China hints at rare earth export curbs in US trade war

  • : Metals
  • 19/05/29

The Chinese government has given the strongest hint yet that it may restrict exports of rare earths to the US as part of the trade war between the countries.

China will continue to keep most of its rare earth resources for domestic use, while meeting "reasonable demand" from other countries, top planning body the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) said.

But "the Chinese people will never accept the US using the products made by China's exported rare earths to counter and suppress China's development," the NDRC said.

The NDRC statement was echoed by a commentary in the state-run People's Daily newspaper today, which referred to China's dominant role in global rare earths supplies and noted that US production of consumer electronics and military equipment is "highly dependent" on Chinese rare earths.

"Will rare earths become a counter weapon for China to hit back against US pressure…? The answer is no mystery," the commentary said.

"We advise the US side not to underestimate the Chinese side's ability to safeguard its development rights and interests. Don't say we didn't warn you!"

The People's Daily commentary was not attributed directly to the government, but is highly unlikely to have been published without official backing.

China exported 53,000t of rare earths last year, around 45pc of its total production of about 120,000t. China accounts for more than 90pc of global supplies of rare earths, while 70-80pc of all US imports of rare earth oxides and metals come from China.

The Chinese government has yet to make clear whether it will restrict rare earth exports to the US. The commerce ministry said last week that China has not implemented any extra trade management measures on rare earths in addition to the regular export licence system.

The China-US trade dispute has escalated in the last few weeks. The US raised its tariffs on $200bn/yr of Chinese imports to 25pc from 10pc on 10 May, with bismuth and several electronic metals affected. But rare earths and critical minerals are among the few products that the US has excluded from potential tariffs on almost all remaining imports from China, reflecting China's dominant role in the global market.

Beijing retaliated against the latest US measures on 13 May by imposing 5-25pc tariffs on imports of hundreds of metals, ores and ferro-alloys from the US, effective 1 June.

The list covers imports of rare earth ores and concentrates, oxides of several elements such as yttrium, praseodymium, terbium and mixed rare earth carbonates from the US. The biggest impact will be on companies that have invested in rare earth mines in the US, as the tariffs will make it less viable to process the material in China.

Any move by Beijing to restrict rare earths exports would be likely to benefit China's domestic magnetic material manufacturers. The US lacks medium and heavy rare earths such as terbium and dysprosium, which are critical to manufacturing high-end magnetic materials, although it is self-sufficient in light rare earths. China exported 4,100t of rare earth magnetic materials to the US last year.

Rare earths prices have risen in the past week in anticipation of stronger demand from the magnetic material sector because of potentially supportive government policies, after Chinese president Xi Jinping's visit to domestic producer JL Mag Rare-Earth on 20 May sparked speculation that rare earths could be dragged into the trade war.

A fall in ore supply from Myanmar (Burma) following a ban on imports that took effect on 15 May is also lifting prices, particularly for medium and heavy rare earths.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/02

Japan's trading firms see metals prices cutting profits

Japan's trading firms see metals prices cutting profits

Tokyo, 2 May (Argus) — Major Japanese trading houses are expecting lower profits from their metals businesses during the April 2024-March 2025 fiscal year, mostly because of lower prices of commoditiessuch as iron ore and coking coal. Japanese trading house Mitsui forecast profits for its metal and natural resource business falling by 14pc on the year to ¥290bn ($1.87bn) during 2024-25, primarily because of lower iron ore prices. Mitsui plans to cut iron ore output by 0.3pc on the year to 60.9mn t at its mining projects where the company owns production rights or a production stake during 2024-25. This includes the joint venture project Robe River in Australia with Australian iron ore producer Rio Tinto. Japanese trading house Sojitz also expects profits from its metal and natural resource business to decline to ¥35bn, down by 20pc on the year, mostly because of a bearish coking coal market. The company said its overall coal business can cut production costs during 2024-25, partly because it plans larger-scale output at the Gregory Crinum coking coal mine in Australia, without disclosing further details. But Sojitz said it cannot generate higher profits because of lower coking coal prices. The trading house expects the average coking coal price to fall to $230/t during 2024-25, according to the company's chief financial officer Makoto Shibuya, down by $57/t from a year earlier. The company reiterated that the price is not necessarily their selling price. Sumitomo expects profits from its natural resource business would remain flat at ¥72bn on the year, mostly as its nickel production in Madagascar recovers from the output cuts in 2023 , with an aim to produce 19,000t of nickel during 2024-25, up by 9.8pc on the year. A rebound in nickel production could offset possible losses from coal and coking coal prices falling to $266/t and $133/t respectively in the ordinary market, down by $21 and $9, according to the trading house. Sumitomo plans to increase coking coal production by 9.1pc to 1.2mn t but reduce coal output by 4.8pc to 4mn t during 2024-25. By Yusuke Maekawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Evion-Metachem Indian project starts producing graphite


24/05/02
24/05/02

Evion-Metachem Indian project starts producing graphite

Singapore, 2 May (Argus) — Australian graphite producer Evion's joint venture with Indian producer Metachem Manufacturing has produced and sold 700kg of expandable graphite, with more output planned in the coming months, after missing its timeline last year. Capacity of the expandable graphite plant, located at Kurkumbh near the west Indian city of Pune, will increase to at least 1,800 t/yr over the coming months, said Evion in its latest quarterly activity report. The agreement between the two firms originally envisioned 2,000-2,500 t/yr of production capacity in the first three years, with plans to begin an expansion to double the capacity starting from the second year. Evion previously was expecting first production in October-December 2023. Evion, formerly known as BlackEarth Minerals, back in 2021 signed an offtake deal with Austrian downstream graphite firm Grafitbergbau Kaiserberg for up to 2,500 t/yr of expandable graphite. Graphite concentrate for the plant is expected to come from external parties in the first two years of operations, subsequently switching to products from its Maniry graphite project in Madagascar, said Evion. Madagascar's national office for the environment is carrying out the environmental and social impact assessment for the Maniry project, according to Evion. India in July 2023 identified 30 critical minerals necessary to its green energy transition and energy self-reliance, including graphite. The country's mines ministry, through state trading firm MSTC, in March launched the second round of its auction , involving 18 blocks, for development of critical and strategic minerals in the country. By Joseph Ho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US southbound barge demand falls off earlier than usual


24/05/01
24/05/01

US southbound barge demand falls off earlier than usual

Houston, 1 May (Argus) — Southbound barge rates in the US have fallen on unseasonably low demand because of increased competition in the international grain market. Rates for voyages down river have deteriorated to "unsustainable" levels, said American Commercial Barge Line. Southbound rates declined in April to an average tariff of 284pc across all rivers this April, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), which is below breakeven levels for many barge carriers. Rates typically do not fall below a 300pc tariff until May or June. Southbound freight values for May are expected to hold steady or move lower, said sources this week. Southbound activity has increased recently because of the low rates, but not enough to push prices up. The US has already sold 84pc of its forecast corn exports and 89pc of forecast soybean exports with only five months left until the end of the corn and soybean marketing year, according to the USDA. US corn and soybean prices have come down since the beginning of the year in order to stay competitive with other origins. The USDA lowered its forecast for US soybean exports by 545,000t in its April report as soybeans from Brazil and Argentina were more competitively priced. US farmers are holding onto more of their harvest from last year because of low crop prices, curbing exports. Prompt CBOT corn futures averaged $435/bushel in April, down 34pc from April 2023. Weak southbound demand could last until fall when the US enters harvest season and exports ramp up southbound barge demand. Major agriculture-producing countries such as Argentina and Brazil are expected to export their grain harvest before the US. Brazil has finished planting corn on time . unlike last year. The US may face less competition from Brazil in the fall as a result. Carriers are tying up barges earlier than usual to avoid losses on southbound barge voyages. Carriers that have already parked their barges will take their time re-entering the market unless tariffs become profitable again. The carriers who remain on the river will gain more southbound market share and possibly more northbound spot interest. By Meghan Yoyotte and Eduardo Gonzalez Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US Fed signals rates likely to stay high for longer


24/05/01
24/05/01

US Fed signals rates likely to stay high for longer

Houston, 1 May (Argus) — Federal Reserve policymakers signaled they are likely to hold rates higher for longer until they are confident inflation is slowing "sustainably" towards the 2pc target. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) held the federal funds target rate unchanged at a 23-year high of 5.25-5.5pc, for the sixth consecutive meeting. This followed 11 rate increases from March 2022 through July 2023 that amounted to the most aggressive hiking campaign in four decades. "We don't think it would be appropriate to dial back our restrictive policy stance until we've gained greater confidence that inflation is moving down sustainably," Fed chair Jerome Powell told a press conference after the meeting. "It appears it'll take longer to reach the point of confidence that rate cuts will be in scope." In a statement the FOMC cited a lack of further progress towards the committee's 2pc inflation objective in recent months as part of the decision to hold the rate steady. Despite this, the FOMC said the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals "have moved toward better balance over the past year," shifting prior language that said the goals "are moving into better balance." The decision to keep rates steady was widely expected. CME's FedWatch tool, which tracks fed funds futures trading, had assigned a 99pc probability to the Fed holding rates steady today while giving 58pc odds of rate declines beginning at the 7 November meeting. In March, Fed policymakers had signaled they believed three quarter points cuts were likely this year. Inflation has ticked up lately after falling from four-decade highs in mid-2022. The consumer price index inched back up to an annual 3.5pc in March after reaching a recent low of 3pc in June 2023. The employment cost index edged up in the first quarter to the highest in a year. At the same time, job growth, wages and demand have remained resilient. The Fed also said it would begin slowing the pace of reducing its balance sheet of Treasuries and other notes in June, partly to avoid stress in money markets. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads


24/04/30
24/04/30

New US rule may let some shippers swap railroads

Washington, 30 April (Argus) — US rail regulators today issued a final rule designed to help customers switch railroads in cases of poor rail service, but it is already drawing mixed reviews. Reciprocal switching, which allows freight shippers or receivers captive to a single railroad to access to an alternate carrier, has been allowed under US Surface Transportation Board (STB) rules. But shippers had not used existing STB rules to petition for reciprocal switching in 35 years, prompting regulators to revise rules to encourage shippers to pursue switching while helping resolve service problems. "The rule adopted today has broken new ground in the effort to provide competitive options in an extraordinarily consolidated rail industry," said outgoing STB chairman Martin Oberman. The five-person board unanimously approved a rule that would allow the board to order a reciprocal switching agreement if a facility's rail service falls below specified levels. Orders would be for 3-5 years. "Given the repeated episodes of severe service deterioration in recent years, and the continuing impediments to robust and consistent rail service despite the recent improvements accomplished by Class I carriers, the board has chosen to focus on making reciprocal switching available to shippers who have suffered service problems over an extended period of time," Oberman said today. STB commissioner Robert Primus voted to approve the rule, but also said it did not go far enough. The rule adopted today is "unlikely to accomplish what the board set out to do" since it does not cover freight moving under contract, he said. "I am voting for the final rule because something is better than nothing," Primus said. But he said the rule also does nothing to address competition in the rail industry. The Association of American Railroads (AAR) is reviewing the 154-page final rule, but carriers have been historically opposed to reciprocal switching proposals. "Railroads have been clear about the risks of expanded switching and the resulting slippery slope toward unjustified market intervention," AAR said. But the trade group was pleased that STB rejected "previous proposals that amounted to open access," which is a broad term for proposals that call for railroads to allow other carriers to operate over their tracks. The American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association declined to comment but has indicated it does not expect the rule to have an appreciable impact on shortline traffic, service or operations. Today's rule has drawn mixed reactions from some shipper groups. The National Industrial Transportation League (NITL), which filed its own reciprocal switching proposal in 2011, said it was encouraged by the collection of service metrics required under the rule. But "it is disheartened by its narrow scope as it does not appear to apply to the vast majority of freight rail traffic that moves under contracts or is subject to commodity exemptions," said NITL executive director Nancy O'Liddy, noting it was a departure from the group's original petition which sought switching as a way to facilitate railroad economic competitiveness. The Chlorine Institute said, in its initial analysis, that it does not "see significant benefit for our shipper members since it excludes contract traffic which covers the vast majority of chlorine and other relevant chemical shipments." By Abby Caplan Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more