Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Pentas Flora launches re-refined Group II N150 base oil

  • : Oil products
  • 24/09/11

Malaysia-based Pentas Flora launched its re-refined Group II N150 base oil grade today, in line with a shift in industry trends towards premium-grade base oils.

The re-refiner started producing Group I SN 150 in 2022 but has converted production to Group II base oils with high-viscosity index from mid-August. The re-refiner also has the capability to produce Group III base oils depending on market demand.

Its re-refining facility at Banting, Selangor has a capacity of up to 36,000 t/yr. Pentas Flora collects up to 50,000 t/yr of used motor oils from nine collection points, targeting to expand this to 28 collection points by 2026.

Most Asian re-refined base oils (RRBO) produced are Group I grades. The transition from Group I to Group II and III RRBO has been dictated by what has been happening in the lubricant industry, which is moving towards using higher performing base oils, said Pentas Flora technical director H Ernest Henderson.

"The industry wants to bring in oils that have better fuel economy, extended drain capabilities, reduce emissions and enhance fuel ability," Henderson said. "So over the years we have seen a shift from older performing standards to new performance standards. These are now demanding the use of higher VI and higher quality base oils."

"And because re-refining basically takes engine motor oil and recaptures and re-establishes the original base oil within those formulation. The fact that we are now using higher performance motor oil using Group II and III… that in turn becomes feedstock which allows us to capture and produce higher quality base oil," he added.

The shift driven by feedstock change is complemented by technology. Pentas Flora's re-refining processes involve distillation to separate the base oil components from the used motor oils, then purification using solvent extraction and lube polishing processes.

Pentas Flora started with Group I RRBO initially because of sulphur content exceeding the Group II and III specifications. But with a lube polishing system installed in August it has been able to increase saturates and reduce sulphur content to meet Group II and III classifications.

Lower carbon footprint

RRBO has been gaining traction in recent years with governments around the world pushing for sustainability and a more circular economy. More companies are also placing more emphasis on environmental, social and governance objectives. So blenders are increasingly looking to include RRBO in finished lubricants.

RRBO takes less energy to produce than virgin base oils, reduces carbon dioxide emissions and is therefore more environmentally friendly and sustainable, said Henderson.

Pentas Flora is one of the few re-refiners in Malaysia, with China and India bigger markets for RRBO. India in April this year implemented the Extended Producer Responsibility for Used Oil regulation where producers of base oils and lubrication oils and importers of used oil have a recycling target of 5pc in 2024-25. This target will progressively increase to 50pc from 2030-31 onwards.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/07/16

New tariff threat could disrupt Mexico GDP outlook

New tariff threat could disrupt Mexico GDP outlook

Mexico City, 16 July (Argus) — Mexico's association of finance executives IMEF held its 2025 GDP growth forecast steady at 0.1pc in its July survey but warned the outlook could deteriorate if the US raises tariffs to 30pc. The survey of 43 analysts maintained projections for year-end inflation at 4pc and for the central bank's benchmark interest rate to fall from 8pc to 7.5pc by the end of 2025. The sharpest variation came in formal employment, after Mexico's social security administration IMSS reported a net loss of 139,444 formal jobs in the second quarter. IMEF cut its 2025 job creation forecast to 160,000 from 190,000 in June — the seventh and largest downgrade this year. Job losses increased in April, May and June, "a situation not seen since the pandemic in 2020," IMEF said. "If this trend is not reversed, the net number of formal jobs could fall to zero by year-end." "It is still too early to call it a recession, but the rise in job losses is worrying," said Victor Herrera, head of economic studies at IMEF. "The next risk we face is in auto plants. Some halted production after the 25pc US tariff was imposed in April. They did not lay off workers right away — they sent them home with half pay. But if this is not resolved in the next 60-90 days, layoffs will follow." The July survey was conducted before US president Donald Trump said on 12 July he would raise tariffs on Mexican goods from 25pc to 30pc starting 1 August. "What we have seen in the past is that when the deadline comes, the tariffs are postponed or canceled," Herrera said. "Hopefully, that happens again. If not, you can expect GDP forecasts to shift into contraction territory." While the full impact would vary by sector, Herrera said the effective average tariff rate would rise from 4pc to 15pc, with most exports either exempt or subject to reduced rates under regional content rules. But 8–10pc of auto exports would face the full 30pc duty. IMEF expects the peso to end 2025 at Ps20.1/$1, stronger than the Ps20.45/$1 estimate in June. But the group warned that rising Japanese rates — which influence currency carry trades — and falling Mexican rates could put renewed pressure on the peso once the dollar rebounds. For 2026, the GDP growth forecast dropped to 1.3pc from 1.5pc, while the peso is seen ending that year at Ps20.75/$1, slightly stronger than the previous Ps20.90/$1 forecast. By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US refiners lobby to revive expired biofuel credits


25/07/16
25/07/16

US refiners lobby to revive expired biofuel credits

New York, 16 July (Argus) — A group of small oil refiners asked US officials at a recent meeting to not just grant exemptions from years-old biofuel blend mandates but to also provide lucrative program credits they can sell to other companies. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed record-high biofuel blend mandates for the next two years, but farm groups fear that a backlog of exemption requests threaten those targets. There are more than 180 unresolved exemption requests stretching over 10 years after courts struck down various denials during former-president Joe Biden's term. Under the Renewable Fuel Standard, oil refiners and importers must annually blend biofuels or buy Renewable Identification Number (RIN) credits from those that do. But refiners that process 75,000 b/d or less of crude and can prove "disproportionate economic hardship" are able to request full exemptions which can mean tens of millions of dollars in reduced compliance costs. In a 20 May meeting with EPA officials, a coalition of small refiners made the case that President Donald Trump's administration should not just grant broad relief from 2019-2022 mandates but also issue "replacement RINs" for any refiners that already complied. EPA should issue these RINs "with adequate lead time" before compliance deadlines and ensure they have "adequate shelf life", according to a proposal shared with EPA by a coalition lawyer and obtained by Argus through a Freedom of Information Act request. The agency should even consider giving companies more credits than they submitted if RINs are cheaper now, the group argued. RINs from those years are otherwise expired and would be useless if returned as is. "Hardship relief is more critical now than ever", the group of 14 companies argues, given rising biofuel quotas. The issue is politically tricky for EPA, since widespread waivers threaten biofuel and crop demand, and has been the subject of numerous court fights over the years. The first Trump administration handed out exemptions generously , but current officials have not yet staked out a clear position. EPA told Argus it is taking steps "to reduce the backlog as soon as possible". Living RIN the past EPA could potentially return credits on a staggered timeline or impose conditions on their use to avert market turmoil, according to lawyers and lobbyists experienced in waiver issues. The proposal alludes to this, noting however that "any conditions on RIN return that are intended to address potential market reactions must strike the appropriate balance to ensure flexibility to small refineries". Biofuel groups have lobbied against retroactive waivers but said that EPA could minimize the damage by making other oil companies blend more biofuels. The agency should ensure that any exemptions "will be made up in the market", said Emily Skor, president of ethanol lobby Growth Energy, at a hearing last week. But the refiners' proposal argues that EPA is not required to do so if it grants exemptions retroactively. The agency has estimated future exemptions when calculating the percentage of biofuels individual refiners must blend — frustrating large producers that then shoulder more of the burden of meeting high-level targets — but doing the same with past-year waivers is more legally risky. The small refiners float a less aggressive approach for other compliance years. The proposal notably makes no reference to petitions for relief from 2016-2018 quotas. EPA under Biden rejected 31 petitions for those years but did not require companies to surrender additional RINs, potentially making any push for extra relief a tougher sell despite courts' skepticism of the underlying denials. And for 2023 and beyond, the refiners say that EPA should rely on "merit-driven scoring". EPA already consults with the Department of Energy, which scores hardship for individual applicants, though the importance of this feedback has varied over the program's history. The coalition also wants EPA to rescind three 2023 compliance year denials issued during the final days of Biden's term, which affected two Calumet refineries and one CVR Energy refinery. RINto the future The coalition's proposal is notable since small refiners — apart from a handful recently calling for a "seat at the table" — have largely not publicized their asks of the Trump administration, leading traders to speculate wildly on policy shifts. RIN prices have been volatile as a result. The coalition includes 14 companies that submitted 41 petitions that courts have told EPA to reconsider as well as 37 requests for more recent years, the proposal says. They are represented by independent attorney Claudia O'Brien, who did not respond to a request for comment. The documents obtained by Argus do not list all companies involved in the effort, but lawyers for Calumet, Par Pacific and Placid Refining were scheduled to attend the May meeting in person with top EPA appointees Aaron Szabo and Alexander Dominguez, while others attended virtually. O'Brien said in a separate email that Hunt Refining, REH Company, and Ergon were part of the coalition. The policy requests represent the position of one group and not necessarily all 34 refineries EPA estimates are eligible for future waivers. It is not clear how officials responded at the meeting or what options they are weighing now. EPA wants to finalize new blend mandates before November and has said it plans to communicate its approach to exemptions beforehand. By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

BMUKN klärt Fragen zu RED III-Entwurf


25/07/16
25/07/16

BMUKN klärt Fragen zu RED III-Entwurf

Hamburg, 16 July (Argus) — Anbieter von Schiffskraftstoffen können ihre THG-Quote im nächsten Jahr auch durch im Straßen- oder Flugverkehr eingesetzte Erfüllungsoptionen erfüllen. Außerdem darf POME im nächsten Jahr weiterhin für die Erfüllung der Unterquote für fortschrittliche Kraftstoffe genutzt werden, jedoch nicht auf die THG-Quote selbst. Das Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Klimaschutz, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMUKN) hat am 15. Juli auf seiner Webseite diese und weitere Fragen zum Referentenentwurf zur Umsetzung der RED III in deutsches Recht beantwortet. Die Frage-und-Antwortseite soll letzte Unklarheiten der Branche klären, bevor die Rückmeldefrist für Verbände am 18. Juli endet. Eine wichtige Richtigstellung bezieht sich hierbei auf die Funktionsweise der Marinequote im nächsten Jahr. Der Referentenentwurf sieht ab 2026 eine separate THG-Quote für den Seeverkehr abseits des Land- und Flugverkehrs vor. Diese Quote bezieht sich sowohl auf die See- sowie Binnenschifffahrt und wird die gleiche Höhe von 12 % im Jahr 2026 sowie auch die gleichen Unterquoten und Obergrenzen haben. Beide Quoten werden getrennt behandelt, sodass die Quotenverpflichtung für Anbieter von Straßen- und Flugverkehrskraftstoffen nicht durch den Einsatz von erneuerbaren Kraftstoffen im Seeverkehr erfüllt werden kann. Andersherum können aber für die Marinequote verpflichtete Unternehmen, Zertifikate aus dem Straßen- und Flugverkehr nutzen. Dies könnte die Nachfrage nach Straßenkraftstoffen mit hoher THG-Einsparung wie beispielsweise Biomethan als Bio-LNG oder CNG erhöhen, da diese sowohl die THG-Quote für Land- und Luft wie auch die für Schiffe effizient erfüllen können. Außerdem stellt das Ministerium klar, dass Biokraftstoffe aus POME (Palmmühlenabwasser) auf die Unterquote für fortschrittliche Biokraftstoffe angerechnet werden können, jedoch nicht auf die THG-Quote. Unternehmen können ihre Unterquote also durch Biodiesel oder HVO aus POME erfüllen, jedoch generiert das Inverkehrbringen dieser Biokraftstoffe keine THG-Zertifikate. Grund für diese Regelung ist, dass Deutschland zur Umsetzung der RED III verpflichtet ist, welche POME als fortschrittlichen Biokraftstoff anerkennt. Jedoch sollte POME hierdurch in Deutschland sehr unattraktiv werden. Marktteilnehmer nehmen bisher keine Auswirkung auf die THG-Zertifikatspreise durch die Frage-und-Antwortseite des Ministeriums wahr. Seit Ende letzter Woche hatten sich die Preise für Zertifikate der Kategorie 'Andere' bei circa 144 €/t CO2e eingependelt. Dies war auch der Frist zur Anmeldung der Treibhausgasminderungen für das THG-Verpflichtungsjahr 2024 geschuldet, die am 15. Juli endete und den THG-Zertifikatsmarkt in den letzten Wochen beruhigt hatte. Von Svea Winter Senden Sie Kommentare und fordern Sie weitere Informationen an feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Heizölabsatz in 2025 übertrifft 2024 bis jetzt deutlich


25/07/16
25/07/16

Heizölabsatz in 2025 übertrifft 2024 bis jetzt deutlich

Hamburg, 16 July (Argus) — Die bisher in 2025 an Argus gemeldeten Heizölvolumen übersteigen die Mengen des gleichen Zeitraum des Vorjahres deutlich. Die hohe Bevorratung bei verhältnismäßig niedrigen Preisen sowie vermehrte Panikkäufe während des Kriegs zwischen dem Iran und Israel sind ausschlaggebend. Seit Mai gleichen sich die Volumen jedoch zunehmend an, im Juli deutet sich sogar ein im Vergleich geringeres Volumen in diesem Jahr an. Endverbraucher zeigten sich besonders im März 2025 kauffreudig. Die an Argus gemeldeten Heizölvolumen lagen im März knapp 74 % über dem Vorjahr (siehe Grafik). Im April hielt sich das Kaufinteresse dann auf höherem Niveau. Endverbraucher nutzten die zu dem Zeitpunkt günstigeren Preise, um sich mit Heizöl zu bevorraten. Mitte März erreichten die Heizölpreise im Bundesdurchschnitt ihren niedrigsten Stand seit Anfang des Jahres. Der Einbruch der ICE Gasoil Futures im April nachdem US-Präsident Trump eine Reihe von Strafzöllen auf verschiedene Länder verkündete — so unter anderem auf Kanada und China — stützte diese Entwicklung. Die Heizölpreise sanken in der Folge auf ein neues Jahrestief bei unter 70 €/100l und hielten sich bis Mitte Juni auf diesem Niveau. Darüber hinaus haben Händler für 2025 weniger Termverträge abgeschlossen . Grund hierfür waren zum einen Unsicherheiten über die Entwicklung der Nachfrage. Zum anderen gestaltete sich auch die Produktion in Deutschland unklar mit dem ausstehenden Verkauf von Rosnefts deutschen Vermögenswerten, inklusive Anteilen an drei Raffinerien, sowie dem geplanten Ende der Rohölverarbeitung im Werksteil Wesseling (147.000 bl/Tag) der Rheinland-Raffinerie. Händler sind daher in diesem Jahr auf mehr Spotkäufe angewiesen, um den Bedarf zu decken. Im Juni kamen dann noch kurzzeitige Panikkäufe im Zuge des Kriegs zwischen Israel und dem Iran hinzu. Endverbraucher befürchteten eine Knappheit in Europa, sollte der Iran die Straße von Hormus sperren, und deckten sich daher mit Produkt ein. Laut Schätzungen von Argus wird etwa ein Fünftel des global Bedarfs an Rohöl und Ölprodukten durch die Straße von Hormus transportiert. Endverbraucher sind daher für die Jahreszeit unverhältnismäßig gut bevorratet. Laut Daten von Argus MDX erreichte der bundesdurchschnittliche Füllstand der privaten Heizöltanks im Juli sein für die Jahreszeit höchstes Niveau seit 2020. Am 14. Juli lag der durchschnittliche Füllstand bei rund 56,1 %, etwa 3,3 Prozentpunkte höher als am selben Tag im Vorjahr (siehe Grafik). Seit Mai halten sich die Heizölabsätze daher insgesamt nur knapp über den Niveau von 2024. Ein allgemein unattraktiveres Preisbild sowie warme Temperaturen bei zeitgleich hohen Füllständen führen dazu, dass Endverbraucher keinen dringenden Bedarf an weiteren Zukäufen haben. Zumeist halten sich Kunden daher derzeit zurück und warten niedrigere Preise ab, sodass Anbieter von einem ungewöhnlich ruhigem Markt sprechen. Händler erwarten, dass die Nachfrage erst zum Herbstanfang wieder signifikant ansteigen wird. Der Einbruch der Heizölabsätze macht sich bereits im Juli kenntlich . Die an Argus gemeldeten Volumen liegen zur Monatsmitte bei nur knapp ein Viertel der Mengen im Vorjahr. Tagesdurchschnittlich wurden im Juli bislang ebenfalls deutlich weniger Mengen gemeldet als in 2024 mit einem Rückgang um über 53 %. Von Natalie Müller An Argus gemeldete Heizölmengen, kumulativ Füllstand der privaten Heizöltanks am 14. Juli Senden Sie Kommentare und fordern Sie weitere Informationen an feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Q&A: Ships to use bioblends to comply with new IMO rule


25/07/15
25/07/15

Q&A: Ships to use bioblends to comply with new IMO rule

Sao Paulo, 15 July (Argus) — Bioblends are the best short-term option for ships to comply with International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations set to be approved in October, according to Andrea Lucchesi , professor at the University of Sao Paulo and an expert on the impact of maritime regulations. Lucchesi, who presented research on the potential economic impacts of the IMO-approved carbon pricing mechanism at the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) 83 in April, spoke to Argus about the recent IMO agreement and the future of decarbonization in shipping. Edited highlights follow. Under the current IMO carbon pricing mechanism, which fuel emerges as the main solution for decarbonization? New studies are being conducted in this regard. As the details of the mechanism will still be defined in October, there is no clarity regarding the next bunker fuels, especially because we cannot just consider the decarbonization potential, but also the cost of port infrastructure and vessel adaptation. Also, the ports will adapt very slowly. What I can say is that the first fuel to be adopted in the transition phase will be the marine biofuel blends, because of their economic viability, emissions reduction potential and supply availability. Is the agreement, as it progressed in MEPC 83, economically and environmentally successful? The agreement approved on 11 April is historic. It is the result of more than seven years of negotiation and is the first to regulate an entire sector of the economy at the international level. Therefore, we consider the agreement a success, even though it has been modified from its initial design, and it is sufficient to achieve the goal of decarbonizing the maritime sector by 2050. Have the GHG reduction targets been made too flexible over the many years of debate? The study I conducted for the IMO aimed to measure the impact of this pricing mechanism, because if we try to accelerate decarbonization beyond market capacity, we will see very strong consequences, especially in developing countries. A more rigid goal is not appropriate. Do you believe the agreement will be approved in October as it was designed, despite the US opposing the measure? Yes. The US will try to influence the matter, but there is considerable support for the measures. They have already been widely debated in recent years. Is the mechanism, as it progressed in the April meetings, economically viable for the entire maritime chain to adapt? The agreement will impact countries very differently. We were careful to assess the impacts on food inflation and the potential impact on malnutrition in developing countries. There will be socioeconomic impacts, so the measures needed to be gradual, as they will be. For example, there needs to be time for ships to be retrofitted, investment in technical measures to increase efficiency, and fuel replacement. Another point is that port technology needs to be adapted. Therefore, the mechanism should begin pricing in 2028, with reduction targets ranging from a modest 4-17pc for the first year. In any case, the sector will have to adapt, because the agreement will be effective in punishing those who do not comply. This agreement will work. The IMO is an institution with the capacity to effectively monitor and punish, and there are mechanisms in place to do so. How much is expected to be raised from the carbon pricing? The revenue generation potential, as it stands today, is $1bn/yr in the initial years, with a growth trend in subsequent years. This revenue is intended to mitigate the socioeconomic impacts of the mechanism on small island nations and developing countries. By Gabriel Tassi Lara and Natalia Coelho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more