Record Permian volumes lift US oil majors

: Crude oil, Natural gas
24/11/11

ExxonMobil and Chevron are pumping record volumes from the prolific Permian shale basin, spurred on by efficiency gains that have helped drive US oil production to a record high, just as Opec+ gears up to release barrels into the market.

ExxonMobil posted Permian output in excess of 1.4mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) in the third quarter, bolstered by the closure of its $60bn acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources in May. Meanwhile, Chevron's production from the top-performing US shale basin set a new company high of 950,000 boe/d, surpassing expectations and putting it firmly on track to reach a goal of 1mn boe/d next year.

Robust results from the Permian, which straddles west Texas and southeast New Mexico, have also been reported by other operators, with leading US upstream independent ConocoPhillips lifting its full-year production outlook after achieving record results from the Lower 48 in the latest quarter. In fact, soaring output from the Permian helped to push overall US production up by 1.5pc to a record 13.4mn b/d in August, according to the Energy Information Administration.

ExxonMobil, which will release a new development plan for the Permian at an analyst event next month, already envisages greater savings from the Pioneer acquisition than the original $2bn/yr that was outlined when the deal was announced. The top US major is integrating Pioneer's water infrastructure network to serve the combined assets at a lower cost. It is also taking advantage of a remote logistics operations centre it inherited through the deal. "We just achieved an all-time Pioneer record for drilling performance in terms of lateral feet drilled per day," chief executive Darren Woods says. A stellar performance from Colorado assets acquired through last year's takeover of PDC Energy also lifted Chevron, as did recent US Gulf of Mexico start-ups.

ExxonMobil was the only major, apart from Shell, able to cut net debt in the third quarter. That suggests its $20bn annual share buyback plan is sustainable in the current climate without needing to resort to asset sales, HSBC noted. The Permian's outperformance, driven by productivity gains that are helping to bring down costs, bodes well for the US majors at a time of macroeconomic uncertainty, and concerns over an oversupplied market putting oil prices under pressure.

While both ExxonMobil and Chevron have ramped up investor returns, analysts say Chevron's share buyback programme could be more vulnerable unless crude prices rebound. But Chevron's Permian spending is set to peak this year, with free cash flow becoming "more of the driver" in 2025 as output reaches a plateau, according to chief executive Mike Wirth. Chevron set a goal of trimming costs by $2bn-3bn by the end of 2026. And ExxonMobil says its $15bn cost savings target by 2027 remains on course, and could even be exceeded.

Less stress over Hess

Growing oil production abroad is set to enhance the US majors' record output at home. Although ExxonMobil's output from Guyana slipped in the third quarter because of work to complete a gas-to-energy project, it has since recovered."Execution is undoubtedly strong, allowing Exxon to maximise value from its assets," HSBC's head of European oil and gas research, Kim Fustier, says.

Chevron's closely watched expansion programme in Kazakhstan remains on track to start operations in the first half of 2025. This should help to offset some gloom over Chevron stock caused by the delay to its $53bn purchase of US independent Hess. A dispute with ExxonMobil over rights of first refusal to an offshore discovery in Guyana will be settled by international arbitration next May. "Uncertainty over the Hess deal will continue to hover in the background for some time, but Chevron is doing well on the elements it can control," Fustier says.

By Stephen Cunningham

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/01/13

Mexico’s industrial output up 0.1pc in November

Mexico City, 13 January (Argus) — Mexico's industrial production edged up 0.1pc in November, as gains in autos and other manufacturing offset weaker construction, national statistics agency Inegi said. Mexican bank Banorte described the monthly increase as "rather small," noting it followed a 1.1pc decline in October and was largely driven by base comparison effects. The bank added that the overall industrial outlook remained "fragile." Manufacturing, which represents 63pc of Inegi's seasonally adjusted industrial activity indicator (IMAI), increased by 0.7pc in November, though it failed to fully recover from a 1.7pc drop in October. Transportation manufacturing, a key subsector accounting for 12pc of the sector, rose by 3.8pc after a steep 4.3pc decline the prior month. Despite recent volatility, Mexico's auto sector achieved record annual light vehicle production in 2024, reaching 3.99mn units. Yet, automaker association AMIA warned of potential challenges in 2025 because of economic uncertainty, which could affect investment and demand. Mining, which makes up 12pc of the IMAI, increased by 0.1pc in November following a 1.1pc decline in October. Growth was driven by a 41.4pc jump in mining-related services, while oil and gas output fell by 2.4pc, marking a fifth consecutive monthly decline for hydrocarbons. Construction, representing 19pc of the IMAI, contracted by 1.8pc in November after modest gains of 0.2pc in October and 1.1pc in September. As industry eyes potential policy shifts under US president-elect Donald Trump, Banorte projected a weak start to 2025 for Mexico's industrial output. But it expects momentum to build as government spending on priority infrastructure projects "moves more decisively." By James Young Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

AI may boom on gas power, then turn to nuclear

25/01/13

AI may boom on gas power, then turn to nuclear

New York, 13 January (Argus) — The first tranche of new US data centers coming on line this decade to run electricity-intensive artificial intelligence (AI) software will probably rely mostly on power generated by natural gas, while the nuclear renaissance hoped for by Big Tech comes later in the 2030s. Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook-parent Meta and Google-parent Alphabet want clean, reliable power as quickly as possible so they can be early movers in the development of AI, which is rapidly advancing and finding new user bases around the world. While these companies do not relish the optics of powering AI development with fossil fuels, gas-fired power is widely expected to fulfill most of the gap between current supply and future demand through at least 2030. Unlike wind and solar, gas can be relied upon for steady, baseload power, a necessary ingredient for always-on data centers. And crucially, unlike nuclear, gas-related infrastructure can be built out quickly. The most recent additions to the US nuclear fleet, Vogtle units 3 and 4 in Georgia, took 15 years to build and cost $30bn, double the expected time and cost. A few decommissioned nuclear reactors can be restarted, as Microsoft is paying to do with a unit of Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania. But this low-hanging fruit will be quickly exhausted. Questions around the meter While there is broad agreement that gas will power the AI data center boom through at least 2030, questions remain about what this rapid gas-fired power build-out will look like. Data center operators can secure power in two ways: wade through the long, arduous interconnection process through which new customers connect to the grid, or bypass the grid altogether and secure their own personal electricity supply through so-called "behind-the-meter" agreements. Many in the gas industry are betting tech companies' need for speed will force them to opt for the latter. "The data centers are not going to wait," Alan Armstrong, chief executive of Williams, the largest US gas pipeline company, told Argus in an interview. "They are going to go to states that allow you to go behind the meter." In this scenario, construction of an AI data center in a state like Louisiana, for instance, might accompany construction of a new intrastate pipeline connecting the state's prolific Haynesville gas field with a new gas-fired power plant. Intrastate pipelines bypass the federal oversight triggered by interstate pipeline construction, and new gas power plants only take 2-3 years to build, East Daley Analytics analyst Zachary Krause told Argus . Most of the incremental power needed to run AI data centers this decade will be generated by new gas plants, Krause said. Even ExxonMobil in December said it was in talks to provide "fully islanded" gas-fired power to AI data centers. It claimed it could even capture 90pc of the CO2 emissions from power generation, appeasing tech companies' climate ambitions. ExxonMobil's non-grid gas generation fleet is "independent of utility timelines, so they can be installed at a pace that other alternatives — including US nuclear — just can't match," ExxonMobil chief financial officer Kathy Mikells said. But connecting to the grid may offer better reliability and economics than behind-the-meter gas power. If an off-grid gas generator trips off line, for instance, an always-on data center without back-up generation depending on that facility would be in trouble. Grid connection also allows generators to sell excess power into the grid. For those reasons, most new data centers this decade will rely on the grid as their primary power source, Adam Robinson, research associate at consultancy Enverus, told Argus . Small modular future But if the 2020s become the decade of gas-powered AI, the 2030s may be when nuclear-powered AI gets its due. The long-awaited nuclear renaissance may come not from conventional reactors, but from next-generation small modular reactors (SMRs), which can theoretically be built much faster and cheaper. No US SMRs yet exist, but given the number of SMR start-ups with expected start dates before 2030, and money pouring into the sector from the likes of Google and Microsoft, at least one of these next-generation reactors should be operating by 2030, Adam Stein, director of nuclear energy innovation at research center Breakthrough Institute, told Argus . SMRs' smaller price tag relative to conventional 1 GW nuclear reactors may also accelerate their adoption, Stein said. "Not every utility needs a GW-scale plant of any kind, but they might need a 300 or 600MW plant," he said. "So the total addressable market is larger for SMRs." By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Trudeau exit may spur Canadian energy growth

25/01/13

Trudeau exit may spur Canadian energy growth

Calgary, 13 January (Argus) — Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau's place in federal politics is winding down after nine years of driving change in climate policy, but those environmental advances came at a cost for the world's fourth-largest oil producer, helping to stifle foreign investment in the country's oil and gas sector. Support for Trudeau fell nationwide over the past year, as inflation and rising housing costs fueled by a relaxed immigration policy and carbon taxes became too much for many to bear. Trudeau, seemingly immune to scandal and high-profile exits on his team, was dealt his biggest blow when his deputy prime minister and finance minister Chrystia Freeland resigned in December, citing his approach to the "aggressive economic nationalism" of US president-elect Donald Trump's threatened trade tariffs, prompting his 6 January decision to step down. Canadian crude producers still managed to lift output by 30pc during Trudeau's tenure since 2015, even as major foreign players abandoned the oil sands for friendlier jurisdictions and upstream projects and pipelines were either mothballed or cancelled outright. Provincial jurisdiction over resources prompted frequent fights between Trudeau and Albertan premiers who guarded their claim to energy and the right to explore and extract within their borders. "We could've done so much more," Alberta premier Danielle Smith said hours after Trudeau's announcement, lamenting missed opportunities for Canada's oil patch over the past decade, including the failed Energy East, Northern Gateway and Keystone XL export pipelines. A tanker ban, tighter regulation and an onerous project approval process were among the tools Trudeau used to try to rein in the oil and gas sector, saying in 2017 that Canada's oil sands needed to be "phased out" before naming a former Greenpeace director as his environment minister. Smith did give Trudeau a nod for his commitment to keeping midstream giant Enbridge's Line 5 pipeline from shutting down, and for helping to get the massive Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) pipeline and Coastal GasLink export projects from Alberta to Canada's Pacific coast across the finish line. But while Smith welcomes Trudeau's resignation, Canada now faces a period of lame duck leadership before it holds federal elections, while cross-border tensions are rising. Your new best frenemy Its largest trading partner is quickly becoming its newest antagonist, with Trump threatening a 25pc tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico. Unencumbered movement of oil is critical on both sides of the border, with 80pc of Canada's 5mn b/d of crude production aimed at refineries in the US. Many landlocked Canadian producers have no practical alternative, like refiners in the US midcontinent connected by pipeline. As political chaos unfolds in Ottawa, Trump has lobbed insults at Trudeau and made calls for the northern neighbour to become the US' "51st state", a taunt that has struck a nerve in Canada. "There isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Canada would become part of the US," Trudeau said on X on 7 January. "Trump's comments show a complete lack of understanding of what makes Canada a strong country," wrote minister of foreign affairs Melanie Joly. Trump will have spotted Canada's weakness months ago, with support for Trudeau tumbling to the benefit of the Conservative Party and its leader Pierre Poilievre. Recent polls indicate the centre-right party would win a majority of seats in the House of Commons if an election were held today. That is likely to happen in May, assuming opposition parties bring down the government when Parliament resumes in late March. Should Poilievre win, Trump will have a partner better aligned on more policies than Trudeau was, but the suggestion that Canada could become part of the US will get the same response. "We will never be the 51st state. Period," Poilievre said. His primary ambitions are to undo Trudeau's work, with the federal carbon tax being the first to go. Rescinding the tanker ban, killing proposed emissions caps and promoting pipeline construction are also on the agenda. Poilievre plans to "take back control" of Canada's resources through permitting and cutting taxes on pipeline and LNG projects to become less reliant on the US. "Canadians will give me a mandate to take the country in a completely opposite direction," Poilievre said on the Jordan B Peterson Podcast earlier this month, describing how vanquishing Trudeau's energy policy will "cause a massive resource boom in our country." The lengthy exchange touched on minimising government, artificial intelligence and immigration, and was shared by Trump's ally, Tesla chief executive Elon Musk, who called it a "great interview". Priming for another Pacific pipeline Canada's energy industry has returned to profit and received a much-needed boost from the federally owned 590,000 b/d TMX pipeline, but rising oil sands production means the newly commissioned system is destined to fill up soon. The prospect of an industry-friendly federal government reinvigorating a relatively dormant midstream sector is positive for investment in Canada, and the US could play an unintended role in deciding where any pipelines are proposed. Enbridge and the Alberta government are teaming up to find ways to expand pipeline capacity. Smith singled out the US as a customer she wants to enhance ties with amid looming tariff threats, but those threats may prompt a revival of pipeline projects to Canada's west coast to reduce dependence on the US market. Enbridge's Northern Gateway pipeline was approved in 2014, but a Liberal Party led by Trudeau came to power in 2015 with sweeping changes for the oil and gas sector, including a tanker ban on the country's Pacific coast, effectively killing the project. The C$7.9bn ($7.3bn) Northern Gateway was not in the interest of local communities, Trudeau said in late 2016, when he officially reversed the previous government's approval. The pipeline would have shipped 525,000 b/d of diluted bitumen westward and 193,000 b/d of imported condensate eastbound to the oil sands region for blending. Construction would have avoided large populations and was seen as the most practical option for getting more Canadian crude to Asia-Pacific. Its northern terminal may not have had the same tanker limitations as TMX faces at Vancouver, and could have seen reduced voyage times. Enbridge now has added support from the Alberta government by way of crude volumes the province collects as tax from some oil companies in lieu of cash payments. These in-kind barrels would be the first to backstop a major pipeline expansion by Enbridge, giving both the midstream company and other producers something to latch onto to advance a future project. This is a new approach for Alberta, after sacrificing C$1.5bn it paid in a last-ditch effort to keep the doomed 830,000 b/d Keystone XL project to the US alive. Outgoing US president Joe Biden revoked that troubled line's permit in 2021. Like Keystone XL, Northern Gateway is no more. Reviving such a project would still require significant stakeholder engagement along any route, and face substantially higher construction costs than a decade ago. The C$34bn TMX put into service in May 2024 was originally pegged at C$5.4bn in 2013, even less than Northern Gateway as TMX was the twinning of an existing system. This would be a big hurdle to clear, even if governments were to allay regulatory concerns. But with an unpredictable Trump returning to the White House, the prospect of shipping more Canadian crude west might soon hold a heightened appeal. By Brett Holmes Canadian oil production Canadian upstream investment Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

US issues 45Z tax guidance for low-carbon fuels

25/01/10

US issues 45Z tax guidance for low-carbon fuels

Washington, 10 January (Argus) — US producers of low-carbon fuels can start claiming the "45Z" tax credit providing up to $1/USG for road use and $1.75/USG for aviation, following the US Treasury Department's release today of proposed guidance for the credit. The guidance includes proposed regulations and other tools to determine the eligibility of fuels for the 45Z tax credit, which was created by the Inflation Reduction Act to replace a suite of incentives for biofuels that expired at the end of last year. Biofuel producers have been clamoring for guidance from the US Treasury Department so they can start claiming the tax credit, which is available for fuels produced from 1 January 2025 through the end of 2027. "This guidance will help put America on the cutting-edge of future innovation in aviation and renewable fuel while also lowering transportation costs for consumers," US deputy treasury secretary Wally Adeymo said. "Decarbonizing transportation and lowering costs is a win-win for America." The creation of the 45Z tax credit has already prompted a change in US biofuels markets by shifting federal subsidies from blenders to producers. Because the value of tax credit increases for fuels with the lowest lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, it could encourage refiners to source more waste feedstocks such as used cooking oil, rather than conventional crop-based feedstocks. While the guidance is still just a proposal, taxpayers are able to "immediately" use the guidance to claim the 45Z tax credit, until Treasury issues additional guidance, an administration official said. The guidance on 45Z released today affirms that only the producer for the fuel is eligible to claim the credit, not blenders. To be eligible for the tax credit, the fuel must have a "practical or commercial fitness for use in a highway vehicle or aircraft" by itself or when blended into a mixture, Treasury said. Marine diesel and methanol suitable for highway or aircraft use are also eligible for 45Z, as is renewable natural gas that can be used as a transportation fuel. Treasury also released an "annual emissions rate table" offering providers a methodology for determining the lifecycle GHG of fuel. Treasury said a key emissions model from the US Department of Energy, called 45ZCF-GREET, used to calculate the value of the 45Z tax credit is anticipated to be released today, although industry officials said it may be delayed until next week. Treasury said it intends to propose regulations at "a future date" for calculating the GHG emissions benefits of "climate smart agriculture" practices for "cultivating domestic corn, soybeans, and sorghum as feedstocks" for fuel. Those regulations could lower the calculated lifecycle emissions of fuel from those crop-based feedstocks and increase the relative 45Z tax credit. US biofuel producers said they are still awaiting key details on the 45Z tax credit, including the update to the GREET model. Among the outstanding questions is if the guidance released today provides "enough certainty to negotiate feedstock and fuel offtake agreements going forward", said the Clean Fuels America Alliance, an industry group that represents the biodiesel, renewable diesel and sustainable aviation fuel industries. It is unclear how president-elect Donald Trump intends to approach this proposed approach for the 45Z credit, which will be subject to a 90-day public comment period. Trump has promised to "rescind all unspent funds" from the Inflation Reduction Act. But outright repealing 45Z would leave biofuels producers and farmers without a subsidy they say is needed to sustain growth, after the expiration last year of a $1/USG blender tax credit and a tax credit of up to $1.75/USG for sustainable aviation fuel. Biofuel and soybean groups were unsuccessful in a push last year to extend the expiring biofuel tax credits. The 45Z credit is likely to be debated in Congress this year, as Republicans consider repealing parts of the Inflation Reduction Act. House Republicans have already asked for input on revisions to the 45Z credit, signaling they could modify the incentive. In a tightly divided Congress, farm-state lawmakers may hold enough leverage to ensure some type of biofuel incentive — and potentially one friendlier to agricultural producers than 45Z — survives. By Chris Knight and Cole Martin Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Opec+ aims to reverse output falls in 2025

25/01/10

Opec+ aims to reverse output falls in 2025

London, 10 January (Argus) — Opec+ production cuts in 2024 saw the alliance reduce its crude output to lower than even in the pandemic-hit years of 2021 and 2022. And while Opec+ plans to start unwinding some of these cuts this year, it is far from clear that there will be sufficient room in the market for this additional supply. Opec+ members subject to targets reduced crude output by 1.66mn b/d to 33.96mn b/d in 2024, Argus estimates. This was an even bigger decrease than 2023's 1.44mn b/d and means that the alliance has taken 3.1mn b/d off line over the past two years — equal to about 3pc of global oil supply. Saudi Arabia cut production by 650,000 b/d to 8.96mn b/d last year, the lowest since 2010. Russian production fell by 430,000 b/d to 9.15mn b/d, the lowest since at least 2010. Other big falls came from Kuwait, whose output dropped by 190,000 b/d to 2.43mn b/d, and Iraq, where production declined by 160,000 b/d to 4.13mn b/d — although this was still well above its 4mn b/d target. Opec+ can at least claim that it has so far achieved its stated objective of ensuring oil market stability — average prices for Atlantic basin benchmark North Sea Dated in 2024 were only around $2/bl lower than in 2023 at around $80/bl. But this has come at a cost. While Opec+ has capped its output, countries outside the alliance have continued to boost production — eating into Opec+ market share. Whether Opec+ will stick to this approach is a key factor to watch in 2025. Pressure has been building from some members who want to increase output as soon as possible. As things stand, Opec+ members are set to start unwinding 2.2mn b/d of voluntary crude production cuts starting in April over an 18-month period. But this is not certain, given that most forecasts show a market surplus this year. Opec+ continues to stress that the return of 2.2mn b/d — one of three cuts it is implementing — will depend on market conditions. For now, the alliance is in wait-and-see mode, particularly given the uncertainties associated with the return of Donald Trump as US president and its impact on the global economy. As always, the extent to which Opec+ members complied with their individual output targets was a big issue in 2024. But on balance, the alliance's output last year was 40,000 b/d under its collective target. While serial overproducers such as Iraq, Kazakhstan and Russia attracted a lot of scrutiny and pledged to compensate for exceeding their targets, members such as Azerbaijan, South Sudan and Nigeria produced well below their own targets. Without target Another key development in 2024 was growing production from members of the group that do not adhere to targets — Iran, Libya and Venezuela. Iran boosted output by 380,000 b/d to 3.32mn b/d, the highest since 2018, despite the continuation of US sanctions on its oil exports. Similarly, sanctions-hit Venezuela increased production by 110,000 b/d to a six-year high of 870,000 b/d. Libya saw its production fall by 60,000 b/d to 1.11mn b/d — mostly owing to politically motivated shutdowns — but it ended the year at 1.4mn b/d, the highest in over a decade. On a monthly basis, members subject to cuts saw very little change in their collective output in December, with production edging up by 10,000 b/d to 33.57mn b/d. This was 270,000 b/d below the group's target for the month. Notable changes included a 50,000 b/d increase from Nigeria, which saw its output climb to 1.54mn b/d — the highest since July 2020 — while Kuwaiti output increased by 40,000 b/d to 2.44mn b/d. But these increases were almost entirely offset by a drop from the UAE, whose production fell by 120,000 b/d to 2.85mn b/d owing to maintenance at one of its onshore fields. Opec+ crude production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Opec 9 21.23 21.22 21.23 +0.00 Non-Opec 9 12.34 12.36 12.62 -0.28 Total 33.57 33.58 33.85 -0.28 *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable Opec wellhead production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Saudi Arabia 8.91 8.93 8.98 -0.07 Iraq 3.99 3.98 4.00 -0.01 Kuwait 2.44 2.40 2.41 +0.03 UAE 2.85 2.97 2.91 -0.06 Algeria 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.00 Nigeria 1.55 1.50 1.50 +0.05 Congo (Brazzaville) 0.27 0.25 0.28 -0.01 Gabon 0.24 0.22 0.17 +0.07 Equatorial Guinea 0.07 0.06 0.07 +0.00 Opec 9 21.23 21.22 21.23 +0.00 Iran 3.40 3.36 na na Libya 1.31 1.24 na na Venezuela 0.90 0.88 na na Total Opec 12^ 26.84 26.70 na na *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable ^Iran, Libya and Venezuela are exempt from production targets Non-Opec crude production mn b/d Dec Nov* Dec target† ± target Russia 8.97 8.97 8.98 -0.01 Oman 0.75 0.75 0.76 -0.01 Azerbaijan 0.48 0.49 0.55 -0.07 Kazakhstan 1.44 1.45 1.47 -0.03 Malaysia 0.36 0.36 0.40 -0.04 Bahrain 0.18 0.18 0.20 -0.02 Brunei 0.08 0.08 0.08 -0.00 Sudan 0.02 0.02 0.06 -0.04 South Sudan 0.06 0.06 0.12 -0.06 Total non-Opec 12.34 12.36 12.62 -0.28 *revised †includes additional cuts where applicable Opec+ crude production* Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more