Paris agreement must restrict old carbon offsets: EU
Countries should not be allowed to use carbon offset credits produced before 2020 to meet their greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets under the UN Paris climate agreement, EU climate commissioner Miguel Arias Canete has said.
Negotiators are hoping to complete rules that could establish an international carbon market under the Paris agreement at a UN climate summit in December, after talks on this issue broke down at last year's summit. A sticking point in the negotiations is whether countries will be allowed to use emissions reduction credits generated under the Kyoto protocol's clean development mechanism (CDM), to comply with their Paris agreement targets.
EU climate commissioner Canete has urged countries to restrict the use of these credits. "The use of pre-2020 units towards post-2020 obligations could significantly undermine ambition," Canete said.
The first CDM projects were registered in 2001, meaning that some credits issued by these projects represent CO2 cuts that were achieved more than a decade ago. Countries' Paris agreement targets take effect from 2020.
Article 6.4
The issue sits inside Article 6.4 of the Paris agreement, which will set up a sustainable development mechanism (SDM) to succeed the CDM.
Negotiators have not yet decided whether CDM projects, and certified emission reduction (CER) credits generated by them, will be transferred to the new mechanism.
The system should avoid "unrestricted banking" of Kyoto protocol units, Canete said. Failing to avoid this would "undermine ambition from the very beginning", he said.
Canete's comments echo those of some parties in the UN negotiations, who want to use the SDM as a way to start a fresh carbon market, containing only newly issued credits that meet certain standards. But others worry that if CDM credits are not transferred to the new market, the system will not contain enough supply to set up a functioning carbon market. It could take years for SDM projects to start issuing their first credits, meaning the new market could struggle with low liquidity.
Most large carbon markets, including the EU's, have restricted the use of CDM credits for compliance, partly because of concerns over the environmental integrity of credit-issuing projects. Critics of the system say the credits do not represent "additional" emissions cuts — some CDM projects would likely continue cutting CO2 even if they stopped selling emissions reduction credits, so buying their credits does not support "additional" emissions cuts.
Low demand for the credits has caused a large oversupply to build up in recent years, and kept prices low. The price of certified emission reduction (CER) credits has been below €1/t of CO2 since late 2012.
"It is important to be blunt here — the CDM delivered investment, but it did not work for everyone, particularly in terms of additionality, distribution and sustained demand," Canete said.
This year's negotiations on Article 6 will kick off this month at a UN meeting in Bonn. Final decisions are expected to be taken at the UN summit in December, in Santiago, Chile.
Related news posts
UN carbon market enshrines appeal, grievance processes
UN carbon market enshrines appeal, grievance processes
Berlin, 3 May (Argus) — The much-debated procedure for appeal and grievance processes for people negatively affected by carbon mitigation activities was finally passed this week by the regulator of the future UN carbon market. The supervisory body of the Paris agreement crediting mechanism, under Article 6.4 of the Paris climate agreement, called the appeal and grievance procedure a "crucial step towards developing a new international carbon market that sets the benchmark for high integrity carbon credits". The mechanism is expected to be passed at the UN climate summit Cop 29 in November in Azerbaijan. The appeal and grievance procedure sets the fee for filing an appeal at $30,000, compared with the $5,000 fee suggested in earlier iterations, which was seen by some supervisory body members at this week's meeting in Bonn, Germany, as "too low for project developers, but too high for vulnerable groups". The fee will be waived for appellants who are appealing for vulnerable groups, such as local communities and indigenous peoples. But the supervisory body failed to pass the mechanism's long-awaited sustainable development tool, instead launching a call for input. Members had criticised the lack of a validation and verification process for the tool, and its unclear delimitations, given that some of its objectives will be addressed in future rules on carbon removals activities or the carbon reduction methodologies under the mechanism. Making the tool mandatory was demanded by both countries and non-governmental organisations at recent Cop summits, with the lack of a grievance process and sustainable development tool part of the reason why the pricing mechanism was not finalised at Cop 28 in Dubai last year. The sustainable development tool of the Kyoto Protocol's clean development mechanism (CDM), which the new mechanism broadly aims to replace, was never made mandatory. A total of 1,796 carbon mitigation activities have now requested to transition from the CDM to the new mechanism, of which more than 300 have not yet provided full details and could miss the 31 August deadline, the UN's climate arm said in Bonn. The supervisory body called for an extension of the transition period to 4 November. Work on the new mechanism's registry is also advancing, with the supervisory body agreeing to launch a consultation on the "legal, technical and financial implications of providing functionality for the treatment of financial security interests in Article 6.4 emissions reductions within the mechanism registry". By Chloe Jardine Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Beccs revenues 'dependent on sustainability'
Beccs revenues 'dependent on sustainability'
London, 3 May (Argus) — Danish state-controlled utility Orsted and UK utility Drax are increasingly dependent on sustainability criteria for their revenue streams from carbon removal (CDR) credit sales from bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (Beccs) projects, delegates heard at the Argus Biomass conference in London last week. "The key to be able to create such a project is to secure finance, which actually comes from the sale of carbon removal certificates," Orsted senior lead business developer for CCS David Fich said. Adding that the ability of companies to prove the sustainability of the biomass they source was now key to securing financing — including from CDR — for Beccs, and not only a matter of communicating that bioenergy and Beccs were environmentally friendly and carbon neutral businesses. Drax commercial director Angela Hepworth agreed: "Sustainability here is not a nice-to-have, this is the very foundation of our licence to upgrade and our ability to sell the credits and enable us to progress in these projects." Aligned standards within the industry and stronger incentives would encourage corporates to buy carbon credits against reputation backlashes, Hepworth added. Drax and Swedish utility Stockholm Exergi commissioned a methodology for measuring the net CO2 removal through Beccs published in October 2023, which was overall well-received by market participants. The utilities also presented it to the European Commission in the same month. A standardised approach to Beccs would encourage smaller buyers, which rely on certifications to identify the sustainable criteria of the carbon removal value chain when purchasing CDR credits, Fich said. While most larger corporates were doing their own due diligence. "The smaller buyers are those that are able to pay more," Fich said, adding that these companies were necessary to improve the liquidity of the market. Orsted signed a contract with Microsoft in May 2023 for the purchase of 2.76mn t of carbon removals over the next 10 years. Drax is also selling CDR certificates in the voluntary carbon market](https://direct.argusmedia.com/newsandanalysis/article/2441200) and is hoping to get the credits into the UK's trading scheme. Such deals "will help to make Beccs credits be seen in the more mainstream markets," Hepworth said. By Marta Imarisio Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Oregon renewable diesel pours into CFP bank
Oregon renewable diesel pours into CFP bank
Houston, 2 May (Argus) — Rising renewable diesel deliveries helped grow the volume of Oregon Clean Fuels Program (CFP) credits available for future compliance by a record 30pc in the fourth quarter of 2023, according to state data released today. The roughly 253,000 metric tonne (t) increase in available credits from the previous quarter — bringing the total to 1.1mn t — illustrates the spreading influence of US renewable diesel capacity on markets offering the most incentives for their output. California and Oregon low-carbon fuel standard (LCFS) credit prices have tumbled as renewable diesel deliveries generate a surge of credits in excess of immediate deficit needs. LCFS credits do not expire. LCFS programs require yearly reductions to transportation fuel carbon intensity. Higher-carbon fuels that exceed the annual limits incur deficits that suppliers must offset with credits generated from the distribution to the market of approved, lower-carbon alternatives. Renewable diesel volumes in Oregon increased by 12pc from the previous quarter to about 37,000 b/d — more than double the volume reported in the fourth quarter of 2022. The fuel represented 24pc of the Oregon liquid diesel pool for the period, while petroleum diesel fell to 75pc. Renewable diesel generated 46pc of all new credits for the quarter, compared to the 14pc from the next-highest contributor, biodiesel. Deficit generation meanwhile shrank from the previous quarter. Gasoline deficits fell by 6.6pc from the third quarter as consumption fell by roughly the same amount. Gasoline use trailed the fourth quarter of 2022 by 7.1pc. Diesel deficits also shrank as renewable alternatives push it out of the Oregon market. Petroleum diesel deficits fell by 19pc from the previous quarter and consumption was 27pc lower than the fourth quarter of 2022. Spot Oregon credits have fallen by half since late September, when state data offered the first indications that renewable diesel that was already inundating the California market had found its way to the smaller Oregon pool. The quarter marks the first time Oregon credits available for future compliance have exceeded 1mn t. Oregon in 2022 approved program targets extending into next decade that target a 20pc reduction by 2030 and a 37pc reduction by 2035. An ongoing rulemaking process this year will consider changes to how the state calculates the carbon intensity of fuels and verifies the activity of participants, but will not touch annual targets. By Elliott Blackburn Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
G7 coal exit goal puts focus on Germany, Japan and US
G7 coal exit goal puts focus on Germany, Japan and US
London, 1 May (Argus) — A G7 countries commitment to phase out "unabated coal power generation" by 2035 focuses attention on Germany, Japan and the US for charting a concrete coal-exit path, but provides some flexibility on timelines. The G7 commitment does not mark a departure from the previous course and provides a caveat by stating the unabated coal exit will take place by 2035 or "in a timeline consistent with keeping a limit of 1.5°C temperature rise within reach, in line with countries' net-zero pathways". The G7 countries are Italy — this year's host — Canada, France, Germany, Japan, the UK and the US. The EU is a non-enumerated member. The announcement calls for accelerating "efforts towards the phase-out of unabated coal power generation", but does not suggest policy action. It calls for reducing "as much as possible", providing room for manoeuvre to Germany, Japan and the US. Coal exports are not mentioned in the communique. Canada and the US are net coal exporters. France, which predominantly uses nuclear power in its generation mix is already scheduled to close its two remaining coal plants by the end of this year. The UK will shut its last coal-fired plant Ratcliffe in September . Italy has ended its emergency "coal maximisation plan" and has been less reliant on coal-fired generation, except in Sardinia . The country has 6GW of installed coal-fired power capacity, with state-controlled utility Enel operating 4.7GW of this. The operator said it wanted to shut all its coal-fired plants by 2027. Canada announced a coal exit by 2030 in 2016 and currently has 4.7GW of operational coal-fired capacity. In 2021-23, the country imported an average of 5.7mn t of coal each year, mainly from the US. Germany Germany has a legal obligation to shut down all its coal plants by 2038, but the country's nuclear fleet retirement in 2023, coupled with LNG shortages after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, led to an increase in coal use. Germany pushed for an informal target to phase out coal by 2030, but the grid regulator Bnetza's timeline still anticipates the last units going offline in 2038. The G7 agreement puts into questions how the country will treat its current reliance on coal as a backup fuel. The grid regulator requires "systematically relevant" coal plants to remain available as emergency power sources until the end of March 2031 . Germany generated 9.5TWh of electricity from hard-coal fired generation so far this year, according to European grid operator association Entso-E. Extending the current rate of generation, Germany's theoretical coal burn could reach about 8.8mn t. Japan Japan's operational coal capacity has increased since 2022, with over 3GW of new units connected to the grid, according to the latest analysis by Global Energy Monitor (GEM). Less than 5pc of Japan's operational coal fleet has a planned retirement year, and these comprise the oldest and least efficient plants. Coal capacity built in the last decade, following the Fukushima disaster, is unlikely to receive a retirement date without a country-wide policy that calls for a coal exit. Returning nuclear fleet capacity is curtailing any additional coal-fired generation in Japan , but it will have to build equivalent capacity to replace its 53GW of coal generation. And, according to IEA figures, Japan will only boost renewables up to 24pc until 2030. The US The US operates the third-largest coal-power generation fleet in the world, with 212GW operational capacity. Only 37pc of this capacity has a known retirement date before 2031. After 2031, the US will have to retire coal-fired capacity at a rate of 33GW/yr for four years to be able to meet the 2035 phase-out deadline. By Ashima Sharma Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more