Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Q&A: Chevron sees global exploration revival

  • : Crude oil, Natural gas
  • 24/11/18

US major Chevron and its peers are taking a more prominent role in global frontier exploration as they push for scale and value in oil and gas output in the face of an uncertain energy transition. Chevron vice-president of global exploration Liz Schwarze spoke to Aydin Calik at the African Energy Week conference in Cape Town, South Africa, earlier this month, Edited highlights follow:

How much of a role do you think exploration will play for Chevron and the wider sector in the next 10 years?

We believe the future of energy is lower carbon, and we're leveraging our strengths to grow energy delivery to an energy-hungry world. We see oil and gas being part of the energy mix for longer, investing to reduce the carbon intensity of our existing operations. Growing our oil and gas for longer, because it's a declining business — as you produce it, you have to replace it.

We replace our resources to underpin our future in three ways. Exploration is one; M&A, buying other companies, is another; and then technology is the third. So think in terms of shale and tight development in the US, with drilling and completions technologies; and the Anchor technology, bringing on the world's first 20k [20,000 lb/inch², ultra-high pressure deepwater] production platform in the Gulf of Mexico. That's technology. It's a new development, but it will help in the long term.

For exploration, at Chevron, we invest in exploring in our existing assets — if we can find new oil and gas pools that we can tie into existing infrastructure, it's a win... it comes on faster, creates a lot of value, leverages existing infrastructure — but we're [also] increasing our investment in more frontier areas, where we can build big, material positions at scale, early and if successful, really build new businesses. That's what you see us doing in places we've added acreage recently, like Brazil and Uruguay. We have the block in Namibia, we're going to drill, and we're in Egypt and so forth. So exploration is a very important part of Chevron's future, and because it's a bit of a long-cycle game, yes, for exploration, 10 years is an easy horizon.

And do you think things might change in terms of what you're exploring for — more oil, more gas?

Oil is relatively straightforward to get to markets, because there's a global market for liquids. If we're going to explore for gas, it'll be in a place that has either an existing market or existing assets to market, for the most part. Sometimes you explore for oil and you find gas. Sometimes search for gas and you find oil — because it's model based particularly in these frontier areas. So, you know, whatever mix we find we have to look at the development scenario for that, so that we can bring as much of that product to market with the highest returns possible for our shareholders.

What are the biggest challenges for explorers today?

We'll focus on the frontier first. Chevron looks at entering a new country or a new basin for exploration, really looking for four things to be there. First, of course, are the rocks — a compelling hypothesis that there are hydrocarbons at commercial scale. Second is a supportive fiscal environment, with which, upon discovery, you'd have the opportunity to create value for everyone. The third is access — the country has to offer a way for an operator like Chevron to enter, whether that's through a competitive bid round or through a direct negotiation; we'll also do farm-ins to other people's acreage. And regular access. That hypothesis of where hydrocarbons are can change through time. Having regular, predictable opportunities to access acreage is important, and it is sometimes a challenge. Some countries have opportunities for a while, and then they'll take things off the market, and then you don't really have another way to invest, and that creates a challenge. And then the fourth consideration is just the overall welcomeness for us to deliver the work programme that we commit to — functioning governmental organisations, all the way from environmental to operational permitting.

Where is the most exciting place to explore at the moment? Are there any new Namibias around the corner?

I hope so! Everywhere we enter, we have a story. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't work. But we've got a well drilling in in Egypt now, so west of the Nile in the Herodotus basin — it's called the Khendjer well. So Egypt, we're excited. Namibia, it's the hot story of the past few years. In the Orange basin, we're in PEL90, and that well will start notionally [on a] December timeframe. Think of a big deepwater exploration well. Think of 90 days as an average. [We are] really very keen to see what our block holds. Certainly, high hopes.

And then we've added new acreage in Brazil, the South Santos and the Pelotas basin, we signed a block last week in Uruguay. And so, you know, some of that geology is what we call conjugate margin in Namibia.

And Angola and Nigeria. There are places in the world that are very successful hydrocarbon provinces that are still under explored and we think have a tremendous potential. And Nigeria deepwater is one. We had a lovely discovery on the Nigeria shelf a few weeks ago — the Meji well. And then we added two blocks in Angola earlier this year, deepwater.

I'm getting a sense, not just from Chevron, that exploration around the world is picking up?

I think this is true across the board. And one of the reasons that you explore is the idea that there's likely a further advantaged barrel relative to some of the existing discoveries. So there are a lot of stranded discoveries — either cost-prohibitive, geopolitically challenged, any number of issues that prevent some of the really big discoveries around the world from coming to market. From an exploration standpoint, if you are able to discover at scale, develop that and then bring it to market, it will be lower in the supply stack from a breakeven perspective. And lower carbon intensity as well from the get go, and it will find a place in the market.

On Namibia, what we have heard from some other operators is high gas content. This might make it more challenging. Have you thought about that?

So when we're thinking about entering a new basin, and then when we're thinking about drilling the well, before we make those investments, we're always thinking about what the development scenario might look like. Because we've got to test that development scenario against our range of resource outcomes and test, you know, whether it's going to be economically viable. Or how would we make it economically viable?

So for Namibia, we have considered, what would you do at various gas contents? The first, simplest, development is that you bring your production flow to your FPSO, compress the gas and reinject it. You can do that, given the resource volumes at a commercial outcome, Over time, I think it'll be interesting to see if there's a broader-basin scale gas solution that comes to bear, whether that's pipe to shore or LNG. It depends on the GOR [gas-oil ratio] and then it'll depend upon the gas terms that the government provides.

In the eastern Mediterranean, is Egypt your main exploration prospect?

Our focus is Egypt for exploration. When we go into an area like Egypt, we try to pick something at scale, and then high-grade from there. And so you relinquish the leases that, with additional data, don't look as prospective as the other ones. Right now, our focus is on block four. We're going to drill, and then we're also in [a block] north of that, that someone else operates on our behalf, and we have a minority interest.

What about Algeria and its shale potential? To what extent do you think you'll be able exploit those resources? And will you be signing something soon?

Chevron has been in conversations with the ministry, upstream regulator Alnaft and Sonatrach since 2020. We signed MOUs, that was in the news. And then the big milestone was 13 June of this year, where we aligned on two areas of interest. And we signed heads of agreement to negotiate Chevron's entry into these two areas of interest. And so that's ongoing now, and that's all I can say about that. We have two areas, one in the Ahnet and one in the Berkine, and seeing if there's a negotiated agreement that would have Chevron enter the country, working with Sontrach to explore and develop those.

Algeria is, again, one of these very hydrocarbon-rich countries in Africa. A tremendous gas resource. So we think it's a really strategic opportunity for Chevron, if we can get to a negotiated agreement that's amenable to both parties. You know, significant resources in an existing, vibrant oil and gas sector, access to markets through pipelines and LNG for the gas. And so we believe at Chevron that we can bring our global experience, and in particular our shale and tight expertise to bear in Algeria. To help them explore and ultimately develop.

But you think you can do shale development there?

Yes. I mean, the first piece would be exploration, right? So, you know, even in shale and tight, the molecules are there, or you're fairly confident the molecules are there. It's just, are the molecules producible at a commercial scale? And so that's always the first phase — you drill some pilots, look at your flow back, then optimise. And we believe everything that we do in the Permian is potentially applicable, especially from a factory perspective, right? And then the challenges are going to be things like supply chain.

How much more exploration potential is there left in the Gulf of Mexico? Would you say, is it mature, or is it still much to play for?

The Gulf of Mexico tends to reinvent itself. So we still see plenty of potential there. What's going on in the Gulf of Mexico right now are two critical technologies. One is on the geophysics side — ocean bottom node acquisition for exploration, which is giving us much better images of very complicated geology. That's a critical technology evolution. And we believe that that will help discern between prospects — point the way of where not to drill, and where maybe to drill. And then the other one is, of course, the Anchor platform, which is the world's first 20k. We are currently the only operator in the world that's operating a 20k field, and so I don't know where that technology would be applicable globally yet. But you know what we see? You've got to build the technology, you put it on production, and then you realise, oh, okay, now I can use this to really unlock some other areas. Still pretty, pretty excited about the Gulf of Mexico.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/07/15

Trump touts $92bn in investments in AI, energy

Trump touts $92bn in investments in AI, energy

Washington, 15 July (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today his administration would fast-track permitting and take other steps to support billions of dollars in recently announced investments in Pennsylvania tied to artificial intelligence and energy production. Trump said an estimated $92bn in investments announced Tuesday would ensure the future will be "designed, built and made right here in Pennsylvania." The investments include data centers to support artificial intelligence, gas-fired power plants, nuclear power plants, pipeline upgrades, and natural gas supply agreements, although many of the projects announced appear to be early in development. "We're building a future where American workers will forge the steel, produce the energy, build the factories," Trump said at the Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon University. Among the projects are plans to invest billions of dollars on the redevelopment of retired coal plants into sites that would host new gas-fired plants that would be co-located with data centers. Technology firms hope that developing data centers next to power plants will sidestep the years-long wait that would be required to upgrade the grid to supply their facilities with electricity. "You're going to build your own electric factory, and you're gonna make your own electricity," Trump said. "You can sell it back into the grid, you'll even make money from the electric business." Those projects include a plan by the firm Frontier Group to develop the site of the retired 2.7GW Bruce Mansfield coal plant into a "significantly larger" gas plant that would also host a "prospective" data center. Investment firm Knighthead Capital Management said it plans to repurpose the retired Homer City coal-fired power plant into a data center that will include 4.4GW in gas-fired power generation. Other projects will upgrade existing power plants. The firm Capital Power said it will spend $3bn over the next decade to expand a gas plant in Shamokin Dam, Pennsylvania. Google said it has reached a $3bn agreement for electricity from two hydropower facilities in Pennsylvania. Constellation Energy said it was investing $2.4bn to upgrade its Limerick nuclear power plant. Trump said he was directing his administration to issue permits quickly for power plants proposed to supply electricity for data centers, with an apparent joke that the world's largest power plant would obtain environmental permits in "about a week" and about two weeks for nuclear plants. "These are permits that would have taken you literally 10 years to get," Trump said. "It's crazy all over the country, but we're freeing it up." The Trump administration has argued that making the US the leader in AI is one of its highest priorities. US interior secretary Doug Burgum said the administration determined early on that "losing the AI arms race" to China would be an "existential threat" such that it justified a declaration of an "energy emergency" to increase domestic energy production. "Energy dominance means prosperity at home, it means peace abroad, it's how we end wars, it's how we build and advance every industry we have," Burgum said. The administration has cited its support for AI to justify slowing the development of wind and solar projects they see as incompatible with the industry's demand for baseload power. Trump said wind "doesn't work" for data centers, and Burgum said he was "completely opposed to having unreliable, unaffordable intermittent energy as our future." Other administration officials have touted efforts to build more fossil fuel infrastructure. "This administration, we're going to make it much, much easier to build new power plants, new infrastructure, even transmission lines, natural gas pipelines," US energy secretary Chris Wright said during an interview with CNBC on the sidelines of the summit. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump to limit US weapon use by Ukraine


25/07/15
25/07/15

Trump to limit US weapon use by Ukraine

Washington, 15 July (Argus) — President Donald Trump's change of position on continued US weapons supply to Ukraine has revived a dilemma his predecessor had to consider: whether to place limits on Kyiv's ability to carry out strikes deep inside Russia's territory. Trump on Monday approved a plan to continue supplying US weapons to Ukraine, which will be financed by contributions from the EU and other NATO members. But he told reporters Tuesday that he is not considering providing long-range missiles to Ukraine and said that Kyiv "shouldn't target Moscow" with US weapons. The range of western-supplied missiles is well short of the distance from the Ukraine-Russia border to Moscow. Former president Joe Biden's administration last year gave authorization to Kyiv to use western weapons against targets in Russian regions bordering northeast Ukraine and against military targets beyond the Russian-Ukrainian border. Other NATO members also have removed most restrictions on use of their weapons. The Biden administration warned Kyiv against attacks on Russian energy infrastructure. But Ukraine used its own military drones to target Russia's sprawling oil infrastructure last year, causing some disruptions but barely affecting the exports of Russian crude and refined products. Few such attacks have taken place this year, but Washington-based experts attribute that to a change in Ukrainian military tactics, which now target air fields, weapons depots and command centers instead of Russian energy infrastructure. Trump on Monday said he would impose "secondary tariffs" on Russia — meaning penalties for countries buying Russian oil and other products — unless Moscow takes steps in the next 50 days to stop its war in Ukraine. "At the end of 50 days, if we don't have a deal, it's going to be too bad," Trump said Tuesday. "The tariffs are going to go on and other sanctions." The Kremlin has had a restrained reaction to Trump's threat, saying "we certainly need time to analyze what was said in Washington" and advising to wait for President Vladimir Putin to respond directly. "We want to understand what the statement about '50 days' means," Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said on Tuesday. "We previously heard of '24 hours' and '100 days'", Lavrov said, likely referencing Trump's vow to stop the fighting in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office, subsequently amended by the White House to a pledge to stop the war in Ukraine within 100 days into his second term. The White House on 25 March announced that Moscow and Kyiv had agreed to implement the "energy ceasefire", but the Kremlin immediately attached new conditions to the agreement and continued attacks on civilian energy infrastructure in Ukraine. Trump in late March promised to impose a 25pc "secondary tariff" on Russian oil sales if the energy ceasefire deal failed. On 27 May, he gave Putin a two week deadline to make progress in peace talks with Ukraine. The Trump administration so far has refrained from imposing additional sanctions against Moscow and even exempted Russia from punitive tariffs imposed on nearly every US trading partner in April. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US claims energy-focused Indonesia trade deal


25/07/15
25/07/15

US claims energy-focused Indonesia trade deal

Washington, 15 July (Argus) — President Donald Trump said today he has secured a trade deal with Indonesia that would involve additional sales of US energy and agricultural commodities and Boeing aircraft. The deal, which Jakarta has yet to confirm, would commit Indonesia to buying $15bn worth of US energy commodities, $4.5bn of agricultural products and 50 Boeing aircraft, Trump said via his social media platform. Speaking to reporters earlier on Tuesday, Trump said the US, under the deal, would impose a 19pc tariff on all imports from Indonesia while that country would impose no tariffs on US products. Trump said he finalized the trade deal after speaking with Indonesia's "Highly Respected President" Prabowo Subianto Tuesday morning. Prabowo has just concluded a trade deal with the EU, which would result in mutual lowering of tariffs on trade. No other details on the US-Indonesia deal were immediately available from the White House and US trade agencies. Trump last week threatened to impose a 32pc tariff on all imports from Indonesia, beginning on 1 August. Indonesia's government has already directed state-owned Pertamina to assess the potential for importing refined products from the US. That directive coincided with a parallel push by Pertamina to shift away from importing oil products from Singapore and import more fuel from the Middle East and the US. The Trump administration since 5 April has been charging a 10pc extra "Liberation Day" tariff on most imports — energy commodities and critical minerals are exceptions — from Indonesia and nearly every foreign trade partner. Trump last week publicized letters sent to leaders of 24 countries, including Indonesia, dictating new, higher tariff rates he said would apply beginning on 1 August. The Trump White House said in April it expected to sign "90 deals in 90 days" following his "Liberation Day" tariffs. The US has clinched only one limited trade deal, which keeps in place a 10pc tariff on US imports from the UK while granting a lower-tariff import quota for UK-made cars. Trump has announced a deal with Vietnam, setting tariffs at 20pc, but other terms remain unknown. A preliminary trade deal with China, agreed in early May, established a separate 10 August deadline for reaching an agreement on tariffs. The US administration is engaged in talks with the EU, Canada and Mexico despite Trump's threats to raise tariffs on imports from those destinations to 30-35pc. Brazil, on the other hand, said it would reciprocate with higher tariffs on US products after Trump threatened to impose a 50pc tariff on imports from Brazil. Trump has justified imposing his "Liberation Day" tariffs by citing an economic emergency caused by allegedly unfair trade practices in foreign countries. His emergency-based tariff authority is facing challenges in US courts, with two lower-level courts ruling already in May that the White House could not impose such tariffs. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold a hearing on 31 July in a case pitting the administration against a group of plaintiffs, including many US states. The US Court of International Trade, in an initial ruling on 28 May, found that Trump's emergency tariffs were unlawful and ordered the administration to rescind the import taxes and to refund already collected duties. The appeals court has suspended that decision until at least the 31 July hearing. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Alt-fuel ship orders fall in 1H25: DNV


25/07/15
25/07/15

Alt-fuel ship orders fall in 1H25: DNV

Sao Paulo, 15 July (Argus) — Ship orders for new alternative-fuelled vessels fell to 151 in the first half of 2025 compared with 179 a year earlier, according to Norway-based classification agency DNV. These orders represented 19.8mn gross tonnes, up by 78pc from the same period in 2024. LNG-fuelled vessels accounted for 87 of the new orders in the first half, followed by 40 methanol-fuelled ships, 17 LPG-powered vessels, and four hydrogen and three ammonia-fuelled ships. Orders stood at 19 in June, up from 16 in May, with two of these LPG-fuelled carriers. The total fleet of ships that could run on LPG stood at just over 150 in the final quarter of last year , with around 126 on order by 2028 following the latest additions, as orders lag other fuel types despite low prices because of safety issues and a lack of four-stroke engines. New orders, 1H 2025 Fuel Number of vessels LNG-fueled 87 Methanol-fueled 40 LPG-fueled 17 Hydrogen-fueled 4 Ammonia-fueled 3 DNV Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Opec+ 8 speed up output hike to 548,000 b/d for August


25/07/15
25/07/15

Opec+ 8 speed up output hike to 548,000 b/d for August

London, 15 July (Argus) — A group of eight Opec+ members have agreed to further speed up their plan to increase crude production, the Opec secretariat said on 5 July. Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Russia, the UAE, Algeria, Oman and Kazakhstan will raise their collective crude production target by 548,000 b/d in August, relative to July. This compares with previous month-on-month hikes of 411,000 b/d for May, June and July. This pace is also four times faster than the eight's original plan to unwind 2.2mn b/d of voluntary crude production cuts at a rate of 137,000 b/d each month between April 2025 and September 2026. The decision means they will have restored almost 80pc of a scheduled 2.46mn b/d increase — which includes a 300,000 b/d capacity-related adjustment for the UAE — in just five months. Should the eight opt for another 548,000 b/d increase for September, they will have fully unwound the cuts 12 months earlier than planned. That would shift focus to a second layer of voluntary cuts totalling 1.66mn b/d that is being implemented by the same eight producers plus Gabon, which are scheduled to remain in place until the end of 2026. The move comes against a backdrop of continued economic uncertainty, largely driven by US trade policy and a rise in geopolitical risk owing to the recent 12-day Israel-Iran war. Supply fears linked to the conflict helped push front-month Brent futures to above $81/bl on 23 June, although prices have since fallen back to around $68/bl — below where many producers prefer. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more