Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Q&A: DCC Energy eyes further LPG and low-carbon growth

  • : LPG
  • 24/06/18

Dublin-based DCC Energy continues to expand and diversify, completing 15 acquisitions over the past year that included two in the LPG sector. The company, which owns several LPG retail subsidiaries in Europe, the US and Hong Kong, bought Germany's Progas and the US' San Isabel Services Propane at the same time as it increasingly moves into low-carbon energy markets such as solar, biofuels and energy management services. Argus' Oliver Binks spoke with DCC Energy chief executive Fabian Ziegler about the company's 2023-24 results and its future plans:

DCC Energy has been moving into new markets as part of the energy transition. What share of the company does LPG represent?

We launched our Cleaner Energy in Your Power strategy last year, aiming to double our profit [and halve carbon emissions] by 2030. We think backwards from the customer, helping them through the energy trilemma, and provide energy solutions consisting of molecules — increasingly green — and often self-generated renewable electrons. We are ahead of schedule. LPG is about half of our profits but only 15pc of our carbon emissions. We believe in LPG's longevity. It is a societally very useful fuel. Like the World LPG Association renaming itself to World Liquid Gas Association, we now move our own definitions from LPG to LG — liquid gas.

DCC Energy has said it plans to grow its LPG offering by 50pc by 2030. Which areas geographically and sectorally is the company targeting?

Our LG journey took us from Ireland to [the UK], to Europe and to the US. We have just strengthened our position in Germany with the acquisition of Progas. A key growth region is the US. We made a small acquisition there last year. We are currently focused on making our business operationally excellent, namely around serving our customers. For now, the strategy places more emphasis on strengthening in each market rather than expansion into new territory.

We like our residential businesses, but we are targeting more growth in the commercial sector, where the case for multi-energy packages is greater. Overall, we aim to grow our LG business, but we need to create more sustainable credibility for LG. We are scaling up biopropane sales across Europe and trialling rDME [renewable DME] in the UK and Sweden, particularly with commercial and industrial customers, to enhance LG's relevance as a long-term low-carbon solution for Europe.

DCC Energy's profit rose strongly in the 2023-24 fiscal year ending in March, but overall sales volumes dropped slightly. How much did the LPG segment fare?

LG is often a mature market in Europe, however our LG sales volumes increased modestly in the year and we believe they can keep growing. We continue to drive the move from oil to gas for commercial and industrial customers. Many customers really appreciate the ability to make affordable CO2 reductions and having their own energy in a tank reliably supplied by DCC companies.

LPG sales in the UK and Ireland came under pressure from a warm winter but still grew on expanding commercial and industrial deliveries. What drove this?

Our businesses in Ireland and the UK continue to grow owing to diverse customer segments that are not all weather dependent. Under our Cleaner Energy in Your Power strategy, we act as an energy transition partner. Customers recognise the fiscal and carbon benefits of LG over heavier forms of fuel, driving growth in the transition. And some customers are investing in new off-grid facilities and choosing LG as their fuel sources. And it helps that we can provide broader energy packages entailing electron solutions. We also aim to increase our supply resilience with storage access at Teesside and our Avonmouth terminal project.

DCC Energy also reported strong profit growth in Scandinavia driven by LPG. What are your plans in this region?

We saw significant LG sales growth [in Scandinavia] last year when natural gas prices skyrocketed and customers wanted security of supply. Our Scandinavian business aims to lead the energy transition, with a focus on understanding our customers' needs and helping them reduce their carbon emissions. We aim to support large-scale production of rDME in Sweden and Norway and to see 50pc of sales coming from a wide range of renewable products by 2030. We have successfully run pilot tests in Sweden with rDME-LG blends at customers' sites, we invested in a rDME-LG blending facility, aiming for first customer deliveries in 2024, and received government funding for replacing LG with 100pc rDME at Bjorneborg Steel.

DCC has acquired Germany's Progas and the US' San Isabel Services Propane over the past year. Do you have plans for further takeovers in the LPG sector?

We have been one of the most active global buyers of LG businesses for several decades and will continue to pursue attractive acquisitions that strengthen our existing businesses, expand our markets and bring other important capabilities. We see a lot of potential in the US, where our DCC Propane business has achieved significant growth through many acquisitions since we entered that market in 2018. We continue to see many interesting opportunities in the US, which is far more fragmented than most European markets, with the top 20 propane retailers accounting for 40pc of the market and over 4,000 independent [firms accounting for 60pc].

Progas owns the Brunsbuttel and Duisburg LPG terminals in Germany. Given Poland faces a looming supply deficit when EU imports from Russia are banned from December, is DCC Energy looking at supplying Poland from these sites?

The Brunsbuttel and Duisburg terminals were welcomed into DCC's portfolio in northwest Europe, where their primary role remains unchanged — to provide supply security to our customers. Spare capacity might be used to support the Polish market. We see the capacity of our existing infrastructure in Germany to be sufficient to support our business there. Earlier this year, we created a central supply and trading team out of Amsterdam, called DCC LPG Procurement, which will look at more infrastructure plays. But we are not in the supply business for the sake of it. Our strategy focuses on our customers and providing them with sustainable solutions. Germany is a good example. Our priority in Germany is a seamless integration of Progas and Tega, [acquired in 2018], that is good for customers and our employees. And building out a leading energy management services business.

Flogas recently commissioned the Teesside LPG terminal near to Dimeta's upcoming rDME plant. Does Flogas plan to distribute DME or other renewable gases from the site?

Being at an energy hub clearly opens possibilities for sourcing low-carbon energy sources such as rDME that can be unlocked for our customers. With the likelihood that rDME will need to be blended with propane to achieve supply without changing infrastructure and equipment, it will be important for rDME sources to be logistically close to sources of propane. Teesside is well placed to offer this solution.

At what stage is the Avonmouth terminal project at?

The first 17,000t tank is fully refurbished and two truck racks have been put in place such that Avonmouth terminal now already plays an important role in providing supply security to our customers in southwest England. A further 17,000t tank will be refurbished and a connection will be made to the Bristol port to enable midsize LPG carrier imports. We expect first imports in 2026-27.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/11/13

US LPG loses market share in Brazil

US LPG loses market share in Brazil

Houston, 13 November (Argus) — US LPG suppliers lost market share in Brazil to imports from Argentina despite a decline in US Gulf coast propane and butane prices. Brazil imported 982,240t of LPG year-to-date October this year, Vortexa data shows. Argentinian supplies comprised 49.5pc of Brazil's imports at 486,400t for the 10-month period, up 17.8 percentage points from a year earlier. Brazil took 47.2pc of its LPG from the US at 463,700t year-to-date October, down by 18.3 percentage points from the same period a year earlier. Brazil's shift toward Argentinian-sourced LPG comes even as prices decreased for full-propane and split butane/propane cargoes loading at the US Gulf coast. US propane export cargo prices slid to $429.1/t year-to-date October this year, from $487.7/t in the same months a year earlier. US split butane/propane loaders dipped to $442.8/t from $499.2/t in the same time period. Brazil's shift away from lower priced US supplies suggests Argentinian cargoes may be more price competitive. Part of the price competitiveness may stem from more economically favorable freight rates for short-haul distances given Argentina's geographical advantage that allows Brazil to offtake Argentina's growing LPG supplies. Brazil may continue to import more LPG from neighboring Argentina as domestic demand there is expected to grow between 5-8pc with the government's incoming Gas do Povo subsidy scheme, according to LPG association Sindigas president Sergio Bandeira de Mello. The subsidy scheme will distribute vouchers for free LPG cylinders to more than 15mn qualifying low-income homes in remote areas of Brazil in an effort to push families away from cooking with firewood and charcoal. The country's four main distributors — Copa Energia, Nacional Gas, Supergasbras and Ultragaz — account for nearly 90pc of the domestic market and have already confirmed that demand under the program will be met by LPG imports. This will come from countries other than the US, most notably from nearby Argentina. By Giovann Rosales Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Nigeria Dangote ramps up gasoline output ahead of works


25/11/07
25/11/07

Nigeria Dangote ramps up gasoline output ahead of works

Lagos, 7 November (Argus) — Nigeria's 650,000 b/d Dangote refinery has ramped up gasoline production since mid-October and is building reserves, ahead of a potential planned maintenance shutdown. The plant's gasoline-producing RFCC unit restarted in October after around a month out of service. A source at the refinery said the unit may have to go offline again to fix some long-standing issues, and this may coincide with a shutdown of the crude distillation unit (CDU). Regulatory data show Dangote's gasoline production was 176,000 b/d on 14 October, post-resumption, and it averaged 195,000 b/d in the next four days. Output then averaged 252,000 b/d between 26–31 October and hit an all-time high of 283,000 b/d on 1 November. Regulatory data shows Dangote stored all the gasoline it produced on 14 October, the day its output ramp-up started. Road tanker and coastal tanker gasoline loadings between 15–31 October averaged 92,000 b/d and 41,000 b/d, respectively, indicating that most of the gasoline produced is going into storage. The RFCC may have to shut again, a refinery source said, for as long as 40 days across December and January, because of instability relating to its design and requirements that have been compounded by a too aggressive start-up pace. Dangote said on 26 October that a refinery debottlenecking process will be completed by early 2026, which suggests a planned CDU shutdown later this year. The two units could be offline at the same time, when gasoline demand is high for the Christmas period. Dangote can produce gasoline blendstock from three other units, and output averaged 151,000 b/d leading up to the RFCC restart. Other regulatory reports seen by Argus show average gasoline production of 129,000 b/d and 170,000 b/d in April and July, respectively. A source at the regulator said Dangote crude receipts have dipped recently, and the gasoline ramp-up has relied on a stock of low-sulphur straight-run (LSSR) fuel oil that was built up deliberately earlier in the year and passively while the RFCC was out. Argus tracking shows Dangote crude receipts edging down since August, and averaging 420,000 b/d in January-September. But Dangote told Argus on 31 October that the highest it had run its CDU at that point was 570,000 b/d. A local oil trader told Argus that if the RFCC stays up for as long as Dangote seems to intend, the refiner should be able to contribute to adequate gasoline supply in the holiday season. Another said Nigerian consumption is well within what Dangote can supply. Dangote said on 26 October, and again on 1 November, that there will be adequate gasoline supply during the holiday period. By Adebiyi Olusolape Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US high court questions Trump's tariff powers


25/11/05
25/11/05

US high court questions Trump's tariff powers

Washington, 5 November (Argus) — President Donald Trump's legal rationale for tariffs targeting major US trading partners ran into a skeptical review during a Supreme Court hearing on Wednesday, including from the justices appointed by him. The high court heard an appeal of two decisions by lower courts that found Trump's administration has overstepped its authority by placing emergency tariffs on most goods imported into the US. Trump has cited a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which previous presidents only used to impose targeted economic sanctions, to impose tariffs on all US trading partners. IEEPA omits references to tariffs. But the Trump administration justifies imposing them by citing two words in the text of the law — that "regulation" of "importation" is among the possible measures that the president can take to address an economic emergency. Tariffs are a foreign policy issue, which the Constitution delegates to the executive branch, solicitor general John Sauer argued on behalf of the administration. Tariffs are not a tax but a regulatory tool, Sauer said. The revenue from tariffs is incidental to the exercise of Trump's regulatory power in foreign policy domain, Sauer said. Both liberal and conservative justices challenged those arguments. Trump's reliance on a law never before used to impose tariffs raises the "major questions doctrine", said Chief Justice John Roberts, a conservative. Roberts was referring to recent Supreme Court decisions, which state that it is up to Congress to decide prominent questions of economic significance. The president has a constitutionally granted authority over foreign policy but in this case, he exercised it by imposing "taxes on Americans, and that has always been the core power of Congress," Roberts said. The possibility that future presidents would use tariffs to advance unrelated policy priorities featured prominently in questions from the bench. "Could the president impose a 50pc tariff on gas-powered cars and auto parts to deal with the 'unusual and extraordinary threat' from abroad of climate change?", conservative justice Neil Gorsuch asked. Sauer acknowledged that the scenario was "highly likely", albeit not under Trump, as "this administration would say 'that's a hoax.'" The legal argument advanced by Trump means that former president Joe Biden could have declared a climate emergency, imposed tariffs and then used the tariff revenue for his student loan relief program, liberal justice Sonia Sotomayor said. "That's all Biden would have had to do with any of his programs." Gorsuch also challenged the government's argument that Congress can at any time remove the power of the president to impose tariffs under emergency authorities. "Congress, as a practical matter, can't get this power back once it handed it over," Gorsuch said. An extension of presidential powers can be enacted with a simple majority but has to be removed by a veto-proof majority, Gorsuch said. "It's a one-way ratchet toward the gradual but continual accretion of power in the executive branch and away from the people's elected representatives." The legal cases before the court pit the Trump administration against a group of private companies and, separately, a coalition of states, who argued that IEEPA does not explicitly authorize Trump to use the tariffs he imposed. Conservative justice Brett Kavanaugh indicated that he would be open to defending the presidential authority to impose tariffs in at least some specific emergency situations, citing Trump's imposition of a 25pc tariff on imports from India in a bid to stop Indian purchases of Russian oil. Next steps The Supreme Court could take weeks, if not months, to make a decision. Trump's preferred outcome is for the high court to overturn the lower courts' decisions and keep the tariffs he imposed in place. "With a Victory, we have tremendous, but fair, Financial and National Security," Trump posted ahead of the hearing. "Without it, we are virtually defenseless against other Countries who have, for years, taken advantage of us." If the Supreme Court decides to keep the lower courts' decisions in place, Trump's administration would have to immediately lift the so-called "fentanyl" tariffs affecting Canada, Mexico and China and the so-called "reciprocal" tariffs of 10pc and higher, in place since 5 April on nearly every US trading partner. The courts' decisions will not affect tariffs Trump imposed on imports of steel, aluminum, cars and auto parts, as the administration has used other, unequivocal legal trade authorities. The Supreme Court would separately have to decide what to do about the revenue collected from emergency tariffs. One of the lower courts ordered that the defendants who challenged tariffs in courts must receive refunds, while another court ordered that all importers must receive refunds. The US government's tariff revenue ran at about $30bn/month as of August, according to an estimate by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

LPG World editorial: The ultimate solution?


25/11/04
25/11/04

LPG World editorial: The ultimate solution?

A recent report touting the benefits of electrified cooking in India unfortunately seems to not understand the realities and challenges the country faces London, 4 November (Argus) — India should transition to electric cooking from LPG and piped natural gas (PNG) as it is "cleaner, safer, cheaper and more sustainable", a report from US non-profit IEEFA, which promotes clean energy transitions, finds. But the report fails to address the feasibility of such a transition when many Indian homes do not receive reliable electricity, nor its consequences from a grid powered largely by coal. "E-cooking" is the "ultimate clean cooking solution for India", the report says. Although it acknowledges the role LPG has played in replacing harmful traditional cooking fuels, backed by the PMUY subsidy scheme, it notes LPG is still "carbon-intensive" and high emitting. Nearly 40pc of Indian homes still use traditional fuels despite the PMUY, it adds. Meanwhile, e-cooking was 37pc cheaper than non-subsidised LPG in fiscal year 2024-25, and 14pc cheaper than PNG. India's dependence on LPG imports also lifted its import bill by 50pc in the past six years, IEEFA says. India should "at least" focus first on transitioning urban areas, with government support a requisite. But a countrywide switch is "the logical choice" for a country now "100pc" electrified. The only things slowing e-cooking uptake are high up-front costs, limited device options and a lack of awareness and regulatory support. Yet scratch the surface and the choice begins to look less logical. E-cooking has an inarguable benefit over LPG — it produces nearly no indoor air pollution. But this ignores the vast improvement made from switching from firewood to LPG, something likely to dwarf the health benefits of moving from LPG to e-cooking, and as the report states, 40pc of homes — in poorer, rural areas — still use wood. It is true Indian power is not "import-dependent". Why? Thanks to domestically produced coal. About three-quarters of Indian electricity comes from coal-fired plants — far more harmful in terms of pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Presumably the report is basing future e-cooking use on lower-emitting fuels. Perhaps gas — which would need to be imported. Or maybe renewables, although the challenges and timescales involved in scaling this adequately are not mentioned. Safety is another important metric, with e-cooking safety deemed "high" and LPG "low". This is probably linked to LPG accidents within Indian homes — deaths from such accidents in India stood at about 31 in 2021. What it ignores is the 78,000-112,000 people a year who die prematurely from coal-fired power in India from pollution, a PNAS study from 2021 found, not to mention casualties at coal-fired power plants and coal mines required to support an e-cooking transition. The report also ignores the LPG industry's robust safety record in well-regulated markets. Taking the report's cost calculations at face value, one must also admit that India can only achieve these power prices thanks to its abundant domestic coal reserves. If, as IEEFA likely wants, the country transitions to cleaner power sources, prices will inevitably climb. For LPG, the PMUY has proven successful because it reduced up-front and fuel-cost barriers for rural, low-income homes. What are the hopes of getting more expensive e-cooking equipment in their hands if electricity costs rise as the power sector transitions and demand grows? Connectivity issues But perhaps the report's biggest problem is its glossing over of Indian electricity access. The government puts connectivity at 99.2-99.5pc — not 100pc. Yet some villages are "connected" if 10pc of homes have access. Only 44pc of rural households in India truly have access to electricity, a study from 2024 found. These often receive less than 12 hours of power daily and outages are frequent. It seems absurd to ask Indian homes to rely on something so unreliable. The government should instead focus on improving electricity access in rural areas, transitioning power to cleaner sources and continuing to move rural users of firewood for cooking to LPG, as well as PNG and e-cooking in urban areas — where appropriate. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Q&A: Sonatrach bullish on future LPG trade growth


25/11/04
25/11/04

Q&A: Sonatrach bullish on future LPG trade growth

London, 4 November (Argus) — Algerian state-owned oil company Sonatrach is the largest producer and exporter of LPG in the Mediterranean region. The firm produces about 130bn m³/yr of natural gas, 8mn t/yr of condensate and 9mn t/yr of LPG, while Algerian LPG exports stand at about 6mn t/yr. The company established its trading and shipping arm, Sonatrach Petroleum Corporation (SPC), in London in 1989 to carry out its international LPG and oil products trade. Argus' David Appleton spoke to Sonatrach's gas marketing division director, Samia Hamadache, and SPC's LPG trading general manager Idir Ait-Feroukh on stage at this year's Argus LPG Conference in Istanbul, Turkey, on 16 October, on the future of Algerian production and exports: How important is Turkey as an importer and consumer of LPG for Algeria? Turkey represents a strategically important, sophisticated and transparent LPG market, characterised by advanced storage, distribution and autogas logistics capabilities. For Sonatrach, Turkey is both a major regional demand centre and a trusted commercial partner, not only for LPG but also for LNG — the first Turkish LNG regasification terminal was established in the 1990s to receive Algerian LNG — the first LNG cargo was delivered to the Turkish market in the 1990s. Another historical milestone in the bilateral relationship was Algeria's rapid delivery of an LPG cargo as humanitarian aid following the devastating earthquake in Turkey at the end of the 1990s. Since then, the co-operation has grown steadily, with direct Algerian LPG exports to Turkey now exceeding 1.7mn t/yr. Algerian LPG contributes to Turkey's supply diversification and energy security, while Turkey provides efficient logistics and competitive access to broader regional markets. LPG supply is growing in several countries, most notably in the US and Mideast Gulf. What is the expectation in terms of Algerian supply in the coming years? In the short term, we anticipate a measured growth trajectory supported by ongoing upstream optimisation, effective associated gas management and reliability enhancements across our processing network. Our approach is pragmatic — we prioritise operational availability, flare reduction and debottlenecking before pursuing large greenfield projects. This ensures a steady, credible supply profile that customers can rely on, rather than pursuing volume for its own sake. For the medium and long term, we are executing an ambitious investment plan to expand capacities, with more than 80pc of investments allocated to oil and gas exploration and production to ensure sustainable growth. Are there plans in Algeria to expand LPG infrastructure and can you give us an overview of your current infrastructure including any shipping assets? Algeria benefits from an integrated and robust infrastructure, encompassing gas processing plants, LPG separation facilities and coastal storage and export terminals along the Mediterranean. We continue to modernise and expand this infrastructure, investing in maintenance, digital scheduling and incremental storage where it delivers value. Future expansions will be in a phased and economically disciplined manner. In shipping, we combine owned and time-chartered capacity with long-term partners to optimise flexibility and efficiency in all export markets. Our subsidiaries, Hyproc Shipping Company and SPC, manage a diversified fleet for transport of LPG, oil products and LNG, strengthening our logistics capabilities. Is there any intention to use additional supply domestically — be it in petrochemicals, autogas or other segments such as residential or industrial — or do you expect this LPG to be all available for export? Our strategy balances domestic use with export growth. Supplying local demand — across residential, industrial, autogas and petrochemical sectors — remains a priority, while keeping sustainability in focus. At the same time, Algeria is a trusted exporter to international markets. Striking the right balance between domestic needs and exports ensures energy security, maximises value for the country and meets long-term international commitments. Of the 9mn t/yr of LPG produced in Algeria, about a third serves the domestic market, with the rest exported. Sonatrach and China's Wanhua Chemical recently signed a landmark deal for propane supply . Do you expect more Algerian LPG to go to Asia, particularly in light of some of the uncertainty in trade policy out of the US? The deal is now in its third consecutive year, demonstrating the satisfaction of both parties, and is part of a broader strategy by Asian, particularly Chinese, players to diversify their supply sources — and for Sonatrach to diversify its portfolio. Algeria stands out for several reasons — its central geographic position, flexible lot sizes and split ratios, and the option of delivering on a fob or cfr basis. Above all, Sonatrach's pragmatic approach and transparent pricing allow Algerian LPG to reach where it generates the most value while preserving long-term relationships in core markets. Our objectives also include developing new, high-value markets where energy demand and industrial growth are accelerating, and pursuing opportunities in any region or country that Sonatrach considers economically advantageous. The supply to China goes to the petrochemical sector. Could you tell us about the quality of Algerian propane and butane and whether it typically makes the specification required for petrochemical feedstock usage? Algerian propane and butane are well-recognised internationally, with a long history of supplying major petrochemical customers while meeting globally accepted specifications. You mentioned Wanhua Chemical, a major global petrochemical player. To add to this, in the past three months alone, we supplied more than 120,000t of butane to petrochemical end users in northwest Europe, including in Rotterdam, a key petrochemical hub, and in Immingham, UK. This demonstrates that Algerian LPG quality meets the stringent purity and international standards required by the petrochemical sector, and by extension other sectors as well, including residential and autogas markets. Algerian propane is particularly suited for propylene production, while our butane, with about 30pc isobutane content, is attractive for petrochemical applications. Our gas processing and LPG separation facilities ensure consistent composition, high purity and stable quality, and we can tailor products to meet specific customer requirements. In what ways do Sonatrach's and SPC's roles complement one another? Sonatrach, based in Algeria, serves as the parent company and portfolio orchestrator, overseeing supply, operations, scheduling, and long-term partnerships. SPC specialises in LPG and oil products trading and shipping and owns six vessel-operating companies — two VLGCs, three LGCs [large gas carrier], and one VLCC [very large crude carrier]. Its operations are conducted through offices in Algiers and London. SPC complements the mission of its parent company by leveraging niche market access, market development expertise, risk management, and portfolio optimisation. Its global reach, presence in key trading hubs, and provision of financial services are further reinforced by the strategic advantages of its London location. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more