Japan’s Mitsui Chemicals uses pyrolysis oil for petchem

  • : Petrochemicals
  • 24/03/22

Japanese petrochemical producer Mitsui Chemicals this month started using pyrolysis oil to make petrochemical products at its Osaka naphtha-fed cracker.

Mitsui Chemicals did not disclose how much pyrolysis oil, which is generated from waste plastics, it uses to produce petrochemical products through the mass balance method, which uses both recycled and conventional feedstocks. But it previously said it planned to buy thousands of tonnes of pyrolysis oil on a spot basis from domestic recycling and polymer wholesaler CFP.

Mitsui Chemicals said it can produce various petrochemical products like ethylene, propylene, butadiene and benzene, as well as polymers such as polyethylene and polypropylene, using pyrolysis oil, just like with conventional naphtha and biomass-based naphtha.

The company has used bio-naphtha to produce low-carbon products since December 2021 when it first processed 3,000t of bio-naphtha that it bought from Finnish biofuel producer Neste.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/22

Minnesota passes producer responsibility law

Minnesota passes producer responsibility law

Houston, 22 May (Argus) — Minnesota became the fifth state to pass an extended producer responsibility (EPR) law for packaging in the US after Governor Tim Walz (D) signed the bill into law on Tuesday. The law requires producers of consumer goods to take responsibility for end-of-life packaging, and provide funding for recycling programs and expansions. However, it does not assign full responsibility to producers, instead requiring them to pay half of recycling costs by January 2029, which will then scale up to 90pc by 2031. Minnesota joins Oregon, Maine, California, and Colorado in adopting an EPR law. The Minnesota law establishes a single producer responsibility organization to administer producer fees and collect recycling data. Some industry associations, including the American Institute for Packaging and the Environment and the Consumer Brands Association (CBA), supported the bill. "The EPR framework established in this bill, which finances recycling through shared responsibility, will strengthen Minnesota's recycling infrastructure and increase recycling access for consumers," CBA said. However, The American Forest & Paper Association (AFPA) urged Governor Walz to veto the bill, saying it would "ultimately punish responsible producers" and inhibit the paper industry's investments. AFPA had criticized Colorado's EPR bill before it became law. The state's EPR bill was passed as part of a larger supplemental budget law for Minnesota natural resources, and includes provisions for other environmental concerns such as water quality. By Zach Kluver Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Braskem restarts Triunfo petrochemical hub


24/05/21
24/05/21

Braskem restarts Triunfo petrochemical hub

Sao Paulo, 21 May (Argus) — Brazilian petrochemical giant Braskem started the gradual resumption of operations at its plants in the Triunfo hub, Rio Grande do Sul state. Braskem said it expects to complete the process in about 15 days, provided that climatic and logistical conditions remain stable. On 7 May Braskem shut down all of its operations in Rio Grande do Sul state after extreme flooding since late April, but said its polymer inventories were safe and protected from the damage caused by heavy rainfall at its operations in southern Brazil during the past two weeks. At the time, Braskem said there was no permanent damage to the industrial facilities, but critical water intake and effluent treatment systems were submerged, rendering them inoperable. Additionally, the Santa Clara River terminal, which was preemptively closed by the local port authority, has also been flooded. Braskem said the decision to resume operations takes into account the safety of people, processes, and logistics, and stated that it will keep the market informed about relevant developments, including their impacts. Since the Triunfo shutdown, Braskem was working with an operational capacity of 50pc. But the company was heard increasing its operating rates in other Brazilian plants to serve customers in the southern region. Braskem last week ruled out bringing material from Mexico. The extreme weather in southern Brazil caused a humanitarian crisis in Rio Grande do Sul and left 161 people dead, 85 missing and over 581,000 people displaced, according to the state's civil defense. Braskem owns and operates six industrial units at the Triunfo hub, with a combined production capacity of over 5mn tonnes (t)/yr of chemicals and thermoplastic resins such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), including a 260,000 t/yr bio-based PE plant. By Frederico Fernandes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Italian plastic packaging tax delayed to 2026


24/05/16
24/05/16

Italian plastic packaging tax delayed to 2026

London, 16 May (Argus) — The Italian Senate has voted to postpone the introduction of a plastic packaging tax for another two years until 1 July 2026. Parliament originally approved legislation to impose a tax on single-use plastic packaging in the 2020 financial year. But it has been a contentious and complex political issue that has received push back from the industry, resulting in its introduction being postponed seven times. The proposed tax is expected to follow a similar model to Spain's existing plastic tax, with the tax rate in Italy's legislation fixed at €0.45/kg of virgin plastic. The tax is designed to cover plastic products such as bottles, bags, food containers, bubble wrap, caps and other single-use plastic items. Recycled plastics and compostable plastics will be exempt. By Chloe Kinner Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option


24/05/16
24/05/16

Low-carbon methanol costly EU bunker option

New York, 16 May (Argus) — Ship owners are ordering new vessels equipped with methanol-burning capabilities, largely in response to tightening carbon emissions regulations in Europe. But despite the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings that low-carbon methanol provides, it cannot currently compete on price with grey methanol or conventional marine fuels. Ship owners operate 33 methanol-fueled vessels today and have another 29 on order through the end of the year, according to vessel classification society DNV. All 62 vessels are oil and chemical tankers. DNV expects a total of 281 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028, of which 165 will be container ships, 19 bulk carrier and 14 car carrier vessels. Argus Consulting expects an even bigger build-out, with more than 300 methanol-fueled vessels by 2028. A methanol configured dual-fuel vessel has the option to burn conventional marine fuel or any type of methanol: grey or low-carbon. Grey methanol is made from natural gas or coal. Low-carbon methanol includes biomethanol, made of sustainable biomass, and e-methanol, produced by combining green hydrogen and captured carbon dioxide. The fuel-switching capabilities of the dual-fuel vessels provide ship owners with a natural price hedge. When methanol prices are lower than conventional bunkers the ship owner can burn methanol, and vice versa. Methanol, with its zero-sulphur emissions, is advantageous in emission control areas (ECAs), such as the US and Canadian territorial waters. In ECAs, the marine fuel sulphur content is capped at 0.1pc, and ship owners can burn methanol instead of 0.1pc sulphur maximum marine gasoil (MGO). In the US Gulf coast, the grey methanol discount to MGO was $23/t MGO-equivalent average in the first half of May. The grey methanol discount averaged $162/t MGOe for all of 2023. Starting this year, ship owners travelling within, in and out of European territorial waters are required to pay for 40pc of their CO2 emissions through the EU emissions trading system. Next year, ship owners will be required to pay for 70pc of their CO2 emissions. Separately, ship owners will have to reduce their vessels' lifecycle GHG intensities, starting in 2025 with a 2pc reduction and gradually increasing to 80pc by 2050, from a 2020 baseline. The penalty for exceeding the GHG emission intensity is set by the EU at €2,400/t ($2,596/t) of very low-sulplhur fuel oil equivalent. Even though these regulations apply to EU territorial waters, they affect ship owners travelling between the US and Europe. Despite the lack of sulphur emissions, grey methanol generates CO2. With CO2 marine fuel shipping regulations tightening, ship owners have turned their sights to low-carbon methanol. But US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol was priced at $2,317/t MGOe in the first half of May, nearly triple the outright price of MGO at $785/t. Factoring in the cost of 70pc of CO2 emissions and the GHG intensity penalty, the US Gulf coast MGO would rise to about $857/t. At this MGO level, the US Gulf coast low-carbon methanol would be 2.7 times the price of MGO. By comparison, grey methanol with added CO2 emissions cost would be around $962/t, or 1.1 times the price of MGO. To mitigate the high low-carbon methanol costs, some ship owners have been eyeing long-term agreements with suppliers to lock in product availabilities and cheaper prices available on the spot market. Danish container ship owner Maersk has lead the way, entering in low-carbon methanol production agreements in the US with Proman, Orsted, Carbon Sink, and SunGaas Renewables. These are slated to come on line in 2025-27. Global upcoming low-carbon methanol projects are expected to produce 16mn t by 2027, according to industry trade association the Methanol Institute, up from two years ago when the institute was tracking projects with total capacity of 8mn t by 2027. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s NS United plans methanol-fuelled bulk carriers


24/05/15
24/05/15

Japan’s NS United plans methanol-fuelled bulk carriers

Tokyo, 15 May (Argus) — Japanese shipping company NS United Kaiun plans to order several methanol-fuelled Capesize bulk carriers, targeting to begin delivery from 2027, as its aims to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from shipping raw materials for steel production. NS United Kaiun signed an initial agreement on 13 May with Japanese shipbuilders Imabari Shipbuilding and Japan Marine United and domestic vessel engineer Nihon Shipyard to build several methanol-fuelled ships of 209,000dwt each. The vessels will be equipped with dual-fuel engines, which can burn methanol and conventional marine fuel. NS United Kaiun expects the future use of green methanol will cut GHG emissions by more than 80pc compared with conventional marine fuel. The company will also co-operate with fuel developers to buy green methanol. Methanol has emerged as a potential alternative fuel as the marine sector looks to cut its GHGs. Fellow Japanese shipping firm NYK Line also plans to receive six chemical tankers over 2026-29, which will burn very-low sulphur fuel oil but will be designed to convert to use methanol. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more