Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

UK political parties repeat existing stances on energy

  • : Crude oil, Electricity, Emissions, Natural gas
  • 24/06/13

The two main UK political parties have set out their plans, including on energy and climate change, with just three weeks until the general election. Energy security and the cost to consumers is a recurring theme for both, but the manifestos present some marked differences in approach to the energy transition.

Both the incumbent Conservative and opposition Labour parties doubled down on existing positions in their respective manifestos. The Conservative party said that it remains committed to the UK's 2050 net zero emissions target, but promises a "pragmatic and proportionate" route. The party's manifesto guarantees "no new green levies or charges while accelerating the rollout of renewables".

The UK's net zero goal is legally-binding, and was passed with significant cross-party support under a Conservative government in 2019. The Conservatives have been in power since 2010, and fielded five prime ministers in that time. Recent polling data show a substantial lead for Labour, which performed well at local elections in May.

Labour placed strong focus on the opportunity the transition offers, saying that it would place the UK at the "forefront of climate action by creating the green jobs of the future at home and driving forward the energy transition on the global stage". The party has committed to zero-carbon power by 2030, although it would "maintain a strategic reserve of gas power stations to guarantee security of supply", it said. The Conservative manifesto reiterates the party's plans to build new gas-fired power plants. The party had previously committed to a decarbonised power grid by 2035, in line with a G7 pledge, although that is not mentioned in its manifesto.

The two main parties clearly diverge on their approaches to North Sea oil and gas production. The Conservatives aim to keep the windfall tax — which effectively results in a 75pc rate — on oil and gas producers in place "until 2028-29, unless prices fall back to normal sooner". Labour confirmed plans to lift the rate to 78pc and run the tax until the end of the next parliament, which is likely to be mid-2029. Labour is also clear that it "will not revoke existing licences" in the North Sea, but it will not issue any new licences — for oil, gas or coal. The Conservatives restated the party's aim to legislate for annual North Sea licensing rounds.

Both parties back nuclear energy, including small modular reactors — though those are unlikely to be operational until after 2030. And both pledge to cut planning bureaucracy and tackle grid connections. Labour's plans to "double onshore wind, triple solar power, and quadruple offshore wind by 2030" would result in installed capacity of 31GW, 48GW and 59GW, respectively, from a baseline of end-2023. The Conservatives' target to triple offshore wind by the end of the next parliament would put installed capacity at 44GW in 2029 — below the 50GW target for 2030 set in 2022 — while it said it supports solar and onshore wind in some circumstances.

Finance in focus

Both parties are keen to pull in private-sector investment, while Labour took up an original Conservative pledge to "make the UK the green finance capital of the world". And both pledge to address the cost of energy for consumers — Labour through local power generation projects and home insulation upgrades, and the Conservatives by ruling out any further "green levies". The latter plans to reverse London's expansion of the ultra-low emissions zone — originally planned by Conservative then-mayor and later prime minister Boris Johnson. Labour said that it would restore a phase-out date of 2030 for new internal combustion engine cars — which prime minister Rishi Sunak in September pushed back to 2035.

On an international level, both parties mention climate leadership at summits such as UN Cops. The Conservatives pledged to "ring-fence" the UK's climate finance commitments, while Labour committed to restore development spending to 0.7pc of gross national income "as soon as fiscal circumstances allow".


Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/07/16

New tariff threat could disrupt Mexico GDP outlook

New tariff threat could disrupt Mexico GDP outlook

Mexico City, 16 July (Argus) — Mexico's association of finance executives IMEF held its 2025 GDP growth forecast steady at 0.1pc in its July survey but warned the outlook could deteriorate if the US raises tariffs to 30pc. The survey of 43 analysts maintained projections for year-end inflation at 4pc and for the central bank's benchmark interest rate to fall from 8pc to 7.5pc by the end of 2025. The sharpest variation came in formal employment, after Mexico's social security administration IMSS reported a net loss of 139,444 formal jobs in the second quarter. IMEF cut its 2025 job creation forecast to 160,000 from 190,000 in June — the seventh and largest downgrade this year. Job losses increased in April, May and June, "a situation not seen since the pandemic in 2020," IMEF said. "If this trend is not reversed, the net number of formal jobs could fall to zero by year-end." "It is still too early to call it a recession, but the rise in job losses is worrying," said Victor Herrera, head of economic studies at IMEF. "The next risk we face is in auto plants. Some halted production after the 25pc US tariff was imposed in April. They did not lay off workers right away — they sent them home with half pay. But if this is not resolved in the next 60-90 days, layoffs will follow." The July survey was conducted before US president Donald Trump said on 12 July he would raise tariffs on Mexican goods from 25pc to 30pc starting 1 August. "What we have seen in the past is that when the deadline comes, the tariffs are postponed or canceled," Herrera said. "Hopefully, that happens again. If not, you can expect GDP forecasts to shift into contraction territory." While the full impact would vary by sector, Herrera said the effective average tariff rate would rise from 4pc to 15pc, with most exports either exempt or subject to reduced rates under regional content rules. But 8–10pc of auto exports would face the full 30pc duty. IMEF expects the peso to end 2025 at Ps20.1/$1, stronger than the Ps20.45/$1 estimate in June. But the group warned that rising Japanese rates — which influence currency carry trades — and falling Mexican rates could put renewed pressure on the peso once the dollar rebounds. For 2026, the GDP growth forecast dropped to 1.3pc from 1.5pc, while the peso is seen ending that year at Ps20.75/$1, slightly stronger than the previous Ps20.90/$1 forecast. By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Vessel identified in Venezuelan oil sanctions busting


25/07/16
25/07/16

Vessel identified in Venezuelan oil sanctions busting

Caracas, 16 July (Argus) — A Venezuelan watchdog group said it has identified fifteen oil tankers used to circumvent US sanctions against crude sales from the country. The vessels take part in a system of clandestine ship-to-ship transfers off the Venezuelan coast at night, according to the report from the Venezuelan chapter of Transparency International, which is operating in exile. The transfers happen on a regular basis, with ship transponders turned off and with no oversight or safety monitoring from port authorities. Many of the ships that enter the sanctions-busting trade were inactive or soon-to-be scrapped — such as the Aframax Cape Balder , which was once listed as inactive and set to be scrapped, according to the report. Many of the ships also change names when starting in the sanctioned shipments realm, such as the Panamax Nabiin , which was formerly known as Euroforce , according to the report. Most of the cargoes end up in China where they are rebranded as Brazilian, Malay or Singaporean crude, according to the report. Of the 15 vessels identified, five are registered in the Comoro Islands, four in Panama, and the rest in other locations. They include seven very large crude carriers (VLCCs), seven Panamax and one Aframax. Aside from the financial incentives, Venezuela relies so heavily on the crude smuggling schemes to deal with a shortage of oil storage, according to the report. Since the first round of US sanctions on the country started in 2019, storage space in the country's Bajo Grande and Ule sites has tightened significantly and has at times forced a reduction in crude production. The other ships named in the report include: the VLCC Varada Blessing; Panamax Jacinda; Panamax Petrogaruda; VLCC Vieira; VLCC Longevo; VLCC Alice; Panamax Sinar G; VLCC Champ; VLCC Latitude; VLCC Ekta; Panamax Colon; Panamax Tailwinds; Panamax Veronica. By Carlos Camacho Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Oil firms in Iraq Kurdistan shut in 200,000 b/d: Update


25/07/16
25/07/16

Oil firms in Iraq Kurdistan shut in 200,000 b/d: Update

Updates with comments from the US State Department Washington, 16 July (Argus) — Foreign oil companies operating in Iraq's semi-autonomous Kurdistan region have shut in more than 200,000 b/d of production following drone attacks on key oil fields, an industry group representing them said on Wednesday. Operators are assessing damage to facilities and even firms that have not taken direct hits have taken fields off line, according to the Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan (Apikur), an industry body representing eight foreign oil companies operating in the region. The group called on the federal government of Iraq and on the Kurdistan regional government to take additional measures to ensure the safety of staff and facilities. Individual members of Apikur, including Norwegian independent DNO and UK-listed Gulf Keystone, already reported shutting in production, in some cases as a precautionary measure. The latest attacks on Wednesday targeted the Tawke, Peshkabir, and Ain Sifni oil fields, according to the Kurdistan region's Ministry of Natural Resources. In the previous two days, attacks targeted the Sarsang field operated by US independent HKN Energy, US firm Hunt Oil's facility in Baadre and the Khurmala field, according to the local authorities. No group has claimed responsibility for the attacks. But in the first public accusation from a senior Kurdistan official, former Iraqi foreign minister Hoshyar Zebari on Wednesday blamed the attacks on Wilaya-aligned factions — a militia group loyal to Iran. Deputy chief of staff to Kurdistan regional prime minister, Aziz Ahmad, via a social media post Wednesday, appealed to the US administration to enable the region "to defend ourselves", noting that the attacks targeted fields operated by two US companies. "Still no call from [US secretary of state Marco Rubio]," Ahmad posted. "We need more than words." The State Department called the attacks "unacceptable". adding that "we've expressed our dismay and our problem with them." The attacks come as tensions between the Kurdistan region and Baghdad continue over the federal government's halt of salary payments to public servants and the prolonged suspension of oil exports through Turkey's Ceyhan port. But both sides were reportedly close to a breakthrough in negotiations that could allow for the resumption of exports and a resolution to the salary dispute. By Haik Gugarats and Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Oil firms in Iraqi Kurdistan shut in 200,000 b/d


25/07/16
25/07/16

Oil firms in Iraqi Kurdistan shut in 200,000 b/d

Washington, 16 July (Argus) — Foreign oil companies operating in Iraq's semi-autonomous Kurdistan region have shut in more than 200,000 b/d of production following drone attacks on key oil fields, an industry group representing them said on Wednesday. Operators are assessing damage to facilities and even firms that have not taken direct hits have taken fields off line, according to the Association of the Petroleum Industry of Kurdistan (Apikur), an industry body representing eight foreign oil companies operating in the region. The group called on the federal government of Iraq and on the Kurdistan regional government to take additional measures to ensure the safety of staff and facilities. Individual members of Apikur, including Norwegian independent DNO and UK-listed Gulf Keystone, already reported shutting in production, in some cases as a precautionary measure. The latest attacks on Wednesday targeted the Tawke, Peshkabir, and Ain Sifni oil fields, according to the Kurdistan region's Ministry of Natural Resources. In the previous two days, attacks targeted the Sarsang field operated by US independent HKN Energy, US firm Hunt Oil's facility in Baadre and the Khurmala field, according to the local authorities. No group has claimed responsibility for the attacks. But in the first public accusation from a senior Kurdistan official, former Iraqi foreign minister Hoshyar Zebari on Wednesday blamed the attacks on Wilaya-aligned factions — a militia group loyal to Iran. Deputy chief of staff to Kurdistan regional prime minister, Aziz Ahmad, via a social media post Wednesday, appealed to the US administration to enable the region "to defend ourselves", noting that the attacks targeted fields operated by two US companies. "Still no call from [US secretary of state Marco Rubio]," Ahmad posted. "We need more than words." The State Department was not immediately available to comment. The attacks come as tensions between the Kurdistan region and Baghdad continue over the federal government's halt of salary payments to public servants and the prolonged suspension of oil exports through Turkey's Ceyhan port. But both sides were reportedly close to a breakthrough in negotiations that could allow for the resumption of exports and a resolution to the salary dispute. By Haik Gugarats and Bachar Halabi Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU states to reach stance on 2040 climate goal in Sep


25/07/16
25/07/16

EU states to reach stance on 2040 climate goal in Sep

Brussels, 16 July (Argus) — EU member states' position on the bloc's 2040 climate target should be finalised on 18 September, after a "very tight process", Danish climate and energy minister Lars Aagaard said today. "There are also some in this room who think that the answer to competitiveness challenges is to abandon climate targets. That is not what I hear a majority of European countries want," Aagaard told the European Parliament's energy committee today. Aagaard is overseeing the process, as Denmark holds the six-month rotating EU council presidency until the end of the year. The European Commission earlier this month formally proposed a 2040 goal of a 90pc cut in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, from 1990 levels. The bloc will then use the 2040 target to submit a climate plan, known as a nationally determined contribution (NDC), for a timeframe to 2035, to UN climate body the UNFCCC. Aargaard will need parliament's approval of the update — the 2040 target — to the bloc's 2021 climate law. But Czech ECR conservative Alexander Vondra referred to voices that see the commission's proposed 90pc net GHG cut as "too draconian". Vondra also called for more flexibility in the use of international carbon credits under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The commission proposes limiting their use for domestic reductions to only 3pc of 1990 GHG emissions. "This 3pc is good for a couple of multinationals, some richer states. Poor states, small companies have no chance. Are you willing to compromise, to give more flexibility?" Vondra asked. Former environment committee chair Pascal Canfin called for robust "flexibilities" when using international carbon credits. "Robust means that it cannot be within the ETS. It has to be negotiated by the commission itself and not having 27 [member state] parallel negotiations," Canfin, a French liberal Renew member, said. Aargaard did not expand beyond previous statements about "general support" among member states on Article 6 credits, and the need to maintain integrity and credibility. He added that EU states have questioned the "how" and not the "why" of the flexibility mechanism. "And then, of course, there is a discussion between the member states in relation to the volume," Aargaard said. Spanish Patriots member Hermann Tertsch said his group "will also monitor parliament's timetable, raising concerns about possible deliberate delays, as the group explicitly expressed resistance to the bill." The far-right group opposes a 90pc reduction target for 2040 but has been allocated the legal file. Any delay to the 2040 target would raise questions about the timing of the bloc's NDC submission that itself is to be derived from the 2040 target. The NDC has to be submitted ahead of the UN Cop 30 climate conference in Belem, Brazil, in November. By Dafydd ab Iago Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more