API endorses a carbon price

  • : Crude oil, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 21/03/25

The American Petroleum Institute (API) has reversed its long-held opposition to putting a price on carbon emissions, endorsing the approach among other measures that the leading US oil and natural gas industry group says will address the risks of climate change while meeting global energy needs.

The API released its climate action framework, which includes advocating a carbon price, less than an hour before the Interior Department convened a virtual forum today to gather information from the industry and environmental activists before it finalizes changes to the federal oil and gas development program it has largely put on pause.

While not directly tied to the forum, the API's seemingly revolutionary advocacy reveals the dilemma for the US energy industry as President Joe Biden's administration is pushing oil and gas companies to toe the line on accelerating energy transition and achieving net zero emissions. Environmental activists are hoping the Interior pause on new oil and gas leases on federal lands would become permanent. But some industry officials hope the forum presents an opportunity to make the case for restarting development and have offered to meet the administration halfway on its climate goals.

"What we are advocating for here is that the API and our member companies will continue to make significant investments to make our future cleaner," API president Mike Sommers said. "And second, we know that government is going to have to play a role on these important programs," including carbon capture and sequestration, he said.

The API says it is not advocating a specific price on carbon or a mechanism. "What we are advocating for is a market based approach," Sommers said. "It could encompass an economy-wide transparent price, like a carbon tax, or it could include a cap on emissions, like a cap-and-trade program."

Supporting a carbon price is a remarkable reversal for the US' main oil lobbying group, which has torpedoed past attempts at climate legislation. But US majors ExxonMobil and Chevron endorsed a carbon price years ago, following on the heels of their European peers. And for environmental activists, the proposal may no longer be enough.

Short on votes, technology

Democrats stung by the failure of a 2010 emissions cap-and-trade bill are wary of giving Republican critics, who see carbon pricing as a federal tax hike, ammunition as they defend thin majorities in Congress. "The votes are just not there for a price on carbon," House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee chairman Frank Pallone (D-New Jersey) said earlier this month.

Sommers conceded that lawmakers from both parties might push back against the carbon price proposal, but added that "what we are pursuing here is what we think is a policy that is in the middle, and the one that harnesses the power of markets to drive innovation, and to drive emissions ever lower."

Biden's net zero pitch is not feasible "without technologies that are not currently in the marketplace today," Sommers said. "We think that the best way to do that is through a market based carbon pricing mechanism that is not picking winners and losers in the marketplace and that makes investments in lower carbon technologies more economic," he said.

The White House earlier this week hosted a virtual meeting with the API and leading oil and gas producers to urge them to "share information about their commitments and ideas for addressing the climate crisis and reducing emissions."

But not everyone in the oil industry is in a conciliatory mode, and their supporters in Congress and state governments are honing arguments on job and economic losses and preparing to challenge Biden's agenda in courts. The Interior's leasing pause is being challenged by 14 oil and gas producing states.

"Production of oil and natural gas from these areas are an important part of the nation's energy portfolio and will be key to ensuring the US remains a key player in the worldwide energy picture," Independent Petroleum Association of America president Barry Russell said at the Interior forum today.

Rescinding federal permits for TC Energy's 830,000 b/d Keystone XL pipeline project resulted in thousands of pipelayers being laid off, according to Republican critics, who contend that even more jobs are at risk. But "oil and gas jobs are not going anywhere", the White House says, and Biden's efforts to accelerate the energy transition is "where the industry is largely going anyway."


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

S Korea’s SK Innovation sees firm 2Q refining margins


24/04/29
24/04/29

S Korea’s SK Innovation sees firm 2Q refining margins

Singapore, 29 April (Argus) — South Korean refiner SK Innovation expects refining margins to remain elevated in this year's second quarter because of continuing firm demand, after achieving higher operating profits in the first quarter. SK expects demand to remain solid in the second quarter given a strong real economy, expectations of higher demand in emerging markets and continuing low official selling price (OSP) levels. This is despite the US Federal Reserve's high interest rate policy and oil price rallies, which are weighing on crude demand. The company's sales revenue dropped to 18.9 trillion won ($13.7bn) in the first quarter, down by 3.5pc on the previous quarter. Its energy and chemical sales accounted for 91pc of total revenue, while battery and material sales accounted for the remaining 9pc. But SK's operating profit increased to W624.7bn in January-March from W72.6bn the previous quarter. This came as its refining business flipped from an operating loss of W165bn in October-December to an operating profit of W591.1bn in the first quarter. SK attributed this increase to elevated refining margins because of higher oil prices, as well as Opec+ production cut agreements and OSP reductions. First-quarter gasoline refining margins almost doubled on the previous quarter from $7.60/bl to $13.30/bl, although diesel and kerosine edged down to $23.10/bl and $21.10/bl respectively. SK Innovation's 840,000 b/d Ulsan refinery operated at 85pc of its capacity in the fourth quarter, steady from 85pc in the previous quarter but higher than 82pc for all of 2023. The refiner's 275,000 b/d Incheon refinery's operating rate was at 88pc, up from 84pc in the fourth quarter and from 82pc in 2023. SK plans to carry out turnarounds at its 240,000 b/d No.4 crude distillation unit and No.1 residual hydrodesulphuriser, both at Ulsan, in the second quarter. Its No.2 paraxylene unit in Ulsan will have a turnaround in the same quarter. By Tng Yong Li Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Singapore’s Jadestone cuts 2024 output guidance


24/04/29
24/04/29

Singapore’s Jadestone cuts 2024 output guidance

Sydney, 29 April (Argus) — Singapore-listed independent Jadestone Energy has cut its 2024 oil and gas production guidance, citing disappointing first-quarter group production. Jadestone said the impact of planned and unplanned downtime across its portfolio resulted in it narrowing its guidance from 20,000-23,000 bl of oil equivalent (boe/d) to 20,000-22,000 boe/d in its results for 2023 published on 29 April. Average production for January-March was 17,200 boe/d, which Jadestone said reflected the impact on its Australian assets, including the 6,000 b/d Montara oil field, of an active cyclone season at the start of 2024. The firm produced 14,000 b/d in 2023, up from 11,500 b/d in 2022. But problems at Montara and lower realised oil prices resulted in a loss of $91mn in 2023 following a $9mn profit recorded in 2023. Jadestone's realised oil price of $87.34/boe in 2023 was 16pc lower than $103.85/boe a year earlier. Proved and probable reserves at the end of 2023 totalled 68mn boe, a 5pc increase on a year's earlier 64.8mn boe, mainly because of the acquisition of a 9.52pc stake in Thailand's Sinphuhorm gas field and increases at the Cossack, Wanaea, Lambert and Hermes oil fields offshore Australia and the Akatara gas field in Indonesia's Sumatra. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia’s QPM hikes gas reserves estimate


24/04/29
24/04/29

Australia’s QPM hikes gas reserves estimate

Sydney, 29 April (Argus) — The energy arm of Australian battery metals firm Queensland Pacific Metals (QPM) has announced its certified reserves have increased more than a third on previous estimates at its Moranbah gas project (MGP) in Queensland state. QPM Energy (QPME) reported a 38pc increase in its total proven and probable (2P) gas reserves to 331PJ (8.8bn m³) on 29 April compared with a March 2022 estimate of 240PJ, as it pivots towards its energy business and pauses spending on its proposed Townsville Energy Chemicals Hub (TECH) project . QPME's waste coal mine gas reserves will be developed along with 300MW of new gas-fired power generation at the firm's Moranbah facilities located in the Bowen basin, a metallurgical and thermal coal producing region. The company is also planning to build compressed natural gas and micro-LNG facilities to distribute gas to northern Queensland customers. The company will seek to increase its output by 25pc to 35 TJ/d (935,000 m³/d) by late 2024, up from October-December 2023's average of 28 TJ/d by drilling a further seven wells by the year's end. A rig has arrived on site for drilling the first well of its Teviot Brook South Well programme, QPM said on 24 April. Australian independent Blue Energy, which is developing the Sapphire pilot project with 59PJ of 2P reserves near MGP, said QPM has confirmed it intends on taking gas Blue makes available to the MGP, in line with an existing non-binding agreement signed in June last year. Blue and QPME's parent company QPM also have a separate non-binding deal for supply of 7 PJ/yr of gas over 15 years to the TECH project. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Lyondell Houston refinery to run at 95pc in 2Q


24/04/26
24/04/26

Lyondell Houston refinery to run at 95pc in 2Q

Houston, 26 April (Argus) — LyondellBasell plans to run its 264,000 b/d Houston, Texas, refinery at average utilization rates of 95pc in the second quarter and may convert its hydrotreaters to petrochemical production when the plant shuts down in early 2025. The company's sole crude refinery ran at an average 79pc utilization rate in the first quarter due to planned maintenance on a coking unit , the company said in earnings released today . "We are evaluating options for the potential reuse of the hydrotreaters at our Houston refinery to purify recycled and renewable cracker feedstocks," chief executive Peter Vanacker said on a conference call today discussing earnings. Lyondell said last year a conversion would feed the company's two 930,000 metric tonnes (t)/yr steam crackers at its Channelview petrochemicals complex. The company today said it plans to make a final investment decision on the conversion in 2025. Hydrotreater conversions — such as one Chevron completed last year at its 269,000 b/d El Segundo, California, refinery — allow the unit to produce renewable diesel, which creates renewable naphtha as a byproduct. Renewable naphtha can be used as a gasoline blending component, steam cracker feed or feed for hydrogen producing units, according to engineering firm Topsoe. Lyondell last year said the Houston refinery will continue to run until early 2025, delaying a previously announced plan to stop crude processing by the end of 2023. By Nathan Risser Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more