Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

BP's scenarios see more room for oil and gas to 2050

  • : Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 24/07/10

BP's latest scenarios for oil and gas demand to 2050 show that, whether the energy transition is speedy or slow, consumption will be higher at the mid-century stage than it previously thought.

This year's BP Energy Outlook, published today, focuses on two scenarios, both at the extreme of transition outcomes. The Current Trajectory scenario — which is not consistent with a 2°C carbon budget — places weight on climate policies already in force. The 'Paris-consistent' Net Zero scenario assumes there is a significant tightening in those policies.

BP's projection for global oil demand to 2050 under the Current Trajectory scenario, at 76.8mn b/d, is slightly greater than the estimate it made under a similar scenario in last year's outlook for 75mn b/d. Under the the same Net Zero scenario it employed last year, BP has significantly raised its oil demand estimate for 2050 to 28.2mn b/d, from 20mn b/d.

In the medium term, BP sees oil demand at 101.7mn b/d under both scenarios in 2025. Under the Current Trajectory scenario this will plateau in the latter part of this decade before falling to 97.8mn b/d by 2035. Under the Net Zero scenario, oil demand will fall more sharply to 94.7mn b/d by 2030 and then to 80.2mn b/d by 2035.

Long road ahead

BP said the single biggest driver reducing oil consumption will be declining use of oil in road transportation, as vehicle efficiency improves and alternative fuels are used more, led by the electrification of cars and trucks.

But some offsetting of this decline will occur "as rising prosperity boosts consumption of plastics, textiles and other oil-based materials," BP said.

Under the Current Trajectory scenario, oil use in road transport declines by 3.4mn b/d over the 2022-35 period and then by 15.5mn b/d between 2035-50. Under Net Zero, road transport consumption declines by 9.6mn b/d over 2022-35 and by 26mn b/d over 2035-50. Oil consumption for use in petrochemicals feedstocks increases in both scenarios through to 2035, adding 5.4mn b/d of demand in the Current Trajectory scenario and 3.5mn b/d of demand under Net Zero.

But there is a divergence after 2035 when the Current Trajectory scenario sees 1.5mn b/d going to feedstocks but the Net Zero scenario sees this falling by 5.6mn b/d. In the former scenario use of oil as a feedstock plateaus at around 25mn b/d in the 2040s, while in the latter scenario use of oil as a feedstock peaks in the 2030s.

Gas up

BP's Current Trajectory scenario has natural gas demand increasing from 3.96 trillion m³/yr in 2022 to 4.73 trillion m³/yr in 2050, slightly greater than the 4.62 trillion m³/yr estimate it had last year in its similar New Momentum scenario.

But as with its oil demand projections, the company's Net Zero scenario sees 1.80 trillion m³/yr of gas demand by mid-century against 1.66 trillion m³/yr previously. Even by 2035 the difference between the two scenarios when it comes to gas demand is stark, a gap of almost 850bn m³/yr or one-fifth of the potential demand by then.

The wide gap between scenario outcomes for gas — with gas demand growing by 19pc under the Current Trajectory projections and plummeting by 58pc under Net Zero by mid-century — reflects two significant opposing trends, BP said. The first is increasing demand in emerging economies as they grow and industrialise. The second is a shift away from natural gas to greater electrification and lower-carbon fuels. But the net effect of these depends on the speed of the energy transition.

Also underpinning BP's projections are trends common to both scenarios. One is that energy demand grows more strongly in emerging economies, driven by rising prosperity and living standards. Another is that the structure of this demand will change as fossil fuels are replaced by a growing share of low-carbon energy.

But despite oil demand declining between 2022-50 in either scenario, oil will continue to play "a significant role in the global energy system for the next 10-15 years" resulting in the need to continue investing in the oil and gas upstream, BP said.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

Foreign oil staff exit Iraq over regional tensions


25/06/23
25/06/23

Foreign oil staff exit Iraq over regional tensions

Dubai, 23 June (Argus) — International oil companies operating in southern Iraq have reduced their foreign staff in response to growing concerns over regional instability, Iraq's state-owned Basrah Oil Company said today. The staff reductions reflect heightened fears that the conflict between Israel and Iran could spill over into the wider region. Tensions escalated after US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites early on 22 June local time, following nearly two weeks of missile and drone exchanges between Israel and Iran. Basrah Oil said several companies operating under licensing agreements in its fields have temporarily evacuated foreign staff. "Most notably, the British company BP, which operates the Rumaila field, has withdrawn some personnel," the company said in a statement. Crude output at Rumaila, Iraq's largest oil field with capacity of around 1.45mn b/d, has recovered to about 1.2mn b/d, Argus understands, after a 24 January fire disrupted around 300,000 b/d of production. Basrah Oil said the staff reductions have not affected output. "Iraqi personnel continue to carry out operations and monitoring, in full co-ordination with remote operators," it said. Italian firm Eni has also scaled back its presence at the 480,000 b/d Zubair field. "Eni has gradually reduced its staff from 260 employees to 98, who are currently working normally in the field alongside Iraqi teams to manage petroleum operations," Basrah Oil said. Sources at Eni told Argus that the company made the cut as a precaution and is monitoring the situation in co-ordination with Italian and local authorities. TotalEnergies, which is redeveloping the Ratawi field to raise capacity by 85,000 b/d to 210,000 b/d, has also reduced staffing. Basrah Oil said 60pc of TotalEnergies' personnel have been withdrawn, but operations have not been affected. Chinese firms operating the West Qurna 1, Siba, and Faihaa fields have not evacuated staff, and operations are continuing smoothly, according to Basrah Oil. Russian firm Lukoil, operator of the West Qurna 2 project, has also maintained normal staffing levels and reported no disruption. By Bachar Halabi and Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Russia condemns US strikes, offers Iran support


25/06/23
25/06/23

Russia condemns US strikes, offers Iran support

London, 23 June (Argus) — Russia has condemned US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities but said they will not affect Moscow's dialogue with Washington. "This is an absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran. It has no basis or justification," state news agency Tass quoted President Vladimir Putin as saying during a meeting in Moscow with Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi. Earlier today, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov also criticised the strikes and expressed "deep regret" over the escalating conflict in the Middle East. "There has been an increase in the number of participants in this conflict, a new round of escalation of tensions in the region. And of course, we condemn this and express deep regret in this regard," Peskov said, according to Tass. Despite the tensions, Peskov said the US strikes would not affect Russia's bilateral dialogue with Washington, describing the two processes as "independent". He also raised concerns about potential radiation risks from the attacks. "We need to find out what happened to these nuclear facilities and whether there is a radiation hazard," he said, while noting that the UN nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, had reported no signs of contamination so far. Peskov said Russia is ready to support Iran, depending on Tehran's needs. "We have offered our mediation efforts. This is specific," he said. "Everything depends on what Iran needs." Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Iran vows payback after US strike on nuclear facilities


25/06/23
25/06/23

Iran vows payback after US strike on nuclear facilities

Dubai, 23 June (Argus) — Iran said today that US airstrikes on its nuclear facilities have expanded the range of legitimate military targets for its armed forces, intensifying concerns over supply disruptions in a region that underpins global oil trade. Powerful and targeted operations with "serious consequences" await the US in response to its direct involvement in strikes on Iranian soil, according to Ebrahim Zolfaqari, spokesperson for Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya central military headquarters. "Mr. Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it," Zolfaqari said. The US strikes on three heavily fortified nuclear facilities in Iran early on 22 June local time marked a clear shift, with Washington now openly joining Israel's military campaign against Tehran's nuclear programme, which Israel views as an existential threat. Israel and Iran have been trading airstrikes and missiles since 13 June. The US has thousands of troops stationed across the Middle East, including in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. While Iran has threatened retaliation, it has so far held back from steps often floated by its leadership, such as striking US bases in the region or closing the strait of Hormuz — a vital waterway through which about a quarter of global seaborne oil trade flows. The US bombing and Iran's threats of retaliation caused crude futures to rise sharply in early trading on 23 June , with front-month Ice Brent climbing above $80/bl for the first time in five months, as the US bombing raised fears of wider escalation. But markets later pared gains. The August Ice Brent contract was trading at $76.56/bl as of 08:25 GMT, down by 45¢/bl from its 20 June settlement. Trump warned Iran against retaliating for the strikes and signalled he is open to regime change in Tehran. "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" he said on Sunday, as Tehran continued to show defiance. He followed up by claiming the strikes had caused "monumental" damage to Iran's nuclear sites, adding that the "biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" The full extent of the damage remains unverified. But "even if nuclear sites are destroyed, game isn't over, enriched materials, indigenous knowledge, political will remain", said top Iranian military and nuclear adviser, Ali Shamkhani. The UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said on 22 June that no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US strikes. Director general Rafael Grossi, in an address to the UN Security Council, confirmed that Fordow — Iran's main facility for enriching uranium to 60pc — was hit. He also said the Esfahan nuclear site and the Natanz enrichment facility were struck again. By Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes


25/06/23
25/06/23

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes

Dubai, 23 June (Argus) — A senior Iranian lawmaker says parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed" in response to US airstrikes on three nuclear sites early Sunday — a move that would severely disrupt global oil flows. Esmaeil Kowsari — a member of the national security and foreign policy commission, and a former high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — told state-owned Press TV that lawmakers had reached a consensus that closure would be the appropriate response. Argus understands that while members of parliament were all in agreement, the issue was not formally put to a vote. Kowsari said the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security body. His comments have drawn global attention as markets await Iran's response to the strikes, which US president Donald Trump ordered against nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The Fordow site is heavily fortified and located underground. The Natanz facility had already been targeted by Israeli strikes, prompting a series of retaliatory missile and drone exchanges between Iran and Israel. Iranian officials, including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had repeatedly warned Washington that any direct military action would trigger a response causing "irreparable" harm to the US. . Variety of options The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through. It has, however, previously targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Closure of the strait is one of several retaliatory options regularly floated by Iranian political and military leaders. Others include military strikes on US bases across the Mideast Gulf. The US maintains installations in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Asked whether closing the strait was under consideration, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi declined to confirm, saying only that "there are a variety of options available to us". Araqchi travelled to Moscow late on Sunday and is expected to meet Russian president Vladimir Putin on Monday. Moscow has condemned the US strikes. Ali Akbar Velayati, a long-time adviser to Khamenei, also issued a veiled threat to Washington, saying: "West Asia is not Greenland, and the strait of Hormuz is fundamentally different from the Panama Canal." The comment referenced earlier threats by Trump to assert US control over Greenland and the Panama Canal during the early days of his second term. US secretary of state Marco Rubio warned that any attempt by Iran to close the strait would be "a terrible mistake." "It's economic suicide for them if they do it, and we retain options to deal with that," he said. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more