Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Q&A: Suburban's renewable quest continues

  • : Hydrogen, LPG, Natural gas
  • 25/06/17

US LPG distributor Suburban Propane was the first company to sell a propane-renewable DME (rDME) blend in California in 2022. The company has also pioneered sales of biopropane in the US and has since expanded into renewable natural gas (RNG) — also called biomethane — and hydrogen. Argus spoke with Suburban's vice-president of renewable energy, Douglas Dagan, about the push into renewables and the challenges ahead:

Could you provide an update on Suburban's renewable DME sales?

We continue to have a strategic partnership with Oberon Fuels, which produces rDME in the US. We are the only commercial seller of a propane-rDME blend — right now we sell to all of our forklift truck and autogas customers from our Anaheim, California, location. The product is a true drop-in replacement that can be used in all propane applications. The blend ratio is currently small, but we are testing higher percentages to determine the maximum drop-in blend level. We received an exemption from the California Air Resources Board [CARB] to run a pilot testing higher blend levels in vehicles.

What is the current blend ratio and what is the maximum you are looking at?

Our commercial blend is 4pc rDME. This ensures no issues as a drop-in replacement. We want to get to a 10pc maximum, but we've done a lot of testing and are delivering at 4pc in the Anaheim market. We are confident there are no issues on the customer side when a 4pc blend is used in an engine. Now we're looking to assess higher blend percentages. Getting CARB pilot approval was the first step.

Why has the maximum fallen from previous estimates of 20pc and then 12pc?

RDME has a lot of potential, but it's more challenging than anticipated. We started testing before the World Liquid Gas Association [WLGA] did. The belief was you could blend up to 20pc and everything would work. It turns out it's more like 10pc — lower than hoped — which means environmental benefits don't scale as fast. You have to ensure no issues arise from the oxygen content in DME, such as seal degradation causing leaks. There must be a high degree of confidence. On the supply side, different blend ratios require dedicated tanks and infrastructure — you can't switch between 4pc and 20pc easily — so it's very costly to have more than one blend.

What are the latest in terms of your renewable propane sales?

We are rapidly scaling — we've sold over 1mn USG [1,900t] of renewable propane in California, where we primarily offer renewable propane. Several programmes support renewable propane, but California credits are the most lucrative. We will sell outside California and are exploring expansion. The biggest challenge is availability. Many producers don't yet see value in separating renewable propane from the stream — it's a by-product, from renewable diesel or sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) production. We're building relationships to say: we have demand, and we'll pay. We just need more of it.

How does Donald Trump's presidency and the resulting pressures on the regulatory environment for the energy transition affect Suburban's renewable plans?

I think the Trump administration is supportive of what we're doing. It has different priorities from the Biden administration, but we still see support at both state and federal levels for our traditional product. On the renewable side, we're developing drop-in renewable propane, as well as RNG and clean hydrogen. There's support for all three. A Trump priority is domestic industry, and our plans are heavily domestic. Every administration brings new challenges. Lack of certainty is the biggest — knowing future policies is hard. Luckily we have a traditional product and a renewable platform that have support from both parties and we think the outlook for the future is good regardless of which party is in control.

Can you explain why the carbon intensity (CI) metric could be an important tool for policy makers?

It's a critical metric, though a bit technical. Policy makers deal with many issues — energy is just one. But the more people understand CI, the better the decisions. The CI scale, developed by Argonne National Lab, is a full life-cycle emissions calculation, covering production and use. Electric vehicles [EVs] are often seen as cleanest, but not always. CI reveals this — the lower the better. For example, if the electricity grid is dirtier than gasoline, switching to EVs worsens emissions. In most US states, the grid is dirtier than traditional propane. Gasoline and diesel score about 100, traditional propane around 80, and renewable propane 20-40.

Suburban is moving into hydrogen and RNG. Is this a diversification strategy or do they somehow complement the core LPG business?

We have a large RNG facility in Arizona using dairy manure and co-feed from organic waste. We can produce 1,000–1,500mn Btu/d of RNG sent via pipeline to California for engine fuel. Its CI score is a little better than minus 350 — phenomenally clean. We're building a new facility in upstate New York, and upgrading one in Columbus, Ohio, that uses food and organic waste. We're also evaluating other RNG opportunities. But we're also growing our LPG business. RNG is a great product — and part of a strategic platform. Digesters make biogas, which becomes RNG. But raw biogas can also be used to make rDME and renewable propane. And RNG can make clean hydrogen — or rDME/renewable propane that can be transported and reformed into clean hydrogen on site. These are all interconnected.

Will the company retain its core focus as a propane supplier?

Yes. Propane is a unique energy source that will remain critical. Many customers are in areas where large-scale grid decarbonisation isn't feasible, so propane as distributed energy is vital. [And] more extreme weather events take down grids. Propane is resilient — useful for heating, cooking and generating electrons to power EVs where the grid can't meet demand. If emergency EVs run on electricity and the grid fails, you need another way to generate electrons. [So, propane has a lasting role.]

Have Suburban's traditional propane sales been pressured by warmer winters?

Winter 2024–25 was much colder than the record-warm winter a year earlier, which had lowered demand. This winter, heating demand climbed and sales increased. But our strategy doesn't rely on cold weather. We're growing non-weather-related demand via traditional and renewable platforms — especially for engines and back-up power. Our goal is to grow both platforms and deploy capital for the greatest returns.

What are your hopes for the rest of this year for the renewables business?

We plan to keep growing RNG production. Output is rising at our Stanfield [Arizona] facility and the other two mentioned. We're also exploring hydrogen opportunities and expect that segment to grow. For renewable propane and DME, we've seen tremendous recent growth — especially in renewable propane. We're pursuing more supply and new markets outside California. Reaching 1mn USG in sales was a big milestone — and we want to keep building on that this year.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/07/11

Brazil advances oil, gas decarbonization strategy

Brazil advances oil, gas decarbonization strategy

Sao Paulo, 11 July (Argus) — Brazil is implementing a roadmap to increase crude output without boosting net emissions from the sector, a key argument for its claim to leadership on climate issues ahead of the Cop 30 UN summit. Although Brazil does not plan to phase out fossil fuel use, it is working to reach net zero emissions by 2050, and slashing greenhouse gases from its hydrocarbons production is part of this strategy. Brazil's oil industry already has a carbon footprint at 14.88kg CO2 equivalent (C02e)/bl of oil equivalent (boe), which is well below the global average of 20kg CO2e/boe, according to the hydrocarbons regulator ANP. But with oil and gas production slated to increase steadily over the next decade, Brazil's government and producers are eyeing a range of options to further slash emissions. "Brazil can double oil output without increasing net emissions by employing existing technologies," Heloisa Borges, the director of oil, gas and biofuels at the government energy planning and research agency (Epe) said. As part of these efforts, the government called on Epe, ANP and state-owned company Pre-Sal Petroleo to present a roadmap to decarbonize the sector. The plan presented in late June outlines options including adopting new technologies and expanding existing emissions reductions techniques, such as leak detection and reducing flaring. "Expanding methane capture not only reduces emissions, but it allows companies to use this gas to substitute other fuels, such as diesel in their operations," Borges said. Other fuel substitution operations include using natural gas as fuel for drilling rigs and electrification of production operations, the study said. State-controlled Petrobras is already advancing its decarbonization strategy. The company's most recent five-year plan earmarks R5.3bn ($950mn) for emissions reductions in its operations as well as $1bn for research and development of new technologies. Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) is a key element, according to Lilian Melo, executive director of the Petrobras' research, development and innovation center Cenpes. The company uses high-pressure separation technology to remove CO2 from oil at the mouth of a reservoir and inject it back into the reservoir after the fluids are separated. This technology significantly reduces emissions, especially because crude produced from pre-salt blocks has high CO2 content, Melo said. The CCUS is used on 23 of Petrobras' offshore platforms in the pre-salt. Petrobras is also working to expand electrification of its on and offshore platforms. Power generation is responsible for 65pc of Petrobras' production-related emissions, according to Melo. The company announced this week a contract with Hitachi Energy to assess electrification of its offshore oil operations. Catch and keep Other oil producers are working to reduce the carbon footprint of their operations, including Eneva, which is also weighing investments in carbon capture and storage. The company is conducting a preliminary study to assess the technical viability of injecting CO2 into fields in the Parnaiba basin in Maranhao state. The Gaviao Real field has been operating for more than 10 years and is expected to become depleted in coming years, when it could potentially be converted to store CO2. Eneva is also weighing investments in carbon storage in the Parana basin, where the company has four exploratory blocks. Preliminary seismic data indicates that these blocks also have salt caverns and the company believes that there is significant potential to offer carbon storage to ethanol mills in areas adjacent to the blocks. Despite Brazil's ambitious emissions reduction plan, it has no intention of pulling back on exploration and production. With few exceptions, the Brazilian government is aligned on developing oil and gas reserves to boost economic growth and energy security and holds that the aim does not hurt its role in climate leadership. Brazil's energy sector GHG emissions mn t CO2e Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Canada focuses on new US deadline, diversifying trade


25/07/11
25/07/11

Canada focuses on new US deadline, diversifying trade

Calgary, 11 July (Argus) — Canadian prime minister Mark Carney reiterated his plan to diversify trade with countries "throughout the world" following another round of tariff threats, and another deadline, from US president Donald Trump. Carney's comments on social media late on 10 July came hours after Trump said Canada could expect a 35pc tariff on all imports , effective 1 August, repeating earlier claims that the northern country was not doing enough to stop fentanyl from crossing into the US. Canada has said these claims are bogus but in late-2024 still committed to spending $900bn (C$1.3bn) on border security measures over six years. "Canada has made vital progress to stop the source of fentanyl in North America," Carney wrote on X. The prime minister said he is now working to strike a new trade deal before the 1 August deadline. Trump and Carney last month agreed they would work toward a broad trade agreement by mid-July, with Canada at the time targeting 21 July to finalize a deal. The 35pc tariff would be separate from tariffs set for specific sectors, which include a 50pc tariff on copper imports. It is not clear if any imports currently covered by the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement (USMCA) would be affected by Trump's latest tariff threats. Carney has advocated the need to shore up trade partnerships with "reliable" countries since being sworn is as prime minister in March, saying the old relationship with the US "is over". The energy-rich nation needs to build more infrastructure to unlock this potential, and with a surge in public support, is trying to entice developers with a new law to fast-track project approvals . But those are multi-year efforts and Canada is still trying to reach a deal with the US to keep goods moving smoothly. The two economies are highly integrated with $762bn worth of goods crossing the US-Canada border in 2024, according to the Office of the US Trade Representative. Canada on 29 June rescinded a digital sales tax (DST) that would have collected revenue from the US' largest tech companies, after US secretary of commerce Howard Lutnick said the tax could have been a deal breaker in trade negotiations. That show of good faith — which seemingly got nothing in return — was criticized within Canada and contrary to Carney's repeated "elbows up" mantra in the face of Trump's threats. By Brett Holmes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump threatens 35pc tariff on Canada by 1 August


25/07/11
25/07/11

Trump threatens 35pc tariff on Canada by 1 August

Houston, 10 July (Argus) — The US will impose a 35pc tariff on all imports from Canada effective on 1 August, President Donald Trump said in a letter to Canadian prime minister Mark Carney. The 10 July letter that Trump posted on social media late Thursday noted that Canada previously planned retaliatory tariffs in response to the US' first tariff threats in the spring. He repeated his earliest justification for the tariffs - the illegal smuggling of fentanyl into the US from Canada - and said he would consider "an adjustment" to the tariffs if Canada worked with him to stop that flow. The 35pc tariff would be separate from tariffs set for specific sectors, which include a 50pc tariff on copper imports . It is not clear if any imports currently covered by the US-Mexico- Canada trade agreement (USMCA) would be affected by the new tariff threats. The Trump administration since 5 April has been charging a 10pc extra "Liberation Day" tariff on most imports — energy commodities and critical minerals are exceptions — from nearly every foreign trade partner. Trump on 9 April imposed even higher tariffs on key trading partners, only to delay them the same day until 9 July. On 7 July, Trump signed an executive order further delaying the implementation of higher rates until 12:01am ET (04:01 GMT) on 1 August. Earlier this week he threatened 50pc tariffs against Brazil for its ongoing criminal prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EQT to report $720mn gain on gas derivatives


25/07/10
25/07/10

EQT to report $720mn gain on gas derivatives

New York, 10 July (Argus) — US natural gas producer EQT expects to report a $720mn gain on its derivative contracts for the second quarter of 2025, more than wiping out the $679mn derivatives loss it reported in the first quarter, the company said Thursday in a regulatory filing. EQT, the second-largest US gas producer by volume, as of 16 April had 3.7 Bcf/d of its second-quarter gas output covered by derivatives, according to a financial disclosure on its website. This is equivalent to more than half of its total production capacity. Prices for those volumes appear to have been locked in before 19 July 2024, as the company had 3.7 Bcf/d hedged by that date. The derivatives gain reflects a drop in US gas prices in recent months as resilient production flipped US gas inventories from undersupply at the end of winter to oversupply in recent months. US gas inventories at the end of February were at a 224 Bcf deficit to the five-year average, according to the US Energy Information Administration. After a string of weekly storage reports showing very large net injections into storage, suggesting producers had returned wells to production that had previously been sidelined by last year's lower prices, inventories last week were at a 173 Bcf surplus, or 6.1pc higher than the five-year average. EQT plans to hedge less of its output going forward, in part because it has increased the amount of gas it can move to consumers outside of its core operating area in Appalachia, where gas prices are comparatively low. The company would need to have "conviction" on its US gas price outlook for it to raise its hedged volumes to even 50pc, which would be "a limit," EQT chief executive told Argus in an interview in June. EQT lost about $8bn on derivatives in the 2020-2022 period, in part from a US gas price spike in 2022 which EQT and other producers were not fully able to exploit as they had already locked in sales at lower prices. EQT plans to release full first-quarter financial results after US market close on 22 July. EQT reported a $242mn profit in 2024, down from $1.74bn in 2023. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Q&A: Titan on the future of LNG and bio-LNG bunkering


25/07/10
25/07/10

Q&A: Titan on the future of LNG and bio-LNG bunkering

London, 10 July (Argus) — Titan is a leading supplier of LNG and bio-LNG as a bunker fuel, mostly supplying volumes in northwest Europe. Argus spoke to Titan's commercial director, Michael Schaap, about the future of LNG and bio-LNG bunkering. How has the demand for LNG as a marine fuel evolved over the past year, and what factors are driving this growth besides FuelEU Maritime? Demand for LNG as a marine fuel has grown significantly over the past year, driven not only by regulatory developments like FuelEU Maritime but also by the growth of the LNG dual-fuel fleet. According to DNV's Alternative Fuels Insights platform, 642 LNG-powered vessels are currently in operation, excluding LNG carriers. Of these, 169 were delivered in 2024, setting a record. The growth in demand is expected to continue — 264 new orders for LNG-fuelled vessels were placed in 2024, also a record and more than double the number of orders placed in 2023. Essentially, the total addressable market for LNG pathway fuels in 2028 will be enormous. The LNG pathway uses LNG (and its established infrastructure), bio-LNG and e-methane (derived from renewable hydrogen). All of these fuels can be blended at any ratio and ‘dropped into' infrastructure and vessels with little to no modification required. It is increasingly recognised as a practical route to take the shipping industry to net zero greenhouse gas emissions. What are the current challenges in scaling LNG bunkering infrastructure to meet the needs of the growing fleet of LNG dual-fuel vessels? A key challenge is ensuring timely investment in bunkering infrastructure to keep pace with the growing number of LNG-fuelled vessels. Take LNG bunkering vessels, for example. According to the DNV, about 64 LNG bunkering vessels are in operation worldwide today, with a further 16 on order. While this far exceeds other alternative fuels, continued investment and expansion will be important. To maintain safe, timely and efficient LNG deliveries that meet demand, it is also important to maintain a suitable number of LNG loading slots. The increased demand for LNG and bio-LNG could alter the dynamics between buyers and sellers in the market. The spot market may become more challenging and expensive for shipowners and operators going forwards. As a result, those that can plan should book capacity well in advance and sign long-term offtake agreements. A good balance of pre-booked business also allows suppliers to reinvest in infrastructure such as bunkering vessels, shifting the market back towards the buyers. Where is Titan looking to expand — beyond northwest Europe? Titan supplies and bunkers LNG and increasingly bio-LNG around the world, partnering with local companies to support if needed. Titan's base, the Zara (Zeebrugge, Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Antwerp) region, is a key hub for LNG, bio-LNG and in the future, e-methane bunkering, and this is not expected to change. Having said this, the Mediterranean is recognised as a key strategic market for expansion. The Mediterranean became an Emission Control Area (ECA) on 1 May, so we expect this to escalate the need for LNG and bio-LNG in the region. Compared with heavy fuel oil, LNG pathway fuels can reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 80pc and almost eliminate sulphur oxide and particulate matter emissions, offering ECA compliance. How is Titan positioning itself to meet the expected boom in bio-LNG demand growth over the coming years and decades? Titan is leading the way in supplying bio-LNG. We have been bunkering nearly all of [Norwegian shipping line] UECC's LNG-powered car carriers with bio-LNG since mid-2024, offering over-compliance with FuelEU Maritime, which presents financial rewards through pooling or banking. The partnership has now been extended through 2025. In 2024, we completed the world's largest ship-to-ship bio-LNG bunkering. We bunkered 2,200t of mass balanced bio-LNG to a Hapag-Lloyd containership in Rotterdam. The bio-LNG was ISSC-certified and recognised under the EU's Renewable Energy Directive known as Red II, marking a major milestone in the clean marine fuels transition. Going forwards, we hope to continue pioneering bio-LNG bunkering across more ports, and we feel it is important for us to further scale our bio-LNG offering as customers increasingly look to focus on regulatory compliance. We will also continue to closely monitor demand and supply signals for other clean marine fuels and will implement them into our portfolio as necessary. What do you see as the main challenges to bio-LNG growth, both in Europe and globally? High production costs remain a challenge for bio-LNG, but processes such as mass balancing are helping to lower supply-side costs. Mass balancing is a system in which biomethane is injected into the gas network and transported to liquefaction plants and LNG terminals using the existing infrastructure. It is expected to feature on many alternative fuel pathways and is a practical way of delivering clean molecules. The best analogy is when domestic energy companies provide consumers with renewable energy in a very similar way. Co-ordinated and consistent public-sector support for biomethane production will also support continued growth in the sector. The EU REPowerEU plan has ambitious biomethane usage targets of 35bn m³ by 2030. In 2023, the EU produced 22bn m³ of biogas, with biomethane being a key component. There is still plenty of work to do. Public-sector support is not only in the interest of end-users, but also of governments. This is because bio-LNG provides energy security, reducing dependency on any other nation's gas supplies. Bio-LNG can be produced locally, anywhere where waste feedstocks are available. At a time of geopolitical instability, the independence and resilience that lots of smaller suppliers can offer is a powerful incentive to invest. Gas prices have been very volatile since the start of this decade. Do you see this as a limiting factor to LNG and bio-LNG bunkering growth? While price fluctuations are a consideration, they do not fundamentally limit growth. LNG and bio-LNG remain cost-competitive compared with other alternative fuels. As LNG and bio-LNG are produced differently, factors that affect the price of one will not necessarily affect the other. To mitigate against market volatility, building in optionality is key. Shipowners and operators have this through their dual-fuel engines, switching to fuel oil if needed. Our bunkering assets are similarly flexible. Using our specialist skill set, we are also open to delivering any fuel that can substantially decarbonise shipping, which will further diversify our operations and build resilience. By Martin Senior and Natalia Coelho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more