Latest market news

UK confirms $28.5bn funding for two CCS, H2 clusters

  • : Emissions, Hydrogen
  • 24/10/04

The UK government has finalised a commitment to provide £21.7bn ($28.5bn) over the next 25 years to two planned clusters for carbon capture and storage (CCS) and connected projects, including for hydrogen production.

The government has reached "commercial agreement with industry" for development of the clusters, it said today.

The funding will go to the HyNet cluster in northwest England and the East Coast cluster in England's northeastern Humber and Teesside regions. The two projects were selected as "Track 1" priority clusters in 2021 and could together store some 650mn t of CO2. They could attract £8bn of private investment, the government said today.

"The allocation of funding marks the launch of the UK's CCS industry," according to Italy's integrated Eni, which leads the development of HyNet's CO2 transport and storage system. Eni in February gave a start date of 2027 for HyNet.

The East Coast cluster is led by the Northern Endurance Partnership, a joint venture between BP, TotalEnergies and Norwegian state-controlled Equinor.

A range of projects will connect to the two hubs to transport and permanently sequester the carbon. These will include hydrogen production projects and supporting infrastructure.

HyNet will involve projects developed by EET Hydrogen, a subsidiary of Indian conglomerate Essar, which is planning to bring a 350MW plant for hydrogen production from natural gas with CCS online by 2027 and another 700MW facility by 2028. The hydrogen will be partly used at EET Hydrogen's sister company EET Fuels at its 195,000 b/d Stanlow refinery but some will also be delivered to industrial consumers in the area. The HyNet cluster includes plans for 125km of new pipelines to transport hydrogen.

The East Coast cluster involves Equinor's [600MW H2H Saltend] project and BP's 160,000 t/yr H2Teesside venture. German utility Uniper's 720MW Humber H2ub (Blue) project, UK-based Kellas Midstream's 1GW H2NorthEast plant and a retrofit facility from BOC, which is part of industrial gas firm Linde, could also connect to the cluster for CO2 storage. All the projects are due to enter into operation before the end of this decade.

The funding confirmation for the CCS hubs "is a vital step forward, catapulting hydrogen towards long-term certainty we need in the UK", industry body the Hydrogen Energy Association's chief executive Celia Greaves said.

The previous government last year picked two "Track 2" carbon capture clusters that are scheduled to start operations by 2030 — the Acorn facility in Scotland and the Viking project in northeast England.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/11/11

Cop: Finance deal remains on the cards, despite Trump

Cop: Finance deal remains on the cards, despite Trump

Edinburgh, 11 November (Argus) — Donald Trump's victory in the US election could influence the tone of discussions at the UN Cop 29 climate talks that get under way in Baku, Azerbaijan, today. But world leaders can still agree on a new finance goal for developing countries that has the potential to shape the energy transition for years to come. Parties to the Paris deal this year need to decide on a new finance goal for developing nations — funded by developed nations — 15 years after the current $100bn/yr target was agreed. But negotiations could be "severely undermined" by Trump's victory, according to non-profit IISD's policy adviser, Natalie Jones. Trump pulled the US out of the Paris accords during his previous term in office and has said he will do so again. His election is "a blow in the fight against the climate crisis", admits France's former climate change envoy, Laurence Tubiana, although he insists that "a positive outcome is possible". Unlike in 2016, at Cop 22 in Marrakesh, Morocco, when the election of Trump came as a shock, parties have had time to plan, many observers noted. And the US could still play a role, while other countries take the lead. Developed and developing nations have grasped the urgency of agreeing on a new goal, observers say. "All parties have an interest in reaching an outcome," non-profit World Resources Institute director of international climate action David Waskow says. Technical talks earlier this year failed to progress on key issues, including the amount of finance to be provided and who will contribute. Developing countries called for a floor of at least $1 trillion/yr, but developed countries have yet to put a number forward. The idea of a layered goal with a public finance core gathered support at ministerial meetings last month. China, in June, refused to be drawn into discussions to broaden the contributor base. In October, it reiterated that the goal is an obligation for developed countries, but said other countries can provide support voluntarily, as stipulated in the Paris agreement. Baku is a pivotal summit since new finance will help support more ambitious climate plans in developing countries, which are to be submitted by 2025. And Cop 30 host Brazil could emerge as a broker to pave the way for a successful gathering next year. Brazil is also heading the G20 this year, with finance for developing nations and the reform of multilateral development banks a priority. All about the money In 2021, the IEA projected that emerging and developing economies' emissions would grow by 5 gigatonnes over the next two decades under current policies. "The NCQG [new collective quantified goal] will be a key enabler of the energy transition," civil society organisation Oil Change International's global policy lead, Romain Ioualalen, says, adding that commitments in Dubai last year — including transitioning away from fossil fuels — will not materialise without a finance deal. Also key for Cop 29 will be whether parties can agree rules to unlock carbon markets under article 6 of the Paris accord. There has been progress this year — including the article 6.4 supervisory body adopting standards on methodologies and greenhouse gas removal — even though discussions are moving too slowly. In Baku, the focus will largely remain on environmental integrity, double counting and the role of registries, with US and EU views differing here. And for article 6 talks, too, there is a risk that Trump's victory could slow the pace of progress, although International Emissions Trading Association president Dirk Forrister says he hopes that the Biden administration's negotiators will use what is left of their time "wisely" to advance work on carbon markets. "Progress this year on article 6 can help unleash more private investment to help countries strive for stronger NDCs," he said. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Cop: Brazil updates national climate plan


24/11/11
24/11/11

Cop: Brazil updates national climate plan

Baku, 11 November (Argus) — Brazil aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 67pc by 2035, compared with 2005 levels, under its updated nationally determined contribution (NDC) — climate plan. This represents an increase of 8 percentage points from the previous target of 59pc for the same period. The new target would allow emissions to total roughly 850mn-1.05bn t of CO2 equivalent (CO2e) by 2035, down from 2.4bn t in the baseline year of 2005. "The new goal represents a key step in promoting a new development model, through the implementation of initiatives such as the climate plan, and the ecological transformation plan, among others," the ministry of environment said ahead of the UN's Cop 29 climate summit in Baku, Azerbaijan. Brazil's emissions in 2023 reached 2.3bn t of CO2e, down from 2.6bn t of CO2e in 2022 , according to Brazilian climate think tank Observatoria do Clima. Emissions from the energy sector increased by 1.1pc, largely because of a rise in fossil fuel use for transport, according to the energy and environment institute (Iema), with transport emissions rising by 3.2pc to a record 224mn t of CO2e. This increase was driven by a 7pc rise in gasoline demand from the light-vehicle market and a 2pc increase in diesel demand for cargo transport. Signatories to the Paris Agreement have until February 2025 to announce their new emission goals under their NDCs. Brazil will host the UN's Cop 30 climate summit in Belem next year and is part of the Cop presidencies Troika, with the UAE and Azerbaijan — the Cop 28 and 29 hosts, respectively. The countries had signaled they would update their climate plans ahead of the February deadline. The UAE released its NDC last week . By Jacqueline Echevarria Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

California LCFS set for key decision Friday: Update


24/11/08
24/11/08

California LCFS set for key decision Friday: Update

Adds comments from meeting. Houston, 8 November (Argus) — Fuel producers today urged California regulators to preserve incentives in a newly uncertain market as residents asked them to start over with greater ambitions for a zero-emission future. California regulators may toughen carbon-slashing targets and raise hurdles for crop-based fuels to participate in North America's largest Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). On Friday California's Air Resources Board heard hours of final testimony on a rulemaking that has been underway for nearly a year — and on the verge of running out of time — to restore shrinking incentives in the state's program to decarbonize road fuels. The decision comes amid growing outcry over the cost of diversifying the state's fuel portfolio passed on to drivers. Choices made on incentives in the largest US renewable fuels and electric vehicle charging markets may offer some clarity to markets now roiled by uncertainty over the approach an incoming second Donald Trump administration will take. "The tools in our toolbox may become much more limited going forward," board chairwoman Liane Randolph said in opening remarks. "While we will do everything we can to protect our authority in California and our existing programs that we have to clean the air, we know that we must do all we can to use our existing state authority to bring clean fuels to California." Board consideration was not expected until late in the day. LCFS programs require yearly reductions to transportation fuel carbon intensity. Higher-carbon fuels that exceed the annual limit incur deficits that suppliers must offset with approved, lower-carbon alternatives. California's program has helped spur a rush of new renewable diesel production that quickly overwhelmed the deficits generated from petroleum gasoline and diesel use in the state. LCFS credits do not expire, and leftover credits available for future compliance grew to 29.1mn metric tonnes by July. The program generated 22.4mn deficits in all of 2023. Tougher targets on tap Board approval of amendments considered today would immediately toughen program targets for 2025 by 9pc. The one-year drop would nearly double reductions first proposed last year, and require cuts six times deeper than the typical year-to-year change in targets. Regulatory staff published models in April suggesting such a target could thin a smothering inventory of excess credits available for future compliance by 8.2mn — roughly a third of the available excess credits. Other proposals would take longer to begin. California would require new attestations about land use for crop-based feedstocks by 2026, shifting toward tougher verification requirements for such feedstocks by 2031. Regulators would limit credit generation for existing suppliers of biodiesel and renewable diesel made from soybean oil or canola oil credits to only 20pc of such fuels they supply to California by 2028. And CARB would begin phasing out outsized credit generation from renewable natural gas used in transportation in 2040, after locking-in incentives for current projects regardless of any regulations that would mandate methane reductions. The program has faced a late push of opposition from fuel suppliers and environmental critics highlighting costs to previously unaware drivers. The campaign inspired an unusual volume of public comment filings in October from residents focused on gasoline costs. Hours of public comment included numerous residents near dairies and other infrastructure critical of incentives that continued operations worsening their air quality, as well as environmental groups opposed to incentives not focused on electric transportation. "This proposal is simply not worthy of your vote," Earthjustice staff attorney Nina Robertson said. "It represents a grab bag of giveaways to polluting special interest that have turned what was once a program for climate progress into a piggy bank for their false climate solutions." But CARB faces a 5 January deadline to approve the proposals. Missing it would restart the regulatory process, which staff has said could take another two years to complete. Credits available for future compliance nearly tripled over the past two years. Renewable natural gas, electric vehicle and even biofuels groups wary of elements of the proposal have issued statements of support this week. "While there is always room for improvement, in our view, there's no reason to delay adoption of this proposal today," Neste US president Peter Zonneveld said. "There is no time to waste." Randolph has repeatedly defended the program in public appearances as the temperature on fuel costs concerns rose. Board member Dean Florez said ahead of the meeting that he would vote against the amendments, citing what he considered a lack of clearer information on potential cost and emissions impact. "The opacity has eroded confidence in our intentions and planning," Florez wrote in a guest editorial. CARB's choices will ripple across fuel supply strategies around the world. California used two thirds of the renewable diesel consumed in the US during the second quarter, and access to the market can determine feedstock margins. With immediate federal choices on biofuel tax incentives or possible feedstock sanctions uncertain, clarity on California's may offer suppliers one of the fuel planning footholds this year. By Elliott Blackburn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canada climate plans not equally at risk post-Trudeau


24/11/08
24/11/08

Canada climate plans not equally at risk post-Trudeau

Toronto, 8 November (Argus) — Canada's climate policies will be overhauled if prime minister Justin Trudeau loses an upcoming federal election, but the Conservative Party might not move to roll back all of the programs. Trudeau over nine years in office has pushed through a raft of carbon pricing policies, cracked down on provinces with insufficiently ambitious plans, and even started a global "challenge" to spur more jurisdictions to price emissions. But Canada's policies have exacerbated cost-of-living concerns at a time when voters across the world are punishing incumbents for inflation, and Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre has barnstormed the country with a pledge to "axe the tax." An election must happen no later than October 2025, and the ruling Liberals are down significantly in polls. "We are going to see change, significant change," said Lisa DeMarco, a senior partner at the law firm Resilient and a member of the International Emissions Trading Association board at the Canada Clean Fuels and Carbon Markets Summit in Toronto, Ontario, this week. What "axe the tax" might mean in practice is uncertain. Inevitable targets are the country's federal fuel charge, currently at C$80/t ($57.54/t) and set to gradually increase to C$170/t in 2030, and a recently proposed greenhouse gas emissions cap-and-trade program for upstream oil and gas producers. But other policies, especially those with industry support, could remain. The country's distinct system for taxing industrial emissions, which includes a federal output-based pricing system that functions as a performance standard, "will likely be untouched," said former Conservative leader Erin O'Toole. A point of debate at the conference was what Poilievre might do with the country's clean fuel regulations, which function similarly to California's long-running low-carbon fuel standard and have boosted biofuel usage in the country. The policy is "certainly not at the top of the list" of Conservative priorities, said Andy Brosnan, president of low-carbon fuels at environmental products marketer Anew Climate. But that does not mean it will escape scrutiny. Conservatives could tinker with the program or push through more muscular changes like excluding electric vehicles, said David Beaudoin, chief executive of the climate consultancy NEL-i. "We should expect that regulation will be maybe not dismantled but somehow changed, perhaps fundamentally," Beaudoin said. In the gap left by the federal government, provinces could make up the difference with their own climate programs, panelists agreed. Quebec for instance has a linked carbon market with California, and British Columbia has its own low-carbon fuel standard. But policymakers should heed the lessons of Trudeau's declining popularity and reorient how they approach climate policy, O'Toole argued. "Try to be minimally disruptive on economically vulnerable citizens," he said. "Try not to pit industry against industry or region of the country against region." By Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

California LCFS set for key decision Friday


24/11/08
24/11/08

California LCFS set for key decision Friday

Houston, 8 November (Argus) — Today California regulators will consider toughening carbon-slashing targets and raising hurdles for crop-based fuels to participate in North America's largest Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). California's Air Resources Board will weigh rulemaking underway for nearly a year — and on the verge of running out of time — to restore shrinking incentives in the state's program to decarbonize road fuels. The decision comes amid growing outcry over the cost of diversifying the state's fuel portfolio passed on to drivers. Choices made on incentives in the largest US renewable fuels and electric vehicle charging markets may offer some clarity to markets now roiled by uncertainty over the approach an incoming second Donald Trump administration will take. LCFS programs require yearly reductions to transportation fuel carbon intensity. Higher-carbon fuels that exceed the annual limit incur deficits that suppliers must offset with approved, lower-carbon alternatives. California's program has helped spur a rush of new renewable diesel production that quickly overwhelmed the deficits generated from petroleum gasoline and diesel use in the state. LCFS credits do not expire, and leftover credits available for future compliance grew to 29.1mn metric tonnes by July. The program generated 22.4mn deficits in all of 2023. Tougher targets on tap Board approval of amendments considered today would immediately toughen program targets for 2025 by 9pc. The one-year drop would nearly double reductions first proposed last year, and require cuts six times deeper than the typical year-to-year change in targets. Regulatory staff published models in April suggesting such a target could thin a smothering inventory of excess credits available for future compliance by 8.2mn — roughly a third of the available excess credits. Other proposals would take longer to begin. California would require new attestations about land use for crop-based feedstocks by 2026, shifting toward tougher verification requirements for such feedstocks by 2031. Regulators would limit credit generation for existing suppliers of biodiesel and renewable diesel made from soybean oil or canola oil credits to only 20pc of such fuels they supply to California by 2028. And CARB would begin phasing out outsized credit generation from renewable natural gas used in transportation in 2040, after locking-in incentives for current projects regardless of any regulations that would mandate methane reductions. The program has faced a late push of opposition from fuel suppliers and environmental critics highlighting costs to previously unaware drivers. The campaign inspired an unusual volume of public comment filings in October from residents focused on gasoline costs. But CARB faces a 5 January deadline to approve the proposals. Missing it would restart the regulatory process, which staff has said could take another two years to complete. Credits available for future compliance nearly tripled over the past two years. Renewable natural gas, electric vehicle and even biofuels groups wary of elements of the proposal have issued statements of support this week. Chairwoman Liane Randolph has repeatedly defended the program in public appearances as the temperature on fuel costs concerns rose. Targets must get tougher, she said earlier this year . She reiterated the need for the standard in response to media questions about the lack of information about potential cost increases. CARB's choices will ripple across fuel supply strategies around the world. California used two thirds of the renewable diesel consumed in the US during the second quarter, and access to the market can determine feedstock margins. With immediate federal choices on biofuel tax incentives or possible feedstock sanctions uncertain, clarity on California's may offer suppliers one of the fuel planning footholds this year. By Elliott Blackburn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more