Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

US rethinking Venezuela diesel swaps

  • : Crude oil, Oil products
  • 20/07/23

The US government is reassessing diesel-for-crude swaps that up to now have been exempt from Venezuela oil sanctions on humanitarian grounds.

Spain's Repsol, Italy's Eni and India's Reliance have been engaging in these transactions with Venezuela's state-owned PdV, with quiet clearance from the US Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (Ofac).

But senior officials in the State Department and the White House National Security Council (NSC) are now reconsidering the exemption on concerns that it is helping President Nicolas Maduro to remain in power, with a wind-down period under review, Argus has learned.

The US first imposed oil sanctions on Venezuela in January 2019, but 18 months later, the "maximum pressure" campaign to topple Maduro is running out of new options. While the US has been building on the sanctions by targeting more oil tankers and individual Venezuelan officials, the basic framework remains static and largely bereft of robust multilateral support.

Under the swap arrangements, Repsol and Eni lift Venezuelan crude as payment for PdV's exclusive offtake of natural gas from their Perla offshore field and other debts, with diesel sent back to settle their books. Reliance, which was Venezuela's top diesel supplier in the second quarter, recently resumed the swaps after a June pause to ensure sanctions compliance.

Among European diesel supplies approaching Venezuela are Malta-flagged Chance and Greece-flagged Happy Lady, both medium-range tankers carrying a combined maximum of 650,000 bl that loaded in Cartagena, and the Bahamas-flagged handysize Atlas with a maximum 275,000 bl that loaded in Sardinian port Sarroch, according to shipping sources. From India, three Reliance cargoes carrying a total of 1.3mn bl scheduled to arrive in Venezuela in late August and September.

Drawing a contrast with more widely used and scarce gasoline, swaps proponents maintain that Venezuela needs diesel for power generation, agricultural activity, water pumps and public transport. PdV produces some diesel in its mostly inoperative refining system, but not enough to meet demand,which once reached around 200,000 b/d.

Baseload and back-up power generation is the most sensitive application for diesel, especially in western states far from the 10GW Guri hydroelectric complex that traditionally supplies most of the country. With the Covid-19 pandemic raging, diesel power is seen as a vital alternative to the unreliable grid.

As for the crude that is allocated for the diesel, the proponents add that without the swaps, more Venezuelan crude will be directed to obscure intermediaries with no benefit to the Venezuelan people.

Ambivalent stance

Venezuela's US-supported opposition, frustrated over Maduro's endurance, supports a swaps ban in line with hawkish inclinations in the White House, but quietly recognizes the risk of saying so publicly. A senior official in Venezuela's US-supported opposition privately describes the debate over diesel swaps as a "false dilemma" because the origins of the electricity crisis lie in Maduro's neglect of the grid, not a diesel shortage.

"Probably some diesel will help, some will go to Cuba or the black market. It is a murky situation," the official said.

In an event today with Washington Diplomat, Carlos Vecchio, the opposition's US envoy, avoided a direct response to a question over the swaps, pointing instead to corrupt oil-for-food transactions spearheaded by Venezuelan government agent Alex Saab whom the US is seeking to extradite from Cabo Verde.

In a separate press conference, Vecchio described Venezuela's oil shipments to its close ally Cuba as an example of resources that should be used to address the country's humanitarian crisis instead.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/05/20

Shell CEO defends 'resilient investment strategy'

Shell CEO defends 'resilient investment strategy'

London, 20 May (Argus) — Shell chief executive Wael Sawan defended the company's "resilient investment strategy" at its annual shareholder meeting today, as directors faced a barrage of questions from climate-focused investors. A resolution calling for more details on Shell's LNG strategy gained over 20pc support, a level consistent with climate-related votes in previous years . But absent this year were the disruptive climate protests that have marked past meetings. This was partly due to Shell's choice of venue, London's Heathrow Airport, which has a five-year High Court injunction banning environmental protests on site. Still, climate-conscious shareholders dominated the discussion. One questioned how Shell could justify expanding oil and gas operations when the IEA's net zero emissions by 2050 scenario suggests no new oil and gas projects are needed. Shell's chairman Andrew Mackenzie responded that the IEA's scenario is just one of many and includes conditional commitments made by governments that may not materialise. "We see a phase of continuing growth, particularly in the use of gas and especially in LNG, that we think is appropriate to invest in," he said. Sawan pointed out that most of the net present value from Shell's oil and gas projects will be realised before 2040, "and so this is a very resilient investment strategy that we are offering our shareholders". He also highlighted that Shell has $20bn of capital invested in low-carbon alternatives such as biofuels, hydrogen and electric vehicle charging. "It is in our interest... to see that market grow," he said. A key focus was Resolution 22, filed by the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR), which called on Shell to explain how its LNG strategy aligns with its climate goals. "We believe that shareholders still don't have the information that they need to properly assess the risks associated with this strategy," said the ACCR's Sarah Brewin. The scale of Shell's uncontracted LNG out to 2050 exposes the company and its shareholders to "significant risk should prices fall and demand soften", she said. The company's LNG outlook "is highly optimistic and increasingly out of step with global trends", she added. Shell's board opposed the resolution, arguing that its strategy is based on a range of scenarios — including one exploring the impact of AI on energy demand. Its 2025 LNG Outlook, based on Wood Mackenzie data, forecasts a 60pc rise in global LNG demand by 2040, driven by economic growth in Asia and decarbonisation in heavy industry and transport. While the resolution did not pass, Shell said it will prepare a note within six months detailing its LNG market outlook, its LNG business strategy and how these align with its climate commitments. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Brazil to walk tightrope in Cop 30 fossil fuel talks


25/05/20
25/05/20

Brazil to walk tightrope in Cop 30 fossil fuel talks

Rio de Janeiro, 20 May (Argus) — Brazil is arguing that its developing country status allows it to consolidate its position as a major crude producer and is likely to lean on developed countries during much-awaited discussions on moving away from fossil fuels at the UN Cop 30 climate conference in November. Attempts to reach an ambitious outcome on mitigation — cutting greenhouse gas emissions — and actions to move away from fossil fuels were quashed at Cop 29 in Baku last year, and all eyes are on Brazil to bridge divides on this issue . Cop 30 president-designate Andre Correa do Lago has failed to address fossil fuels in his two letters outlining priorities for the summit, but members of the Cop 30 team have indicated the issue will be on the agenda. With geopolitical tensions and energy security questions redirecting government priorities away from the energy transition, the outlook is more challenging than when Cop parties agreed the global stocktake (GST) conclusion on fossil fuels and energy in 2023 . But Brazil is well-placed to take the lead. It is a respected player in climate discussions and has one of the cleanest energy mix — 49pc of its energy and 89pc of its electricity comes from renewables. Its own mitigation efforts prioritize slashing deforestation, which accounts for the lion's share of Brazil's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Non-profit World Resources Institute Brazil describes the emissions reduction target in Brazil's nationally determined contribution (NDC) — climate plan — as "reasonable to insufficient" and notes that energy emissions are expected to increase by 20pc in the decade to 2034. Its NDC avoids any concrete steps towards winding down crude. After you The government's view on fossil fuels is that Brazil's developing country status, the oil and gas industry's importance in its economy and comparatively low fossil fuel emissions justify pushing ahead with oil production. Correa do Lago said earlier that Belem was picked as a venue for Cop 30 to show that Brazil is still a developing country, adding that any decision on oil and gas should be taken by Brazil's citizens. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said that oil revenue will fund the energy transition. It is a position that has earned Brazil accusations of hypocrisy from environmentalists at home and abroad, but which also places it as a possible model for other hydrocarbon-producer developing countries. Brazil's diplomatic tradition of pragmatically balancing seemingly opposing positions could serve it well here, said Gabriel Brasil, a senior analyst focused on climate at Control Risks, a consultancy. He does not see Brazil's attempt to balance climate leadership with continued oil production as hurting its standing among fellow parties or energy investors. Civil society stakeholders hope pre-Cop meetings will help bring clarity on how Brazil might broach the fossil fuel debate. Indigenous groups, which are set to be given more space at Cop, are demanding an end to fossil fuel extraction in the environmentally sensitive Foz do Amazonas offshore basin. Meanwhile, Brazilian state-owned Petrobras moved one step closer to being authorized to begin offshore drilling there . During meetings of the UN climate body — the UNFCCC — in Panama City this week, the Cop 30 presidency will present ideas for the summit "with a focus on the full implementation of the GST". But it has to wait for countries to update their NDCs to gauge what is achievable on mitigation. Only 20 have submitted new NDCs so far, with the deadline pushed back to September. Brazil's own NDC gives some clues. It welcomes the launch "of international work for the definition of schedules for transitioning away from fossil fuels in energy systems" and reiterates that developed countries should take the lead. And a report commissioned by Brazil's oil chamber IBP and civil society organization ICS to be given to negotiators ranks Brazil as a "mover" in the transition away from oil and gas, ahead of "adapters" like India and Nigeria but behind "front-runners" Germany and the US. The research develops the idea of a country-based transition plan, using criteria such as energy security and institutional and social resilience, as well as oil and gas relevance. By Constance Malleret 2023 Brazil emissions sources Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Libyan crude returns to Asia after one-month hiatus


25/05/20
25/05/20

Libyan crude returns to Asia after one-month hiatus

London, 20 May (Argus) — Libyan crude is once again heading to Asia-Pacific after exports to the region came to a complete halt in April — the first such pause since August 2020, according to Argus tracking data. The Suezmax Sea Sapphire departed Libya's Zueitina port on 15 May with around 1mn bl of light sweet crude bound for Thailand's Ko Sichang terminal, where it is expected to arrive on 26 June, according to Vortexa and Kpler. It marks the first Libyan crude cargo to load for Asia-Pacific since March, and flows to the region averaged 76,000 b/d in the first three months of this year. Despite favourable arbitrage conditions in April — the Brent-Dubai EFS more than halved on the month to 30¢/bl in March when April-loading cargoes were trading — no Libyan crude was loaded for the region last month. Buyers in Asia-Pacific appear to have opted for light sour Caspian CPC Blend instead. Shipments of the Caspian grade to Asia-Pacific hit a two-year high of 541,000 b/d in April, supported by weaker price differentials. But with eastbound arbitrage shipments now less workable, most May and June-loading CPC Blend supplies are heading to Europe, according to traders. This may have prompted Asia-Pacific refiners to turn back to Libyan grades. Thailand has been a regular buyer of Libyan crude, taking 16 cargoes in 2022 and nine in 2023, according to Argus tracking data. The Sea Sapphire is already the third Libyan cargo to load this year, matching the total for the whole of 2024. A second Suezmax cargo of Libyan crude is scheduled to depart Marsa al-Hariga on 27 May and arrive at China's Ningbo port on 24 June, although the fixture remains unconfirmed. Despite renewed interest from Asia-Pacific, Libya's overall crude exports are scheduled to fall by 9pc on the month in May to 1.13mn b/d across its 12 grades, according to provisional loading programmes. By Ellanee Kruck Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Zuglogistik vor Herausforderungen


25/05/20
25/05/20

Zuglogistik vor Herausforderungen

Hamburg, 20 May (Argus) — Die Versorgung der Tanklager per Kesselwagen gestaltet sich deutschlandweit immer schwieriger. Zunehmende Probleme durch Ausfälle treffen auf einen erhöhten Bedarf an Kesselwagen aufgrund des andauernden Rheinniedrigwassers. Das Logistiksystem der Bahn scheint an der Auslastungsgrenze zu sein. Vor allem Personalausfälle bei den Zugführern aufgrund von Krankheit und einer hohen Fluktuation belasten das System, so Marktteilnehmer. Die siebenwöchige Totalsperrung der Strecke 6081 zwischen Berlin und Eberswalde erhöht den Personalbedarf und verlängert die Transportwege seit dem 11. April. Kesselwagen, die Ware aus der PCK Raffinerie (226.000 bl/Tag) in Schwedt in Richtung Berlin und Südost transportieren, müssen derzeit einen Umweg von knapp 400 km in Kauf nehmen. Die Sperrung soll bis voraussichtlich Ende Mai anhalten. Darüber hinaus sinken seit Mitte Februar die Rheinpegel , wodurch sich das Ladevolumen der Binnenschiffe sukzessive verringert. Anbieter weichen daher für die Versorgung der Tanklager verstärkt auf Kesselwagen aus. Im April stieg zudem die Nachfrage vor allem nach Heizöl und Diesel, was die Situation zusätzlich verschärfte. Züge verzögerten sich daher erheblich oder fallen zum Teil ganz aus. Dies wirkt sich teilweise auch auf Transporte in die Schweiz aus, berichten Händler. Der Engpass in der Logistik führt dazu, dass Händler einzelne Tanklager bereits seit mehreren Wochen nicht anfahren können, um Ware zu verladen. Eine Entspannung der Situation ist nicht abzusehen. Nach einer kurzen Erholung sind die Pegel am Oberrhein wieder gefallen. Eine volle Auslastung der Ladekapazität wird auch im Mai voraussichtlich nicht möglich sein, laut der wahrscheinlichkeitsbasierten 14-Tage-Vorhersage der Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde. Und eine weitere Sperrung steht bevor: Die Deutsche Bahn plant eine Generalsanierung der Strecke zwischen Hamburg und Berlin. Diese wird ab August 2025 für neun Monate voll gesperrt sein. Von Gabriele Zindel Senden Sie Kommentare und fordern Sie weitere Informationen an feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

US budget bill not enough of permitting fix: CEO


25/05/19
25/05/19

US budget bill not enough of permitting fix: CEO

Washington, 19 May (Argus) — Republican efforts to unilaterally overhaul federal pipeline permitting through a filibuster-proof budget bill will not provide the certainty needed to make major investments in new energy infrastructure, an industry executive said today. Republicans in the US House of Representatives will vote as early as this week on a bill that would offer fast-tracked approval of new pipelines and immunity from some lawsuits, in exchange for a fee of up to $10mn. But that bill, along with attempts by the White House to expedite project approvals by executive order, fall short of what industry officials would like to see on permitting, US midstream operator Howard Energy Partners chief executive Mike Howard said. "Permit reform through an executive order or a reconciliation bill, that doesn't give me the confidence to go spend billions of dollars on new infrastructure," Howard said at a conference held by the news publisher RealClear. "You have to have an act of Congress that both sides of the aisle agree to and make real laws." Energy industry officials have good reason to be skeptical that permitting provisions in the budget bill will remain intact over the years it can take to plan, permit and build large-scale energy infrastructure. Wind and solar developers, oil companies and others making investments based on the clean energy tax credits that Democrats passed through the Inflation Reduction Act now face a risk those credits will be gutted by the Republican budget bill . A bipartisan permitting deal would probably be far harder to negotiate if Republicans succeed in using the pending budget bill to dismantle the clean energy spending in the Inflation Reduction Act, given that any agreement would need to fast-track pipelines in exchange for faster approval of electric transmission lines needed for renewables. Pipeline officials say they are continuing to push for permitting legislation, along with other fixes to expedite projects. "We spend more money on our permitting process than we spend on the steel in modern pipeline projects today, so we are a lot more focused now on the regulatory process and really getting streamlined because we think there's a tremendous amount of value in getting that resolved," US gas infrastructure company Williams chief executive Alan Armstrong said today in an interview on CNBC. Last week, US gas producer EQT's chief executive Toby Rice said there needs to be "significant reform" on permitting to offer the industry the confidence needed to start investing again in new pipelines, after a series of major projects were blocked over the last five years. "We're going to have to have more conversations with the pipeline guys," Rice said at an event held by the US Energy Association. "We've had executives that have lost billions of dollars proposing pipelines and having them blocked, canceled or opposed." By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more