Southeast Asian oil demand to rise to 2050: IEA

: Crude oil, Electricity, Natural gas
24/10/22

Southeast Asia's oil demand is set to increase to 7mn b/d in 2050 under current policies, according to the IEA's latest Southeast Asia Energy Outlook released today.

Oil demand in the southeast Asian region is set to rise from 5mn b/d in 2023 to 6.4mn b/d in 2035, and to 7mn b/d in 2050. This is a downward revision from the IEA's previous outlook in 2022, which projected oil demand rising to about 7mn b/d in 2030 and 7.5mn b/d in 2050.

The IEA's stated policies scenario (Steps) is based on countries' existing policies, while the announced pledges scenario (APS) assumes that governments meet all their national energy and climate targets, including long-term net zero goals. Under the APS, oil demand continues to grow but to a lesser extent to 5.2mn b/d in 2035, and then falls to 3.8mn b/d in 2050.

The transport sector is the main driver of the region's increase in oil demand, with oil consumption in that sector more than doubling from 1.3mn b/d in 2000 to 2.8mn b/d currently. Under current policies and trends, gasoline and diesel consumption for road transport rises by around 30pc by 2050, reaching nearly 1.6mn b/d.

The region's gas demand is projected to rise from around 170bn m³ currently, to around 210bn m³ in 2030 and about 270bn m³ in 2050. This compared to the IEA's 2022 projections of 240bn m³ in 2030 and about 340bn m³ in 2050.

Gas demand has increased by 5pc since 2022, according to the IEA. This recovery comes after a 4pc fall in demand over 2019-22, resulting from Covid-19 and a rise in LNG prices following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.

Overall energy demand is expected to rise by "about a third by 2035 and two-thirds by 2050," according to the IEA, with just under half of this demand growth to be met by fossil fuels. Under the APS, energy demand grows to a smaller extent of around 40pc to 2050, reflecting accelerated improvements in efficiency, electrification and fuel switching.

The share of fossil fuels in the total energy mix falls from 78pc currently to 65pc in 2050. This is lower than the 2022 outlook's projection that fossil fuels would make up more than 70pc of the energy mix in 2050.

The downward revisions in fossil fuel demand and their share in the energy mix is likely because renewables are set to grow rapidly in the region. Renewable energy already accounts for just under 20pc of the region's energy mix, through hydropower, geothermal and bioenergy. Clean energy is set to meet more than 35pc of energy demand growth to 2035 under the Steps scenario, because of rapid expansions in wind and solar power.

IEA's growing presence in southeast Asia

The IEA and Singapore inaugurated the IEA Regional Co-operation Centre on 21 October — the first office outside of the organisation's Paris headquarters. The centre will serve as a hub for IEA's activities and engagement in the region, so the organisation can provide policy guidance, technical assistance, training and capacity-building to address areas such as scaling up the deployment of renewables and increasing access to finance for clean energy investments.

Southeast Asia is projected to be second only to India in the contribution to global energy demand growth over the coming years, said IEA's chief energy economist Tim Gould on 22 October at the Singapore International Energy Week. This is why the new regional center is so important, he added.

Cross-border electricity trade, in particular, is going to be a high priority, Gould said. "A key work, from an IEA perspective, is to make those opportunities to bring in the private sector and different sources of finance for these projects," he added.

By Prethika Nair

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/06/17

Trump wants Iran's ‘unconditional surrender’: Update

Updates with details throughout Washington, 17 June (Argus) — US president Donald Trump is taking an increasingly bellicose tone toward Iran following Israel's devastating military strikes, while the White House national security council is discussing Washington's next steps in a conflict that could engulf the world's largest oil producing region. Trump, in a social media post today, called for Iran's "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER" — without specifying what that would entail. He claimed that "we now have complete and total control of the skies over Iran", seemingly linking the US to the Israeli attack. And he said that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, "is an easy target", but added: "We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now." The White House, meanwhile, began to spread a narrative that suggested that the US could join in Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, even if Tehran does not directly attack US interests or personnel in the region. Trump "has shown remarkable restraint in keeping our military's focus on protecting our troops and protecting our citizens," vice president JD Vance posted on social platform X, adding that Trump "may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment". Trump cut short his visit to the G7 leaders summit in Canada to return to Washington Monday night. The US administration has come under intense lobbying from the isolationist wing of politicians loyal to Trump, who have called publicly for him not to commit US military personnel and resources to attack Iran. Senate Democrats, in turn, began to circulate legislation demanding that Trump ask for authorization from Congress before using military force against Iran. Trump blasted former Fox News anchorman Tucker Carlson as "kooky" for arguing vociferously against US participation in any attack in Iran. Trump, at the same time, criticized French president Emmanuel Macron for suggesting that Trump's early exit from the G7 summit was meant to work toward a ceasefire in the Middle East. "People are right to be worried about foreign entanglement after the last 25 years of idiotic foreign policy," Vance said. "But I believe the president has earned some trust on this issue." Trump, in stump speeches during the presidential campaign and since reclaiming the White House, has frequently denounced his predecessors for entangling the US in wars in the Middle East. In a speech in Riyadh last month, Trump offered "peaceful engagement" to Tehran and criticized his predecessors as "the interventionists (who) were intervening in complex societies they did not understand". Since Israel first launched its attack on Iran on 13 June, the US has warned Tehran not to target US forces in retaliation. Iran has taken no such step and has called on Trump to restrain Israel from further attacks to allow US-Iran nuclear diplomacy to resume. Iran in recent years has relied on its proxy networks in Iraq, Syria and Yemen to launch attacks on US forces. The degree of Tehran's remaining control over those proxy groups is uncertain. Iran also has not tried to block vessel traffic through the strait of Hormuz, a critical waterway that in 2023 accounted for 27pc of global maritime oil trade. Targeting vessel traffic in Hormuz would mark an irreversible escalation in the conflict, with damaging consequences for Iran as well as the global oil trade. Iran's Mideast Gulf neighbors, which have invested in better relations with Tehran in recent years, are watching the prospect with concern. "The UAE stands for dialogue, de-escalation and diplomacy," Abu Dhabi's state-owned Adnoc chief executive Sultan al-Jaber said at an energy forum in Washington today. "We call on parties to show restraint, and we reaffirm our belief in peace over provocation." US energy secretary Chris Wright was scheduled to speak at the same forum, hosted by think tank the Atlantic Council, but he abruptly cancelled his appearance to participate in the White House discussions on Iran. The US is rushing military, naval and air assets to the Middle East, saying the buildup is aimed at enabling Israel to protect itself from Iranian missile strikes. While Israel has targeted the majority of Iranian nuclear sites, it likely will be unable to destroy Iran's Fordow nuclear enrichment facility on its own. Fordow suffered only minor damage in recent days, and Israel appears to believe that leaving the plant operational would mean a failure of a key military goal, said retired general Frank McKenzie, who served as the commander of Middle East-based US forces in 2019-2022. "I'm certain they're going to get around to Fordow as it may be, trying to get us into the conflict," McKenzie said on Monday. "But I don't see how we get in unless we're attacked, and the Iranians have been very careful about not doing that up until now." By Haik Gugarats and Chris Knight Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Chevron latest E&P to join the US lithium hunt

25/06/17

Chevron latest E&P to join the US lithium hunt

New York, 17 June (Argus) — Chevron has joined the ranks of some of the world's biggest oil producers in taking initial steps to explore for lithium, a key component in electric vehicle (EV) batteries. The second-biggest US oil major said it has acquired about 125,000 net acres in northeast Texas and southwest Arkansas, covering parts of the Smackover formation — a region that has already drawn interest from rivals including ExxonMobil and Equinor for the high lithium content in its briny groundwater. Oil companies are seeking to leverage existing skillsets to deploy advanced methods to extract lithium from brine water — which is regularly produced along with oil and natural gas — at the subsurface. The goal is to produce lithium at lower cost and with a smaller environmental footprint than traditional hard rock mining techniques or those that require massive evaporation ponds and more freshwater resources. "Establishing domestic and resilient lithium supply chains is essential not only to maintaining US energy leadership but also to meeting the growing demand from customers," said Jeff Gustavson, president of Chevron New Energies. "This opportunity builds on many of Chevron's strengths including subsurface resource development." Chevron acquired the two leasehold acreage positions from TerraVolta Resources, whose investor is an affiliate of the Energy & Minerals Group, and East Texas Natural Resources. Financial details of the deals were not disclosed. The announcement follows growing interest in the region as oil companies seek to navigate the demands of the energy transition. Smackover Lithium, a joint venture between Standard Lithium and Equinor, aims to produce 22,500 t/yr of battery-grade lithium carbonate from the Southwest Arkansas Project (SWA) by 2028. In May, the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission approved a 2.5pc quarterly gross royalty for the Reynolds Unit in Phase I of SWA, located in Lafayette and Columbia counties —setting a precedent for similar projects statewide. In November 2024, ExxonMobil signed a deal to supply up to 100,000 t of lithium carbonate to South Korea's LG Chem , sourcing the feedstock from the Smackover Formation. "By early next decade, big oil and big mining will replace the likes of [major US-based lithium producer] Albemarle at the top of the lithium world," said independent analyst Joe Lowry, host of the Global Lithium podcast. By Stephen Cunningham and Carol Luk Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

TSO error, generation loss led to blackout: Spain VP

25/06/17

TSO error, generation loss led to blackout: Spain VP

London, 17 June (Argus) — Programming mistakes from Spain's transmission system operator (TSO) and "improper" disconnection of generating units by utilities contributed to Spain's 28 April blackout, according to Spain's vice-president and ecological transition minister, Sara Aagesen. Aagesen addressed the public following a meeting with the council of ministers, in which she presented a report on the government's findings from its investigation into the blackout that affected the Iberian peninsula on 28 April . Poor planning for voltage controls may have contributed to the blackout on 28 April. The day before the Iberian outage, Spanish TSO Red Electrica requested that 10 thermal plants be available in case of voltage issues on 28 April, Aagesen said. Market mechanisms meant the plants were not expected to be part of the 28 April generation mix, but the TSO often selects thermal units spread across Spain for back-up in case of an extraordinary event, in exchange for financial compensation. At 20:00 local time (18:00 GMT) on the night before the blackout, one of the thermal plants informed the TSO that it would not be able to operate the next day, and the TSO decided not to select another plant to take its place. The TSO "decided to reprogramme [for the next day], but not replace the need for a thermal plant", which meant the TSO went into the day of the blackout with "resources for voltage control that were inferior to what they had calculated the previous morning for the middle hours [of 28 April]". Some of the generation that disconnected from the grid in the initial stages of the blackout happened in an "improper manner". While some units automatically disconnected to protect themselves from voltage fluctuations, it was suggested that some generation units should not have done so. This created a wider "wave of over-voltage", amplifying the effects. And generation loss was detected not only in the Badajoz, Granada and Sevilla provinces as previously believed, but also in Caceres, Huelva and Segovia. This phase of the blackout took place within the space of 21 seconds. There is still no indication that a cyber attack took place on 28 April. The minister reiterated the government's stance on the matter, ruling out external influences on the events during the blackout. The full report covering the government's investigation into the blackout, approved by the council of ministers, will be published this evening. Aagesen will hold a meeting with her Portuguese counterpart, Maria da Graca Carvalho, in Portugal this evening at 20:00 local time (20:00 BST). By James Doran Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Two oil tankers collide off UAE coast: Update

25/06/17

Two oil tankers collide off UAE coast: Update

Adds fire, details on both tankers throughout Dubai, 17 June (Argus) — Two oil tankers have collided off the coast of the UAE, the country's national guard said today, with at least one seemingly on fire as a result. The collision occurred early today, 17 June, in the Sea of Oman, around 24 nautical miles off the port of Khor Fakkan on the UAE's east coast, according to the national guard. It identified one of the vessels as the Antigua and Barbuda-flagged Adalynn , a Suezmax-class tanker that had departed Fujairah heading for the Suez Canal, according to MarineTraffic data. Unverified video on social media shows the Adalynn on fire. The national guard said 24 crew members were removed and brought ashore at Khor Fakkan. Adalynn was, under a previous name, under US sanctions from March 2022 to September 2023, accused of being used for illicit shipments in support of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Shipping company Frontline said its very large crude carrier (VLCC) Front Eagle was the other tanker. Frontline said there was a fire on the Front Eagle's deck, which was quickly extinguished. All its crew are safe, Frontline said. Tracking data show the tanker had departed Khor Fakkan and was bound for Zhoushan, China. MarineTraffic data show both tankers are stationary. The incident comes a day after the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) said it had received multiple reports of "increasing electronic interference" in the Mideast Gulf and strait of Hormuz. The interference is probably linked to the latest escalation between Israel and Iran, triggered by Israeli air and missile strikes on several Iranian military and nuclear sites on 13 June. The two sides have since exchanged missile fire with growing intensity, and critical infrastructure was hit over the weekend. By Nader Itayim, Elshan Aliyev and Ben Winkley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

UN Bonn climate talks delayed by agenda disagreements

25/06/17

UN Bonn climate talks delayed by agenda disagreements

Edinburgh, 17 June (Argus) — The start of UN climate talks in Bonn, Germany, has been delayed as a result of agenda disagreements over finance and trade measures. The Bonn technical negotiations — halfway-point talks before the UN Cop 30 conference in Brazil — were scheduled to begin on 16 June, but the plenary was suspended as parties failed to agree on an agenda. The opening meeting is due to restart later today. Bolivia — acting on behalf of the Like-Minded Group of Developing Countries (LMDC) negotiating group — proposed two additional items to the provisional agenda. The LMDC group also includes countries such as China, Saudi Arabia, Cuba and Vietnam. The group's first proposed agenda item seeks to add a line on the implementation of Article 9.1 of the Paris Agreement relating to the provision of climate finance to developing countries from developed nations. The EU opposed the agenda item as proposed by the LMDC, and asked for references to Article 9.2 and 9.3, which relate to the provision of finance by "other parties" and sources of finance. The LMDC rejected this counterproposal. Finance remains a central issue in climate negotiations. At Cop 29 last year, almost 200 countries agreed on a new goal to provide $300bn/yr in climate finance to developing nations by 2035. The Cop 29 finance outcome was significantly lower than the trillions of dollars sought by developing countries, which expressed frustration at the time. But the Cop 29 text also called on "all actors… to enable the scaling up of financing to developing country parties for climate action from all public and private sources to at least $1.3 trillion/yr by 2035". Consultations on a roadmap to achieve that level will take place in Bonn. The second agenda item proposed by the LMDC relates to "promoting international co-operation and addressing the concerns with climate change related trade-restrictive unilateral measures" — namely the EU's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM). The CBAM was a point of contention during the Cop 28 and 29 talks, with countries such as China and Brazil raising concerns about its impact on developing countries. The mechanism aims to create a level playing field by imposing an effective carbon price on imports to the EU in sectors covered by the bloc's emissions trading system (ETS). This is to prevent EU-based firms from moving carbon-intensive production to non-EU jurisdictions with lower carbon costs, and to avoid EU products being replaced by more carbon-intensive imports. The European Commission expects the CBAM, when fully phased in, to capture more than half of the emissions covered by the bloc's ETS. The scheme's full implementation starts on 1 January 2026, but its impact is already starting to be felt . Six emissions-intensive industries are included under CBAM's scope at present — cement, fertilizers, iron and steel, aluminium, electricity and hydrogen. By Caroline Varin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more