Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

LPG World editorial: That time of year?

  • : LPG
  • 24/04/16

Increased US LPG supply is changing global markets, having a dampening effect on traditional seasonal price fluctuations, writes Peter Wilton

As the northern hemisphere winter disappears into the rear-view mirror, the lack of seasonality in LPG prices in the key trading hubs of northwest Europe and northeast Asia has been striking.

In Europe, large cargo prices for propane delivered into Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) held steady through winter at around 50pc of prices for regional benchmark Brent crude. In Asia, Argus Far East Index (AFEI) propane assessments, the benchmark for large cargoes sold to Japan, South Korea and China, lost some ground against crude, slipping to below 60pc of Dubai crude futures this month from around 70pc in late December.

This appears to be another sign of how ample US supply, courtesy of the country's shale revolution, has changed global markets. Now, the US can not only provide volumes when net-short regions require them — it can seemingly leave the export taps open regardless of needs elsewhere, severely dampening seasonality in seaborne cargo markets in the process.

Is the influence of robust US export volumes now so great that seasonal fluctuations in the crucial residential and commercial sectors — estimated to account for 45pc of global LPG demand this year — have little effect on spot prices? A cursory glance at the 2022-23 northern hemisphere winter would suggest not, and that the 2023-24 winter was perhaps an aberration, given how prices spiked in January 2023. In the second half of that month, cif ARA propane gained 12 percentage points against Brent crude, while AFEI surged by 15 percentage points against Dubai crude — a classic winter bull run.

But this was not driven by heating demand. The trigger was a perfect storm of supporting factors in the key Chinese market, including a concertina effect on demand — following disruption caused by December 2022's post-Covid reopening of its economy and the late January 2023 lunar new year holiday — that effectively squeezed many weeks of buying for its propane dehydrogenation (PDH) plants into that early January period.

Stripping out that spike, 2022-23 winter pricing patterns look much less seasonal. Following the surge in prices, average monthly cif ARA assessments were rangebound for a full year at 45-55pc of Brent, with AFEI in a similarly tight 53-67pc range. Much greater price variance used to be the norm in winter, when seaborne propane prices would react inversely to falling temperatures.

Seasonal disruption

Growing US supplies supported by strong domestic natural gas prices look likely to remain the dominant influence. But several smaller demand-side factors could also further inhibit seasonality. Firstly, heating demand's vulnerability to decarbonisation from alternative renewable liquid gases. The idea of renewable feedstocks reaching steam crackers or PDH units in any great volume is, for now, largely an aspirational environmental goal — usage of and investment in bioLPG production by petrochemical companies is modest at best. The firms that are either significant buyers of bioLPG or launching renewable liquid gas projects are LPG distributors such as SHV Energy and UGI International.

Secondly, if current policy support for expanding LPG cooking schemes to help tackle energy poverty in developing economies genuinely bears fruit in the coming decades, this non-seasonal demand will soak up much more supply from the US and elsewhere than traditional, temperature-dependent markets, and hence become more influential on prices. Thirdly, as the IEA has noted, the most recent Cop climate pledges fall far short of what is needed to meet the Paris Agreement's 1.5°C ceiling for global temperature rises above pre-industrial levels. And a warmer planet will mean lower demand for fuels, clean or otherwise, for space heating.

AFEI % of Dubai crude in heating season

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/05/15

France consults on expanded biofuels mandate

France consults on expanded biofuels mandate

London, 15 May (Argus) — France has opened consultation on the transposition of part of the recast renewable energy directive (RED III) into national law, which would replace the current system with a new one called "incentive for the reduction of the carbon intensity of fuels" (IRICC). The proposal introduces two separate sets of requirements for transport fuels. The first is for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions, broken down by transport sectors — road, aviation, maritime, LPG and natural gas for vehicles, which could be CNG or LNG (see table). In the current draft, the GHG reduction target for the road sector will start at 5.9pc in 2026, rising to 10.6pc in 2030 and 18.7pc in 2035. For aviation, the target starts at 2.5pc in 2026, rising to 5.8pc in 2030 and 18.8pc in 2035. The GHG mandate levels include a gradual phasing-in of new fuel sectors – river and maritime fuels, fuel gasses, and aviation. To meet the overall RED III target of 14.5pc emissions reduction by 2030, the national French target includes the biofuels mandates, a share for rail transport, and a share or private vehicle charging. The second set of requirements is a renewable fuel requirement by energy content, which is broken down by fuel type — diesel, gasoline, LPG and natural gas fuels and marine fuel (see table). The blending requirements for diesel start at 9pc in 2026, rising to 11.4pc in 2030 and 16pc in 2035. For gasoline, the mandates start at 9.5pc in 2026, rising to 10.5pc in 2030 and 14.5pc in 2035. Finally, the proposal includes a set of sub-mandates for advanced fuels and renewable hydrogen . The advanced biofuels mandate would start at 0.7pc in 2026, rising to 1.95pc in 2030 and 2.6pc in 2035. Users of renewable fuels of non-biological origin (RFNBOs) would not be subject to the advanced sub-mandate. In feedstock restrictions, the crop cap will rise to 7pc from 6.2pc in 2030 and 2035, while the limit for fuels made from feedstocks found in Annex IX-B of RED will be at 0.6pc in 2026, 0.7pc in 2030 and 1pc in 2035 for diesel and petrol. Aviation fuel will not have a IX-B cap until 2030, and from then it will be 6pc. Mandate compliance would be managed by a certificate system through the CarbuRe registry, with a compliance deadline of 1 March the following year. Public electric vehicle charging would also generate tickets, although the amount of tickets generated by charging light passenger vehicles would be reduced from 2031 to reach 50pc in 2035. Renewable hydrogen used in transport would also generate tickets counting towards the hydrogen sub-quota and reduce the overall GHG savings requirement. Public charging stations will start generating fewer tickets for electric passenger vehicles from 2031 to 50pc by 2035. France is also considering steep penalties for non-compliance, at €700/t CO2 not avoided for the GHG reduction requirement and at €40/GJ for the fuel targets. The penalty for not meeting hydrogen and advanced fuel sub-targets would be doubled, at €80/GJ. The consultation is open for comments until 10 June. By Simone Burgin Proposed GHG reduction by transport sector % 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Road and non-road diesel 5.9 7.1 8.3 9.5 10.6 13.2 14.8 16.2 17.5 18.7 Aviation 2.5 3.3 4.1 4.9 5.8 8.4 10.8 13.3 15.9 18.7 RFNBO sub-target (% en.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 2.0 2.0 2.0 5.0 Maritime 2.5 3.25 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.5 RFNBO sub-target (% en.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 2.0 2.0 LPG and natural gas fuels 0.0 0.0 2.7 6.3 10.6 13.2 14.8 16.2 17.5 18.7 DGEC Proposed energy content mandate by fuel type % (en.) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Diesel 9.0 9.5 10.1 10.7 11.4 12.2 13.0 13.8 14.9 16.0 Petrol 9.5 9.7 10.0 10.2 10.5 11.1 11.8 12.6 13.4 14.5 Natural gas fuels 0.0 0.0 3.0 7.0 12.0 15.0 16.0 18.0 19.0 21.0 LPG 0.0 0.0 3.0 7.0 12.0 15.0 16.0 18.0 19.0 21.0 Marine fuel 2.9 3.8 4.7 5.9 7.1 8.2 9.4 11.8 14.1 17.1 DGEC Proposed caps and sub-targets % (en.) 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 Feedstock caps Crop feedstocks 6.2 6.4 6.6 6.8 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Annex IX-B feedstocks* 0.6 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 1.0 Cat. 3 tallow 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Tall oil 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.2 Fuel sub-targets Advanced feedstocks 0.7 0.95 1.25 1.6 1.95 2.0 2.1 2.25 2.4 2.6 RFNBOs/Renewable hydrogen 0.05 0.2 0.5 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 *For diesel and petrol Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Naphtha no longer competitive feedstock: Braskem


25/05/12
25/05/12

Naphtha no longer competitive feedstock: Braskem

Sao Paulo, 12 May (Argus) — Brazil-based petrochemical producer Braskem is pursuing a strategic shift in polymers production by favoring natural gas liquid (NGL) feedstocks and moving away from naphtha. Naphtha is no longer a competitive feedstock in the petrochemical sector, driving the need for greater flexibility in raw material sourcing, chief executive Roberto Ramos said Monday on the company's first-quarter earnings call. The transition to lighter feedstocks is part of a broader initiative to enhance efficiency, reduce costs, and improve competitiveness amid evolving global petrochemical dynamics, Ramos said. The company's plan focuses on increasing the use of ethane and propane as primary feedstocks in Mexico and Brazil. In Mexico, Braskem has inaugurated an ethane import terminal, which will provide a stable supply to its operations. The facility has the capacity to store 80,000 b/d of ethane, while the polyethylene (PE) plant processes 66,000 b/d. This surplus storage has prompted considerations for a new PE unit in Mexico to maximize the available feedstock. In Brazil, Braskem aims to reduce reliance on naphtha-based PE production by integrating more natural gas-derived inputs. The company is evaluating projects to utilize feedstocks sourced from shale gas extracted in Argentina's Vaca Muerta formation. The petrochemical complex in Rio Grande do Sul, which operates with a mixture of naphtha and natural gas, is among the facilities targeted for increased gas utilization. Braskem's Rio de Janeiro facility is also undergoing expansion of its gas-based assets, adding two new furnaces that crack ethane and propane to increase capacity to 700,000 t/yr. This increased production is anticipated to lower unit production costs and improve profitability. The move to gas-based production is expected to optimize operations and align Braskem's facilities with cost-effective supply chains, Ramos said. The shift comes as global trade dynamics continue to influence raw material availability. While US-China trade agreements have temporarily eased tariff pressures, Braskem is trying to position itself to navigate long-term supply chain uncertainties by diversifying its production inputs. Ramos has also indicated potential investments in ethanol dehydration technology, which would allow select facilities to convert ethanol into ethylene, further supporting PE production with an alternative renewable feedstock. Production and sales Braskem said its first-quarter domestic resin sales fell by 4pc from the same period in 2024, but sales were little changed from the prior quarter. Domestic resin sales totalled 807,000 metric tonnes (t) in the first quarter, down from 839,000t a year earlier. Resin sales volumes remained in line with the fourth quarter last year, but the company highlighted a quarter-on-quarter increase in PE and polypropylene (PP) sales volumes of 2pc and 3pc, respectively, offset by a 16pc reduction in PVC sales. In Mexico, Braskem Idesa's PE sales fell by 11pc from the same period in 2024 and by 5pc quarter-on-quarter, as the company is looking to manage inventory ahead of a planned maintenance shutdown in the second quarter. The plant utilization rate reached 79pc, rising from the fourth quarter on higher ethane availability through the Fast Track solution. But utilization fell by four percentage points year-on-year, mainly due to reduced supply of ethane from Mexico's Pemex. Braskem posted a first-quarter profit of $114mn, rebounding from a loss of $273mn a year earlier and a loss of $967mn in the fourth quarter last year. By Fred Fernandes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Polish seaborne LPG imports rise on Russia embargo


25/05/07
25/05/07

Polish seaborne LPG imports rise on Russia embargo

The EU ban on some Russian imports led to higher utilisation of Poland's Baltic Sea terminals, writes Waldemar Jaszczyk London, 7 May (Argus) — Polish seaborne LPG imports surged in the first quarter as the country's Baltic Sea terminals became the market's main supply route following the EU's ban on Russian propane-butane mix and propane arrivals. But the growth was capped by reduced re-exports to Ukraine, softening domestic demand and more butane arriving from Russia. The four Baltic Sea terminals received 320,000t of LPG in January-March, up from 282,000t a year earlier, Kpler data show. European LPG distributor SHV's 900,000 t/yr Gdansk facility received 181,000t, and the Alpetrol-run 420,000 t/yr Gdynia terminal took 89,000t, up by 26pc and 37pc, respectively. Deliveries to state-owned fuel supplier Orlen Paliwa's 250,000 t/yr Szczecin terminal rose by 24pc to 37,000t but were below the 50,000-60,000 t/yr seen in previous years given modernisation works. The firm plans to raise Szczecin throughputs by 50pc to 400,000 t/yr by mid-2025. These offset a decline in imports to petrochemical producer Azoty's 437,000 t/yr propane dehydrogenation (PDH) complex in Police by more than a half to 19,000t. Azoty is negotiating a sale of the plant to Polish oil firm Orlen as it looks to cut debt accrued largely to develop it. The EU embargo on Russian LPG, which took effect on 20 December, boosted seaborne intake by forcing Polish importers to shift their supply routes to northwest Europe. Propane and propane-butane mix accounted for over 90pc of Russia's LPG exports to Poland, while normal butane and isobutane, which are not sanctioned, took the balance. Russia was the key supplier to Poland historically, with a 43pc share of all imports in 2024 at 1mn t/yr, according to Polish LPG association POGP. But weaker import demand as a result of stockbuilding prior to the embargo's start and reduced re-exports to Ukraine, which has shifted its supply routes to Danube river ports in the south, limited the increase in seaborne arrivals. And rising intakes of pure normal butane and isobutane from Russia by rail, which is then blended with propane and sold as autogas, has also weighed on Baltic imports. Russian butane deliveries averaged around 30,000 t/month in the first quarter compared with the more typical 80,000 t/month prior to sanctions. Poland seaborne LPG imports Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

NWE propane prices bounce back from multi-year lows


25/05/07
25/05/07

NWE propane prices bounce back from multi-year lows

Prices have recovered from a ‘Liberation Day' slump but have not yet reached their pre-tariff level, writes Efcharis Sgourou London, 7 May (Argus) — Northwest European propane prices have rebounded after slumping in the wake of US president Donald Trump's tariff announcement on 2 April. But they remain below pre-tariff levels after Trump ratcheted up his trade war with China a week later. Propane swaps and large cargo prices on a cif Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) basis hovered at $450-460/t over the second half of April, more than $80/t above the five-year lows reached on 9 April, when Trump watered down tariffs on all but China, hiking this rate to 145pc. But prices were still more than $100/t below where they stood prior to Trump's announcement on 2 April. An unexpected lack of availability when spot buying interest emerged over the second half of April helped the large cargo and swaps values rebound. A few bids lodged for a mid-to-late-May delivery of 22,400t lifted the physical price relative to front-month paper to premiums of $9-12/t, after it had fallen to a discount of $1.50/t in early to mid-April, when the price collapsed. The unmet bids shed light on the level of premium needed to lure regional selling, while fears of an excess of US LPG being redirected to Europe owing to its trade war with China cooled as the market awaits the wider ramifications later this month — Beijing's 125pc retaliatory tariff on US goods starts from 13 May. Just over 600,000t of US LPG was shipped to northwest Europe in April, largely unchanged on March and close to the rolling six-month average, Kpler data show, while about 400,000t is forecast to arrive in May as of 7 May. The US-northwest European arbitrage is also unfavourable for spot trade despite recent cif ARA price gains. North Sea selling was also stable last month compared with March, with the UK and Norway exporting 400,000t of LPG in April, and forecast to ship just over 300,000t in May as of 7 May, according to Kpler. But this is significantly lower than a year earlier as production in the North Sea continues to undershoot expectations. NWE large cargo propane, swap price Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

India mulls swapping Mideast Gulf and US LPG


25/05/07
25/05/07

India mulls swapping Mideast Gulf and US LPG

Indian importers could make $20-30/t if they swap Middle Eastern term imports with US cargoes, writes Rituparna Ghosh London, 7 May (Argus) — Indian LPG importers are considering swapping contracted imports from the Middle East with US cargoes to enable them to ship the former supply to China, owing to its 125pc tariff on US LPG, according to market participants. Abu Dhabi's Adnoc has offered to supply Indian buyers with discounted US cargoes compared with Mideast Gulf exports priced on the basis of state-run Saudi Aramco's contract price, traders say. The Middle Eastern supply can then be sold to China to meet its shortfall from lost US imports of mainly propane because of the tariff. Indian state-run refiner BPCL says it can make a $20-30/t profit on swapping Mideast Gulf and US cargoes. Rival firms and importers IOC and HPCL have yet to disclose if they are considering cargo swaps. Delhi has directed importers to guarantee enough supply arrives if the US-China tariffs lead to such swaps, which is likely to include more imports from the US. The US loaded four evenly split propane-butane cargoes on to the VLGCs Eneos Gunjo , BW Mindoro , Shahrastani and Vivit Dubhe over 14-23 April, which are headed to India for delivery in the second half of May, ship tracking data show. Traders in Singapore have meanwhile approached Indian refiners to purchase their term imports from the Middle East for resale in the spot market — an offer that has been declined by the refiners. Delhi has said it is considering eliminating a 2.5pc import tax on US LPG and ethane in order to strengthen trade ties with the US. But the rate is small and IOC, HPCL and BPCL are already exempt from it, meaning the impact would be negligible, market participants say. Private-sector firm Reliance Industries would benefit from the move as India's sole importer of US ethane, bringing in around 1.3mn t in 2024, down by a fifth from a year earlier, Kpler data show. India's LPG imports from the US have historically been miniscule. The country brought in 120,000t of US LPG from a total of 21.4mn t last year, with most of its supply coming from the UAE at 8.2mn t, Qatar at 5.1mn t and Saudi Arabia at 3.4mn t, according to Kpler. Around 85-90pc of India's LPG imports are tied to long-term contracts with these three Middle Eastern countries, while spot trading represents just 10-15pc. India also imports mainly evenly split propane-butane cargoes, while US exporters ship more full propane cargoes to China. Ethane appeal The removal of the tariff on US ethane is unlikely to have much impact on imports in the short term given a lack of infrastructure to accommodate it. But it will support India's long-term plan to use more US ethane for its expanding petrochemical industry. BPCL and state-owned gas firm Gail are investing in new ethane-fed cracker projects at existing petrochemical facilities to capitalise on the abundant availability of cheap US ethane and the growing fleet of very large ethane carriers. This follows Reliance switching to US ethane at its 1.5mn t/yr ethylene cracker in Jamnagar in west India's Gujarat state over the past few years, having previously relied on ethane extracted from LNG imports from the Mideast Gulf. Gail operates two 450,000 t/yr crackers at its Pata petrochemical plant in Uttar Pradesh in northern India, which can use either ethane or propane. This arrives through the Hazira-Vijaypur-Jagdishpur pipeline having been fractionated and processed from LNG at Hazira on the west coast of Gujarat. BPCL is also increasingly integrating its refining operations with petrochemicals, but only has 500,000 t/yr of propylene capacity at its 310,000 b/d Kochi refinery in Kerala. BPCL is investing close to $6bn to develop a petrochemical complex including an ethane-fed cracker at its 156,000 b/d Bina refinery in Madhya Pradesh, while Gail is spending a similar amount on a facility that will include a 1.2mn t/yr ethane-fed cracker near its 5mn t/yr LNG plant at Dabhol in Maharashtra. US LPG exports to India US ethane exports to India Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more