US-led carbon initiative misses launch date

: Coal, Electricity, Emissions
24/04/23

The Energy Transition Accelerator (ETA), a global initiative to use voluntary carbon market revenue to speed the decarbonization of developing countries' power sectors, has missed its planned Earth Day launch but continues to prepare for doing business.

At the Cop 28 climate conference in Dubai last year, the initiative's leaders said they hoped to formally launch the program on 22 April 2024.

That didn't happen, but the program's leaders last week announced that the US climate think tank Center for Climate and Energy Solutions will serve as the ETA's new secretariat and that former US special presidential envoy for climate John Kerry will serve as the honorary chair of an eight-member senior consultative group that will advise the ETA's design and operations.

The ETA plans to spend 2024 "building" on a framework for crediting projects they released last year. ETA leaders said the initiative could ultimately generate tens of billions of dollars in finances through 2035.

The ETA also said the Dominican Republic had formed a government working group to "guide its engagement" as a potential pilot country for investments and that the Philippines would formally participate as an "observer country" rather than as a direct participant immediately. The ETA is still engaging Chile and Nigeria as potential pilot countries too, the initiative told Argus.

The ETA is being developed by the US State Department, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Bezos Earth Fund and would be funded with money from the voluntary carbon market. The initiative's ultimate goal is to allow corporate and government offset buyers to help developing countries decarbonize their power sectors through large projects that accelerate the retirement of coal-fired power plants and build new renewable generation.

As of now, the ETA's timeline for future changes and negotiations with countries and companies is unclear. The program's goals are ambitious, especially at a time when scrutiny of some voluntary carbon market projects from environmentalists has weighed on corporate offset demand.

By Mia Westley

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/05/21

Thailand's Banpu adopts biomass co-firing in China

Singapore, 21 May (Argus) — Thailand's mining and power generation conglomerate Banpu plans to adopt biomass co-firing for all its combined heat and power plants (CHPs) in northern China. It has fully implemented 10pc biomass co-firing at its coal-fired Zhengding power plant. The plant has a total installed capacity of 139MW electrical (MWe), including a power generation capacity of 73MW and steam production output at 370 t/hr. The type of biomass used at this plant could not be immediately ascertained, and Banpu did not respond to a request for comment. Banpu's Zouping CHP, with a combined capacity of 233MWe, 125MW of power and steam output at 600 t/hr, is "undergoing commissioning", the company said. Its plans to co-fire with biomass at the 246MWe Luannan coal-fired plant is in the "bidding phase," the company added. The plant has a power capacity of 150MW and steam production output at 538 t/hr. The move to boost biomass co-firing at its operations in China is part of the company's plans to reduce carbon emissions and earn revenue from carbon emission allowances (CEAs)— a type of carbon credit or emission permit, giving rights to emit a certain amount of greenhouse gases within a carbon market. CEAs are part of a "cap-and-trade" system, designed to reduce overall emissions. Higher earnings from CEAs from its Chinese plants and cost management in the coal business lifted its net profit in the first quarter. Banpu reported a net profit of 574mn baht ($17.3mn) before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation in the first quarter, up by 19pc from the same period in 2024. By Nadhir Mokhtar Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Brazil to walk tightrope in Cop 30 fossil fuel talks

25/05/20

Brazil to walk tightrope in Cop 30 fossil fuel talks

Rio de Janeiro, 20 May (Argus) — Brazil is arguing that its developing country status allows it to consolidate its position as a major crude producer and is likely to lean on developed countries during much-awaited discussions on moving away from fossil fuels at the UN Cop 30 climate conference in November. Attempts to reach an ambitious outcome on mitigation — cutting greenhouse gas emissions — and actions to move away from fossil fuels were quashed at Cop 29 in Baku last year, and all eyes are on Brazil to bridge divides on this issue . Cop 30 president-designate Andre Correa do Lago has failed to address fossil fuels in his two letters outlining priorities for the summit, but members of the Cop 30 team have indicated the issue will be on the agenda. With geopolitical tensions and energy security questions redirecting government priorities away from the energy transition, the outlook is more challenging than when Cop parties agreed the global stocktake (GST) conclusion on fossil fuels and energy in 2023 . But Brazil is well-placed to take the lead. It is a respected player in climate discussions and has one of the cleanest energy mix — 49pc of its energy and 89pc of its electricity comes from renewables. Its own mitigation efforts prioritize slashing deforestation, which accounts for the lion's share of Brazil's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Non-profit World Resources Institute Brazil describes the emissions reduction target in Brazil's nationally determined contribution (NDC) — climate plan — as "reasonable to insufficient" and notes that energy emissions are expected to increase by 20pc in the decade to 2034. Its NDC avoids any concrete steps towards winding down crude. After you The government's view on fossil fuels is that Brazil's developing country status, the oil and gas industry's importance in its economy and comparatively low fossil fuel emissions justify pushing ahead with oil production. Correa do Lago said earlier that Belem was picked as a venue for Cop 30 to show that Brazil is still a developing country, adding that any decision on oil and gas should be taken by Brazil's citizens. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said that oil revenue will fund the energy transition. It is a position that has earned Brazil accusations of hypocrisy from environmentalists at home and abroad, but which also places it as a possible model for other hydrocarbon-producer developing countries. Brazil's diplomatic tradition of pragmatically balancing seemingly opposing positions could serve it well here, said Gabriel Brasil, a senior analyst focused on climate at Control Risks, a consultancy. He does not see Brazil's attempt to balance climate leadership with continued oil production as hurting its standing among fellow parties or energy investors. Civil society stakeholders hope pre-Cop meetings will help bring clarity on how Brazil might broach the fossil fuel debate. Indigenous groups, which are set to be given more space at Cop, are demanding an end to fossil fuel extraction in the environmentally sensitive Foz do Amazonas offshore basin. Meanwhile, Brazilian state-owned Petrobras moved one step closer to being authorized to begin offshore drilling there . During meetings of the UN climate body — the UNFCCC — in Panama City this week, the Cop 30 presidency will present ideas for the summit "with a focus on the full implementation of the GST". But it has to wait for countries to update their NDCs to gauge what is achievable on mitigation. Only 20 have submitted new NDCs so far, with the deadline pushed back to September. Brazil's own NDC gives some clues. It welcomes the launch "of international work for the definition of schedules for transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems" and reiterates that developed countries should take the lead. And a report commissioned by Brazil's oil chamber IBP and civil society organization ICS to be given to negotiators ranks Brazil as a "mover" in the transition away from oil and gas, ahead of "adapters" like India and Nigeria but behind "front-runners" Germany and the US. The research develops the idea of a country-based transition plan, using criteria such as energy security and institutional and social resilience, as well as oil and gas relevance. By Constance Malleret 2023 Brazil emissions sources Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Brazil backs R80mn for Amazon reforestation project

25/05/20

Brazil backs R80mn for Amazon reforestation project

Sao Paulo, 20 May (Argus) — Brazil's Bndes development bank will finance R80mn ($14.14mn) for Brazilian reforestation startup re.green to recover degraded areas in the Amazon rainforest and the Atlantic forest. The investment will fund re.green's deal with Microsoft , aimed at generating carbon offsets in both biomes, Bndes said. The resources come from the Climate Fund, which is linked to the environment ministry and is managed by Bndes. The project includes areas in Brazil's Restoration Arc initiative, which focuses on recovering degraded territories in the Amazon rainforest's most damaged areas. The Restoration Arc plans to restore 6mn hectares of native flora in the Amazon, as well as recover 1.65bn metric tonnes of CO² from the atmosphere by 2030. But it requires investments of $10bn (R56.5bn), Bndes said. The Climate Fund was created in 2009 with some of its funds coming from oil and natural gas exploration to mitigate and combat climate change. It currently holds around R11bn, according to Bndes. Reforestation is one of Brazil's flagship themes for the UN Cop 30 summit, which it will host in northern Para state in November. By Maria Frazatto Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Nuclear issue splits Australia’s opposition coalition

25/05/20

Nuclear issue splits Australia’s opposition coalition

Sydney, 20 May (Argus) — Australia's Liberal-National opposition coalition has split because of a nuclear energy disagreement, leaving the ruling Labor Party in a stronger position to push through its renewable energy agenda and possibly ushering in a period of energy policy stability. The Nationals leader David Littleproud announced the split at a press conference at parliament house on 20 May. He said the parties are no longer aligned on nuclear forming part of the energy grid and its proposed A$20bn ($12.8bn) future fund for regional Australia. The Liberal party did not confirm whether it would support nuclear energy or the future fund, Littleproud added. Australia's opposition coalition — comprising of the right-leaning National and Liberal parties — has separated after an 80-year alliance, further affirming the Labor government's majority after its landslide win on 3 May . Neither the Liberal nor the National party is likely to form government in the future without each other's support, so the split hands more power to the Labor party to pursue its energy transition policies and could allow the Liberal party to move towards the middle of the political spectrum. It could also see the Labor and Liberal parties forming a consensus, after many years of disagreement on energy policy as well as resources and energy tax regimes . The Liberal party needs time to "reinvent" themselves after their massive loss, he added. The party lost 15 seats in the House of Representatives in the last election, while the Nationals lost just one. Littleproud said he will work with the Liberal party leader Sussan Ley to rebuild their relationship and potentially reform a coalition before the next election. "We will be pragmatic and work constructively with Sussan Ley and her team to bring down the Albanese government after next election," he said. By Grace Dudley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

GFG puts Australian Mn plant on care and maintenance

25/05/20

GFG puts Australian Mn plant on care and maintenance

Sydney, 20 May (Argus) — UK-owned steelmaker GFG Alliances has placed its Liberty Bell Bay manganese alloy smelter in Tasmania into care and maintenance over manganese ore supply issues, Tasmanian minister for business, industry and resources Eric Abetz said on 19 May. GFG is committed to the long term success of the Liberty Bell smelter and expects the pause to be temporary, a company spokesperson told Argus on 20 May. The Tasmanian state government is working with GFG and the Australian federal government to address challenges at the plant. It has also asked prime minister Anthony Albanese to support Liberty Bell, state premier Jeremy Rockcliff said on 20 May. Liberty Bell Bay is Australia's only ferroalloy plant and is permitted to produce a combined total of 290,000 t/yr of ferromanganese and silicomanganese. GFG sources Liberty Bell Bay's manganese ore from Australian metal producer South32's Australian Gemco mine and South African sites, which have faced recent production disruptions because of bad weather and maintenance shutdowns. Cyclone Megan flooded and damaged parts of Gemco in March 2024, taking it off line for four months. South32 closed the mine again in January-March 2025 to complete mine dewatering work. South32 also cut manganese production at its South African operations by 10pc on the year in January-March because of scheduled maintenance work and an unplanned shutdown at its Wessels mine. Gemco's manganese production is forecast to reach approximately 5mn t in the 2025-26 financial year ending 30 June, the Northern Territory state government said in a budget announcement. South32 has not released its Gemco production guidance for 2025-26. Liberty Bell Bay's production pause comes after the South Australian state government placed GFG's 1.2mn t/yr Whyalla steelworks into administration in February. The state government later announced plans to transfer control of the Whyalla port from GFG to the steelwork's administrators. Liberty Bell Bay is one of only six facilities in Tasmania covered under Australia's federal safeguard mechanism. It received 8,762 safeguard mechanism credits (SMCs) for the July 2023-June 2024 compliance year as its covered scope 1 emissions of 196,125t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) were below its baseline of 204,887t of CO2e. Two facilities operated by GFG — the Whyalla steelworks and the Middleback Range iron ore mine — ended the compliance year in an excess emissions situation because they were in administration, according to the Clean Energy Regulator (CER). By Avinash Govind and Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more