Generic Hero BannerGeneric Hero Banner
Latest market news

Africa attempts to surmount clean cooking obstacles

  • : Emissions, LPG
  • 24/12/03

Financial backing and carbon credits could be vital for making LPG more affordable as a clean cooking fuel, writes Elaine Mills

Sub-Saharan Africa still has many of the same intractable challenges to overcome if it is to come close to achieving universal clean cooking access, delegates heard at LPG Week in Cape Town, South Africa. But government support, public-private collaboration, grassroots movements and carbon credits could pry open markets.

The IEA is spearheading momentum behind the drive to clean cooking adoption in sub-Saharan Africa, expecting 45pc of the transition to be to LPG. A global transition would result in a net reduction of 1.5bn t of CO2 equivalent by 2030, of which sub-Saharan Africa alone would account for 900mn t, it says. "We can't imagine a more important global initiative in terms of our objectives of development, poverty alleviation, health and prosperity," the IEA's head of sustainable transitions, Daniel Wetzel, said during the World Liquid Gas Association event.

Sub-Saharan Africa consumes less than 4kg/capita of LPG per year, according to South Africa's Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources. This compares with north Africa's 35kg/yr, including Morocco, which has the highest in the world at 73kg/yr, Argus Consulting data show. The IEA estimates Africa requires investment of $4bn/yr to facilitate clean cooking. The continuing challenge for LPG penetration in southern Africa is "affordability, availability and acceptability", the International Finance Corporation's (IFC's) regional industry manager for manufacturing, Bambo Kunle-Salami, said. An average household needs to spend about $300-400/yr on LPG, while GDP per capita is just over $1,000/yr, he said.

Government backing is essential, as "no LPG has grown on its own organically or reached desired levels [without] government intervention", the UN-backed Global LPG Partnership's East Africa director, Elizabeth Muchiri, said. Subsidies can solve cost barriers but many African governments cannot afford them, Kunle-Salami said. It might also encourage cross-border smuggling, so if used they must be targeted to low-income homes with a clear end goal, he said. Some countries have struggled to scale back their LPG subsidies, Wetzel said. But the IEA expects LPG prices to drop sharply later this decade as global demand peaks, allowing markets to reduce subsidies and emerging markets to expand.

Kenya has distributed subsidised cylinders to low-income homes, scrapped LPG taxes and introduced mandates on new homes to include LPG infrastructure, Muchiri said. Some banks and retailers have offered microfinancing and pay-as-you-go smart meters on cylinders, she said. Ghana has also provided free cylinders and stoves to those most in need, its National Petroleum Authority director Akua Kwakye said. A cylinder recirculation model was introduced so consumers do not own the cylinders, which improves safety and reduces costs, she said.

Logistics and their cost impact are a significant problem in Africa, Kunle-Salami said. "In a healthy market [logistics costs] should be 10-20pc, but in many African countries it is as high as 40-50pc," he said. A lack of storage infrastructure to protect from supply shocks is another issue. This requires significant investment that needs private-public collaboration, Wetzel said. But centralised solutions can only go so far — only grassroots initiatives create trust and acceptance, he added.

Credits where they're due

The IEA thinks carbon credits have huge potential in making LPG more affordable as a clean cooking fuel owing to the emissions savings and certainty of the verification. Such schemes might yield higher-quality credits than many other carbon-offsetting projects, Wetzel said. Many of the firms IFC finances struggle to understand, let alone access, the carbon market, Kunle-Salami said. But agreements on Article 6 at the UN's Cop 29 climate summit on establishing a global carbon market, and inclusion of clean cooking at the G7 and G20 summits, provide more hope such credits can become important, delegates heard.

Nigeria LPG residential demand.

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

25/02/07

Ecuador vows to cut GHG emissions by 7pc in 2035

Ecuador vows to cut GHG emissions by 7pc in 2035

Quito, 7 February (Argus) — Ecuador committed to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) by 7pc by 2035 compared with the baseline projected emissions for that year, it said in its second Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) this week. The reduction is the equivalent to 8.8mn metric tonnes (t) of CO2 equivalent (CO2e). Ecuador emitted 88.3mn t of CO2e in 2022 mainly from the energy sector (47pc), including transportation and power generation; land use (29pc); agriculture (13pc); waste management (6pc) and industrial processes (5pc). If the current trend projected since 2010 continues without any actions, Ecuador's annual emissions will reach almost 130mn t of CO2e in 2035. But by applying mitigation measures such as more renewable energies, sustainable methods of production and mobility, with domestic funding, the emissions will be reduced to about 121.2mn t of CO2e, for a 7pc cut. With more financial support from the international community, Ecuador aims to reduce its GHG emissions by another 8 percentage points. That would cut another 10.6mn t of CO2e, for a total reduction of 15pc and emissions of 110mn t of CO2e in 2035. The mitigation measures will cost Ecuador about $6.5bn. In 2019, Ecuador launched its first NDC and set the goal to reduce GHG emissions by 9pc annually from 2020-2025. But it missed the goal, mainly because the 2020 pandemic generated an economic crisis that cut funds to implement mitigation measures. By Alberto Araujo Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia’s Orica mulls selling safeguard carbon units


25/02/07
25/02/07

Australia’s Orica mulls selling safeguard carbon units

Sydney, 7 February (Argus) — Australian chemicals and explosives firm Orica is eligible to receive safeguard mechanism credits (SMCs) for the July 2023-June 2024 compliance year and is now considering options for the units, including potential sale to a third party, it told Argus . Orica did not disclose how many SMCs it was eligible to receive or whether the units have already been issued. It has two facilities under the scheme — Kooragang Island in New South Wales (NSW) and Yarwun Nitrates near the Queensland state city of Gladstone. SMCs are issued if a facility reports scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions below its baseline. Orica said in November that it did not expect a requirement to surrender Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) for the July 2023-June 2024 compliance year. It still does not expect such a requirement, it told Argus on 6 February. Both the company's facilities are registered as carbon projects, and Orica received a total of nearly 600,000 ACCUs from the Kooragang Island decarbonisation project last year . The credits are generated as a result of tertiary emissions abatement reactors installed across three nitric acid plants at the facility, which includes ammonia and ammonium nitrate plants. "In line with Orica's carbon market strategy, we anticipate holding originated ACCUs for future safeguard mechanism compliance obligations," the company told Argus on 6 February. SMC data expected for early March The Clean Energy Regulator (CER) earlier this week said it issued the first ever SMCs into eligible accounts in the new registry that will replace the Australian National Registry of Emissions Units (ANREU). It did not say how many SMCs have been issued so far but noted that further issuances are likely this month. "The CER will publish the 2023-24 safeguard data, including facility-level information about SMC issuances, by 15 April 2025," it told Argus on 7 February. "The CER will also start to include SMC observations in its quarterly carbon market reports." The quarterly report for the fourth quarter of 2024 is expected to be published in early March, the regulator added. The main data for that period was published in late January, showing ACCU supply and demand at new highs . Market participants said no SMC trades had been seen so far, although some companies have been exploring potential sales. Now that the first SMCs have been issued, account holders with SMCs in their accounts are already able to transfer the units between accounts, the CER noted. Australia's Climate Change Authority (CCA) said late last year that 60 out of 215 facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism reported scope 1 GHG emissions below their baselines and could be eligible to apply for a total estimated 9.2mn SMCs , far higher than previously estimated, impacting market sentiment for ACCUs. Spot prices for generic ACCUs ended the week below A$35 ($22), down slightly on the week and compared to levels close to A$43 in mid-November. By Juan Weik Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

EU red tape ‘unsustainable burden’ for transition


25/02/06
25/02/06

EU red tape ‘unsustainable burden’ for transition

London, 6 February (Argus) — EU regulations in their current form are hindering rather than enabling the energy transition, limiting access to funding and slowing renewable installations, delegates at the Financial Times International Energy Policy Forum in Brussels heard this week. EU regulation has become "duplicative", Anthony Gooch Galvez, secretary general of the European Round Table for Industry (ERT), told delegates this week. "The burden is unsustainable" even for ERT members, which tend to be big companies, he said, pointing to the additional problems this would cause small to medium-sized businesses. The EU is "too prescriptive" and expects perfection from day one, Ann Mettler of Bill Gates-founded Breakthrough Energy said, leading to low-carbon technologies not being deployed. The "regulatory tsunami did not lead to the desired outcome", and the bloc should give more space to the private sector to support their development, she said. A lack of policy planning has contributed to the problem, Mettler said, pointing to the low number of final investment decisions that have been taken on hydrogen projects. Companies need to be able to implement their plans, she said. "Very cumbersome licensing and permitting processes" are also impeding progress in the region, IEA executive director Fatih Birol told delegates, calling for these to become "much more nimble". And while funding is technically on the table, it is often difficult to access, Gwenaelle Avice Huet of French firm Schneider Electric said, of which the EU's Recovery and Resilience Facility is a prime example. "It's not just about the level of money available." US presents opportunity But the stability of the EU's Green Deal, which was announced in 2021 and remains in place, does offer a stark contrast to the US, said Sebastien Treyer, executive director of think-tank the Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations. Other speakers also noted the importance of stability and predictability within regulatory frameworks. "You need to have rules to play a good game", Galvez said. In the US, policy has fluctuated wildly between regimes, with president Donald Trump pausing some funding from the country's Inflation Reduction Act in the first days of his new term. This shift could mean US-based investors in the transition look to the EU for opportunities, said Marcin Korolec, president of the Green Economy Institute. "The federal government is not the whole of America. Many other economic players are still very willing to collaborate," Treyer agreed. But a lack of urgency from the European Commission could see the EU fail to capitalise on this, Korolec warned. He criticised in particular the bloc's planned competitiveness fund, announced last week, which would be funded under the EU's next budget starting in 2028, towards the end of Trump's term. "Sitting in a chair for three years waiting is absurd," he said. By Victoria Hatherick and Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Ambition focus as nations to fail new GHG goal deadline


25/02/06
25/02/06

Ambition focus as nations to fail new GHG goal deadline

Edinburgh, 6 February (Argus) — Most countries and major emitters that are party to the Paris Agreement will fail to meet a 10 February deadline for sharing new climate plans. Climate policy observers have stressed that higher ambitions beat timeliness when it comes to new 2035 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions cut targets, but challenges abound ahead of the UN Cop 30 climate summit in Brazil. Only 10 countries, including G20 members Brazil and the UK, have submitted new climate plans — or Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) — so far. Around 200 countries and jurisdictions such as the EU have signed the Paris agreement. They need to submit their 2035 targets to the UN climate body UNFCCC by February as part of the so-called ratchet mechanism, which requires them to review and revise plans every five years. "There have not been any signals that any major emitters will submit their NDCs before the deadline, but we may see a handful of smaller emitters trickling in," think-tank International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) energy policy advisor Natalie Jones said. Non-profit the World Resources Institute (WRI) associate Jamal Srouji expects around 20 countries to submit by the deadline. But most climate plans should come in the second half of this year, with the UN general assembly in September emerging as a new potential milestone followed by Cop 30 in Belem, Brazil. Countries missing their NDC deadline is not new. They were slow to submit plans in the previous 2020-21 round — although they were grappling with a pandemic — and after Cop 26, when it came to strengthening 2030 targets. Jones described the UNFCCC's non-enforceable February deadline as "arbitrary". "It is much more important to have good quality plans than NDCs handed in on a forced deadline, although of course there is no guarantee that the plans that will come later will be necessarily better," Jones said. Srouji concurred: "Higher ambitions from major countries are far more critical because we know that we are off track for meeting the Paris goals". US exit The US submitted its new NDC in December under then president Joe Biden, knowing that the new president Donald Trump would pull out of the Paris accord again. This will take effect on 27 January next year. It was important for the US to submit this NDC, Srouji said, as it will serve as "a guiding post" for what the country could achieve, at sub-national levels in particular. But the US' Paris exit could dampen momentum on global NDCs, with some fearing a spillover effect . Indonesia, which earlier signalled it would submit by February, is unlikely to do so now, after the country's climate envoy Hashim Djojohadikusumo expressed discontent. "If America does not want to comply with international agreements, why should Indonesia comply?" he asked. Argentina pulled its delegation from Cop 29 last year and may consider leaving the Paris agreement. Among other major emitters, Canada set a new 2035 climate goal in December. The country was planning to submit its new plan by February, but the resignation of prime minister Justin Trudeau and a new election due this year could put the country's climate ambitions at risk. All eyes will of course be on China, the world's largest emitter, and whether it pledges stronger targets. The country is unlikely to submit its new plan by the deadline, according to observers. Expectations are high, but "targets will likely fall short of achieving the 1.5°C goal, leaving much work to be done to accelerate emissions reduction," think tank Asia Society Policy Institute director Li Shuo said. China signalled at Cop 29 that its NDC will be "economy-wide" and "cover all greenhouse gases", while continuing to strive to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060, without providing further details. "There is a big question mark, in the absence of US leadership, if will we see China along with the EU engaging and stepping up, or if will we see the country retreating like the US," IISD's Jones said. EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra, who said the bloc's NDC will come in time for Cop 30, said that Europeans will need to show more leadership. But the EU's 2035 goal will be derived from its 2040 target and German MEP Peter Liese pointed to a deadlock in discussions . The European Commission has proposed a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target of 90pc by 2040, from 1990 levels, which Poland said is "very difficult to accept". Challenges Cop 30 host Brazil, along with the UAE Cop 29 presidency, stuck to their promise of being early movers by submitting updated goals last year, although these were met with mixed reactions. Cop 29 host Azerbaijan did not submit a new NDC in Baku, with its president signalling challenges for some developing countries in establishing new plans. Some southeast Asian countries have highlighted challenges in providing new targets , such as the lack of common models between sectors, financing and economic growth. Chile said that it will submit an emissions reduction plan by the middle of this year, as a draft document is under consultation . There are many reasons for delays. "The UNFCCC timeline is not necessarily aligned with national decision-making processes and many developing countries face resource and capacity constraints," Srouji said, adding that parties are also expected to submit other documents such as adaptation plans and long term climate strategies. The IEA can provide support on national energy transition plans. The energy watchdog has recently supported Uganda and Vietnam on transition plans, and is in the early stages of transition advisory work with Colombia and Tanzania, it said. Colombia indicated that it will submit its NDC by June as the country seeks to address the "divisive issue" of fossil fuels, on which its economy is dependent. Mixed bag The climate plans submitted so far accounted for around 16pc of global emissions as of 5 February, including commitments from the UK and Brazil, according to WRI. IISD's Jones described the current NDCs as a "mixed bag", in terms of targets and the level of details, saying that the UK emerged as a leader with commitments on oil and gas licensing, while New Zealand has put forward a weak target and no plans. The UK's plan sets out the government's manifesto pledge to phase out sales of new cars "relying solely on internal combustion engines" by 2030, and notes that it will consult on issuing no new oil and gas licences to explore new fields. But none of the countries which posted new NDCs so far — apart from St Lucia — seem to have raised their 2030 targets, despite agreeing to "revisit and strengthen" them in the Cop 28's global stocktake (GST). How countries will respond to elements of GST — which also resulted in all parties agreeing to "transition away" from fossil fuels — will be a key issue to watch, especially after they failed to build on their commitments at Cop 29 in Baku. "While NDCs may show progress on the commitments of the Paris agreement and the commitments of a lot of countries on climate action, it is not clear what they will deliver in terms of the ability to keep 1.5°C in reach", Srouji said. "This is how Cop 30 comes into play, to make sure countries respond adequately and keep on track, he said. By Caroline Varin Countries GHG 2035 reduction targets Countries Headline 2035 target Baseline UAE Cutting GHG emissions by 47pc by 2035 2019 Brazil Cutting GHG emissions by 59-67pc by 2035 2005 US Cutting GHG emissions by 61-66pc by 2035 2005 Uruguay Cutting GHG emissions by 30pc by 2035 2020-22 Switzerland Cutting GHGemissions by 65pc by 2035 1990 UK Cutting GHG emissions by 81pc by 2035 1990 New Zealand Cutting GHG emissions by 51-55pc by 2035 2005 Andorra Cutting GHG emissions by 63pc by 2035 2005 Ecuador Cutting GHG emissions by 7pc by 2035 2010 St Lucia Cutting GHG emissions by 22pc in energy sector by 2035* 2010 Canada** Cutting GHG emissionsby 45-50pc by 2035 2005 Source countries' NDCs *conditional target **Canada only submitted its headline target, not its NDC Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Australia's Beach cuts FY24-25 oil, gas output target


25/02/06
25/02/06

Australia's Beach cuts FY24-25 oil, gas output target

Sydney, 6 February (Argus) — Australian independent Beach Energy has narrowed its oil and gas output guidance for the year to 30 June 2025, given delays in bringing the Western Australian (WA) 250 TJ/d Waitsia gas plant on line. Beach will produce 18.5mn-20.5mn bl of oil equivalent/d (boe/d) in 2024-25, it said in its half-year results to 31 December. It revised the top end of its previous forecast of 17.5mn-21.5mn boe down because of delays at Waitsia, which is operated by joint venture partner Japanese trading house Mitsui. Beach has maintained its guidance for first sales gas at Waitsia in April-June. The Adelaide-based firm last month reported its output at 10.2mn boe in July-December 2024, 15pc higher on the year, leading Beach to raise the bottom end of its guidance. The five Waitsia LNG swap cargoes that Beach has executed to date have brought forward revenue for the firm, which reported A$139mn ($87.1mn) from the two shipped in July-December 2024. A fifth cargo was lifted from Australian independent Woodside Energy's 14.4mn t/yr North West Shelf (NWS) LNG terminal in January, while a possible sixth may occur before the end of June. "We have opportunities for additional swaps in the market and we're looking very closely… I'm hoping to get another [cargo] out before the half-year," chief executive Brett Woods said on 6 February. About 35pc of the gas exported via swap cargoes to date were from Beach's own 20 TJ/d (534,000 m³/d) Xyris gas plant, meaning it will not need to be swapped back, Woods said. Beach expects 8-10 cargoes/yr of Waitsia gas to be shipped until 2028, with scope to further extend the project's LNG exports following the WA government's changes to onshore gas export rules. Waitsia partners hold a gas processing agreement with the NWS JV running until the end of 2028. Beach will start its Offshore Gas Victoria programme in 2025 as part of its ambition to become a major domestic gas supplier. This includes drilling the Hercules gas prospect in Victoria state's offshore Otway basin in April-June, described as a "large scale opportunity" with prospective reserves of 100bn ft³ (280mn m³). No change was made to Beach's 2024-25 capital expenditure guidance of A$700mn-$800mn. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2025. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Generic Hero Banner

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more