Gatun Lake to reach all-time high in Dec: Panama Canal

: Freight, LPG, Natural gas
24/11/08

Water levels at Gatun Lake that supplies the Panama Canal will reach an all-time high in December, according to forecasts from the Panama Canal Authority (ACP).

This is a significant shift from the start of the year, when water levels were at the lowest January level since 1965 following an extensive El Nino induced-drought in 2023 (see chart).

ACP expects water levels at the lake to hit 88.9ft on 7 December and then 89ft on 18 December, which if confirmed would break the 88.85ft record registered on 5 December 2022.

This time last year water levels were in an 80-82ft range, the lowest on record for the November-December months, which prompted ACP to enforce rigorous transit restrictions that sent shockwaves through LPG and other shipping markets.

The change in water levels reflects the transition from El Nino to La Nina, which typically brings more rainfall to Panama.

Higher water levels from the onset of the rainy season in May allowed the ACP to gradually lift transits back to full capacity by August. This has helped keep auction prices for transits at the larger Neopanamax locks near initial $100,000 bidding levels — and even outpace demand, with many slots turned away without receiving any bids.

Argus' average weekly auction prices have ranged from $112,900 to $209,389 since July, settling at $136,750 by last week. This is a complete turnaround from a year earlier, when shippers paid as high as nearly $4mn for a single transit. On average, Neopanamax auction prices cost $2.1mn in November 2023.

This probably helped support Panama Canal's profits in its financial 2024 year, to $3.45bn from $3.2bn a year earlier despite a 20pc fall in transits because of water-saving restrictions implemented. The ACP said the results reflected strategies such as the "freshwater surcharge, improved water yield through structural and operational upgrades, system enhancements for reservations and auctions, and maritime service operations."

Water levels are forecast to gradually decrease again from 23 December with the start of the dry season, which usually lasts by May.

By Yohanna Pinheiro

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/06/24

LPG prices plunge on possible Israel-Iran ceasefire

London, 24 June (Argus) — Global LPG prices fell by around 6pc today after Israel and Iran appeared to agree a ceasefire. An end to the 12-day conflict would alleviate fears of supply disruptions, and LPG prices started to retreat after rising on Monday, 23 June . The Asia Pacific Argus Far East Index (AFEI) July paper contract fell by $34.50/t to $555.50/t, and the equivalent European propane paper value fell by $33/t to $477/t. Swap contracts, with liquidity far greater than physical trading, can be a useful indicator of global sentiment. The prompt contract, currently July, can move rapidly and accurately reflect the trajectory of physical price moves. Some market participants are skeptical on the durability of the truce . Iran has yet to confirm its agreement. The hostilities have endangered Iranian infrastructure, ports, terminals and facilities that could affect LPG output. There was also an implied threat from Tehran of closure of the strait of Hormuz. Either scenario would severely affect output from the region. Iran exports about 10mn t/yr of LPG, most of it to China, and 40mn t/yr passes through the strait of Hormuz, equivalent to 27pc of global seaborne exports. Any disruption to Middle East flows would force China, the biggest LPG buyer, to seek more product from the biggest seller, the US. This would leave less product for European buyers and would necessitate higher European price premiums to compete with Asia-Pacific buyers, which typically offer better netbacks to US sellers. By Efcharis Sgourou Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Iran fires missiles at US military base in Qatar

25/06/23

Iran fires missiles at US military base in Qatar

London, 23 June (Argus) — Iran today fired missiles at a US base in Qatar in retaliation for the weekend attack on its nuclear facilities. The Iranian military said the US' Al-Udeid base was its target. The Qatari government said it intercepted the missiles and there were no deaths or injuries. Tensions in the region have been stretched since the US bombed Iranian nuclear facilities at the weekend. US president Donald Trump today again expressed a desire for regime change in Tehran, which in turn said US military interests were now legitimate targets. Earlier, Qatar closed its airspace and the US and UK embassies there issued safety warnings to their citizens, suggesting this Iranian attack was flagged and expected. The price of Ice Brent crude fell by as much as 4.5pc in the wake of the Iranian attack to an intraday low of $72.48/bl, having hit a five-month high of $81.40/bl earlier in the day. The Iranian move echoes its attacks on US military targets in Iraq after the US' killing of senior Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani in January 2020. Perhaps mindful of this, foreign firms operating in Iraq today started removing some employees from the country. Regional airlines began cancelling and rerouting flights across the Middle East, with flight tracking showing almost no flights in the air above the Mideast Gulf. By Ben Winkley Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trump again brings up regime change in Iran

25/06/23

Trump again brings up regime change in Iran

Washington, 23 June (Argus) — President Donald Trump's administration is trying to articulate what it ultimately aims to achieve in Iran, after directly involving the US in the Israel-Iran war over the weekend. Senior administration officials took to the TV news shows on Sunday to assert that Washington is not trying to topple the government in Iran. They claimed that the US bombing raids, in the early hours of Sunday Tehran time, caused irreparable damage to Iran's nuclear program. And they suggested that the US will not carry out additional air strikes unless Iran retaliates against US interests in the region or targets vessel traffic in the strait of Hormuz. But Trump then contradicted his own administration's message by posting on his social media platform: "If the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!" Iran has responded with tough rhetoric to the US air strikes but did not hit back at US interests across the region, even though Iran and Israel continued to exchange missile attacks. Tehran said today that US airstrikes have expanded the range of legitimate military targets for its armed forces, while a senior Iranian lawmaker said the parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed". The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through on that rhetoric. In the past, Tehran has targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Crude oil futures, which in the run-up to the US attack already reflected risk premiums associated with potential disruption to oil flows from the Mideast Gulf, rose in early trading in Asia today but eased later in the day. Trump, who has frequently touted declines in oil prices during his second administration, posted today: "EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!" He then posted, "To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!!" The Energy Department cannot mandate how much crude US oil companies produce, but it does control the US emergency oil stocks. Uncertainty ahead The Pentagon has been more restrained than Trump and his national security advisers in providing an assessment of the air strikes. Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, general Dan Caine said on Sunday that initial assessments indicated that Iran's nuclear facilities suffered "extremely severe damage and destruction" but noted that it was too early to say whether Iran maintains any nuclear capability. Trump by contrast posted about "monumental damage" and asserted that "obliteration is an accurate term" in reference to Iran's nuclear sites. "Sometimes we have a tendency to think that a military solution can insert some certainty into a situation," said retired general Joe Votel, who commanded Middle East-based US forces in 2016-19. "But I think what we're seeing here is that there still is a significant amount of uncertainty about what is going to take place." It will take time to accurately assess the impact of US air strikes on Iran's nuclear program, Votel said today during a discussion hosted by think tank the Middle East Institute. The UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA, said on 22 June that no increases in off-site radiation levels had been reported following the US strikes. The eventual shape of Iran's response is a further cause of uncertainty, Votel said. "Do they have a surprise for us, if they held something in reserve that we're going to see revealed here?" An Iranian counter-attack aimed at the US would invite more US strikes. But if Iran's response proves muted or non-existent, "will we be going back?," he asked. "And then, how does all this conclude?" The US embassy in Qatar today issued a "shelter in place" warning to US citizens in the country, which hosts the largest US air force base in the region. The US embassy did not cite a specific threat, noting that the warning was out of an "abundance of caution". The UK embassy issued a similar warning to British citizens. By Haik Gugarats Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Subsidised bio-LNG deemed eligible under FuelEU

25/06/23

Subsidised bio-LNG deemed eligible under FuelEU

London, 23 June (Argus) — Subsidised bio-LNG and other types of alternative fuels are deemed eligible under FuelEU Maritime Regulation, according to sources with knowledge of the matter. FuelEU allows emissions reductions supported under other legal frameworks, such as the support schemes under RED, in order to encourage greater investment in less carbon-intensive marine fuels. Under Directive (EU) 2018/2001 (RED), the greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions are counted towards member states' targets, while under FuelEU the targets are set to shipping companies. Excluding subsidised marine fuels may otherwise lead to competitive disadvantages for smaller sectors, such as European biomethane. The European Commission has not yet issued an official statement. Demand for bio-LNG has risen sharply this year with the start of FuelEU Maritime in January, requiring ship-owners to reduce their GHG emissions by 2pc in 2025, with targets steadily rising to 80pc in 2050. Subsidised, bunker dob bio-LNG in Northwest Europe was last assessed at €78.09/MWh ($89.55/MWh) on Thursday, while its unsubsidised counterpart was assessed at €93.59/MWh. By Madeleine Jenkins Bio-LNG vs Gas Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes

25/06/23

Iran raises Hormuz closure threat after US strikes

Dubai, 23 June (Argus) — A senior Iranian lawmaker says parliament has concluded that the strait of Hormuz "should be closed" in response to US airstrikes on three nuclear sites early Sunday — a move that would severely disrupt global oil flows. Esmaeil Kowsari — a member of the national security and foreign policy commission, and a former high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — told state-owned Press TV that lawmakers had reached a consensus that closure would be the appropriate response. Argus understands that while members of parliament were all in agreement, the issue was not formally put to a vote. Kowsari said the final decision lies with the Supreme National Security Council, Iran's top security body. His comments have drawn global attention as markets await Iran's response to the strikes, which US president Donald Trump ordered against nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The Fordow site is heavily fortified and located underground. The Natanz facility had already been targeted by Israeli strikes, prompting a series of retaliatory missile and drone exchanges between Iran and Israel. Iranian officials, including supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had repeatedly warned Washington that any direct military action would trigger a response causing "irreparable" harm to the US. . Variety of options The strait of Hormuz is the world's most critical oil transit route, with around 17mn b/d of crude and refined products — roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade — passing through it. Iran has repeatedly threatened to close the strait in past confrontations but has never followed through. It has, however, previously targeted or seized vessels transiting the waterway, prompting some shipowners to consider alternative routes. Closure of the strait is one of several retaliatory options regularly floated by Iranian political and military leaders. Others include military strikes on US bases across the Mideast Gulf. The US maintains installations in Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Asked whether closing the strait was under consideration, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araqchi declined to confirm, saying only that "there are a variety of options available to us". Araqchi travelled to Moscow late on Sunday and is expected to meet Russian president Vladimir Putin on Monday. Moscow has condemned the US strikes. Ali Akbar Velayati, a long-time adviser to Khamenei, also issued a veiled threat to Washington, saying: "West Asia is not Greenland, and the strait of Hormuz is fundamentally different from the Panama Canal." The comment referenced earlier threats by Trump to assert US control over Greenland and the Panama Canal during the early days of his second term. US secretary of state Marco Rubio warned that any attempt by Iran to close the strait would be "a terrible mistake." "It's economic suicide for them if they do it, and we retain options to deal with that," he said. By Nader Itayim Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more