European gas operators expand hydrogen plan
A group of Europe's gas system operators have substantially expanded a proposal to build a continent-wide hydrogen network using repurposed natural gas pipelines and new infrastructure.
Industry association European Hydrogen Backbone (EHB) has proposed building a 11,600km hydrogen transportation network by 2030, which would expand to 39,700km across 21 European countries by 2040. This is enlarged from last year's proposal for a 6,800km network by 2030 and 23,000km by 2040, connecting 10 European countries.
The previous plan was concentrated in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium and France, but the newly-proposed network widens the project's reach to the UK and Ireland, much of central and eastern Europe, Finland, Estonia and Greece.
About 69pc of the proposed network would consist of repurposed existing natural gas infrastructure, with the remainder consisting of newly-built pipelines used to connect new offtakers and located in countries with small gas grids, EHB said. This is down from 75pc in the previous version of the proposal. A dedicated network is needed to integrate planned renewable electricity generation and to develop a liquid cross-border hydrogen market, EHB said (see planned pipelines table).
The network would eventually incorporate major existing gas infrastructure, including salt caverns and aquifer storage sites across the continent (see country-level table).
BBL or Interconnector to link UK
The UK's network would be connected to mainland Europe by retrofitting the Interconnector — which connects to Belgium — or the BBL, which connects to the Netherlands. And one of the two pipelines connecting Ireland and the UK at Moffat could be converted to carry hydrogen. The plan foresees four of the UK's five major industrial hubs connected to hydrogen production clusters by 2030 through a phased re-purposing of existing infrastructure.
EHB also proposed converting a number of pipelines that connect EU markets with gas exporters, including at least one of the five parallel lines that compose the Transmed route which connects Italy and Libya, the two undersea connections between Algeria and Spain, one of the pipelines used to deliver Norwegian gas to mainland Europe and the Trans-Adriatic Pipeline (Tap) — which only started up this year and delivers Azeri gas sent to Europe through Turkey. But this would likely require suppliers to produce hydrogen domestically for delivery to Europe, either through steam reformation of methane or through electrolysis, primarily powered by renewable electricity sources.
Major existing gas transit routes are also included in the proposal. The large-diameter Tag pipeline passing to Italy from Slovakia as well as connections through the Czech Republic and Slovakia could be repurposed if gas flows "drop significantly", freeing up one of two parallel lines, EHB said.
A "much more dynamic picture" has emerged for Germany compared with the previous proposal, the association said. Natural gas and hydrogen may compete for the same pipeline infrastructure by 2035, with decisions to depend largely on political support for the scale-up of hydrogen and general market developments of hydrogen and natural gas, EHB said.
Some operators mentioned Russia as a possible hydrogen source. The country yesterday said it plans to achieve a 20-25pc share of global hydrogen trading by 2035.
The proposal also incorporates new infrastructure, including hydrogen produced by excess renewables output on "energy islands" offshore the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark and a new subsea pipeline connecting Germany, Sweden, Finland and Estonia.
The expanded network would allow pipeline imports from Europe's eastern and southern neighbours — including Ukraine — as well as imports of liquid hydrogen at Europe's main ports, EHB said. And extending the network through central and eastern Europe would allow renewables to play a larger role in a largely coal-based power mix and enable hydrogen to decarbonise heavy industry concentrated in the region.
But the design of the network and timeline depend on market conditions for hydrogen and gas, as well as the introduction of a "stable hydrogen framework", the group said. Hydrogen supply and demand and its increasing integration in the energy system may lead to alternative or additional routes, as well as a shift in the timeline forward or backward, EHB said.
Investment costs down, transport costs up
The envisaged hydrogen network by 2040 would cost €43bn-81bn, EHB said. While up from the €27bn-64bn previously anticipated, the cost per kilometre is lower as the proposal now incorporates smaller diameter pipelines which are cheaper to repurpose.
But smaller diameter pipelines have higher operating costs, increasing the average transport cost to €0.11-0.21/kg hydrogen. This is attractive and cost-effective for long-distance transportation, taking into account an estimated future production cost of €1-2/kg, EHB said (see investment costs, project costs tables).
Country-level, selected proposed H₂ commitments | |
Country | Emission commitments / H₂ plans or possible outcomes |
Austria | By 2030, 100pc renewable electricity |
By 2030, blending to/from existing cross-border infrastructure | |
By 2035, bi-directional repurposing of one TAG string | |
By 2040, additional interconnector to Germany for Ukrainian H₂ | |
By 2040, carbon neutrality | |
Belgium | By 2040, demand expected to exceed production |
Czech Republic | By 2035, possible transit to Germany from Slovakia |
By 2035, possible transit to Germany from Germany via Gazelle pipeline | |
Denmark | By 2030, 70pc emisssions reduction |
In 2030, two "energy islands" of 2GW each | |
In 2030, 3GW electrolysis capacity | |
By 2040, one island expanded to 10GW, offshore H₂ production | |
France | In 2030, 6.5GW electrolysis capacity |
By 2040, "mature" network with three interconnectors with Spain | |
Most pipelines would be repurposed | |
Germany | In 2030, H₂ demand of 90-110TWh |
Imports from Netherlands, Czech Republic | |
UK | By 2030, 5GW H₂ production capacity |
By 2030, 40GW offshore wind capacity | |
By 2030, four low-carbon industrial clusters | |
By 2035, all five industrial clusters potentially connected | |
By 2040, repurposed connection to Ireland | |
Most pipelines would be repurposed | |
Greece | By 2040, two main industrial clusters connected by new H₂ pipelines |
Plans for 7GW of wind capaciy and 8GW of solar capacity | |
Possible export connection via TAP or south-east Europe | |
Hungary | By 2030, 6GW solar capacity |
By 2035, possibility of mature work with six interconnections | |
By 2035, a transit country for Ukrainian H₂ | |
By 2050, carbon neutrality | |
Ireland | By 2030, 5GW offshore wind capacity |
By 2040, reconfiguration of Dublin gas network | |
Italy | By 2030, repurposing of pipelines enabling import via Tunisia |
By 2035, onward connnection to Austria, Slovenia | |
By 2040, possible interconnection with Switzerland | |
Netherlands | By 2027, first 'backbone' of repurposed pipelines available |
By 2030, 10-15GW network capacity | |
By 2050, 180GW offshore wind capacity | |
Poland | By 2030, 2GW electrolyser capacity |
By 2030, 5.9GW offshore wind capacity | |
By 2040, 11GW offshore wind capacity | |
Post 2040, all industrial clusters connected | |
Repurposing of existing pipelines difficult due to gas demand projections | |
Slovakia | Transit market for Ukrainian-sourced supply |
By 2035, repurposing of one existing pipeline from Ukraine | |
Spain | By 2030, 4GW electrolyser capacity |
Long-term H₂ production and supply ambition | |
By 2035, connection to France, north Africa | |
By 2040, additional connection to France | |
— European Hydrogen Backbone |
Estimated project costs | ||||
Cost scenarios | ||||
Capex | Low | Medium | High | |
Pipeline capex (small, new) | €mn/km | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 |
Pipeline capex (medium, new) | €mn/km | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
Pipeline capex (large, new) | €mn/km | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.4 |
Pipeline capex (small, repurposed) | €mn/km | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Pipeline capex (medium, repurposed) | €mn/km | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
Pipeline capex (large, repurposed) | €mn/km | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
Compressor station capex | €mn/MWe | 2.2 | 3.4 | 6.7 |
Assumptions | ||||
Weighted average cost of capital | % | 5-7 | 5-7 | 5-7 |
Operations and maintenance (ex. electricity) | €/yr as % of capex | 0.8-1.7 | 0.8-1.7 | 0.8-1.7 |
Electricity price | €/MWh | 40 | 50 | 90 |
Depreciation (pipelines) | yrs | 30-55 | 30-55 | 30-55 |
Depreciation (compressor stations) | yrs | 15-33 | 15-33 | 15-33 |
— European Hydrogen Backbone |
Planned hydrogen infrastructure, EHB* | km | |
Repurposed | New | |
Pipeline diameter | ||
Small (<28in, <700mm) | 3,172.0 | 1,586.0 |
Medium (28-37in, 700-950mm) | 11,498.5 | 5,154.5 |
Large (>37in, >950mm) | 12,688.0 | 5,551.0 |
Total | 27,200.0 | 12,450.0 |
— European Hydrogen Backbone | ||
*Total differs from elements due to rounding |
European Hydrogen Backbone costs, 2040 | €bn | ||
Low | Medium | High | |
Pipeline cost | 33.0 | 41.0 | 51.0 |
Compression cost | 10.0 | 15.0 | 30.0 |
Total investment cost | 43.0 | 56.0 | 81.0 |
Operational expenditure (/yr) | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
Electricity costs (/yr) | 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Total operatonal cost | 1.7 | 2.2 | 3.8 |
— European Hydrogen Backbone |
Related news posts
Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining
Shell's 1Q profit supported by LNG and refining
London, 2 May (Argus) — Shell delivered a better-than-expected profit for the first quarter of 2024, helped by a strong performance from its LNG and oil product businesses. The company reported profit of $7.4bn for January-March, up sharply from an impairment-hit $474mn in the previous three months but down from $8.7bn in the first quarter of 2023. Adjusted for inventory valuation effects and one-off items, Shell's profit came in at $7.7bn, 6pc ahead of the preceding three months and above analysts' estimates of $6.3bn-$6.5bn, although it was 20pc lower than the first quarter of 2023 when gas prices were higher. Shell's oil and gas production increased by 3pc on the quarter in January-March and was broadly flat compared with a year earlier at 2.91mn b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d). For the current quarter, Shell expects production in a range of 2.55mn-2.81mn boe/d, reflecting the effect of scheduled maintenance across its portfolio. The company's Integrated Gas segment delivered a profit of $2.76bn in the first quarter, up from $1.73bn in the previous three months and $2.41bn a year earlier. The segment benefited from increased LNG volumes — 7.58mn t compared to 7.06mn t in the previous quarter and 7.19mn t a year earlier — as well as favourable deferred tax movements and lower operating expenses. For the current quarter, Shell expects to produce 6.8mn-7.4mn t of LNG. In the downstream, the company's Chemicals and Products segment swung to a profit of $1.16bn during the quarter from an impairment-driven loss of $1.83bn in the previous three months, supported by a strong contribution from oil trading operations and higher refining margins driven by greater utilisation of its refineries and global supply disruptions. Shell's refinery throughput increased to 1.43mn b/d in the first quarter from 1.32mn b/d in fourth quarter of last year and 1.41mn b/d in January-March 2023. Shell has maintained its quarterly dividend at $0.344/share. It also said it has completed the $3.5bn programme of share repurchases that it announced at its previous set of results and plans to buy back another $3.5bn of its shares before the company's next quarterly results announcement. The company said it expects its capital spending for the year to be within a $22bn-$25bn range. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US Fed signals rates likely to stay high for longer
US Fed signals rates likely to stay high for longer
Houston, 1 May (Argus) — Federal Reserve policymakers signaled they are likely to hold rates higher for longer until they are confident inflation is slowing "sustainably" towards the 2pc target. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) held the federal funds target rate unchanged at a 23-year high of 5.25-5.5pc, for the sixth consecutive meeting. This followed 11 rate increases from March 2022 through July 2023 that amounted to the most aggressive hiking campaign in four decades. "We don't think it would be appropriate to dial back our restrictive policy stance until we've gained greater confidence that inflation is moving down sustainably," Fed chair Jerome Powell told a press conference after the meeting. "It appears it'll take longer to reach the point of confidence that rate cuts will be in scope." In a statement the FOMC cited a lack of further progress towards the committee's 2pc inflation objective in recent months as part of the decision to hold the rate steady. Despite this, the FOMC said the risks to achieving its employment and inflation goals "have moved toward better balance over the past year," shifting prior language that said the goals "are moving into better balance." The decision to keep rates steady was widely expected. CME's FedWatch tool, which tracks fed funds futures trading, had assigned a 99pc probability to the Fed holding rates steady today while giving 58pc odds of rate declines beginning at the 7 November meeting. In March, Fed policymakers had signaled they believed three quarter points cuts were likely this year. Inflation has ticked up lately after falling from four-decade highs in mid-2022. The consumer price index inched back up to an annual 3.5pc in March after reaching a recent low of 3pc in June 2023. The employment cost index edged up in the first quarter to the highest in a year. At the same time, job growth, wages and demand have remained resilient. The Fed also said it would begin slowing the pace of reducing its balance sheet of Treasuries and other notes in June, partly to avoid stress in money markets. By Bob Willis Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
FERC OK’s Virginia Transco gasline expansion
FERC OK’s Virginia Transco gasline expansion
New York, 1 May (Argus) — The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) today gave Williams the green light to expand natural gas capacity to Virginia by 101mn cf/d (2.9mn m3/d) on its Transco pipeline. The project, called the Commonwealth Energy Connector, involves the construction of 6.3 miles of new pipeline within Transco's existing right-of-way in southeast Virginia, near the border with North Carolina. The project also includes adding horsepower at compressor station 168, west of the new pipeline segment. Williams plans to begin construction this winter and put the project into service by the end of 2025. Environmental advocacy group Sierra Club opposed the project, arguing FERC failed to assess its potential greenhouse gas emissions, rendering its National Environmental Policy Act analysis moot. FERC disagreed, conceding that although the project's final Environmental Impact Statement demonstrated it would contribute to greenhouse gas emissions, the effects of those emissions on the environment could not be measured because FERC lacks the methodology to do so. The US south-Atlantic gas market has become more volatile in recent years as gas and power demand have soared, outpacing pipeline capacity expansions in the region. The combined gas consumption of Virginia and North and South Carolina in 2022 averaged 4.7 Bcf/d, up by 69pc from a decade earlier, US Energy Information Administration data show. Regional gas and power consumption is widely expected to continue climbing through the end of the decade on a massive build-out of data centers , especially in Virginia. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
US gas industry pins hopes on AI power demand
US gas industry pins hopes on AI power demand
New York, 1 May (Argus) — US natural gas producers and pipelines have pivoted almost in unison this year to talking up what they see as one of the strongest bullish cases for gas this decade: surging electricity demand from yet-to-be-built data centers to power artificial intelligence software. EQT, the largest US gas producer by volume, in an investor presentation last week called growing data center demand the "cornerstone" to the "natural gas bull case." Combining its own research with data from the US Energy Information Administration, the gas giant forecast an increase in gas demand of 10 Bcf/d (283mn m3/d) by 2030 to generate electricity, mostly to run data centers. Its more aggressive data center build-out scenario envisions a whopping 18 Bcf/d increase in gas demand through 2030. Total US gas production is currently about 100 Bcf/d. Kinder Morgan, one of the largest US gas pipeline operators, this month forecast 20pc of US power being gobbled up by data centers in 2030, up from a 2.5pc share in 2022. Cobbling together projections from several consultancies and financial advisories, the company said the electricity needed to run artificial intelligence software alone will comprise 15pc of US power demand by 2030. If just 40pc of that demand is met by gas, that would represent an increase in gas demand of 7-10 Bcf/d, it said. This is roughly in line with the high end of US bank Tudor Pickering Holt's forecast for gas demand to power data centers through 2030 (1.3-8.5 Bcf/d) and well above Goldman Sachs' and consultancy Enverus' projections of 3.3 Bcf/d and 2 Bcf/d, respectively. New tech, old problems Separating the wide ranges of these projections is the highly speculative nature of forecasting demand years into the future for competing energy sources to power next-generation technology. But the major upside and downside risks, analysts say, concern the more humdrum challenges of permitting and building out energy infrastructure. Goldman Sachs expects 28GW, or 60pc, of the generation capacity needed to power new data centers through 2030 will come from natural gas — 9GW from combined cycle gas turbines and 19GW from gas peaker plants. But with an average lag of four years from the time a gas transmission project is announced to the time it enters service, to say nothing of the high probability of litigation being brought by environmentalists and landowners, construction and permitting timelines are "the most top of mind constraint for natural gas," the bank said. Indeed, litigation and opposition from state regulators have ultimately led developers to call off several interstate pipeline projects in the eastern US in recent years. The exception to the rule, Equitrans' 2 Bcf/d Mountain Valley Pipeline is moving forward only because congressional action allowed it to bypass federal permitting hurdles. This is a particular problem for the gas industry's hopes of exploiting the data center boom, as a large share of future data centers are slated to be built in the southeast US, far from the major US gas fields. New data centers representing 2 Bcf/d of gas demand in Georgia probably requires a new pipeline into the southeast, FactSet senior energy analyst Connor McLean said. Southeast premium A significant data-center buildout in the southeast without new pipelines could put upward pressure on regional gas prices, McLean said. This could exacerbate the effects of what has become perhaps the most prominent bullish case for US gas: a massive build-out of LNG export terminals along the US Gulf coast. With new export terminals pulling increasing volumes of gas south along the Transcontinental gas pipeline to super-chill and ship overseas in the coming years, the build-out in data centers will likely produce "an even bigger deficit in that southeast (gas) market," EQT chief financial officer Jeremy Knop told investors last week. "We think that market really, in time, becomes the most premium market in the country," he said. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.
Business intelligence reports
Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.
Learn more