News
26/10/20
Details drive the future of REC markets
Details drive the future of REC markets
Houston, 20 October (Argus) — Registries that track and issue renewable energy
certificates (RECs) are supplying more data to voluntary market participants as
buying habits — and scrutiny on those habits — take on new layers of complexity.
REC buyers are calling for more data to inform their purchases. The registries
aiming to satisfy those requests, such as by adding generation tracking on an
hourly basis, have been careful to work within the existing market framework.
Providing information like hourly tracking is not "about replacing the existing
REC infrastructure" but expanding it, according to Jeff Berman, vice president
for registry solutions at Xpansiv, which owns the North American Renewables
Registry (NAR). "At the core, the only difference should be at the point of
issuance," he said. "Instead of having a month and a year vintage, you have an
hour and a day vintage. Ultimately, what you are designing should be no
different than what exists on a broad level from what exists today." In some
cases, buyers may not be aware of the distinction, unless they take a closer
look at the data. "You can have a generator that opts into the [hourly tracking]
process, and the certificates won't be issued as a traditional monthly
certificate but, for all intents and purposes, will act like one," CleanCounts
chief executive Ben Gerber said. The war in the weeds The increased focus on
additional data in part stems from standard-setting organizations, such as the
GHG Protocol, planning tighter requirements for scope 2 emissions accounting.
The GHG Protocol is mulling not only hourly requirements, but also constraints
on project location and age. Traditionally, REC accounting has been volumetric.
Buyers retire credits on a monthly or annual basis to cover their power use,
which means they continue to rely on other forms of generation when renewables
are not available, even if on their books they exclusively use zero-emissions
electricity. Companies have largely used their own discretion when choosing
projects, with some selecting generation in the same region and others
prioritizing support in areas with less wind or solar, even if it is across the
country. The proposed changes are "rooted in the growing need for more accurate
emissions accounting", according to the GHG Protocol, which intends to implement
the revisions at the end of 2028. The proposal has sparked backlash from
businesses and raised concerns that the new rules could undercut corporate
efforts to scrub emissions from the power sector . More sophisticated
requirements could increase reporting burdens and costs, discouraging clean
energy procurements. Supporters have dismissed the skepticism as an expected
reaction to revamping entrenched practices. The shift to full hourly tracking
would not be immediate, EnergyTag head of US policy and markets Alex Piper said
during a panel at the Renewable Energy Markets 2026 conference in September. "I
think hourly matching is often equated to 24/7," Piper said. "24/7 is way down
the road, and it is not the same thing as starting an hourly matching journey."
A more expansive future The new guidelines are not the lone driver of evolving
attitudes in the voluntary markets. Large companies, particularly in the tech
sector, have eyed using zero-emissions generation at all hours for several
years. But conversations about sustainability have become "more focused on
outcomes" as buyers have developed more nuanced understandings of how power
systems work, according to Berman. That shift has amplified discourse around
dispatchable resources, particularly nuclear. The trend has already resulted in
companies like Google reviving shuttered nuclear plants . Echoing that interest,
Xpansiv's CBL platform in the past year launched "emissions-free energy
certificates" for the PJM and NEPOOL markets to provide a tradeable instrument
for nuclear. Registries are still analyzing the demand for more niche
inclusions. CleanCounts plans to launch other, more granular offerings in late
2026 or early 2027, including information to denote generators on tribal lands,
agrivoltaic projects and hydropower stations certified by Low Impact Hydropower
Institute (LIHI) for minimizing their environmental impacts. The LIHI tag
already appears on certain qualifying projects in the NAR registry. Buyers will
likely place importance on new resource traits as the market continues to
evolve. NAR has garnered interest from carbon capture and storage facilities,
and it is working on time-shifted certificates that would better capture the
benefits of energy storage systems. NAR plans to implement the feature "in the
near future", Berman said. While companies and accountability watchdogs will
ultimately determine demand, the registries that make the markets function will
continue to refine their offerings in response. "We'll provide the mechanism to
do it and let people decide," Gerber said. "But we do know that the future of
these certificates really is based off of the need to have access to more
granular information." By Patrick Zemanek Send comments and request more
information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2026. Argus Media group . All
rights reserved.