Social justice trumps climate ahead of German elections

  • : Electricity, Emissions
  • 21/09/23

Climate concerns have been pushed from the top of German voters' personal considerations in an electoral race that has been increasingly dominated by social justice, while concerns mount about the cost of the energy transition.

Polls suggest Germany's future government is most likely to be led by outgoing finance minister Olaf Scholz of the Social Democratic Party (SPD), following the federal elections on 26 September.

The SPD's preferred coalition partner is the opposition Green Party, Scholz said, although this party would be unable to govern on its own, based on polling trends.

The SPD, which has put social justice issues at the top of its agenda, has seen its choice vindicated, given its spectacular, if unexpected, comeback over the past few months.

The Greens, which for much of this year polled ahead of the SPD and almost at parity with outgoing chancellor Angela Merkel's centre-right Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) group, have slipped to third place. But they are likely to be part of most potential coalitions drawn up from the five-party pool.

The pro-business liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) ranks fourth in the polls, while the left-wing Linke party has stagnated at 6pc, just above the 5pc threshold needed for a party to enter the Bundestag. The populist right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) will not form part of any federal government.

Priority shift

Social justice issues rank top of voters' personal concerns, having pushed climate change to second position, according to recent surveys.

While flooding in western Germany earlier this summer has added to a general awareness of the urgent need for climate action, the costs of the energy transition are also increasingly viewed as a problem in a country in which more than half of the population live in rented accommodation.

Perhaps reflecting this priority shift, the bureau of green energy policy spokeswoman Julia Verlinden said that if the Greens enter potential coalition negotiations, "it will be a question, besides important issues such as the minimum wage and a guaranteed basic child allowance, of obtaining as much as possible for climate protection".

High wholesale energy prices have not quite filtered through to consumers yet, except for pump prices and announcements by several gas retailers that there will be double-digit price increases in the autumn. Federal transport minister Andreas Scheuer of the CSU party has warned that if the €2/litre threshold is breached at the pump, policymakers may have to intervene.

Differences between the five parties over energy policy are less fundamental than they were during the last federal elections four years ago. The CDU/CSU party has had to adapt its long-time renewables-critical attitude, as industrial firms — generally the party's core clientele — started looking to the Greens in their quest for green power.

The CDU/CSU earlier this year lost some of its most influential anti-renewables hardliners in parliament, which made it easier for the party to support the outgoing government's ambitious new climate protection law.

Slow renewables growth

The slow expansion of renewables — particularly onshore wind — is the dominant issue for Germany's energy sector, a problem enshrined in the manifestos and statements of all five parties.

Party leaders have repeatedly pledged that once in power, they will streamline and accelerate planning procedures and tackle nature conservation issues, regional planning laws and air traffic-related restrictions.

But support at the federal level for renewables growth may not necessarily translate into rapid changes on the ground, as regional plans are the responsibility of individual states and local context plays a crucial role. Germany several times has had to tweak its renewables support to make it comply with EU state aid rules. Parts of the amended renewable energies law (EEG) that took force this year still do not have EU approval.

Existing legislation calls for a 65pc share in renewable power by 2030. The SPD wants 100pc of Germany's power consumption to be covered by renewables by 2040. The CDU/CSU has given no concrete target, but pledges accelerated growth. The Greens aim for 100pc renewables by 2035. The FDP rejects mandated growth targets, instead calling for demand-driven growth. Linke, which demands the nationalisation of the power sector — among other industries — calls for a shift to a 100pc renewables system "as soon as possible".

Earlier coal phase-out

An earlier coal phase-out — by 2030 against the mandated deadline of 2038 — by now is regarded as nearly inevitable, given high EU emissions trading system (ETS) prices and the fact that Germany's climate protection plans allow the energy sector a carbon allowance of just 108mn t of CO2 in 2030.

The Greens and Linke have proposed a mandated coal phase-out by 2030.

The leaders of the SPD and CDU/CSU have publicly stated that they expect the country's coal-fired fleet to be phased out by 2030. But they do not propose to legislate on an earlier phase-out; the CDU/CSU, like the FDP, said this should be left to the EU ETS.

SPD parliamentary deputy chairman for energy and the environment Matthias Miersch recently pledged that before agreeing on any accelerated coal phase-out plan, the SPD will ensure that "no-one is left behind", referencing the party's commitment to voters.

The parties' manifestos were written before energy wholesale market prices started soaring. Regarding price concerns, the manifestos focus on the EEG levy on power consumption and the domestic carbon price in the transport and heating sector, introduced at the start of this year.

All parties have pledged to somehow reduce or phase out the EEG levy in the next few years to ensure electricity becomes cheaper and as part of a general revamp of taxes and tariffs in the power system. The EEG levy, however, is likely to fall substantially next year — from its cap of €65/MWh this year — given the strong rise in wholesale power prices.

Domestic EU ETS

Regarding the domestic carbon price, which started at €25/CO2e but will be raised annually, the SPD, Greens and Linke all have pledged that lower-income households will not suffer, while the FDP has called for a rapid integration of the domestic scheme in an EU system.

In a survey of economists organised by economic research institute Ifo, more than half of respondents said a coalition government formed by the CDU/CSU and FDP would lead to a scenario with the highest CO2 emissions in Germany by the end of the four-year parliamentary term. It is also the coalition most expected — by 44pc of the economists — to produce the strongest economic growth.

Opinions are "remarkably" split on the coalition make-up most likely to preside over the lowest-emissions scenario in the next four years, Ifo said. About 18pc believe an SPD/Greens government will see the lowest emissions, with other coalitions following close behind. "It seems that economists are unsure about whether it is low economic growth — or rather, Green policies — that will have the highest effect on denting CO2 emissions," Ifo economist Niklas Potrafke said.


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

24/05/20

Japan’s FEPC calls for clearer nuclear policy stance

Japan’s FEPC calls for clearer nuclear policy stance

Osaka, 20 May (Argus) — Japan's Federation of Electric Power Companies (FEPC) has called for a clarification of the country's nuclear power policy, to ensure stable electricity supply and alignment with its net zero emissions goal. The call comes as the government reviews its basic energy policy , which was formulated in 2021 and calls for the reduction of dependence on nuclear reactors as much as possible. But Japan's guidelines for green transformation, which was agreed in February 2023, states that Japan should make the most of existing nuclear reactors. Tokyo should clearly state in its new energy policy that it is necessary to not only restart existing nuclear reactors, but also build new reactors, said FEPC chairman Kingo Hayashi on 17 May. Hayashi is also the president of utility Chubu Electric Power. Hayashi emphasised that to utilise reactors, it would be necessary to have discussions regarding financial support, policy measures that would help ensure cost recovery, address back-end issues in the nuclear fuel cycle and conduct a review of nuclear damage compensation law. Japan's current basic energy policy is targeted for the April 2030-March 2031 fiscal year, when the country's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is forecast to fall by 46pc from 2013-14 levels. To achieve this, the power mix in the policy set the nuclear ratio at 20-22pc, as well as 36-38pc from renewables, 41pc from thermal fuels and 1pc from hydrogen and ammonia. Japan typically reviews the country's basic energy policy every three years. Nuclear, as well as renewables, would be necessary to reduce Japan's GHG emissions, although thermal power units would still play a key role in addressing power shortages. But Japan has faced challenges in restarting the country's reactors following safety concerns after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, with only 12 reactors currently operational. Japan's nuclear generation in 2023 totalled 77TWh, which accounted for just 9pc of total power output. Tokyo has made efforts to promote the use of reactors, after the current basic energy policy was introduced in 2021. The trade and industry ministry (Meti) has updated its nuclear policy, by allowing nuclear power operators to continue using reactors beyond their maximum lifespan of 60 years by excluding a safety scrutiny period in the wake of the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster. This could advance the discussion on Japan's nuclear stance, especially if the new basic energy policy includes more supportive regulations. The trade and industry ministry started discussions to review the energy policy on 15 May, aiming to revise it by the end of this fiscal year. It is still unclear what year it is targeting and what ratio will be set for each power source in the new policy. But the deliberation would form a key part of efforts to update the GHG emissions reduction goal, ahead of the submission of the country's new nationally determined contribution in 2025, with a timeframe for implementation until 2035. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Japan’s Jera to handle 35mn t/yr LNG until FY2035-36


24/05/17
24/05/17

Japan’s Jera to handle 35mn t/yr LNG until FY2035-36

Osaka, 17 May (Argus) — Japan's largest LNG importer Jera plans to maintain its LNG handling volumes at no less than 35mn t/yr until the April 2035-March 2036 fiscal year. Rising renewable power supplies and the possible return of more nuclear reactors are likely to pressure LNG demand from Japan's power sector. Jera consumed 23mn t of LNG in 2023-24, down by 3pc on the year, although it handled 35mn t through its global operations during the same year. But Jera needs to secure sufficient LNG supplies to adjust for imbalances in electricity supplies and ensure power security, through more flexible operations. It is also looking to further promote LNG along with renewable electricity in Asian countries, while helping to reduce their dependence on coal- and oil-fired power generators. The 2035 target for LNG is part of Jera's three pillars of strategic focus, along with renewables as well as hydrogen and ammonia , which was announced on 16 May to spur decarbonisation towards its 2050 net zero emissions goal. The company plans to invest ¥5 trillion ($32bn) for these three areas over 2024-36. Jera also aims to retire all supercritical or less efficient coal-fired units by 2030-31 . This would help achieve the company's target of cutting CO2 emissions from its domestic business by at least 60pc against 2013-14 levels by 2035-36. By Motoko Hasegawa Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Biomass start-ups lift Japan's Renova April power sales


24/05/17
24/05/17

Biomass start-ups lift Japan's Renova April power sales

Tokyo, 17 May (Argus) — Japanese renewable power developer Renova's electricity sales doubled on the year in April, following the start-up of three biomass power plants in the past six months. Renova sold 199,601MWh of electricity — including solar, biomass and geothermal — in April, double the 99,857MWh a year earlier, the company announced on 13 May. The 75MW Sendai Gamo plant in northeastern Miyagi prefecture started operations in November 2023 and produced 40,753MWh in April. The 74.8MW Tokushima Tsuda plant in western Tokushima prefecture, which was commissioned in December 2023, generated 10,870MWh in April. The 75MW Ishinomaki Hibarino plant in Miyagi began normal runs in March and supplied 49,495MWh in April. Renova plans to add 124.9MW biomass-fired capacity in the April 2024-March 2025 fiscal year, with the 75MW Omaezaki plant in central Shizuoka city scheduled to begin commercial operations in July, followed by the 49.9MW Karatsu plant in southern Saga city in December. Omaezaki is currently conducting trial runs and Karatsu is under construction. The additions will increase Renova's biomass-fired capacity to 445MW. By Takeshi Maeda Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EBRD ‘green project’ funding hit €6.54bn in 2023


24/05/15
24/05/15

EBRD ‘green project’ funding hit €6.54bn in 2023

London, 15 May (Argus) — The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) hit a record level of investments in the "green economy" in 2023, at €6.54bn ($7.1bn) in 337 projects — up from €6.36bn in 2022. The multilateral development bank (MDB) again reached its target for at least 50pc of its total annual investment to go towards green projects. Of total investments, 50pc went to green projects — flat on the year. The EBRD initially set the goal for 2025, but hit it in 2021, with 51pc of its investment going to green projects. The EBRD's investments stood at €13.1bn in 2023 — a new record high — going towards 464 individual projects. The bank has since the beginning of 2023 ensured that all new investment projects are in line with the Paris climate agreement goals. The Paris agreement seeks to limit the rise in temperature to "well below" 2°C above pre-industrial levels, and preferably to 1.5°C. Countries' focus on MDBs and their role in delivering climate finance has intensified in recent years. Climate finance is set to dominate climate talks this year, including at the UN Cop 29 summit, set for November in Baku, Azerbaijan. Mukhtar Babayev, Cop president-designate, last month called on MDBs and parties to the Cop process to deliver on climate finance. The EBRD is owned by 73 shareholder governments, the EU and the European Investment Bank. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US court upholds RFS blending targets for 2020-22


24/05/14
24/05/14

US court upholds RFS blending targets for 2020-22

Washington, 14 May (Argus) — A federal appeals court has affirmed biofuel blending requirements for 2020-22 under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), rejecting lawsuits from refineries and renewable fuel producers challenging the standards. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acted within its authority in the rule when it revised the biofuel blending targets to account for small refinery exemptions it expected it would award in the future, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit said today in a 2-1 ruling. The court rejected a complaint by refineries that argued EPA could only revise the annual biofuel blending targets based on exemptions it had already approved in the past. "The statute does not confine EPA to the Refiner Petitioners' preferred method of accounting for small refinery exemptions," DC Circuit judge Cornelia Pillard wrote on behalf of the majority. "EPA's choice to account for them both retrospectively and prospectively is not arbitrary or capricious." The ruling leaves intact a 2022 rule that required renewable fuel blending to increase to 20.63bn USG by 2022, up from 17.13bn USG in 2020. For the first time under the RFS, the rule used a new formula that tried to avoid a recurrent issue under which EPA failed to account for upcoming requests from small refineries for exemptions from the RFS. EPA has subsequently decided to start denying all small refinery exemptions, under a new argument that small refiners do not face a disproportionate hardship from complying with the RFS. But if the courts throw out that finding in a pending lawsuit , the formula at issue in today's court ruling could take on a greater relevance for how EPA accounts for small refinery exemptions when setting biofuel blending targets. The DC Circuit rejected a separate lawsuit by cellulosic ethanol producers that said EPA should have required increased blending of cellulosic ethanol, based in part on the availability of carryover compliance credits. The court found EPA had adequate authority to waive volumetric targets set by the US Congress in 2007 based on its finding there were inadequate domestic supplies of the fuel, which is produced from plant fibers. Judge Gregory Katsas, who dissented from the ruling, said he believed the biofuel blending requirements for 2022 were set "arbitrarily high." Katsas cited EPA's finding that those standards would impose an estimated $5.7bn in additional costs for fuel but only deliver $160mn in energy security benefits. Katsas also faulted EPA for increasing the biofuel blending targets by 250mn USG in 2022 to "cancel out a legal error" from biofuel blending targets in 2016. Katsas said there was no authority to transfer volume requirements from one year to another. By Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more