Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

EU wants more than renewables at Cop 28

  • : Coal, Crude oil, Electricity, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 23/11/17

Wopke Hoekstra hopes delivering on the bloc's climate targets will strengthen its hand in Dubai, writes Dafydd ab Iago

The EU's newly appointed climate commissioner, Wopke Hoekstra, wants the UN Cop 28 climate talks to achieve more than an agreement on renewables and energy efficiency goals, with any EU wins tied to progress on loss and damage funding and questions over how substantial the EU contribution can be.

Hoekstra said earlier this year that agreeing on a goal of tripling global renewable energy capacity and doubling rates of energy efficiency by 2030 will not be enough to call Cop 28 a success. He suggested a focus on "unabated" progress when it comes to phasing out fossil fuels was not sufficient.

Pressure has been mounting ahead of Cop 28 for parties to agree on language signalling the need to reduce output and demand of all fossil fuels, after India last year suggested broadening the focus from coal. But the EU's position lacks agreement timelines. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said in September that unabated fossil fuels need to be phased out "well before 2050", while the bloc's environment ministers have not agreed on a specific deadline. The EU parliament has called for a "tangible" phase-out of fossil fuels as soon as possible. But Hoekstra has not committed to a deadline. This lack of detail may forebode the same lack of progress towards a phase-out as at last year's Cop 27 in Sharm el-Sheikh.

Yet Hoekstra has been linking progress at Cop 28 on the operationalisation of a loss and damage fund — for compensating irreversible climate change, as agreed in Sharm el-Sheikh last year — to success in climate mitigation, or cutting emissions. "If we make enough progress on mitigation, the fund can be launched in Dubai, with the first pledges too," he said earlier this month. This week he promised a "substantial financial contribution" from the EU, but once again tied to an "ambitious outcome" for mitigation and adaptation.

Money's too tight

But the EU did not say how much it will contribute to the fund, and squeezing out more money from the bloc, the world's largest climate donor, could prove difficult. Aware of those limits, Spain's climate minister Teresa Ribera has re-floated the idea of fossil fuel companies dedicating a share of profits to sustainable development in the most vulnerable countries. This could find support at Cop 28. Hoekstra supports exploring a range of fossil fuel taxes, and using a share of proceeds from the EU emissions trading system for climate finance. EU finance ministers have reaffirmed their "strong" commitment to developed countries collectively mobilising $100bn/yr in climate finance through to 2025.

Another idea pushed by Von der Leyen at a recent climate summit in Nairobi was for global carbon pricing and true carbon credits at Cop 28. She also noted the need to include and reward carbon sinks. Just 23pc of the world's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are covered by either a carbon tax or an emissions trading system, according to World Bank analysis, but this is up from 7pc a decade earlier.

A new EU agreement on methane regulation could strengthen the bloc's hand. The EU and US were behind a Global Methane Pledge, launched at Cop 26 in Glasgow. "The EU has one more law to demonstrate to our international partners that we are delivering on our climate targets," Hoekstra says. The EU has spent recent months adopting legislation to reform its own climate policies in line with its stricter 2030 emissions target to cut GHG emissions by at least 55pc compared with 1990 levels. With finished laws on the statute book now pushing the EU towards a 42.5pc renewables share in final energy consumption, and a projected 57pc GHG emissions cut by 2030, Hoekstra is also airing a new policy with 85-90pc GHG emissions cuts by 2040.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/07/07

Alberta, Ontario to study oil pipelines, port, rail

Alberta, Ontario to study oil pipelines, port, rail

Calgary, 7 July (Argus) — Alberta and Ontario plan to study new trade routes to boost economic activity between the two provinces and beyond, with an interest in exporting oil and gas through Hudson Bay, leaders said today. Alberta premier Danielle Smith and Ontario premier Doug Ford signed two memorandums of understanding to drive interprovincial trade and major infrastructure development, including pipelines and rail lines. The broad intent is to further connect Alberta's energy resources to Canada's most populous province, and on to foreign partners, using steel from Ontario. "Built using Ontario steel, new pipelines would connect western Canadian oil and gas to existing, and potential, new refineries in southern Ontario," said Ford during a joint press conference in Calgary, Alberta. A "potential" new deep sea port at James Bay on the south side of Hudson Bay in northern Ontario would also enable further export opportunities for land-locked Alberta, which is trying to get more pipelines built before growing oil sands production fill existing capacity. Oil and gas would need to flow across Saskatchewan and Manitoba to get to Ontario. Alberta has taken an all-of-the-above strategy in its pipeline pursuits, calling for more egress in all directions, including enhanced access to Pacific Rim markets via a 1mn b/d bitumen pipeline to British Columbia's (BC) coast. "Having access to the northwest BC coast is essential to being able to get to Asian markets, and that's the one that we hear the most enthusiasm for," said Alberta premier Danielle Smith, who expects to have some "good news" on that front in a few months. Federal regulations need to be undone: premiers Smith and Ford called on the federal government to significantly amend or outright repeal the onerous Impact Assessment Act and other legislation that has stifled investment, including the oil and gas emissions cap, Clean Electricity Regulations and the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act that currently prevents an oil pipeline to BC's northwest coast. "No one will build a pipeline to tidewaters if there is a ban on tankers," said Ford. "It is the craziest thing I've ever heard of . . . a ban on tankers." Ford is the latest premier to side with Alberta's stance on federal oversight after Saskatchewan premier Scott Moe did in June . Ford's automobile , steel and aluminum sectors have been caught in US president Donald Trump's crosshairs, spurring the premier to look elsewhere to shore up trade, including within Canada. But hostilities from south of the border are not new for Ontario, whose refining sector relies on Enbridge's 540,000 b/d Line 5 cross-border pipeline. "We have the governor of Michigan constantly threatening to close down the pipeline," said Ford. "Do you know the disaster that would create in Ontario?" To both kickstart a lagging economy and pivot away from the US, Canadian prime minister Mark Carney fast-tracked Bill C-5 through Parliament last month to allow "nation building" projects to bypass regulatory hurdles. To be considered for the new "National Interest Projects" list, a project should strengthen Canada's autonomy, provide economic benefits, have a high likelihood of completion, be in the interests of Indigenous groups, and contribute to meeting Canada's climate change objectives. "The days of relying on the United States 100pc, they're done, they're gone," said Ford. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Multilateralism should steer climate finance: Brics


25/07/07
25/07/07

Multilateralism should steer climate finance: Brics

Sao Paulo, 7 July (Argus) — Developed countries must fully engage in climate finance to support developing countries trying to meet Paris agreement goals, top Brazilian officials said at the Brics summit held in Rio de Janeiro on 6-7 July. "One decade after the Paris agreement, [the world] lacks resources for a fair and planned transition," Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said. "Developing countries will be the most affected by losses and damages, while they are also the ones that have fewer ways to fund mitigation and adaptation," Lula da Silva said during his keynote address Monday. The Brics summit discussed climate finance in anticipation of the UN Cop 30 climate summit , which will be also be held Brazil, in November. The group issued a declaration that reinforced its commitment to uphold multilateralism as a solution for climate actions, while it also emphasized developed countries' responsibility towards developing countries to financially enable just transition pathways and sustainable development aligned with the Paris agreement. The Cop 29 summit in Baku, Azerbaijan, in November 2024 managed to reach an agreement to allocate $300bn/yr in resources for climate action. But delegates to the upcoming UN Cop 30 summit are targeting at least $1.3bn/yr in public and private funds to tackle climate change, focusing especially on countries that are already dealing with extreme weather conditions and lack financial resources to mitigate it. The Brics also announced a memorandum of understanding on the Brics Carbon Markets Partnership focused on capacity building and multinational cooperation to support climate strategies such as mitigation efforts and emergency resource mobilization. The declaration opposes unilateral protectionist measures, arguing that they "deliberately disrupt the global supply and production chains and distort competition." Climate justice, the fight against desertification, strengthened climate diplomacy and subsidies to environmental services were the main topics of discussion during the Brics summit, Brazil's environment minister Marina Silva said. Brazil will launch its own initiatives to promote climate finance in Cop 30. One program already launched is the Tropical Forest Forever Facility (TFFF) fund that aims to raise $125bn to preserve 1bn hectares of global tropical forests across 80 developing countries. Brics' development bank NDB will target 40pc of its investments to promote sustainable development, such as energy transition. The bank has approved $40bn in investments for clean energy, environment protection and water supply, it said last week. Brazil accounts for $6.4bn of total investments, gathering resources to 29 projects under climate actions, according to the institution. Brazil currently holds the presidency of the Brics, which also includes Russia, China, India and South Africa. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, UAE, Ethiopia, Indonesia and Iran are also members. Belarus, Bolivia, Kazakhstan, Thailand, Cuba, Uganda, Malaysia, Nigeria, Vietnam and Uzbekistan act as partner nations. Heated speech During his keynote address, Lula criticized the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as an institution that promotes unilateralism and stressed his support for reforming institutions of the UN to promote multilateralism and political equity for developing countries. He also mentioned that 65 of the biggest banks in the world committed to a $869bn investment to the fossil fuels sector last year. "Market incentives run contrary to sustainability," he said. By João Curi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Drilling slowdown undermines Trump’s energy dominance


25/07/07
25/07/07

Drilling slowdown undermines Trump’s energy dominance

New York, 7 July (Argus) — US shale producers expect to drill fewer wells in 2025 than they initially planned to at the start of the year, dealing a potential blow to President Donald Trump's goal of unleashing energy dominance. Almost half of the executives quizzed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas in its second-quarter 2025 energy survey have scaled back their anticipated drilling in response to lower crude prices. The decline was most notable among the large operators — or those with output of at least 10,000 b/d — that now account for about 80pc of total US production, according to the bank. The anonymous survey, which gauges the pulse of the shale heartland, has become an outlet for industry insiders to vent their growing frustration at the Trump administration, and executives from exploration and production (E&P) firms offered a withering criticism of the president's tariff policies and unrelenting push for lower oil prices that have contributed to an industry-wide slowdown. "It's hard to imagine how much worse policies and DC rhetoric could have been for US E&P companies," one unidentified executive wrote. "We were promised by the administration a better environment for producers but were delivered a world that has benefited Opec to the detriment of our domestic industry." The survey found that activity contracted slightly in the three months to the end of June, with firms becoming increasingly uncertain about the outlook. "The key point from this survey release is that conditions deteriorated for companies in the oil and gas sector this quarter, with survey responses pointing to a small decline in overall activity as well as oil and gas production," Dallas Fed senior business economist Kunal Patel says. The deteriorating outlook for shale comes as the Opec+ group has stepped up efforts to unwind past output cuts, which might help it to regain market share. But the White House argues that efforts to remove permitting obstacles will help the homegrown oil industry to thrive over the longer term, bolstered by Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill that paves the way for expanded oil and gas leasing. Still, that did not stop executives in the latest Dallas Fed survey from complaining that Trump's " Liberation Day chaos " has jeopardised the sector's prospects, and recent volatility is inconsistent with the president's "Drill, baby, drill" mantra. One drew attention to calls from some within the White House for a price target of $50/bl. "Everyone should understand that $50 is not a sustainable price for oil," the executive said. "It needs to be mid-$60s." Firms were also asked about how their production would change at lower prices. A slight decline was expected if oil prices hovered around $60/bl over the next 12 months, while a significant pullback was anticipated if oil retreated as far as $50/bl. Steel yourself About a quarter of producers estimated that tariffs have increased the cost of drilling and completing a new well by as much as 6pc. And about half of the surveyed oil field services firms expect a recent increase in US steel import tariffs to result in a slight decline in customer demand in the next year. "Despite efforts to mitigate their impact, the scale and breadth of the tariffs have forced us to pass these costs on to our customers," one services firm executive wrote. "This comes... when the economics of oil and gas production are already challenged due to the dynamics of global oil supply and demand." On top of this, firms expect challenges related to the huge volumes of water produced alongside oil in the top Permian basin of west Texas and southeastern New Mexico to act as a constraint on drilling in the next five years. "Water management continues to disrupt plans and add significant costs," one executive said. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US' Peabody extends Australian coal mine lock-out again


25/07/07
25/07/07

US' Peabody extends Australian coal mine lock-out again

Sydney, 7 July (Argus) — US coal producer Peabody Energy has extended a lock-out of workers at its Australian Metropolitan mine until late on 9 July, because of a continuing dispute with the Mining and Energy Union (MEU). MEU workers will remain barred from entering the mixed thermal, pulverised coal injection (PCI), and hard coking coal mine — which produced 1.8mn t of coal in 2024 — without pay until 9 July, the union and company confirmed on 7 July. Peabody's lock-out began on 28 June and was scheduled to end on 6 July . The company ended the action early on 3 July, but then reintroduced and extended it late on 4 July because of partial work bans. The MEU can launch an unlimited number of work stoppages and limited work bans at Metropolitan, based on a 7 June strike authorisation. The MEU and Peabody remain at odds over the use of contractors at the mine, among other issues. The two groups are scheduled to engage in a Fair Work Commission (FWC) mediation on 8 July. They have already had two FWC mediations over the dispute, said Peabody's vice-president of underground operations Mike Carter on 7 July. Peabody has also met with employees more than 10 times, he added. Metropolitan Coal remains fully committed to ongoing good faith negotiations with its workers, a Peabody spokesperson said on 7 July. MEU workers will rally outside the site early on 8 July, joined by other labour unions. The labour dispute at Metropolitan follows a series of strikes at Peabody Energy's 12mn t/yr Wilpinjong thermal coal mine in February, over a different contract negotiation. By Avinash Govind Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Opec+ 8 speeds up output hike to 548,000 b/d for August


25/07/05
25/07/05

Opec+ 8 speeds up output hike to 548,000 b/d for August

London, 5 July (Argus) — Eight core Opec+ members have agreed to further speed up their plan to increase crude production, the Opec secretariat said on Saturday. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Russia, the UAE, Algeria, Oman and Kazakhstan will raise their collective crude production target by 548,000 b/d in August, relative to July. This compares with previous month-on-month hikes of 411,000 b/d for May, June and July. This pace is also four times faster than the eight's original plan to unwind 2.2mn b/d of voluntary crude production cuts at a rate of 137,000 b/d each month between April 2025 and September 2026. The decision means they will have restored almost 80pc of a scheduled 2.46mn b/d increase — which includes a 300,000 b/d capacity-related adjustment for the UAE — in just five months. Should the eight opt for another 548,000 b/d increase for September, they will have fully unwound the cuts 12 months earlier than planned. That would shift focus to a second layer of voluntary cuts totalling 1.66mn b/d that is being implemented by the same eight producers plus Gabon, which are scheduled to remain in place until the end of 2026. The move comes against a backdrop of continued economic uncertainty, largely driven by US trade policy and a rise in geopolitical risk due to the recent 12-day Israel-Iran war. Supply fears linked to the conflict helped push front month Brent futures to above $81/bl on 23 June, although prices have since fallen back to about $68/bl – below where many producers prefer. But the eight countries once again cited "steady global economic outlook and current healthy market fundamentals, as reflected in the low oil inventories" as the basis for their decision. They also reiterated, as in previous months, that the "increases may be paused or reversed subject to evolving market conditions." One delegate told Argus that they agreed with the decision given the current strength in refining margins, but also that there may not be the same opportunity to return some of these barrels later in the year. This appears to be a reference both to the seasonal uptick in demand with the summer in the northern hemisphere, and to projections of weaker oil demand in the second half of 2025, particularly in the fourth quarter. Another delegate told Argus that there were no diverging views to the decision taken today, compared to the previous meeting when two member countries pushed to pause the monthly hikes. The actual increases in Opec+ production may fall short of the headline figure, given that some members are already producing above their targets and almost all of the eight have pledged to compensate for past overproduction. The group noted that the faster pace would help facilitate this compensation. The group is scheduled to meet again on 3 August to decide on September production levels. By Aydin Calik, Bachar Halabi and Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more