Texas winterization has economic basis: Fed

  • : Electricity, Natural gas
  • 21/04/15

Solutions to prevent future winter storm blackouts in Texas are "economically justified" based on analysis, the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas said in a report issued today.

"Our analysis indicates winterizing for extreme winter weather events appears financially reasonable," the group said, suggesting the possibility of insulating power plants to addressing the "efficacy of intermittent renewable generation".

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas noted that no single source of power generation was to blame for the outages in Texas during the middle of February this year mirroring analysis by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas.

"While industry sources report gas production difficulties occurred because of wells and other such installations freezing, the bigger disruption began when power was cut to the wells, processing plants and compressor stations that move the gas into and along major pipelines serving power plants," the group said.

Approximately 38 of 176 gas processing plants shut down because of weather conditions and power disruptions, with gas production falling by 45pc from 13-17 February, according to the analysis.

The Fed's Dallas branch estimated that the freeze and outages cost Texas' economy $80bn-$130bn in losses both directly and indirectly.

Winterizing standards on new oil and gas wells could offer a targeted long-term solution, while a faster, larger and affordable solution would be prioritize electricity delivery to gas infrastructure, the bank said. Winterizing the 162 gas-powered plants in Texas could cost up to $95mn, the group said, using adjusted data from a joint study by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and North American Electric Reliability Corporation on winter power outages in Texas and New Mexico in 2011.

The Fed estimated costs for totally winterizing Texas' power infrastructure at approximately $430mn/yr.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/07

EPA sets new oil and gas methane reporting rules

EPA sets new oil and gas methane reporting rules

Washington, 7 May (Argus) — Federal regulators have updated emissions reporting requirements for oil and gas facilities as they prepare to implement a methane "waste" fee for the industry. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Monday finalized new rules it says will improve the accuracy of data from the oil and gas sector under the federal greenhouse gas emissions reporting program. Oil and gas facility owners and operators will be required to estimate emissions from additional types of equipment under the rule, and they can draw on newer technologies, like remote sensing, to help estimate emissions. "EPA is applying the latest tools, cutting edge technology, and expertise to track and measure methane emissions from the oil and gas industry," agency administrator Michael Regan said. "Together, a combination of strong standards, good monitoring and reporting, and historic investments to cut methane pollution will ensure the US leads in the global transition to a clean energy economy." Data to support new fee The revisions to the "Subpart W" reporting requirements will be used to determine the amount of methane that will be subject to a "waste emissions charge" created by the Inflation Reduction Act. Under the law, the charge will be calculated based on the annual data that about 8,000 oil and gas sources are now required to report. The charge will begin at $900/t for 2024 methane emissions above a minimum threshold using current measurement data. It will then rise to $1,200/t in 2025 and $1,500/t in subsequent years. Industry officials had raised "serious concerns" about several aspects of the original proposal , warning it could lead to inflated emissions data. "We are reviewing the final rule and will work with Congress and the administration as we continue to reduce GHG emissions while producing the energy the world needs," American Petroleum Institute vice president of corporate policy Aaron Padilla said. The industry group previously said it will ask Congress to repeal the fee, which is only likely to occur if Republicans win control of the White House. Data collected since 2010 Oil and gas facilities have reported emissions under Subpart W since 2010. To simplify reporting, operators often count the equipment they have deployed, and use industry-wide averages to estimate emissions, in addition to other direct and indirect measurements. The industry has argued the Subpart W data is not accurate enough to collect the methane charge, which is expected to cost operators more than $6bn over the next decade. Environmental groups have had their own criticisms of the data, which they say omits vast amounts of emissions such as those from "super-emitter" events and poorly maintained flares. The final rule seeks to respond to some of those concerns by relying on updated emission factors, incorporating additional empirical data on emission rates, collecting data at a more granular level and relying on remote sensing technologies to detect large emission events. EPA also revised Subpart W to include more types of sources, including produced water tanks, nitrogen removal units and crankcase venting. The final rule also sets a threshold of 100 kg/hr of methane for requiring the reporting of emissions from "other large release events." The new data rules will take effect on 1 January 2025 and will first apply to reports submitted in early 2026 for next year's emissions. EPA is allowing the use of the new methodologies for calculating 2024 emissions, but operators can still use the existing rules. By Michael Ball Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia’s Gorgon LNG train to be out for five weeks


24/05/07
24/05/07

Australia’s Gorgon LNG train to be out for five weeks

Singapore, 7 May (Argus) — One of three trains at Australia's 15.6mn t/yr Gorgon export terminal will be off line for five weeks, a source familiar with Gorgon operations told Argus on 7 May. The train has been off line since 30 April because of a mechanical fault in a turbine. The five-week shutdown expectation is slightly longer than the initially expected shutdown period of about 2-3 weeks, traders said. Each week of downtime on one train at Gorgon reduces the terminal's available liquefaction capacity by about 100,000t. The five-week shutdown is likely to reduce the terminal's production by about 5-8 cargoes, traders said. One standard-sized cargo is roughly equivalent to 60,000-70,000t of LNG. But overarching sentiment from market participants is that the impact on both prices and supply will be limited, as only one train is affected and there are ample cargoes for June and July. There will be a temporary spike in prices as affected buyers — if any — will have to secure prompt cargoes to replace lost LNG from Gorgon, keeping prices supported well above $10/mn Btu, traders said. The shutdown will have a greater impact on prices if repair works drag on for longer and affect summer deliveries, they added. The ANEA price, the Argus assessment for spot LNG deliveries to northeast Asia, for the first and second half June were assessed at $10.57/mn Btu and $10.58/mn Btu on 7 May, higher by 40¢/mn Btu from the previous day. First- and second-half July ANEA prices were assessed at $10.64/mn Btu and $10.66/mn Btu, up by 36¢/mn Btu/mn Btu from a day earlier. Chevron has rescheduled deliveries of some LNG cargoes for their Asian offtakers, according to some traders. Further details are unclear. Shell might have bought around 3-4 cargoes because of the shutdown at Gorgon, according to traders. It is not clear whether the cargoes are for June or July delivery. Some traders have offered both June- and July-delivery cargoes to Chevron but the firm has responded by saying that the shortfall can be managed by optimising its own portfolio, traders said. The Gorgon LNG joint venture is operated by Chevron with a 47pc stake, while ExxonMobil and Shell hold 25pc each. By Simone Tam Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Brazil state faces power outages after record flood


24/05/06
24/05/06

Brazil state faces power outages after record flood

Sao Paulo, 6 May (Argus) — Brazil's Rio Grande do Sul state is facing power outages following record floods that killed more than 80 people and forced over 130,000 people out of their homes. The extreme weather took three substations, 25 transmission lines, five hydroelectric plants and 11 power transformers off line, according to grid operator ONS. In response, ONS started importing power from neighboring Uruguay and requested that the 250MW hybrid natural gas and diesel Canoas and 345MW coal-fired Pampa Sul power plants increase power generation. Earlier today, an estimated 435,000 consumers did not have electricity. The rains affected 341 of the 497 cities in the state, where the government declared a state of emergency in 336 municipalities. The government is working to re-establish power to the state as quickly as possible, the mines and energy ministry said in a social media post. The ministry also held an emergency meeting early yesterday and today to guarantee fuel supplies in the state . State capital Porto Alegre is expected to receive more rain later this week, according to Rio Grande do Sul-based weather forecaster MetSul. Metsul warned that parts of the Porto Alegre metropolitan area could remain uninhabitable for weeks or months. Brazil's airline association Abear said that the Salgado Filho international airport will remain closed indefinitely, after the airport's runway flooded. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US majors widen output gap over European rivals


24/05/06
24/05/06

US majors widen output gap over European rivals

New York, 6 May (Argus) — ExxonMobil and Chevron are seeing investments in Guyana and the Permian shale basin pay off, widening a gap with their transatlantic counterparts that could get even bigger with the completion of recent mega-deals. ExxonMobil is championing a speedy ramp-up of a massive offshore oil discovery in Guyana, where production has surged to more than 600,000 b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) in the space of just a few years. And Chevron recorded a 35pc jump in first-quarter US output from a year earlier, buoyed by better-than-expected performance from the Permian basin, as well as the $7.6bn acquisition of US independent PDC Energy that bolstered its footprint in Colorado's DJ basin. And after years of delays and cost overruns, its highly vaunted expansion project in Kazakhstan is finally close to seeing the light of day. Even though European rivals including Shell and BP are backtracking on previous plans to scale back their reliance on oil and gas production, the US majors are poised to extend their lead after dominating a recent round of industry consolidation. ExxonMobil will become the top producer in the Permian after wrapping up its $59bn takeover of shale giant Pioneer Natural Resources. Anti-trust regulators at the US Federal Trade Commission cleared the deal after barring Pioneer's former chief executive, Scott Sheffield, from gaining a seat on the board, following allegations that he sought to collude with Opec members. And Chevron is still optimistic that its pending $53bn purchase of independent producer Hess will close by the end of the year, even though ExxonMobil has thrown a spanner in the works by claiming its right of first refusal over Hess' 30pc stake in Guyana's prolific Stabroek block, where it is the operator. Chevron's attempt to muscle in on Guyana's oil riches would answer lingering concerns over its long-term growth profile. The dispute has now been referred to international arbitration in Paris and the company hopes the transaction can be completed this year. A failure of the deal to close would not "materially" hit Chevron's near-term valuation, according to bank HSBC. "However, the strategic gap between Chevron and ExxonMobil could widen over time if the Hess deal does not happen," the bank says. Advantage Exxon Excluding the Pioneer transaction, ExxonMobil forecasts its output will grow to 4.2mn boe/d by 2027 from about 3.8mn boe/d this year. Chief executive Darren Woods has doubled down on so-called "advantaged" projects including Guyana and the Permian, which offer the most profitable and low-cost barrels that will be key drivers of revenue growth. The company's share of overall production from such assets has increased to 44pc from 28pc in recent years. Woods sees the growing cash flow from those projects as vindication of his strategy to direct "counter-cyclical" investments before and during the pandemic, which were unpopular with some investors at the time. Spending discipline remains a key priority even as new projects start up. ExxonMobil has achieved $10.1bn of cost savings from 2019 levels, and is on course to hit $15bn by 2027. And Woods says there is scope for even more savings to be found. Meanwhile, Chevron says its output from the Permian is trending better than previous guidance for a 2-4pc decline in the first half of 2024, with more wells due to come on line later this year. The company is also preparing to start up its Anchor offshore platform in the Gulf of Mexico in the middle of the year, with more projects in the region to follow. "The outlook in the US is especially strong," chief executive Mike Wirth says. Chevron is guiding for 4-7pc overall output growth this year, after pumping a record 3.1mn boe/d last year. By Stephen Cunningham Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Brazil hydroelectric dam bursts under record rains


24/05/03
24/05/03

Brazil hydroelectric dam bursts under record rains

Sao Paulo, 3 May (Argus) — Brazilian power generation company Companhia Energetica Rio das Antas (Ceran) found a partial rupture in its 100MW 14 de Julho hydroelectric plant following record precipitation in Rio Grande do Sul state. Flooding from the record rains has left 37 dead and forced more than 23,000 people out of their homes, causing widespread damage across the state, including washed out bridges and roads across several cities. Ceran reported that the dam of the hydroelectric plant on the Antas River suffered a rupture under the heavy rains and the company implemented an emergency evacuation plan on 1 May. Ceran's 130MW Monte Claro and 130MW Castro Alves plants are under intense monitoring, the company said in a statement. Rio Grande do Sul state governor Eduardo Leite declared a state of emergency and the federal government promised to release funding for emergency disaster relief. Leite said the flooding will likely go down as the worst environmental disaster in the state's history. Brazil's southernmost state along the border with Argentina has been punished by record precipitation over the past year owing to the effects of the strong El Nino weather phenomenon, according to Rio Grande do Sul-based weather forecaster MetSul Meteorologia. Brazilian power company CPFL Energia controls Ceran with a 65pc equity stake. Energy company CEEE-GT, which is owned by steel manufacturer CSN, owns another 30pc, and Norway's Statkraft owns the remaining 5pc. The state had declared a state of emergency as recently as September 2023 because of unusually heavy rains that resulted in the death of more than 30 people. Weather forecasters expect El Nino conditions to abate in the coming months over the eastern Pacific. Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more