Trump orders review of CO2 rules: Update

  • : Coal, Electricity, Emissions
  • 17/03/28

Updates throughout to reflect singing of order

President Donald Trump today directed the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reconsider two major regulations affecting coal-fired power plants as part of an effort to curtail the previous administration's efforts to address climate change.

Trump signed an executive order taking aim at former president Barack Obama's Clean Power Plan and a companion rule setting CO2 limits for new power plants.

The president directed EPA to undertake an "immediate re-evaluation" of the power plant regulations and decide whether to repeal or revise them. "Perhaps no single regulation threatens our miners, energy workers more than this crushing attack on American industry," Trump said.

The order is intended to help push the US toward energy independence and refocus EPA on its "core mission" of ensuring clean air and safe drinking water. It also serves as an overall rebuke of Obama's effort to address climate change, which had infuriated fossil fuel producers.

"My administration is putting an end to the war on coal," Trump said.

The order also targets a number of other Obama administration actions, including ordering a review of methane rules for oil and gas, ending a moratorium on coal leases on federal land and rescinding guidance on the use of the social cost of carbon estimate to help measure the effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.

Former EPA officials who helped craft the regulations called Trump's executive order a dangerous move that is "embarrassing" the US.

"The administration's ‘Back to the Future' environmental policy might be funny if it were a movie, but it is real life," former EPA administrator Gina McCarthy said. "They want us to travel back to when smokestacks damaged our health and polluted our air, instead of taking every opportunity to support clean jobs of the future."

Their allies in Congress vowed to do what they could to defend the rules, but acknowledged that any legislative efforts will not make it far in the Republican-controlled Congress. "Today's executive order calls into question America's credibility and our commitment to tackling the greatest environmental challenge of our lifetime," said US senator Tom Carper (D-Delaware), the ranking member on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

But industry groups that had sued EPA to overturn the power plant rules said Trump's action will provide much needed regulatory relief and boost US energy security. "These executive actions are a welcome departure from the previous administration's strategy of making energy more expensive through costly, job-killing regulations," US Chamber of Commerce president Thomas Donohue said.

The administration has no timetable for completing the regulatory review. EPA will have to conduct a formal rule-making process, which could take more than a year to complete. And supporters of the regulations are already promising to take the administration to court.

"We will not surrender our children's future to fossil fuel profits without a fight," Natural Resources Defense Council president Rhea Suh said.

The Clean Power Plan requires states to develop plans to cut CO2 from existing power plants from 2022-2030, which EPA has said will result in a 32pc reduction in emissions. The new unit standards limit emissions from new coal-fired generators to no more than 1,400lb CO2/MWh.

Trump's order does not address EPA's 2009 endangerment finding for GHG emissions, which the agency used as the foundation for its regulatory efforts. It also will not answer the question of whether the US should remain in the Paris climate agreement. That issue "is still under discussion," a senior administration official said.

While the order may keep the door open to EPA regulating power plant emissions in some fashion, the White House does not believe the agency is legally required to set any standards, despite the endangerment finding.

"I do not believe there is an obligation under Section 111(d) or (b)," the senior administration official said, referring to the two sections of the Clean Air Act under which EPA issued the power plant rules. EPA issued the 2009 finding under Section 202 of the law, which deals with automobiles.

As part of the review, EPA will ask the DC Circuit Court of Appeals essentially to delay issuing a ruling in the litigation that dozens of states, utilities and industry groups filed to overturn the Clean Power Plan. The court heard oral arguments last fall but has yet to issue a ruling in the case. The US Supreme Court put the regulation on hold last year pending the outcome of the litigation.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans


24/04/24
24/04/24

Barge delays at Algiers lock near New Orleans

Houston, 24 April (Argus) — Barges are facing lengthy delays at the Algiers lock near New Orleans as vessels reroute around closures at the Port Allen lock and the Algiers Canal. Delays at the Algiers Lock —at the interconnection of the Mississippi River and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway— have reached around 37 hours in the past day, according to the US Army Corps of Engineers' lock report. Around 50 vessels are waiting to cross the Algiers lock. Another 70 vessels were waiting at the nearby Harvey lock with a six-hour wait in the past day. The closure at Port Allen lock has spurred the delays, causing vessels to reroute through the Algiers lock. The Port Allen lock is expected to reopen on 28 April, which should relieve pressure on the Algiers lock. Some traffic has been rerouted through the nearby Harvey lock since the Algiers Canal was closed by a collapsed powerline, the US Coast Guard said. The powerline fell on two barges, but no injuries or damages were reported. The wire is being removed by energy company Entergy. The canal is anticipated to reopen at midnight on 25 April. By Meghan Yoyotte Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel


24/04/24
24/04/24

Baltimore to temporarily open 4th shipping channel

Cheyenne, 24 April (Argus) — The Port of Baltimore is preparing to open another, deeper temporary shipping channel this week so at least some of the vessels that have been stranded at the port can depart. The new 35-ft deep Fort McHenry Limited Access Channel is scheduled to be open to commercially essential vessels from 25 April until 6am ET on 29 April or 30 April "if weather adversely impacts vessel transits," according to a US Coast Guard Marine Safety Information Bulletin. The channel will then be closed again until 10 May. The channel also will have a 300-ft horizontal clearance and 214-ft vertical clearance. This will be the fourth and largest channel opened since the 26 March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. The Unified Command has said that the new limited access channel should allow passage of about 75pc of the types of vessels that typically move through the waterway. Vessels that have greater than 60,000 long tons (60,963 metric tonnes) of displacement will likely not be able to move through the channel and those between 50,000-60,000 long tons of displacement "will be closely evaluated" for transit. There were seven vessels blocked from exiting the port as of 27 March, including three dry bulk carriers, one vehicle carrier and one tanker, according to the US Department of Transportation. Two of the bulk carriers at berth in Baltimore are Kamsarmax-sized coal vessels, data from analytics firm Kpler show. The US Army Corps of Engineers still expects to reopen the Port of Baltimore's permanent 700-foot wide, 50-foot deep channel by the end of May. The Key Bridge collapsed into the water late last month when the 116,851dwt container ship Dali lost power and crashed into a bridge support column. Salvage teams have been working to remove debris from the water and containers from the ship in order to clear the main channel. By Courtney Schlisserman Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules


24/04/24
24/04/24

EU adopts sustainability due diligence rules

Brussels, 24 April (Argus) — The European parliament has formally approved a Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), which will require large EU companies to make "best efforts" for climate change mitigation. The law will mean that relevant companies will have to adopt a transition plan to make their business model compatible with the 1.5°C temperature limit set by the Paris climate agreement. It will apply to EU firms with over 1,000 employees and turnover above €450mn ($481mn). It will also apply to some companies with franchising or licensing agreements in the EU. The directive requires transposition into different EU national laws. It obliges member states to ensure relevant firms adopt and put into effect a transition plan for climate change mitigation. Transition plans must aim to "ensure, through best efforts" that business models and company strategies are compatible with transition to a sustainable economy, limiting global warming to 1.5°C and achieving climate neutrality by 2050. Where "relevant", the plans should limit "exposure of the company to coal-, oil- and gas-related activities". Despite a provisional agreement, EU states initially failed to formally approve the provisional agreement reached with parliament in December, after some member states blocked the deal. Parliament's adoption — at its last session before breaking for EU elections — paves the way for entry into force later in the year. Industry has obtained clarification, in the non-legal introduction, that the directive's requirements are an "obligation of means and not of results" with "due account" being given to progress that firms make as well as the "complexity and evolving" nature of climate transitioning. Still, firms' climate transition plans need to contain "time-bound" targets for 2030 and in five-year intervals until 2050 based on "conclusive scientific" evidence and, where appropriate, absolute reduction targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) for direct scope 1 emissions as well as scope 2 and scope 3 emissions. Scope 1 refers to emissions directly stemming from an organisation's activity, while scope 2 refers to indirect emissions from purchased energy. Scope 3 refers to end-use emissions. "It is alarming to see how member states weakened the law in the final negotiations. And the law lacks an effective mechanism to force companies to reduce their climate emissions," said Paul de Clerck, campaigner at non-governmental organisation Friends of the Earth Europe, pointing to "gaping" loopholes in the adopted text. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement


24/04/24
24/04/24

Ayala’s South Luzon coal plant eligible for retirement

Manila, 24 April (Argus) — Early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants in the Philippines has advanced with utility Ayala Energy's 246MW South Luzon Thermal Energy eligible for the US-based Rockefeller Foundation's coal to clean credit initiative (CCCI). The Rockefeller Foundation is a non-profit philanthropic group that creates and implements programmes in partnership with the private sector across different industries aimed at reversing climate change. Ayala has been working with the foundation to further shorten South Luzon's operating life from an original decommissioning date of 2040 to 2030. Doing so could result in the reduction of up to 19mn t of carbon emissions, Ayala said. An assessment by the Rocky Mountain Institute, the technical partner of the foundation for its energy-related projects, found that an early retirement date of 2030 instead of the original retirement date of 2040 could yield positive financial, social and climate outcomes. But decommissioning by this date will require carbon finance. Carbon financing will need to cover costs associated with the early retirement of the power plant's power supply contract, costs associated with 100pc clean replacement of the plant's power generation, plant decommissioning and transition support for workers affected by the plant's early closure, Ayala said. Ayala's listed arm ACEN welcomed the plant's eligibility for the CCCI programme, as its retirement is part of the company's goal to have its power generation portfolio composed solely of 100pc renewable sources by 2025. The Philippines' Department of Energy (DOE) said if successful, the pilot programme could serve as a basis for the development of other early retirement efforts as part of the country's plan to reduce carbon emissions. The DOE is seeking the early decommissioning of coal-fired power plants older than 20 years with a combined total capacity of 3.8GW by 2050, as part of the Philippines' transition to clean energy. By Antonio delos Reyes Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more