Social justice trumps climate ahead of German elections
Climate concerns have been pushed from the top of German voters' personal considerations in an electoral race that has been increasingly dominated by social justice, while concerns mount about the cost of the energy transition.
Polls suggest Germany's future government is most likely to be led by outgoing finance minister Olaf Scholz of the Social Democratic Party (SPD), following the federal elections on 26 September.
The SPD's preferred coalition partner is the opposition Green Party, Scholz said, although this party would be unable to govern on its own, based on polling trends.
The SPD, which has put social justice issues at the top of its agenda, has seen its choice vindicated, given its spectacular, if unexpected, comeback over the past few months.
The Greens, which for much of this year polled ahead of the SPD and almost at parity with outgoing chancellor Angela Merkel's centre-right Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) group, have slipped to third place. But they are likely to be part of most potential coalitions drawn up from the five-party pool.
The pro-business liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) ranks fourth in the polls, while the left-wing Linke party has stagnated at 6pc, just above the 5pc threshold needed for a party to enter the Bundestag. The populist right-wing Alternative for Germany (AfD) will not form part of any federal government.
Priority shift
Social justice issues rank top of voters' personal concerns, having pushed climate change to second position, according to recent surveys.
While flooding in western Germany earlier this summer has added to a general awareness of the urgent need for climate action, the costs of the energy transition are also increasingly viewed as a problem in a country in which more than half of the population live in rented accommodation.
Perhaps reflecting this priority shift, the bureau of green energy policy spokeswoman Julia Verlinden said that if the Greens enter potential coalition negotiations, "it will be a question, besides important issues such as the minimum wage and a guaranteed basic child allowance, of obtaining as much as possible for climate protection".
High wholesale energy prices have not quite filtered through to consumers yet, except for pump prices and announcements by several gas retailers that there will be double-digit price increases in the autumn. Federal transport minister Andreas Scheuer of the CSU party has warned that if the €2/litre threshold is breached at the pump, policymakers may have to intervene.
Differences between the five parties over energy policy are less fundamental than they were during the last federal elections four years ago. The CDU/CSU party has had to adapt its long-time renewables-critical attitude, as industrial firms — generally the party's core clientele — started looking to the Greens in their quest for green power.
The CDU/CSU earlier this year lost some of its most influential anti-renewables hardliners in parliament, which made it easier for the party to support the outgoing government's ambitious new climate protection law.
Slow renewables growth
The slow expansion of renewables — particularly onshore wind — is the dominant issue for Germany's energy sector, a problem enshrined in the manifestos and statements of all five parties.
Party leaders have repeatedly pledged that once in power, they will streamline and accelerate planning procedures and tackle nature conservation issues, regional planning laws and air traffic-related restrictions.
But support at the federal level for renewables growth may not necessarily translate into rapid changes on the ground, as regional plans are the responsibility of individual states and local context plays a crucial role. Germany several times has had to tweak its renewables support to make it comply with EU state aid rules. Parts of the amended renewable energies law (EEG) that took force this year still do not have EU approval.
Existing legislation calls for a 65pc share in renewable power by 2030. The SPD wants 100pc of Germany's power consumption to be covered by renewables by 2040. The CDU/CSU has given no concrete target, but pledges accelerated growth. The Greens aim for 100pc renewables by 2035. The FDP rejects mandated growth targets, instead calling for demand-driven growth. Linke, which demands the nationalisation of the power sector — among other industries — calls for a shift to a 100pc renewables system "as soon as possible".
Earlier coal phase-out
An earlier coal phase-out — by 2030 against the mandated deadline of 2038 — by now is regarded as nearly inevitable, given high EU emissions trading system (ETS) prices and the fact that Germany's climate protection plans allow the energy sector a carbon allowance of just 108mn t of CO2 in 2030.
The Greens and Linke have proposed a mandated coal phase-out by 2030.
The leaders of the SPD and CDU/CSU have publicly stated that they expect the country's coal-fired fleet to be phased out by 2030. But they do not propose to legislate on an earlier phase-out; the CDU/CSU, like the FDP, said this should be left to the EU ETS.
SPD parliamentary deputy chairman for energy and the environment Matthias Miersch recently pledged that before agreeing on any accelerated coal phase-out plan, the SPD will ensure that "no-one is left behind", referencing the party's commitment to voters.
The parties' manifestos were written before energy wholesale market prices started soaring. Regarding price concerns, the manifestos focus on the EEG levy on power consumption and the domestic carbon price in the transport and heating sector, introduced at the start of this year.
All parties have pledged to somehow reduce or phase out the EEG levy in the next few years to ensure electricity becomes cheaper and as part of a general revamp of taxes and tariffs in the power system. The EEG levy, however, is likely to fall substantially next year — from its cap of €65/MWh this year — given the strong rise in wholesale power prices.
Domestic EU ETS
Regarding the domestic carbon price, which started at €25/CO2e but will be raised annually, the SPD, Greens and Linke all have pledged that lower-income households will not suffer, while the FDP has called for a rapid integration of the domestic scheme in an EU system.
In a survey of economists organised by economic research institute Ifo, more than half of respondents said a coalition government formed by the CDU/CSU and FDP would lead to a scenario with the highest CO2 emissions in Germany by the end of the four-year parliamentary term. It is also the coalition most expected — by 44pc of the economists — to produce the strongest economic growth.
Opinions are "remarkably" split on the coalition make-up most likely to preside over the lowest-emissions scenario in the next four years, Ifo said. About 18pc believe an SPD/Greens government will see the lowest emissions, with other coalitions following close behind. "It seems that economists are unsure about whether it is low economic growth — or rather, Green policies — that will have the highest effect on denting CO2 emissions," Ifo economist Niklas Potrafke said.
Related news posts
Malaysia sets up cross-border renewable energy exchange
Malaysia sets up cross-border renewable energy exchange
Singapore, 17 April (Argus) — The Malaysian government is creating the Energy Exchange Malaysia (Enegem) to allow for cross-border "green electricity" sales to neighbouring countries, starting with pilot sales to Singapore. The auctioning process for cross-border sales of clean electricity will begin with a 100MW pilot run utilising the existing connection between peninsular Malaysia and Singapore, announced Malaysia's Ministry of Energy Transition and Water Transformation on 15 April. The auction will be open to renewable energy bidders in Singapore that have import licences issued by Singapore's Energy Market Authority. This pilot phase of 100MW is to "make sure that it works, and then if it does work, hopefully it can be expanded to a gigawatt level," said the chairman of the Energy Commission Malaysia Rashdan Yusof at the Atozero conference in Singapore on 17 April. "On the demand side, there will also be an auction for suppliers of renewable energy into the exchange," said Rashdan, adding that the exchange will aggregate all the renewable energy sector participants, predominantly in the solar sector, and then provide the energy to Singapore, depending on requirements such as load factors, among other things. Malaysia aims to catalyse the development of the Asean regional electricity grid and cross-border energy trading. There are "tremendous discussions" on future interconnections, said Rashdan. Malaysian state-owned utility TNB has signed six agreements with utility counterparts in Thailand, Vietnam and Laos, and has two feasibility studies planned with utilities in Indonesia and Singapore, he said, without providing additional details on these deals. There is great willingness to establish this regional power grid but one of the obstacles is that "each jurisdiction has different energy pricing systems," said Rashdan. There is a significant difference in energy pricing between Singapore and Malaysia, for example, as energy is largely subsidised in Malaysia. "These subsidies, I find, will be a core impediment in terms of the free flow of electrons," he added. "The energy exchange can level the economic and commercial playing field, so that money can flow. Once the money can flow, the electrons will flow. That's the aim of the energy exchange, to have that transparency and market-based system, without the distortion of price subsidies." There are a number of bilateral power agreements in the region, with some even crossing multiple borders, such as the Laos-Thailand-Malaysia-Singapore Power Integration Project, which connects renewable power supplies from Laos to Singapore. But Asean countries need to scale up to multilateral power trading to fully benefit from regional grid interconnectivity. Regional grid optimisation in Asean could cut the net present cost of full decarbonisation by 11pc from $7.2 trillion to $6.5 trillion, according to international classification society DNV's Asia-Pacific regional director for energy systems Brice Le Gallo last year. By Prethika Nair Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
BHP to expand gas-fired West Australia power station
BHP to expand gas-fired West Australia power station
Sydney, 17 April (Argus) — Australian resources firm BHP plans to increase power generation at its 154MW Yarnima gas and diesel-fired facility near the Pilbara iron ore mining hub of Newman in Western Australia (WA) state. The proposal, according to documents filed with WA's Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), will see output increase by 85MW to a total of 239MW through gas reciprocating engines and associated infrastructure with up to 120MW of nominal new capacity to be built in stages. Peak scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the project are predicted to be 480,030 t/yr of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), while scope 3 emissions related to supplying the gas are expected to be 37,260t CO2e/yr. Power demand at BHP's iron ore operations in the Pilbara is forecast to increase from 150MW currently to 1GW by 2040, as the company reduces its GHG emissions through electrification of its rail and mining fleets and must balance renewables with firmed generation. The iron ore mining sector is a large-scale producer of Australian GHG emissions through its Pilbara-based operations. Displacing liquid fuels such as diesel, which Australia consumes at an average rate of around 500,000 b/d by electrifying processes and switching to lower CO2-emitting sources such as gas, is expected to trend as Australia's largest polluters meet government mandates . Yarmina currently runs a 35MW diesel-fired temporary power station as part of its installed capacity. Canadian energy firm TransAlta earlier this year lodged plans to build a new 150MW gas-fired power station for BHP's Nickel West operations in WA's Northern Goldfields region. WA's domestic market is likely to be short on gas later this decade despite being Australia's largest LNG export state, the Australian Energy Market Operator (Aemo) has warned in its Western Australia Gas Statement of Opportunities. Aemo's modelling released last year shows the closure of WA's state-owned coal-fired power stations will drive increased requirements for gas-fired electricity generation in the next decade. By Tom Major Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US Gulf lowest-cost green ammonia in 2030: Report
US Gulf lowest-cost green ammonia in 2030: Report
New York, 16 April (Argus) — The US Gulf coast will likely be the lowest cost source of green ammonia to top global bunkering ports Singapore and Rotterdam by 2030, according to a study by independent non-profits Rocky Mountain Institute and the Global Maritime Forum. Green ammonia in Singapore is projected to be sourced from the US Gulf coast at $1,100/t, Chile at $1,850/t, Australia at $1,940/t, Namibia at $2,050/t and India at $2,090/t very low-sulphur fuel oil equivalent (VLSFOe) in 2030. Singapore is also projected to procure green methanol from the US Gulf coast at $1,330/t, China at $1,640/t, Australia at $2,610/t and Egypt at $2,810/t VLSFOe in 2030. The US Gulf coast would be cheaper for both Chinese bio-methanol and Egyptian or Australian e-methanol. But modeling suggests that competition could result in US methanol going to other ports, particularly in Europe, unless the Singaporean port ecosystem moves to proactively secure supply, says the study. In addition to space constraints imposed by its geography, Singapore has relatively poor wind and solar energy sources, which makes local production of green hydrogen-based-fuels expensive, says the study. Singapore locally produced green methanol and green ammonia are projected at $2,910/t and $2,800/t VLSFOe, respectively, in 2030, higher than imports, even when considering the extra transport costs. The study projects that fossil fuels would account for 47mn t VLSFOe, or 95pc of Singapore's marine fuel demand in 2030. The remaining 5pc will be allocated between green ammonia (about 1.89mn t VLSFOe) and green methanol (3.30mn t VLSFOe). Rotterdam to pull from US Gulf Green ammonia in Rotterdam is projected to be sourced from the US Gulf coast at $1,080/t, locally produced at $2,120/t, sourced from Spain at $2,150/t and from Brazil at $2,310/t. Rotterdam is also projected to procure green methanol from China at $1,830/t, Denmark at $2,060/t, locally produce it at $2,180/t and from Finland at $2,190/t VLSFOe, among other countries, but not the US Gulf coast . The study projects that fossil fuels would account for 8.1mn t VLSFOe, or 95pc of Rotterdam's marine fuel demand in 2030. The remaining 5pc will be allocated between green ammonia, at about 326,000t, and green methanol, at about 570,000t VLSFOe. Rotterdam has a good renewable energy potential, according to the study. But Rotterdam is also a significant industrial cluster and several of the industries in the port's hinterland are seeking to use hydrogen for decarbonisation. As such, the port is expected to import most of its green hydrogen-based fuel supply. Though US-produced green fuels are likely to be in high demand, Rotterdam can benefit from EU incentives for hydrogen imports, lower-emission fuel demand created by the EU emissions trading system and FuelEU Maritime. But the EU's draft Renewable Energy Directive could limit the potential for European ports like Rotterdam to import US green fuels. The draft requirements in the Directive disallow fuel from some projects that benefit from renewable electricity incentives, like the renewable energy production tax credit provided by the US's Inflation Reduction Act, after 2028. If these draft requirements are accepted in the final regulation, they could limit the window of opportunity for hydrogen imports from the US to Rotterdam to the period before 2028, says the study. By Stefka Wechsler Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
AES closes 276MW coal-fired power in Chile
AES closes 276MW coal-fired power in Chile
Santiago, 16 April (Argus) — US utility AES has disconnected its two Norgener coal-fired plants from Chile's national grid, removing 276MW of combined capacity almost two years earlier than scheduled. The plants in northern Chile's Antofagasta region were originally due to close on 31 December 2025. AES has 3.4GW of generation assets in Chile of which now more than half are renewable, it said. The early closure of Norgener 1 and 2, which began operations in 1995 and 1997, respectively, is part of the country's commitment to close all coal-fired plants by 2040. To date, it has closed 11 coal-fired plants with combined capacity of nearly 1.7GW, or 30pc of the 5.5GW in operation in 2019 when the phase-out plan was announced. A further four plants with a combined capacity of 873MW are scheduled to close in 2025, according to the energy ministry. A public-private decarbonization working group is developing a roadmap through 2030 to speed up the closure of Chile's remaining coal plants. By Emily Russell Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more