Repsol 2Q profit doubles but cash flow turns negative

: Crude oil, Electricity, Natural gas, Oil products
24/07/24

Spanish integrated Repsol's profit more than doubled on the year in the second quarter, as lower one-time losses and better results in the upstream and customer divisions more than offset a weaker refining performance.

But its cash flow turned negative as it completed the buyout of its UK joint venture with China's state-controlled Sinopec, raised investments and experienced weaker refining margins. Net debt was sharply higher, largely reflecting share buy-backs.

Repsol has said it will acquire and cancel a further 20mn of its own shares before the end of the year, which will probably further increase its debt. It completed a 40mn buy-back in the first half of the year.

Repsol's profit climbed to €657mn ($714mn) in April-June from €308mn a year earlier, when earnings were hit by a large provision against an arbitration ruling that obliged it to acquire Sinopec's stake in their UK joint venture. Excluding this and other special items, such as a near threefold reduction in the negative inventory effect to €85mn, Repsol's adjusted profit increased by 4pc on the year to €859mn.

Repsol confirmed the fall in refining margins and upstream production reported earlier in July. Liquids output increased by 3pc on the year to 214,000 b/d, and gas production fell by 4pc to 2.1bn ft³/d.

Adjusted upstream profit increased by 4pc on the year to €427mn. The higher crude production and a 13pc rise in realised prices to $78.6/bl more than offset lower gas production and prices, which fell by 6pc to $3.1/'000 ft³ over the same period.

Adjusted profit at Repsol's industrial division — which includes 1mn b/d of Spanish and Peruvian refining capacity, an olefins-focused petrochemicals division, and a gas and oil product trading business — was down by 16pc on the year at €288mn. Profit fell at the 117,000 b/d Pampilla refinery in Peru after a turnaround and weak refining margins, and there was lower income from gas trading. Spanish refining profit rose on a higher utilisation rate and gains in oil product trading.

Repsol's customer-focused division reported adjusted profit of €158mn in April-June, 7pc higher on the year thanks to higher retail electricity margins, a jump in sales from an expanded customer base, higher margins in aviation fuels and higher sales volumes in lubricants.

Repsol swung to a negative free cash flow, before shareholder remuneration and buy-backs, of €574mn in the second quarter, from a positive €392mn a year earlier. After shareholder remuneration, including the share buy-backs and dividends, Repsol had a negative cash position of €1.12bn compared with a positive €133mn a year earlier.

Repsol's net debt more than doubled to €4.595bn at the end of June from €2.096bn on 31 December 2023, reflecting the share buy-backs and new leases of equipment.

By Jonathan Gleave

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/06/18

Banks increased fossil fuel financing in 2024: Report

London, 18 June (Argus) — Banks "significantly increased" their fossil fuel financing in 2024, reversing a trend of steadily declining fossil fuel financing since 2021, a report from a group of non-profit organisations found this week. The 65 biggest banks globally committed $869bn in 2024 to "companies conducting business in fossil fuels", the report — Banking on Climate Chaos — found. Those banks committed $429bn last year to companies expanding fossil fuel production and infrastructure. The report assesses lending and underwriting in 2024 from the world's top 65 banks to more than 2,700 fossil fuel companies. Figures are not directly comparable year-on-year, as the previous report, which assessed 2023, covered financing from 60 banks. The 60 biggest banks globally committed $705bn in 2023 to companies with fossil fuel business, last year's report found. Those banks committed $347bn in 2023 to companies with fossil fuel expansion plans. Of the five banks providing the most fossil fuel finance in 2024, four were US banks — JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo. The 65 banks assessed in this year's report have committed $7.9 trillion in fossil fuel financing since 2016, when the Paris climate agreement took effect, the report found. Finance is at the core of climate negotiations like UN Cop summits. Developed countries are typically called upon at such events to provide more public climate finance to developing nations, but the focus is also shifting to private finance, as overseas development finance looks set to drop . But fossil fuel financing banks are increasingly facing the risk of targeted and more complex climate-related litigation, according to a recent report by the London School of Economics' centre for economic transition expertise (Cetex). Climate litigation is not currently adequately accounted for in financial risk assessment, with case filing and decisions negatively impacting carbon financiers, it said. "While early climate cases primarily targeted governments and big-emitting ‘carbon majors', cases against other firms have proliferated quickly," Cetex said. The report also showed that, based on a review of disclosures from 20 banks supervised by the European Central Bank, many banks across Europe recognise litigation risks as material in the context of climate and environmental factors but tend to not be specific about the risks incurred. By Georgia Gratton and Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

AWRP tanker insurance to jump in Mideast Gulf

25/06/18

AWRP tanker insurance to jump in Mideast Gulf

London, 18 June (Argus) — Additional War Risk Premiums (AWRP) in the Mideast Gulf could be set to rise sharply in the coming days in the wake of the Iran-Israel conflict, potentially pushing up freight rates, sources indicated to Argus , as the number of underwriters willing to commit at current levels appears to be shrinking. Offers from underwriters in line with last-done levels are becoming increasingly scarce, sources told Argus , with a number of underwriters now offering at significantly higher premiums. The situation is extremely fluid and even the higher offer levels are expected to climb in the coming days, sources said. One source suggested that tomorrow would be a trigger point to revise AWRP rates upwards for all oil and gas cargoes seeking Mideast Gulf cover and the new level would require "a massive uplift". AWRP cover protects a vessel against any physical loss or damage incurred from war related activities such as missile, drone or mine attacks, as well as capture, seizure or detainment. Although vessels are still able to secure AWRP in line with the standard 0.125pc for the Mideast Gulf before the conflict, participants have indicated that some offers are now at or above 0.2-0.4pc of the insured value of the vessel — hull and machinery value. Offers vary widely depending on the specifics of the vessel or providing insurer but several sources have indicated that some offers are at least 50pc higher than early last week. One source stressed that protection and indemnity (P&I) clubs have not yet made a definitive statement on insurance but there is increased alertness. P&I clubs provide marine protection and indemnity insurance for about 90pc of the world's oceangoing tonnage and are key determiners of the overall policies around marine insurance. AWRP in the Black Sea for a Russian crude cargo on a Suezmax tanker peaked at 1.5pc of the insured value of the ship according to Argus assessments, (around $800,000) in 2022 and 2023 as a result of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Argus estimated that the insured value of a very large crude carrier (VLCC) at around $90mn, and a 0.4pc AWRP would equate to around $360,000. A shipowner could receive up to 50pc of this back as part of a no claims bonus but it remains a substantial extra cost faced by crude exporters from the Mideast Gulf. The Mideast Gulf to Asia-Pacific VLCC rate already jumped to the equivalent of $2.14/bl for Murban crude ($16.35/t or WS70) on 17 June from $1.34/bl ($10.28/t or WS44) on 12 June before the first missile strike on Iran. VLCC tankers carrying crude from the Mideast Gulf is the single largest crude trade in the world and since the start of the current conflict between Israel and Iran the cost of freight has bounced almost to a 2025-high from close to a 2025-low. A higher AWRP would most likely be passed on to charterers, leading to further gains in the spot freight market. There is also the likelihood that some insurers could cease offering cover citing inherent risks. But, higher AWRPs are also an opportunity for insurers to generate higher revenues, albeit with significant risks. By John Ollett, George-Maher Bonnett, and Rithika Krishna Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Malaysia's Petronas to build third LNG import terminal

25/06/18

Malaysia's Petronas to build third LNG import terminal

Singapore, 18 June (Argus) — Malaysian state-owned Petronas plans to develop the country's third LNG regasification terminal, the firm's chief executive Tengku Muhammad Taufik said at the Energy Asia 2025 conference in Kuala Lumpur on 17 June. The need for the third regasification terminal in peninsular Malaysia comes on the back of expectations of rising demand, Taufik added. The plan follows a government directive to ensure energy supply security in peninsular Malaysia, according to state-controlled news agency Bernama. There are two import terminals presently operational in the peninsular — the 3.8mn t/yr Melaka and 3.5mn t/yr Pengerang import facilities. The third terminal will likely be built in Lumut, southwest Perak, and have a nameplate capacity similar to existing terminals, Bernama reported. Malaysia's LNG receipts have held stable in recent years, having steadily increased since the country began importing in May 2013. Imports totalled 1.04mn t over January-May, little changed from 1.06mn t a year earlier, Vortexa data show. And gas-fired power generation comprised 41pc of the power generation mix over the same period, averaging 5.7 GWh/d, up from 5.5 GWh/d a year earlier, data from electricity planning authority Single Buyer show. This indicates imported LNG makes up about 32pc of total gas used in power generation. Malaysia is mulling becoming a net LNG importer within the next 10-20 years because of declining natural gas reserves and growing energy demand. Gas is set to account for as much as 56pc of the country's energy mix by 2050. But Petronas continues to retain an "advantaged" position in east Malaysia to export LNG in fulfilling its contractual obligations, Taufik stated. Malaysia exports LNG through the 30mn t/yr Bintulu terminal in Sarawak alongside the 1.5mn t/yr PFLNG Satu and 1.3mn t/yr PFLNG Dua floating LNG (FLNG) units offshore Sabah. By Irfan Jaafar Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Karoon updates guidance on new Brazil oil blocks

25/06/18

Karoon updates guidance on new Brazil oil blocks

Sydney, 18 June (Argus) — Brazil-focused Australian oil firm Karoon Energy has updated its 2025 guidance after winning access to six of 33 oil and natural gas exploration blocks awarded by Brasilia. The Melbourne-based company secured 100pc interests in the Santos basin blocks offshore Brazil which will be formally granted in October-December, Karoon said. The firm's 2025 capital expenditure guidance has increased to $120-140mn from a previous $105-125mn to incorporate bid bonuses and a financial guarantees owing. "The terms of the bid included a bonus payment of approximately $14.8mn in total plus a minimum work program of $20.2mn, to be undertaken within seven years of the formal award of the blocks. The bids did not include well commitments on any of the blocks," chief executive Julian Fowles said on 18 June. Two of the blocks include the Piracuca discovery, which Karoon said could be tied back to its proposed Neon development, while four deepwater blocks represent a strategic move for Karoon to consolidate its position in the area. State-controlled Petrobras and Spanish-Chinese joint venture Repsol-Sinopec returned the shallow-water Piracuca field to domestic oil regulator ANP in 2017, after determining the acreage was not commercially viable. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US Supreme Court asked to rule on tariffs

25/06/17

US Supreme Court asked to rule on tariffs

Washington, 17 June (Argus) — Plaintiffs in one of the legal cases challenging President Donald Trump's authority to impose tariffs are asking the Supreme Court to hear their arguments even before US federal appeals courts rule on their petition. The legal case brought by the plaintiffs — toy companies Learning Resources and hand2hand — resulted in a ruling by the US District Court for the District of Columbia in late May that Trump did not have the authority to impose tariffs by citing a 1978 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). That case is currently on appeal at the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. The plaintiffs today urged the Supreme Court to take the case and schedule oral arguments at the start of its fall term in October, or possibly in a special September sitting. The plaintiffs argued the Supreme Court will eventually have to rule on the case given the unprecedented use of IEEPA by the Trump White House to impose tariffs, so special consideration should be given to the case even before appeals courts rule on it. The Supreme Court is under no obligation to fast-track the case. The schedule for legal challenges to Trump's authority is clashing with his claims to be negotiating multiple deals with foreign trade partners. Trump cited the IEEPA to impose, then rescind, tariffs of 10-25pc on energy and other imports from Canada and Mexico in February-March. He used the same law to impose 20pc tariffs on China in February-March, and to impose 10pc tariffs on nearly every US trading partner in April. The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has stayed the toy companies' case until the resolution of a separate, broader legal challenge to Trump's tariff authority. In that case, the US Court of International Trade ruled in late May that Trump's use of IEEPA was illegal and ordered the administration to remove all tariffs it imposed under that rubric and to refund all import duties it collected. The trade court's ruling is under review at the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which scheduled an oral argument on 31 July to hear from plaintiffs — a group of US companies and several US states — and from the Trump administration. The trade court's ruling in late May was unexpected, as it "actually ruled on the merits of the case, as opposed to just granting or denying an injunction," according to Alec Phillips, chief political economist with investment bank Goldman Sachs' research arm. "The question now is, will the Federal Circuit uphold the ruling, and will ultimately the Supreme Court uphold the ruling?" The Trump administration argued that the legal challenges to its tariff authority could undermine its ability to negotiate with foreign trade partners. The administration has so far produced two limited trade agreements, with the UK and China, despite promising in early April to unveil "90 deals in 90 days". Trump on Monday described ongoing trade negotiations as an easy process. "We're dealing with really, if you think about it, probably 175 countries, and most of them can just be sent a letter saying, 'It'll be an honor to trade with you, and here's what you're going to have to pay to do'", Trump said. But on the same day he pushed back on calls from Canada and the EU to negotiate trade deals, arguing that their approach is too complex. "You get too complex on the deals and they never get done," Trump said. The legal challenges to Trump's authority under IEEPA will not affect the tariffs he imposed on foreign steel, aluminum, cars and auto parts. US trade statistics point to a significant tariff burden in place in April, the latest month for which data are available.The effective US tariff rate on all imports — the amount of duties collected divided by the total value of imports — rose to 7.1pc in April from 2.4pc in January. Trump has dismissed concerns about the impact of tariffs on consumer prices, noting on Monday that "we're making a lot of money. You know, we took in $88bn in tariffs." Treasury Department revenue data show that the US has collected $98bn in customs revenue for the year through 13 June, up from $63bn in the same period last year. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more