Germany to change balancing auction rules in July
A cap on bids for so-called energy prices in the auctions for minute and secondary balancing energy is likely to be shelved following the introduction in July of new capacity allocations rules, German energy regulator Bnetza said today.
German imbalance prices in March rose to a 14-month high and above average day-ahead intra-day settlements for that month, partly because a lack of competition for energy prices continued to dominate bidding behaviour.
The first delivery day for the new rules in the minute and secondary reserve auctions will be 12 July, Bnetza said.
The regulator expects that a prices cap at €9,999/MWh for bids on the energy price in the tenders will no longer be needed after the introduction of the changes.
Bnetza introduced the price cap in response to high imbalance prices in autumn 2017 which the regulator said did not correlate with the demand-supply balance in the power system at the time. The regulator in February launched a market consultation on changes to the allocation system in the tenders.
Providers of minute and secondary balancing reserve receive a capacity price in €/MW to reserve capacity in case transmission system operators (TSOs) need balancing energy to smooth out power supply and demand discrepancies. They receive the energy price in €/MWh if TSOs 50Hertz, Amprion, Tennet and TransnetBW call on the reserved capacity. TSOs called on minute that received a energy price of €77,777/MWh on 17 October. This increased the so-called imbalance price — which reflects the cost for securing and activating balancing energy — to a new all-time high of around €24,455/MWh for one 15-minute interval and to €20,615/MWh for another 15-minute period on that day. Balancing responsible parties (BRPs) relying on minute reserve had to pay €8mn for the 30-minutes of high imbalance prices on 17 October, Bnetza said.
Bnetza decided to by and large adopt the proposed changes consulted in February, although there are some amendments.
The energy price is not considered at all in the existing allocation rules with capacity in the pay-as-bid auctions awarded based on capacity prices, which encourages low bids.
The changes to be implemented in July will introduce a so-called allocation price at which capacity in the tenders will be awarded. The allocation price will add up the capacity value and the energy value. The capacity value is the quotient of the bid for the capacity price in €/MW and the underlying product duration — the period for which TSOs secure balancing energy — in hours. The energy value is the bid for the energy price in €/MWh multiplied by a weighted factor. Bnetza in its consultation had proposed to leave it up to German TSOs to determine the weighted factor. Following market feedback, the regulator decided that the weighted factor will be set on a quarterly basis. It will be determined on the basis of the relation between the highest actual activated minute or secondary reserve energy and the highest contracted capacity in the respective balancing energy market segments in the 12 preceding months, the regulator said.
March imbalance price
The average German imbalance price rose to €44.32/MWh in March, which was the highest level for any month since January 2017 and compared with an average imbalance price of €39.29/MWh in February. In contrast, the average ID 3 hourly settlement, the weighted average of all transactions concluded in the last three hours of trading, in the German-Austrian intra-day market operated by the Paris-based Epex Spot exchange fell slightly to €39.42/MWh in March from €39.67/MWh in February.
German TSOs reported an average German power market deficit of 219MW in March which lagged behind an average of 246MW a month earlier. But the number of 15-minute intervals with a system deficit of more than 1GW rose to 132 from 79 in February and to the highest level since at least October 2017. And the number of 15-minute intervals in which balancing responsible parties reported a nationwide power system surplus of more than 1GW rose to 22, compared with 19 in February and the highest since December.
While a rising number of 15-minute intervals with a high system deficit or surplus is likely to have been a driver of imbalance prices in March, results in the auction for minute reserve balancing energy indicate that the price cap failed to fundamentally alter bidding behaviour.
Imbalance prices in October averaged €41/MWh, more than €3/MWh below those in March despite the introduction of the price cap since then. The premium of imbalance prices in October over average ID3 intra-day prices was much wider at €11.69/MWh compared with March.
The highest imbalance price for any 15-minute period in March stood at €811/MWh compared with the €24,455/MWh recorded on 17 October as the cap prevented price spikes. But participants in the minute reserve auction continued to bid at or near €0/MW for capacity prices and at much higher levels for energy prices. The average successful bid for energy prices stood at €561.82/MWh, much lower compared with €5,292/MWh in October when a total of 616 energy price bids above €5,000 were successful. This included 480 bids above €10,000/MWh which are no longer allowed until the expected shelving of the price cap.
Successful energy price bids above €5,000/MWh still stood at 160 in March compared with 136 bids above €5,000/MWh but below €10,000/MWh in October 2017.
Wider impact
Efet Germany urged Bnetza to include energy prices in their allocation rules for balancing energy reserve auctions ,and in February welcomed the regulator's consultation to this end.
But the association had warned of a wider impact of the price cap — even though it is temporary only — saying it has undermined the market's confidence in the regulator's and the German government's acceptance of high prices. The price cap was a sign that the political will to pay high electricity prices is "perhaps lip service", Efet Germany said at the time.
A ban on price caps and the aim to strengthen price signals in the wholesale power and balancing energy market was at the core of the German caretaker government's power market reform package form 2016. And the German economy and energy ministry in June 2015 signed a joint declaration with other European countries — its "electrical neighbours" — on regional cooperation on security of supply which include a commitment to refrain from legal price caps in the power market.
Related news posts
Mitsui makes delayed exit from Paiton power project
Mitsui makes delayed exit from Paiton power project
Tokyo, 1 May (Argus) — Japanese trading house Mitsui completed on 30 April the ¥109bn ($690mn) sale of its stake in Indonesia's 2,045MW Paiton coal-fired power plant in east Java following multiple delays. Mitsui originally tried to complete its exit by the end of March 2022 . It said the procedures with Paiton's offtaker Indonesian state-owned power firm Persero took more time than expected without providing further details. Japanese thermal power producer Jera withdrew from Paiton by selling its 14pc share in 2021. Mitsui sold its 45.515pc share in Paiton Energy, as well as a 45.515pc stake in Netherlands-based subsidiary Minejesa Capital and a 65pc stake in Singapore-based IPM Asia that are related companies of the Paiton project. Mistui sold the stakes to RH International (RHIS), which is a Singapore-based subsidiary of Thai power producer Ratch, and Indonesian power company Medco Daya Abadi Lestari's subsidiary Medco Daya Energi Sentosa (MDES). Paiton Energy is now owned by RHIS, MDES and Qatar-based company Nebras Power. Mitsui did not disclose their ownership ratios. Paiton consists of the 615MW No.7, 615MW No.8 and the 815MW No.3 units, which sell electricity to Persero through an unspecified long-term contract. Mitsui now holds 9.6GW of power capacity assets globally, with 8pc being coal-fired projects. The exit from Paiton cut its coal-fired ratio by 8 percentage points, while raising its renewable ratio by 3 percentage points to 32pc. Growing global pressure against coal-fired power generation likely prompted Mitsui to exit Paiton. Energy ministers from G7 countries this week pledged to accelerate "efforts towards the phase-out of unabated coal power generation". By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Italian April power imports drop on NTC restrictions
Italian April power imports drop on NTC restrictions
London, 30 April (Argus) — Italian net electricity imports fell to their lowest in more than a year in April owing to significant constraints in net transfer capacity (NTC) from France to Italy, supporting an increase in domestic generation. Net imports averaged 4.7GW in April, down from 7GW in March and well below 6.7GW in the same month last year, according to data from Italian transmission system operator Terna. This was the country's tightest net importing position for any month since August. Italian imports from France saw the largest year-on-year decline, averaging 1.5GW compared with 2.7GW in April last year. This was Italy's lowest net imports since August 2022. Imports from Switzerland also fell on the year, declining by 500MW to 2.3GW, the lowest since August last year ( see chart ). The steep drop in imports to Italy's north zone is largely a result of significant reduction in the available NTC on France's eastern borders. Since early March, strong commercial exports through all of France's eastern borders, combined with low availability of the French power grid because of planned and unplanned outages, have led to "an extremely tense situation" for the French transmission system, the country's grid operator RTE has said. These factors have led to soaring physical flows and security issues on some interconnectors on the France-Switzerland and France-Italy borders. RTE on 5 March reduced the day-ahead NTC on the France-Italy border from a scheduled 4.5GW to 1.6GW, but the measure proved "insufficient to mitigate operational issues", RTE said. The overloads, although close to the France-Italy border, were induced by high commercial exports on all of France's eastern borders, including those with Belgium and Germany. RTE consequently applied additional safety measures to guarantee the operational security of the grid, such as lowering the NTC on the France-Switzerland border from 2.5GW to 2GW. Export constraints have resulted in French prices remaining at a significant discount to Italy, with the French spot index delivering at an average discount of €59.13/MWh in April compared with €35.37/MWh in March and €28.61/MWh in April last year. And falling Italian imports have driven a 2GW year-on-year increase in domestic generation to 24.6GW in April, while Italian power demand has remained virtually stable at 28.8GW. Minimum temperatures in Milan averaged 6.6°C on 1-30 April, up from 5.3°C in March and above 5.7°C in April last year. RTE is expecting some NTC curtailments until the beginning of May and from August to mid-October, it said. By Timothy Santonastaso Italian imports by country GW Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
G7 countries put timeframe on 'unabated' coal phase-out
G7 countries put timeframe on 'unabated' coal phase-out
London, 30 April (Argus) — G7 countries today committed to phasing out "unabated coal power generation" by 2035 — putting a timeframe on a coal phase-out for the first time. The communique, from a meeting of G7 climate, energy and environment ministers in Turin, northern Italy, represents "an historic agreement" on coal, Canadian environment minister Steven Guilbeault said. Although most G7 nations have set a deadline for phasing out coal-fired power, the agreement marks a step forward for Japan in particular, which had previously not made the commitment, and is a "milestone moment", senior policy advisor at think-tank E3G Katrine Petersen said. The G7 countries are Italy — this year's host — Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US. The EU is a non-enumerated member. But the pledge contains a caveat in its reference to "unabated" coal-fired power — suggesting that abatement technologies such as carbon capture and storage could justify its use, while some of the wording around a deadline is less clear. The communique sets a timeframe of "the first half of [the] 2030s or in a timeline consistent with keeping a limit of 1.5°C temperature rise within reach, in line with countries' net-zero pathways". OECD countries should end coal use by 2030 and the rest of the world by 2040, in order to align with the global warming limit of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels set out in the Paris Agreement, according to research institute Climate Analytics. The countries welcomed the outcomes of the UN Cop 28 climate summit , pledging to "accelerate the phase out of unabated fossil fuels so as to achieve net zero in energy systems by 2050". It backed the Cop 28 goal to triple renewable energy capacity by 2030 and added support for a global target for energy storage in the power sector of 1.5TW by 2030. The group committed to submit climate plans — known as nationally determined contributions (NDCs) — with "the highest possible ambition" from late this year or in early 2025. And it also called on the IEA to "provide recommendations" next year on how to implement a transition away from fossil fuels. The G7 also reiterated its commitment to a "fully or predominantly decarbonised power sector by 2035" — first made in May 2022 and highlighted roles for carbon management, carbon markets, hydrogen and biofuels. Simon Stiell, head of UN climate body the UNFCCC, urged the G7 and G20 countries to lead on climate action, in a recent speech . The group noted in today's outcome that "further actions from all countries, especially major economies, are required". The communique broadly reaffirmed existing positions on climate finance, although any concrete steps are not likely to be taken ahead of Cop 29 in November. The group underlined its pledge to end "inefficient fossil fuel subsidies" by 2025 or earlier, but added a new promise to "promote a common definition" of the term, which is likely to increase countries' accountability. The group will report on its progress towards ending those subsidies next year, it added. Fostering energy security The communique placed a strong focus on the need for "diverse, resilient, and responsible energy technology supply chains, including manufacturing and critical minerals". It noted the important of "guarding against possible weaponisation of economic dependencies on critical minerals and critical raw materials" — many of which are mined and processed outside the G7 group. Energy security held sway on the group's take on natural gas. It reiterated its stance that gas investments "can be appropriate… if implemented in a manner consistent with our climate objectives" and noted that increased LNG deliveries could play a key role. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Japan’s Chugoku delays Shimane No.2 reactor restart
Japan’s Chugoku delays Shimane No.2 reactor restart
Tokyo, 30 April (Argus) — Japanese utility Chugoku Electric Power has postponed the restart of its 820MW Shimane No.2 nuclear reactor in western Japan's Shimane prefecture from August to December, as reinforcement works are taking longer than expected. The reinforcement works are taking longer, as the utility is also conducting facility inspections to prepare to reactivate the reactor after an extended closure since January 2012 for stricter nuclear safety inspections, said Chugoku on 30 April. Chugoku previously planned to complete the reinforcement works in May , but has now postponed this to October. The utility had aimed to begin normal operations at the reactor in September , but has now delayed it to January 2025. Chugoku had previously modified the restart schedule multiple times . The return of the Shimane No.2 reactor could have helped Chugoku reduce its reliance on thermal generation fuels including oil, LNG and coal, especially during the peak power demand season of summer. Chugoku is currently building the 1,373MW No.3 reactor at Shimane, aiming to complete its safety-enhanced construction sometime during April-September 2025. The company has filed an application with the Nuclear Regulation Authority for a safety screening of the No.3 reactor. Its 460MW Shimane No.1 reactor was scrapped in April 2015. By Nanami Oki Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more