EU ETS, despite all coal and lignite-fired thermal power plants in the region considered to be in breach of the requirements of the EU's large combustion plant directive. But thermal capacity remains key in the Balkans, despite more renewables entering the power mix. Coal-fired generation accounts for about 40pc of annual domestic generation in the region. By Annemarie Pettinato Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more